Show Posts
Speaking of "rulebreakers":
Anyone who has offended by nutildah, click here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1134 ;support
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1133 ;support
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1132 ;support
Need to see actual evidence for Type-2 and Type-3 flag to support it. The reference link used is NOT in a topic started by you as required by flag creation rules. It is a thread created by "the-one-above-all". Unless you are alt of "the-one-above-all", then it is an invalid reference and cannot be used to support the flags regarding nutildah.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1134 ;support
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1133 ;support
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1132 ;support
Quote
* This user violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages.
* This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages.
* This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages.
Quote
* You must create a topic describing the specific acts which damaged you. It must not be self-moderated.
* On my honor, I affirm the following: 1) This user violated a written contract, resulting in damages; 2) I have not been made whole by the user; 3) no existing flag covers this same incident; 4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic; 5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above. Furthermore, I promise to withdraw my support for this flag if this user makes me whole in the future.
@BitcoinSV, can you provide any evidence to prove that nutildah broke a contract with you that resulted in damages? * On my honor, I affirm the following: 1) This user violated a written contract, resulting in damages; 2) I have not been made whole by the user; 3) no existing flag covers this same incident; 4) this incident is accurately and completely described in the above topic; 5) the incident occurred roughly in the month given above. Furthermore, I promise to withdraw my support for this flag if this user makes me whole in the future.
If not, then you lied while creating the flag and you have no honor, sir!
BitcoinSV has also created Type-2 and Type-3 flags against:
nullius: Type-2 and Type-3
DooMAD: Type-2 and Type-3
MagicByt3: Type-2 and Type-3
blurryeyed: Type-2 and Type-3
dragonvslinux: Type-2 and Type-3
shinohai: Type-2 and Type-3
all of which reference this single thread (archived here, which does not accurately nor completely describe ANY of the supposed contracts that were violated.
In fact, all the Type-2 and Type-3 flags raised by BitcoinSV have invalid references that do not provide any details of any contracts or instances of contract violation that relate to BitcoinSV. They are all vexatious and invalid.
Is this sort of flagrant disregard for the rules of flag creation and obvious flag abuse grounds for a ban?
