I'm trying to find a RegEx list for some cryptocurrencies addresses, but all I managed was the rules for BTC, ETH, and others from the top list. I will be grateful for any information I receive. Here is a list of coins for which I need RegExp. Thank you.

"bsv", "doge", "fct", "maid", "rdd", "part", "eurs", "kin", "nxt", "gbyte", "vtc", "ignis", "qrl", "flo", "sls", "xdn", "zcl", "nlg", "emc", "sbd", "aeon" "game", "lbc", "nim", "mer", "rads", "pot", "dyn", "xel", "rvr", "mue", "exp", "bsd", "amp", "tx", "ok", "iop", "meme", "synx", "nbt", "golos", "proc", "ebst", "lmc", "gbg"

Any help is appreciated.

[Bounty thread:]

Bounty thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4931637.0
ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4931616
Site: http://diana.io
WP: http://diana.io/whitepaper/diana_en.pdf

I will not write about how ugly their site is. You can do it yourself. The main thing in the other. Guys, here's their team:

They explain it this way:

The reason for us using the 'art-alternative' is since most of our DAO members are concerned about their personal security,
Since this project is mostly based on liberating the moon for equal-chance of ownership.
People who think otherwise, might try and sabotage our project by attacking our members.

We believe this was the reason 'Satoshi' decided to stay 'incognito' since it gave him the most security.

They sell the moon:

So I see the red flags:
unprotected site (possibly phishing);
painted team;
no information about sftcup, hard cup;
new profiles of social networks;
a fantastic idea;
lack of information about the project on the network.

Guys, if it's not scammers, then who is it? Idiots?

[What happened:]

What happened: a non-existent team
BTC link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4837173
Archive: http://archive.fo/MoKUZ
ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4613187.0
ANN archive: http://archive.fo/qkCpH
Website: https://yooba.org
Site archive: http://archive.fo/gX5eH
Whitepaper: https://yooba.org/assets/YoobaWhitePaper_en.pdf
WP archive: http://archive.fo/X3HeA

The team does not have a description, there are no links to social networking profiles. The project does not have consultants.

Icoholder shows only one participant - Flyye. Search for team members by image is impossible - they are sewn into the site, and even after it is saved, they are not recognized.

Search engines do not know these people. Team Leader - Flyye - it's great!! Who is this person? From white paper it follows that this is Ye Song, but the search for such a person has not yielded results.

I managed to identify by name 2 members of the team:

Michael Harrall



Jingo Cabiles



I found their LinkedIn profiles:

They are not related to Yooba.

This is alarming: the team is not public and, probably, fake.

P.S. If you have something to add, please do it.

[I just want to warn potential investors and bounty participants.]

Friends, I have no direct evidence that this ICO is a fraud, but only the facts that I managed to get about the Maketoken team. I just want to warn potential investors and bounty participants.

BCT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4746327
BCT thread archive: http://archive.fo/zmVhU
Website: http://maketoken.io/
Archive: http://archive.fo/nobwz
Whitepaper: http://maketoken.io/MAKE_Whitepaper_v0.1.3.pdf
What happened: a team with a bad past.

They offer a reward for MAKE tokens for distributing advertisements on Shiftwear products.



Members of the Maketoken team are directly related to Shiftwear:
DAVID COELHO - PRESIDENT AND FOUNDER
NICK JOHNSON - CEO AND FOUNDER

Comments about Shiftwear and David Coelho on Reddit. They are suspected of fraud.

Another article about Shiftwear: http://archive.fo/LEmnM
Here is a comment about the product Shiftwear on Indiegogo

Here is a comment about Shiftwear on their page Facebook I have not read other posts, but I think the comments are the same.

As you can see, Shiftwear sells air, so I do not think that Maketoken will be another project.

Your opinion?

[ICO:]

ICO: Strixglobal
BCT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4745443
Site: http://www.strixglobal.co
What happened: Suspicion of a fake team

The official site was created just a few days ago



It does not have a SSL certificate, so any actions on it are not protected.



Team.

The participants on the site are actually taken from another project: https://ico.criptohub.com.br



Advisors have no faces at all. I found a profile of one of them LInkedin Nikolay Shkilev. His activities have nothing to do with Strixglobal. You can see for yourself.

Profiles of Criptohub participants do not contain any mention of Strixglobal. For example, LInkedin Carlo Ramon Vailatti has nothing to do with Strixglobal.





The LinkedIn profiles of other Criptohub members also have no mention of Strixglobal. You can check it yourself.
I did not even begin to study Whitepaper, because the fake team is already a red flag.

I think they are scammers, but what do you think?

[ICO name:]

ICO name: GraphenTech
Start ICO: Aug 27, 2018
End ICO: Oct 27, 2018
BCT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4732688
Site: https://www.graphentech.io
The first thing that bothered me was the ambitiousness of the project (Soft Cap $ 37 Millon USD & Hard Cap $ 133 Millon USD). I decided to start by studying the team.



At first glance, nothing strange, but among other project participants, if you look at Linkedin (https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/people/?facetCurrentCompany=%5B%2211540609%22%5D) is Raul Molina, not presented in the list on the official website.

His profile is https://www.linkedin.com/in/raul-molina-0b5b1213/



The search for this name on Google showed that this is a very interesting person - it's a scammer! You just read the comments on this page https://blokt.com/ico-ratings/graphentech



Raul Molina was hidden after he was noticed.



Read also this investigation: http://graphentech-scam.com/



Friends, it's obvious that they are deceivers. They hid their "leader", so I consider this ICO to be fraud !!!

UPD Here is information about one more person in project CARINA YUMISACA



Here is information about her activities: http://graphentech-scam.com/The-Usual-Suspects-A-Small-Brief.html



I think that's enough.

[They started a new campaign!]

ICO: Lexzoom
BCT Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4723041.0
Site: https://www.lexzoom.tech/

UPD. Friends, during the study, I found a mention of these scammers on July 3 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4594712 But I decided to create this topic so that scammers do not get a second chance. They started a new campaign!

The team is not public



The supposedly already collected part of the alleged soft cover is mentioned, but no name of the "investor" or the name of the organization has been named.

Icobench showed the following group of developers



Profile for Alex Davidson Linkedin not found



Who is Theodore Dylan, too, is unclear



Profiles of other participants are also missing. I will not upload the pictures, you can check it yourself.
The advisors team also does not have any profiles in LinkedIn.
I did not manage to check the photo of the "team". I could not get links to the photos or keep them at myself. But, I think that the lack of data about these people is already a red flag.

And the most amazing is Whitepaper



It turns out that the "document" is only informative. That is, "we warned you ..."  

There are a lot of interesting things in this ICO, but I will not write about it, because there was already a topic, and what I have already presented is enough.

Let's not give scammers a second attempt.

[Project:]

I'm not aiming to accuse anyone of fraud, I just cite the results of my little research.

Project: Coincooper https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4691219.0
Start: 07/17/2018 end 08/28/2018
Website: https://coincooper.com

The simplicity of the site is striking. The planned soft cap is 9.000.000 USD, moreover, investors are promised up to 50% of income every quarter. I wonder how this result will be realized.



The technical documentation is simple and does not contain any specific information about this, nor about the team behind the project. A third-party search of at least one member of the project team has not yielded results.
Pages in social networks were created a few days ago, which is also very strange.



 I decided to check at least the domain of the official site, and found an interesting coincidence.
Link: https://www.whois.com/whois/coincooper.com



Checking the registrant's number (+1.4806242599) in Google showed that the number was featured in the fraud of ICO Coinader back in March 2014 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=527461.5

Link:  https://www.whois.com/whois/coinader.com



 In addition, this number is on the site scamwarners.com (https://www.scamwarners.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=90945&start=15), where it is linked to the site casherr.com (financial transactions). The domain name is already empty and is for sale! If there is time, you can use the search and read comments about this site scammers.

In general, the project Coincooper looks very suspicious, so I assume that this is another scammers. What do you think?

[UPD 24.08.2018]

Как уже наверное многие заметили, за последнее время некоторые баунти менеджеры были покрашены в связи с тем, что вели скам проекты. Однако необходимо быть внимательными и баунтистам, поскольку продолжая создавать отчеты в ветке скам проекта, они продолжают рекламировать мошенников. К примеру, ICO XeonFrame, в ветке которого Lutpin создал пост https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4476252.msg41073127#msg41073127 , и все, кто запостил отчеты после его сообщения, получили негативный траст.

Другой случай — это Coinect — https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4424486.0 , скам, в котором я даже немного поучаствовал, пока не понял что это такое а самом деле. Вот разоблачающий топик https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4427056.0 , а баунти менеджер Wapinter также был окрашен за уже второй скам проект.

С одной стороны, тенденция на окрас менеджеров скам проектов вселяет надежду на то, что скама станет поменьше, однако с другой стороны, можно получит негативный траст за продвижение такого проекта.

UPD 24.08.2018

Хотел закрыть топик, полагая, что тема себя изжила, и сдесь оставляют мусор. Но просмотрев последние страницы, понял, что тема до сих пор актуальна и вызывает споры.

Я решил дать несколько советов, как по крайней мере снизить риск быть покрашенным. Итак:

1. Многие считают, что в большинство кампаний лучше вступать через пару недель, когда ситуация будет более менее понятна. Отчасти это верно, хоть я сторонник самостоятельного анализа проекта на стадии его запуска. Но и это отнюдь не страховка, а ведь бывают такие жирные с первого взгляда ICO. В этом случае, первые неделю-две советую каждый день заходить на первую страницу и смотреть траст менеджера. Если покрашен — немедленно выходить, удалив отчеты.
2. Как можно чаще просматривать раздел Scam Accusations. Чтобы не ломать глаза, можно нажать Ctrl+F, где вбить название ICO. Если есть такая тема — однозначно на выход.
3. Регулярно юзать ваш любимый поисковик по формуле «*название ICO* scam». Поверьте, BCT хоть и крупнейший, но не единственный форум, поэтому лучше поискать инфу на сторонних ресурсах.
4. И наконец, очевидное. Если проект «умирает» (нет активности в социалках, админа в чате видно редко и т.д.), советую не тратить время попросту. В большинстве случаев, если награда будет, то это будет мусор в кошельке.

P.S. Писал на скорую руку, поэтому буду дополнять по мере.

Будьте внимательны, всем добра!