[study]

So, there was a study (not yet peer reviewed), and results probably surprises anyone.

Group's brains were measured with a method known as Dynamic Directed Transfer Function (dDTF), that basically measures connections on the brain.
It was measured on using LLMs during tasks, using search engines, and using just their own skills unaided.

And compared to baseline (not surprisingly) LLM group had significant drop in brain activity.

My take from this is that, in a long run, if unaided group would keep using their brains for tasks, they would develop their brain because of training, while AI group would eventually lose even their existing skills (at least when it comes to writing essays). Because if you don't use your brains, those connections on the brains wouldn't be needed either.



There are ways to use AI that benefits people, but using that for your creative work, or anything that needs brains is just killing your brains.

I am interested if people in here have an exit strategy. Or do you believe you are in crypto for the rest of your life?

If there's a number on how much you need to reach in fiat money to exit, what exactly would that cover? If it's retirement, how luxurious retirement it would be?

I would be amazed if everyone would stick in this their whole life, because speculative trading / investing is going to take lot from your time and it's very tiresome when you do it for years.
Especially with altcoins, there's a danger to wear yourself out with sleep deprivation and constant market awareness. Following news closely comes with that and news today are mostly doom scrolling now.

So what's your goal? Your own mansion? Enough passive money for rest of your life from real estates you are buying? Enough funds to start your own company? Or are you just in here until your loans are paid?

Reason why i am asking that i noticed that i don't have a clear exit strategy myself, and i might want to get one.
But higher i get, more greedier i get, so i change my plans and that often leads to losing that investment because higher it gets, harder it falls.

US Treasury Department has removed sanctions against Tornado Cash. Soon after this SEC closed their investigation into "Hawk Tuah Girl", and there are no monetary sanctions or restrictions for her next token projects.

What this signals to me is that USA is taking whole another road, where they are legalizing influencers using their faces on crypto scams. It's actually pretty obvious when President and first lady are doing it, they can't admit any wrong doing so they are trying to make it new normal and legit.

Removing sanctions against tornado cash, sounds like first step to allowing all mixers. No matter what your stand on this is, you have to admit that it's definitely helping scammers.

I predicted that amount of scams would have been next level even without crippling regulatory oversight, but i can't even imagine what's coming now.

Wildest scenario with a tinfoil hat i can think of, is that USA would be leaving FATF all together, replacing SEC with some shady private blockchain project, while turning into money laundering paradise. And by doing so, they would basically break AML world wide network.

I've seen this before. Team that should be winning according to odds, lets the underdog get more points before the game ends, and then at some point they will catch up and win.

Are they so confident that they can just taunt the other team, by creating this false sense of security before destroying them? Does the other team know that WCC is just toying with them, or do they think they are actually winning?

Edit: End result was obviously like i thought it would be

[wants]

He has some days left, and i have been wondering if he does something surprising like this.

He doesn't have anything to lose, and it's not like there are any consequences for presidents of US any more, so he wouldn't have to answer to anyone.
Reasons why he might want to do it, is that he wants his legacy to be remembered, and definitely at least wants to do a grand gesture before exit.

He already commuted nearly 1,500 sentences and pardoned 39 people in one day, so i don't think that selling cryptos this is far fetched.

He might do it just out of spite against trump, but as US government holds over 207k bitcoins, that would would be a huge incentive for him to act. It would be billions of dollars addon to budget, that could be given to any cause he likes to support. Frankly i am more amazed if he wouldn't consider it.

I am not afraid that this would hurt crypto in long run in any way, but it might start the new bear market for sure. Imho that's healthy because it would let new blood in and more people would have changes to enter with lower prices. And it's not like shorters would lose money. They would have more money to long with after shorting, if they wanted.

This clip is from a guy who spent 7 days with Taliban. And apparently some of them traded meme coins. Guy in the pic made money with shiba and doge, and lost it and jokingly even using the phrase "buying high, selling low".

While i don't know what kind of guy would hang with talebans or would be "bros" with them, i found it some what funny how people are same and relatable in some matters, no matter what their circumstances are.

It wasn't really that surprising to me, that these guys would be into crypto as well in a same way most of westerns are. Idea of getting rich overnight attracts no matter where you live and meme coins have that reputation. But video confirmation from something like this seems surreal.

And i totally see the appeal for them, as for anyone who is blacklisted by banks. Although new upcoming AML regulations and prove of origin would stop them cashing out in the future.

Link if the image link doesn't work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cFWnyDTMOI

[1: Jealousy:]

Or "Most lottery winners end up being miserable"

This are both false beliefs, but somehow majority of people believe them to be true. While in reality, most lottery winners end up doing better then ever. And that they are bettering the lives of themselves and their family.

There are at least 2 psychological reasons, that i believe to be a reason, why we tend to believe the opposite:

1: Jealousy:

Winning can happen to anyone, even people who least "deserve" it. So our subconscious mind reasons it for us in a way that makes as satisfied. If we believe they should pay a price for winning, it's easier to accept our own loss. It can be partying too much, getting robbed or being betrayed by closest friends, or being miserable and lonely. If we think that there's some terrible price to pay for winning, that makes losing seem like a better option in a long run.

2. Propaganda:

We tend to believe that people who play lottery go broke because of he same reason they were broke to begin with. And that's being irresponsible with money, so they lack skills to keep the money.

This is propaganda created by rich people. We tend to believe it's all hard work and mad skillz in finances, while biggest reason for anyone getting rich is actually correct circumstances. May rich people had right people around them, and often started with financial extra boost. Or that they just were insanely lucky, buying something that ended up mooning. But rich people rarely admit this, because if being rich is part of someone's personality, they need to be proud of it. Otherwise they would have to rethink their own accomplishments.

Sure, financial skills and hard work play a part, but that doesn't mean anyone with those would get rich. There are numerous reasons for that but i will sum it up to "correct circumstances".

Stories we hear and headlines we see also fuel this belief, because those are the kind of stories being shared and getting clicks. Not the ones where winners are doing just fine, and living a comfortable quiet life.

I share just one article about this belief, even though there are probably many:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnjennings/2023/08/29/debunking-the-myth-the-surprising-truth-about-lottery-winners-and-life-satisfaction/

I am interested if people are doing this and how they do it. Do you take notes and what kind of information do you use?

I have sometimes just watched a hands trough to end knowing that i'll lose, just to know how others play their cards that seemingly don't make sense, and i have seen them just just waiting for the river to save them etc. But analyzing others only works in cash table games where there are certain amount of people, and i am mostly playing huge tournaments these days, and changes to meet same players is rather low, as so are cases where i could even use my notes against them.

This made me think if there are bot services that i could use for creating player profiles automatically. You know, bots that would include action history and deduct best action for each player, in every possible combination. Combining info on how they have played each hand, combined with which community cards and in which stages (pre-flop, flop, turn, or river). And obviously using data like chip count, bet, and if they have BB at the time, and stuff like that.

I am certain that something like this could be build, but parsing that data into useful information requires lots of work. But i am assuming there must has already to be AI that is using massive behavioral profile databases to beat those players.

So, as automated bots are probably frowned on, how about bots that don't play, but just calculate best actions for current situation against the players in real time?

Someone who i don't know just send me ~$20 worth of cryptos via internal transaction in a popular cex. i haven't contacted helpdesk to ask what's happened yet, because obviously this was just a mistake.

Now what i would like to know that what's the policy in such cases? Will they eventually reverse the transaction if the sender wants that? Will they try to charge me later on if i withdraw or trade that with a leverage?

I mean the amount is peanuts and from what i understand helpdesks ask way more money to deal with transactions to wrong chain for example. But i don't know what's the case with internal transaction mistakes.

Morally i know that i should send it back, even though i don't know the sender's account, but if i ask about that from helpdesk, i am not sure how they would even react. Would they just confiscate it and charge the fee from sender to recover the money, which will probably be more then the money i recived.

What's your tactic on playing live events?

I have been lately trying out tactic that i bet if the game score hits on some parameters that i am looking for. Like in soccer for example, if other team leads 2 points at half time or past it. If there are any betting possibilities to bet a winner, i'll take it. I know it's with low multipliers, but so far i am doing ok with this. And in baseball, if other team leads by over 10 points on round 2, i am betting on it. I know this must seem idiotic and too simplified to any pro gambler, but i am trying my luck with it.

But finding these kind of games that fit my parameters and accept bets takes time and constant surveillance. And even if i am using a lot of time for it i am losing too much time.

So far i haven't found any free sites where i can set up live score parameters that alert me for right betting conditions. And i am starting to think i should build a bot for it. I don't even need it for betting, just alerting. I can do the betting manually.

What things you people are looking for in live events to bet for?

In 2020 Dusk become large (up to 10%) shareholder of NPEX. Right after they started partnership period which included developing innovative financial pilot projects and at the time it was obvious that they were experimenting with dusk tech. Even though mainnet wasn't ready yet.

Now they announced that they have official agreement of that exchange and incentivized test net period is over as they are preparing to launch the mainnet.

So if you don't know anything about Dusk, here's my summary, of what has happened so far:

Dusk has been been building a privacy preserving and EU regulatory compliant blockchain for security exchange, which i admit thought was an impossible job because of MICA, FATF travel rule, AML laws and EU regulations in general. But looks like they have found a ways to tackle with all the hurdles. I have to admit that most of the tech goes over my head and i haven't studied how they did their "Citadel" (zero-knowledge KYC solution), yet, but i've been waiting for that tech for a long time, and most likely most of us have because of all the hacks and leaks and stolen personal information on centralized crypto exchanges.

And by "security exchange", i mean actual security exchange, powered by blockchain where you can trade, issue and own actual stocks and regulated instruments. Not just synthetics that others are playing with and calling them RWAs.

At the time of writing dusk has $174,7M marketcap, so do your math on what's happening next.

https://venturebeat.com/business/dusk-and-npex-partner-to-launch-first-fully-regulated-blockchain-powered-securities-exchange/

I find it really interesting that recent BTC flash crash (or dip/correction if you rather call it that) that just happened crashed nearly all the altcoins with it, except SOL and JUP (sol based swap). While they dipped as well, it was nothing compared to rest of the market.

It could fall later for sure, but i doubt it will crash as hard because i can't recall seeing anything like this during bullmarket corrections and this could attract other investors that have been overlooked SOL until now.

Reason for this dump was supposedly the fact that someone moved 4637 btc to binance, and even without selling them, it would cause some people start selling.

I would imagine other people have been wondering this too, so what's your theory for SOL? Other then it's a best coin ever or something like that.

I just watched Bitconned, a netflix documentary about scammers behind Centra.

Even though main characters behind it were easy to really hate and loath deeply, as they were obnoxius born rich kids, full of themselves, proud to be criminals, self entitled and borderline narcissists.

And while it's infuriating to watch these people brag, and it's like a flashback from every scam i ever saw, it's also one of the best documentaries from that crazy time of ico frenzy and summarizes the whole craziness of it, and it doesn't underestimate people who watch it. It's honest and accurate. It's also fulfilling to watch how that scam unfolds and gets busted, and it's pretty interesting to see the world from the point of scammers. And luckily it's not only those annoying rich scammers they are interviewing.

Guys like these with nonsense scam projects are one of the reasons why crypto is having a bad rep, not meme tokens like pepe. Thet don't come even close to this.

Trailer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDqRvMmuUcU

But even though this was one crazy scam, i would rather see protagonists of a documentary somewhat relatable, that they would be interesting outcasts and underdogs, or at least so weird like crypto couple that hacked bitfinex. That story seems to have really weird background. Or movie from Ben Mezrich's book Bitcoin Billionaires. At least the book was rather good.

I don't think this would even work with huge amounts, but i am talking about $1000 - 50k transactions to cash or cash equivalent.

Current tight AML laws made it sure that evading regulations became harder. Privacy coins are being delisted, mixers banned, crypto ATMs, at least in finland require KYC, so what's left? Are people still tradning person to person. I know they are lending usdt etc but to cash money <-> crypto without kyc? Localbitcoins used to have pseudonymous accounts but now they require kyc as well.

At some point you had an opportunity to buy pay cards for google play, paysafecards and buy stuff with those. Are those still not requiring kyc to buy?
Because those seem to be options that scammers at least are still using while pretending to be mircosoft helpdesk or what ever.

I am guessing that one of more  some of the scammers operate with stolen KYC that most likely becomes

Disclaimer: I don't need this kind of service, i am just interested if this is still possible, and with how large amounts?

PS: please include urls

So, this is freaking huge event.

Binance has been found guilty for money laundering and has to pay $4.3 Billion USD in penalties.

CZ has been found guilty and resigned from CEO position. Now he is out with a bail.

People seem to be unsure how this affects, but i for example am confused how fast this got solved.

So what do you people think? Is this bullish or bearish? Boxmining in youtube seems to be bullish, but that's what crypto hypers often do.
Everything needs to be bullish, even if that means being in denial, because they get their livinghood from bullish people.

Was this something we need for growth in a long run? Does binance have liquidity for penalties if there will be a bank run from there? Is CZ going to same jail with SBF?

Markets are dumping BNB, even though they are pretty careful so far, as it's only -9.25% in 1 day.

I would think that shorting bnb could be a smart call after the panic starts. And it takes some time, but if binance needs to liquidate alts and btc. Everything is going down for sure.

Source video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jq-vIMylwb8

Also there are ton of other sources all over the net now

I've been recently trying live betting, with a strategy of betting for winners after a quick evaluation of how is the game going, and how much of it is left to play. I am accepting even smallest multipliers like 1.05+ if i am quite certain i would win. I've done many of them for few days now and so far i've been happy for my system, and i already have 3x my initial starting bet.

But i can't help wonder if i am making some noob errors that come back to bite me later. As i know that there are no 100% safe winning, i think i will start losing at some point, and with small multipilers, all it takes is few losses to get back to where i started from. I am quite noob at this so i am probably doing every newbie mistake.

So i wanted to ask from experienced gamblers here, who make live bets; how do you choose your bets and what kind of bets are you preferring (other then betting for winners).

Also are there some good tips on how to make most of from those? Because to someone less informed like myself, most of the other kind of bets seem like shots in the dark. I am assuming that there are more profitable strategies. Like what kind of other bets are worth looking into?

Binance just announced that their visa debit cards will stop working in Europe after 20. December 2023.

Accounts (even in in EU) are still safe, it's just their handy visa payment method that needs more alternatives to fill the gap. Crypto.com card keeps still working in EU, which makes me think that they are just after binance now. If i needed to give an educated guess, i would guess that binance might have made it harder for them to track down users. And since their actions and userbase is too opaque, eu kicks their cards out.

I am sensing more regulatory issues coming up as this is clearly just a one symptom of something bigger.

source:
https://www.binance.com/en/support/faq/frequently-asked-questions-on-binance-card-eea-program-closure-d6c54984df904db7a0705f2914827381

Hilarious summary or the defence:

Faruk Fatih Ozer, 29, fled to Albania in 2021 with investor assets after his Thodex exchange suddenly collapsed.

He was extradited back to Turkey in June and found guilty of money-laundering, fraud and organised crime.

Ozer told the court he would "not have acted so amateurishly" if his intent was criminal, state media reported.

"I am smart enough to lead any institution on Earth," the Anadolu agency quoted him as saying.

"That is evident in this company I established at the age of 22."

So, basically man claims to be such a genius that we should believe he can pull a better heist than this, but at the same time we should believe that he is such an amateur that he fails to run a generic crypto exchange and loses all the assetes. And being such a genius he goes and gets caught by interpol from albania

Prosecutors asked for 40,562 year sentence so i guess THAT was ridiculous, unlike 11,196 years which is totally sensible.
It might not be enough, but it sets an example. I might have a personal issue with scamming crypto scammers as i've seen those people ruining so many lives in this scene.

But he is a first timer, so maybe he sits only half of it.

Source
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66752785

SBF must be thanking his lucky stars for not been born in Turkey.

AI prediction of 2.9.2023 UFC Fight Night

After ChatGPT came out, i've seen some threads about AI and if it could help in gambling.
Back then, AI:s couln't access to internet so they couldn't find latest stats to compare, but now it's a whole new ball game.
While i am highly skeptical about results i thought i might give it a go to try it.

I admit that this is a fraction of any sample size that would be needed to come to any conclusion if it's working but i thought it would be fun little experiment.

I chose Bing AI chat creative mode as my tool, as it seems to be most efficient free tool for this kind of stuff. I tried also google bard, while it had some insightful opinions about some matches, it didn't have any data about most of the fighters so it couln't make any predictions. Basically my prompt for ai was "if these two would fight, who would win and how, and can you give me details how you came that conclusion"

I haven't check if the data is legit, as AI's have an issue of inventing things that doesn't exist (lying), you should take the results with the grain of salt. Prediictions doubly so. I myself did some small multi bets from these predicions. Not too much because i don't want to trust my money on this silly experiment, but some to have some skin in the game.

Full details were too long and specific to post in here, they contained links to articles, records and statistics, fighting styles, advantages and disadvantages, etc, so i asked it to summarize it for me afterwards. But i put links to original long answers and they are most interesting part of this and definitely worth checking out.

Links to full, detailed answer won't work immediately, you have to wait after a click a bit for them to appear in bing search page.

I will update the results next to prediction recap at the end to see if any of these were even remotely correct. I'll do it Sunday, as i am offline whole Saturday.

But here we go; summarized predictions about that fight night ->

		Farid "Ferocious" Basharat	vs	Kleydson "KR" Rodrigues

Bing AI:

- Farid Basharat and Kleydson Rodrigues are both undefeated fighters in the UFC bantamweight division.
- They will fight each other on September 2, 2023 at UFC Fight Night.
- I think Basharat will win by submission in the third round because he has more experience, more skills, and more physical advantages than Rodrigues.

Link to full, detailed answer

		Loosa "The Last Ninja" Ange	vs	Rhys "Skeletor" McKee

Bing AI:

- Loosa Ange and Rhys McKee are both promising and exciting fighters in the UFC welterweight division.
- They will fight each other on September 2, 2023 at UFC Fight Night.
- I think McKee will win by knockout in the second round because he has more experience, more power, and more physical advantages than Ange.

Link to full, detailed answer

		Nora Cornolle	vs	Joselyne "La Pantera" Edwards

Bing AI:

Nora Cornolle and Joselyne Edwards are both female fighters in the UFC bantamweight division.
They will fight each other on September 2, 2023 at UFC Fight Night.
I think Edwards will win by knockout in the first round because she has more experience, more power, and more physical advantages than Cornolle.

Link to full, detailed answer

		Zarah "Infinite" Fairn	vs	Jacqueline Cavalcanti

Bing AI:

- Zarah Fairn and Jacqueline Cavalcanti are both bantamweight fighters who have never fought each other before.
- Zarah Fairn is a tall and powerful striker who has a record of 6-5, but she has lost to some of the top featherweights in the UFC and missed weight in her last fight.
- Jacqueline Cavalcanti is a well-rounded fighter who has a record of 5-1, and she has shown impressive performances in various promotions, such as LFA, UAE Warriors, and PFL.
- I think Cavalcanti would win over Fairn by using her speed, versatility, and conditioning. She would be able to avoid Fairn's strikes, take her down, and finish her with a TKO or a submission.


Link to full, detailed answer

		Taylor "Double Impact" Lapilus	vs	Caolán "THE DON" Loughran

Bing AI:

- Taylor Lapilus and Caolan Loughran are bantamweight fighters who will fight at UFC Fight Night 226 in Paris, France.
- Lapilus is a former TKO Major League MMA Bantamweight Champion who has a record of 18-3-0. He is a well-rounded fighter who can finish his opponents with strikes or submissions.
- Loughran is the current Cage Warriors Bantamweight Champion who has a record of 8-0-0. He is a powerful striker who has won five of his eight fights by knockout.
- I think that Lapilus has a slight edge over Loughran in this fight because he has more experience, more tools, and home advantage.
- I predict that Lapilus will win the fight by unanimous decision after three rounds of action. He will outpoint Loughran on the feet and avoid his submissions on the ground.

Link to full, detailed answer

		Morgan "The Last Pirate" Charriere	vs	Manolo "Angelo Veneziano" Zecchini

Bing AI:

- Morgan Charriere and Manolo Zecchini are featherweight fighters who will fight at UFC Fight Night 226 in Paris, France.
- Charriere has more experience, wins, and skills than Zecchini. He has never been knocked out or submitted.
- Zecchini is also a good striker, but he has less diversity and defense. He has been knocked out and submitted once.
- I think Charriere will win by KO/TKO in the second or third round, but Zecchini could also surprise him. Both fighters are talented and motivated.

Link to full, detailed answer

		William "Jaguar" Gomis	vs	Yanis "The Desert Warrior" Ghemmouri

Bing AI:

- I think William Gomis will win the fight against Yanis Ghemmouri by knockout or decision.
- Gomis has more experience, power, reach, and versatility than Ghemmouri.
- Ghemmouri is a good grappler, but he will not be able to overcome Gomis's striking and defense.

Link to full, detailed answer

I asked follow up question, that in which round that knockout could would happen, and it said second round.

		Volkan "No Time" Oezdemir	vs	Bogdan Guskov

Bing AI:

- Volkan Oezdemir and Bogdan Guskov are both light heavyweight fighters who have impressive knockout power and striking skills.
- Oezdemir has more experience, better defense, and more versatility than Guskov.
- Oezdemir would win this fight by KO/TKO in the first or second round.

Link to full, detailed answer

		Benoit "God of War" Saint-Denis	vs	Thiago Moisés

Bing AI:

- Benoit Saint-Denis and Thiago Moisés are both lightweight fighters who have different strengths and weaknesses.
- Moisés has more experience, better striking, and comparable grappling to Saint-Denis.
- Moisés would win this fight by decision or late stoppage.

Link to full, detailed answer

		Manon "The Beast" Fiorot	vs	Rose "Thug" Namajunas

Bing AI:

- Manon Fiorot and Rose Namajunas are two top female fighters in the UFC who will fight in Paris on September 2, 2023.
- Fiorot is a kickboxer with a 10-1 record and 5-0 in the UFC. Namajunas is a former champion with an 11-5 record and 2 wins over Zhang Weili.
- I think Fiorot will win by decision because she has more size, strength, and momentum than Namajunas. Namajunas may have trouble with Fiorot's pressure and power.

Link to full, detailed answer

		Ciryl "Bon Gamin" Gane	vs	Serghei "Polar Bear" Spivac

Bing AI:

- Ciryl Gane and Serghei Spivac are two heavyweight fighters who will fight in Paris on September 2, 2023.
- Gane is a former title challenger who is good at striking, speed, and versatility. He has 11 wins and 2 losses.
- Spivac is a rising contender who is good at grappling, wrestling, and durability. He has 15 wins and 2 losses.
- The fight could end in different ways depending on their skills and strategies. Some possible outcomes are:
    - Gane wins by knockout or decision using his striking and movement.
    - Spivac wins by submission or decision using his wrestling and grappling.
    - The fight ends in a draw or a no contest due to an even match or an unforeseen event.
- This is not a prediction or a recommendation, but only a summary of some information I have found on the web. The actual outcome may vary.

Link to full, detailed answer

As i asked for best guess, bing refused to take a guess, so i started a new session, where it for some reason guessed:

Ciryl Gane is the favorite to win the fight against Serghei Spivac. He has better speed, striking, and defense than Spivac.
Serghei Spivac is the underdog in the fight. He has good grappling, wrestling, and submission skills. He has never been knocked out in his career.
I think Ciryl Gane would win the fight by knockout or decision, but Serghei Spivac could also surprise him with his ground game and chin.

Link to full, detailed answer

I double checked with Google Bard AI and it agrees -> https://g.co/bard/share/9b83e86ea5b8
It said either TKO or decision, i asked it to elaborate and it would estimate TKO happening in 4th or 5th round.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's summarize every prediction:

	Farid Basharat vs Kleydson Rodrigues	*	Basharat will win by submission in the third round	-	Result comes here
	Loosa Ange vs Rhys McKee	*	McKee will win by knockout in the second round	-	Result comes here
	Nora Cornolle vs Joselyne Edwards	*	Edwards will win by knockout in the first round	-	Result comes here
	Zarah Fairn vs Jacqueline Cavalcanti	*	Cavalcanti will win with a TKO or a submission.	-	Result comes here
	Taylor Lapilus vs Caolán Loughran	*	Lapilus will win by decision	-	Result comes here
	Morgan Charriere vs Manolo Zecchini	*	Charriere will win by KO/TKO in the second or third round	-	Result comes here
	William Gomis vs Yanis Ghemmouri	*	Gomis wins by knockout on 2nd round or decision.	-	Result comes here
	Volkan Oezdemir vs Bogdan Guskov	*	Oezdemir wins by KO/TKO in the first or second round.	-	Result comes here
	Benoit Saint-Denis vs Thiago Moisés	*	Moisés would win this fight by decision or late stoppage.	-	Result comes here
	Manon Fiorot vs Rose Namajunas	*	Fiorot will win by decision	-	Result comes here
	Ciryl Gane vs Serghei Spivac	*	Ciryl Gane wins by knockout in 4th or 5th round or decision	-	Result comes here

[81,182]

So, could we talk about for a moment about Inferno Drainer. For you who are unaware about it, it's a scam-as-a-service (SaaS).

At the time of writing, number of total victims is 81,182 and total amount of stolen money is $35,978,485 so it's not a tiny problem.
It started this year and has been a quickly growing scam industry. Majority of stolen assets have been from ETH chain



Data from Scamsniffer - Dune

This service provides users with a code that enables them to steal crypto, and service providers take 20% of the stolen loot.
Morals aside, i admit giving a free updated scamming software is an ingenious business model for criminals, if you don't count the fact it's highly immoral and evil.

You might have seen scammers (newb users) using this even in bitcointalk, linking fake websites that looks like legit known sites. Like paypal, exchanges, or airdrops etc. And those pages are offering to link your metamask, or asking login credentials or even a seed phrases. And moment you give any of them you'll obviously get your money stolen.

So, let's talk. Where do you stand on this? Are you tempted to use this highly illegal service to scam people? Do you have high enough morals not to? Or would you use if you knew you didn't get caught?

Source article is from earlier this year when only 16% of current amount were stolen: https://drops.scamsniffer.io/post/5-9-million-stolen-by-scam-as-a-service-provider-called-inferno-drainer/