Show Posts
This d00d here
after an involantary committment to a mental hospital, keeps a self-moderated thread where he Since the thread is self-moderated and I was asked not to post in it, I'm starting this one--without self-moderation, where I might reply.
1. An evangelising Christian woman currently experiencing family tensions due to re-buying BTC that her husband has sold.
BitChick now:
Bitcoiners want to get billionaires quick with their little scheme, call noobs that are trying to get out of the mess late "greedy".
It is no secret that I sold some at $675 in 2013. The next exit zone starts earliest at $3,000, probably higher.
It is no greed to sell at a bottom, it is just stupid. Stuff is as valuable as a year ago (or more, due to more adoption, etc.), yet 75% cheaper. This is a game and you are offered 4 times better odds than last time when you took them. Instead of taking them now, or holding, you decide to fold.
If anyone becomes a billionaire with bitcoin, he deserves it. So many chances of folding were offered but he held on.
There is voice of reason in the midst of so much babbling nonsense. Thanks Risto.
I am having to argue a bit with BitchicksHusband a little about not folding right now though. I guess it is hard not to get emotional. We did have to sell some of our holdings in December but bought back a little last week. I think the hardest thing to wrap my brain around is the fact that BTC should be so much more valuable with all of the infrastructure that has been put into place during 2014. Why hasn't some of the money used to build this infrastructure been used to boost the price up a bit? Aren't these companies at all concerned about BTC users getting disillusioned and leaving BTC completely?
The extent of batshit craziness:
Simply pointing out that you are taking financial advice from a man recently released from a mental institution
Yes, and guess what? There is no law that compels me to mention it. I do it voluntarily, for my reasons. After going through this, and many other experiences, I know some things about how the world operates. People are able to learn it from my writings, but you can never learn very much if it is not verified by experience.
My dealings with the government started in 2005, by my reading of some conspiracist literature, which seemed to be alarmingly truthful when I compared it to the things I saw happening in the world. Already in 2008 I was so dangerous that an armed team of 8 guys was sent to my home at daybreak. Then came seizures and many court cases. Many perceive that Finland is a lawful country, with lawbreakers punished and law also granting rights to people. Well, miles of laws we have here, but if they are not expedient for the situation at hand, they can be broken by judges. I lost the recognition towards the judicial system after they too many times mistreated me, even against their own laws.
If I believed in my rights, I could have the hospitalization order re-examined, since the law requires me to be "dangerous to myself or others" for such procedure to take effect. Everyone knows that I have never hit another person, nor had a thought or word of hurting myself for over a decade. The only thing I am dangerous against, is the banking cartel. But I already know from experience that the judicial system is capable of straight-faced delivery of any verdict. So raising these matters in court does not help. Raising them here makes fools cry out: "look the guy's just come out from a nuthouse", but it's not the fools for whom I write, it is the wise - the people who understand things, and are here for learning, and contributing themselves.
If something in the above disqualifies me from being read, there's the "Ignore" button for that. Thank you.
In turn, I feel it a chore that your messages need to be "open"ed first before deletion, so please don't post. Thank you.
