|
Bueno, tengo en el corto-medio plazo algunos gastos previstos, unos 50k EUR, y estoy pensando en ir vendiendo algo de coin para pagarme una parte con eso. Pero naturalmente si vendo 5 BTC y me aparecen de golpe 10k EUR en el banco, es posible que me hagan algunas preguntas.
Quisiera evitar esas preguntas.
L@s que hayáis vendido BTC a cambio de transfe SEPA, ¿habéis tenido problemas? ¿En qué punto empieza a sonar el teléfono? ¿Podría ser viable vender unos 1000 EUR al mes sin problema? ¿1500? ¿Tiene sentido abrirse varias cuentas de banco para ir recibiendo transferencias alternativamente en ellas? Así al menos los bancos no se mosquearán mucho y ya todo quedaría sujeto a que "el organismo público" echara un ojo por su cuenta o no lo hiciera, no?
(yo por mi parte haría efectivo, si alguien quiere tradear algo así como 4000-5000 en persona que me pinche por privi y arreglamos algo en localbtc, estaré por Madrid hasta este domingo y el fin de semana me puedo acercar a Guadalajara, Collado Villalba o Móstoles—billetes de 200 no son problema, y vendería incluso un poco por debajo del mercado, que esto me interesa bastante)
|
|
|
|
Alguien ha cogido el BIP 148 propuesto por shaolinfry y ha hecho un fork (en el sentido de código fuente  ) de bitcoin core implementándolo. En bitnodes se puede ver que ya hay unos cuantos nodos ejecutando este código. Ahora no sale pero antes había uno de Barcelona, gracias!! Me he bajado el fuente de core y el de core+bip148: $ git clone https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git bitcoin-core
Cloning into 'bitcoin-core'...
remote: Counting objects: 89168, done.
remote: Total 89168 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 89167
Receiving objects: 100% (89168/89168), 78.18 MiB | 1.64 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (66482/66482), done.
Checking connectivity... done.
$ git clone https://github.com/UASF/bitcoin.git bitcoin-UASF
Cloning into 'bitcoin-UASF'...
remote: Counting objects: 89176, done.
remote: Total 89176 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 89175
Receiving objects: 100% (89176/89176), 78.18 MiB | 299.00 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (66488/66488), done.
Checking connectivity... done. Cambié a la rama 0.14 en ambos repositorios: $ cd bitcoin-core
$ git checkout 0.14
Branch 0.14 set up to track remote branch 0.14 from origin.
Switched to a new branch '0.14'
$ cd ..
$ cd bitcoin-UASF
$ git checkout 0.14
Branch 0.14 set up to track remote branch 0.14 from origin.
Switched to a new branch '0.14'
$ cd .. Comprobé las diferencias entre core y core+bip148: $ diff -urpN bitcoin-core bitcoin-UASF
[blah blah cosas de git]
diff -urpN bitcoin-core/src/clientversion.cpp bitcoin-UASF/src/clientversion.cpp
--- bitcoin-core/src/clientversion.cpp 2017-03-26 00:33:00.222894462 +0000
+++ bitcoin-UASF/src/clientversion.cpp 2017-03-26 00:40:56.349650311 +0000
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
* for both bitcoind and bitcoin-core, to make it harder for attackers to
* target servers or GUI users specifically.
*/
-const std::string CLIENT_NAME("Satoshi");
+const std::string CLIENT_NAME("Satoshi BIP148");
/**
* Client version number
@@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ std::string FormatFullVersion()
return CLIENT_BUILD;
}
-/**
- * Format the subversion field according to BIP 14 spec (https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0014.mediawiki)
+/**
+ * Format the subversion field according to BIP 14 spec (https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0014.mediawiki)
*/
std::string FormatSubVersion(const std::string& name, int nClientVersion, const std::vector<std::string>& comments)
{
diff -urpN bitcoin-core/src/validation.cpp bitcoin-UASF/src/validation.cpp
--- bitcoin-core/src/validation.cpp 2017-03-26 00:40:49.453668289 +0000
+++ bitcoin-UASF/src/validation.cpp 2017-03-26 00:40:56.397650186 +0000
@@ -1851,6 +1851,13 @@ bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, C
flags |= SCRIPT_VERIFY_NULLDUMMY;
}
+ // mandatory segwit activation between Oct 1st 2017 and Nov 15th 2017 inclusive
+ if (pindex->GetMedianTimePast() >= 1506816000 && pindex->GetMedianTimePast() <= 1510704000 && !IsWitnessEnabled(pindex->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus())
+ if (!((pindex->nVersion & VERSIONBITS_TOP_MASK) == VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS) && (pindex->nVersion & VersionBitsMask(chainparams.GetConsensus(), Consensus::D
+ return state.DoS(0, error("ConnectBlock(): relayed block must signal for segwit, please upgrade"), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-no-segwit");
+ }
+ }
+
int64_t nTime2 = GetTimeMicros(); nTimeForks += nTime2 - nTime1;
LogPrint("bench", " - Fork checks: %.2fms [%.2fs]\n", 0.001 * (nTime2 - nTime1), nTimeForks * 0.000001);
Y a compilarrrrr: $ cd bitcoin-UASF
$ ./autogen.sh
$ ./configure --without-miniupnpc --disable-wallet --without-gui
$ time make -j 3
$ file src/bitcoind
src/bitcoind: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=1a4233b81430d232090c7dd53895121064520914, not stripped |
|
|
|
|
Cucú,
Pues desde anoche al ir a bitfinex.com (HTTP) me sale un "Error code 22", "The proxy failed to resolve site from host name, if this site was recently added please allow a few minutes before trying again". Si le pongo el https entonces el navegador se me echa a llorar porque el certificado que recibe no es de bitfinex sino de incapsula.
¿Le ocurre a alguien más? He probado desde casa, desde el curro y desde el móvil con el mismo resultado en todas partes.
|
|
|
|
|
So I was taking a look to the forumers in my trust list, made a couple of changes and pressed the button to update the list. I got an error along the lines of "Please try again, please notify admin if it fails again". I went to try again and found my list now contains only DefaultTrust.
No way to recover it, right?
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
I have an online buy ad in localbtc. Price is above market to encourage people to click. I don't mind "losing" a bit there, the point is buying, not taking profit from trades.
If often happens to me that I wake up in the morning and find a trade in localbitcoins that has been autocanceled because I didn't pay in 150 minutes. Oh sorry I was sleeping! Other times I'm busy at work (well that's what I'm paid for after all right?) and trades autocancel as well. I have meetings longer than 150 minutes. Today after having lunch, some table talk and a movie, I come back to my room and find yet another autocanceled trade. Cmon, can I have a life of my own thanks?
I know I can set "Opening hours" for my ad so it doesn't run during the night, and that's a nice to have feature, but I often stay awake until past midnight on fridays and saturdays, like normal people (?), and localbitcoins doesn't (seem to) support that AFAIK. And I'd have the ad running on a Sunday afternoon anyway but I'd still miss today's one. "Opening hours" is not a solution.
Am I missing something? How do you localbitcoiners manage to successfully run online buy ads?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
