Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2025, 04:20:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 »
61  Other / Meta / How things are working now in Bitcointalk.org on: February 21, 2015, 06:13:29 PM
I complained about an Automated Transactions (AT) topic being moved into the alts section and I get told that that mod might have "gone on holidays" so I just have to wait until they decide to come back.

This is supported by hilariousandco (a new mod who - have a look - has an ad sig).

So now the mods are paid for their posts?

They go on "holiday" whenever they choose after moving your topic and "we should just wait patiently" until they decide what should happen.

Hmm....

(whether or not you care about my issue I think you should care about mods being part of ad sigs campaigns as any reasonable person would know that it is a "conflict of interest")
62  Other / Meta / AT is a technology designed for any blockchain - it is not an alt! on: February 21, 2015, 10:45:45 AM
Mods - please stop moving topics about AT (Automated Transactions) into the alts section.

AT is not an alt nor has it been designed to only work with alts (even if it is only currently implemented in an alt so far) - it is a technology which can be implemented in any blockchain platform (even Bitcoin if they ever decided to do that).

Perhaps whoever is moving my topics could take the time to read this: http://ciyam.org/at/at_script.html
63  Economy / Service Discussion / How to do a Crowfund app with only 28 lines of code... on: February 20, 2015, 07:38:00 PM
The Crowdfund AT created by CIYAM Developers (and now running on Burst) is only 28 lines of assembly code (3 of which are actually effectively "labels" so only 25 code steps).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=949438.msg10522786#msg10522786

When people question about "why don't you build a high level language" I would say - when you have something as efficient as this then why rush to make it "less efficient"?

(and after initialisation it actually requires *zero* processing from all nodes until the "decision block" is reached - so arguably the most cost effective crowdfunding platform in the world and is available for anyone to use "commission free" right now)
64  Other / Off-topic / Guo nian hao (happy Chinese new year)! on: February 18, 2015, 04:55:03 PM
Taken from my apartment window (the building you see isn't a reflection - it was so loud and close that my hand ended up shaking when I took the photo).


65  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Any way to improve Bitcoin Core when operating in hostile environments? on: February 17, 2015, 05:00:13 PM
Recently I find that Bitcoin Core has become almost unusable in China (due to either direct attacks by the GCF on use of the protocol or indirect attacks on anything that comes from outside of China).

I had hoped the new version would help but after testing it for hours today it is no better (and I don't think I can *ever* catch up the blockchain now without either forking out for an expensive VPN or physically leaving the country).

What the GCF does is attack all traffic it doesn't like (that includes anything encrypted that comes from outside the country and any ports or IP addresses they don't like within the country which of course includes Bitcoin).

It crashes connections regularly (which still results in general protection failures in Bitcoin Core even though I read some of those had been addressed) and makes it impossible to even try and use Bitcoin Core at the same time as use your web browser or nearly anything else (your connections just get stuck in some sort of GCF sticky glue that makes the 1980's seem fast).

I don't know if there is anything that can be done but I do worry that soon there will be very few people running full nodes in China.

Please don't suggest TOR as that doesn't work in China (and 99% of VPN's don't either).
66  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / GPG public key for SHA256SUMS.asc (0.10.0)? on: February 17, 2015, 03:43:12 AM
After downloading 0.10.0 and SHA256SUMS.asc it appears that I don't have the GPG public key of the signer (although I do GPG keys for Gavin, Jeff and Pieter) am I missing an updated GPG public key?
67  Other / Off-topic / The no ad-sigs posters allowed topic - come and not be annoyed by rubbish posts on: February 16, 2015, 03:17:13 PM
I am getting so sick of seeing pointless, rubbish ad-sig posts in every single topic on this forum that I have started this topic just to allow others that have something that might be of any actual interest to others to post in.

Rules are:

1. If you have an ad-sig then I will delete your post no matter how "relevant" you think it is (go and post somewhere else - you have plenty of places to do that and I am sick of you guys trying to "defend yourselves").

2. If you post crap or abuse I'll delete that too.

Let's see if it is possible to actually have some enlightened posts on this forum again.
68  Economy / Services / Wanted: Reliable VPS hosting for BTC that allows for user-provided VM image on: February 16, 2015, 02:15:41 PM
Unfortunately the VPS provider that CIYAM has been using seems to be no longer capable of providing a reliable service (it goes offline now every other day for hours with seemingly no amount of "fixes" making it actually better).

So I have decided ciyam.org needs to be moved to a service provider that actually can provide a reliable VPS which can work with my own VM image (a 64-bit SUSE distro) which will need to be migrated from the existing service provider.

I am willing to pay up to 50 USD per month for this service (for which I expect very decent performance,  bandwidth and storage) and the provider must be able to list "well-known" websites that are their clients (which I will check - so if you are a "one-man show" please don't waste my time).
69  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Understanding the Automated Transaction system (AT) on: February 08, 2015, 04:09:39 PM
In order to help explain how AT works and to help anyone trying to create ATs who mostly use this forum for information I have created this topic.

*** mods please note that AT has been designed to work on any blockchain so please do not move this into the alts section ***

The current documentation for AT can be found here: http://ciyam.org/at but it is highly technical (we do intend to provide some simpler documentation as we progress).

So if you have any questions about AT (what it can and can't do, how does it work, etc.) please ask away.

P.S. I've made this topic self-moderated as unfortunately I am currently being followed by trolls in every new topic I create (but I will only be removing off-topic or troll posts).
70  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Why the constant push to have only the one blockchain? on: February 05, 2015, 04:21:17 PM
Although I am not against the 1MB block size limit being raised it seems to me that the entire point of "decentralisation" seems to have escaped the Bitcoin project (the core devs at least mostly seem to be completely against having other blockchains).

I certainly understand that the Bitcoin Foundation is going to have that opinion (for financial reasons) and I can understand a lot of people heavily invested in Bitcoin (such as the Winklevoss twins) also having that opinion.

But any "rational" person would surely think that having other blockchains (with different code and proofs) cannot be a *bad* thing as it alleviates the "one point of failure" that we will otherwise always have.

I don't see how "one blockchain" is ever going to service the needs of everyone (without requiring a ridiculous amount of space and without having near instant confirmations) so IMO it is simply inevitable that we are going to need many.
71  Other / Politics & Society / IRS now making people in Aus bend over backwards to fill out forms on: February 03, 2015, 01:32:55 PM
Just got a message from my ING Direct account informing me that I need to fill out a form (presumably in actual paper) to state my US tax status.

Why? I'm not a US citizen (nor have even visited the country) so I guess it is simply because this is what the US government has decided - that every Australian (and I'd guess many other countries also) interest earning bank account holder now needs to do.

Personally I think every US interest earning bank account holder should have to fill out forms to say they are not a taxable entity for every single other country they have forced into to doing this shit to.
72  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / AT vs. Ethereum - what direction are we headed in? on: January 28, 2015, 04:50:25 PM
Some people may already be aware that AT has been launched on a mainnet (via the Burst altcoin - http://www.theuknews.com/index.php/nav/newsr/5228) providing Turing complete "smart contracts" including the world's first decentralised Lottery (which is already running).

Whilst CIYAM Developers have *zero* VC funding nor any IPO funds we have however managed to create our "smart contracts" implementation and see it through to launching on a mainnet in a relatively short space of time (no easy feat)

It has been noted that the fact that currently ATs have to be written in an "assembly" language makes them not easy to develop but at the same time it should be noted that we are looking into using LLVM in order to allow ATs to be written in C or C++.

The Ethereum project have not only decided to not use any well known high level language (they have created their own) but they are also now forking a web browser (something that we have no plan to do as we think most people are simply not going to want to change their browser).

Also AT has been designed from the start to work on multiple blockchains (i.e. relatively easy to integrate with any alt and will get easier as we progress) and we plan to be able to demonstrate an "atomic cross-chain transfer" within the next month.

It is a "David vs. Goliath" issue that we face but we feel that providing a system that supports major existing high level programming languages and all main browsers and allowing all blockchains to join in is perhaps something that might be more appealing to the devs in this field compared to the Ethereum approach.

AT documentation can be found here: http://ciyam.org/at (and yes it is rather technical)

Your comments are welcome.
73  Economy / Economics / Why does anyone pay attention to people that study "economics"? on: January 18, 2015, 07:45:04 PM
At least in the Keynsian variety.

The entire concept is built on infinite expansion which anyone with even half a brain should now know doesn't work as our Earth has "finite" resources (and our ability to find another Earth is not going to happen before we have exhausted this one's natural resources in trying to find it).

I actually think it is rather funny that we have people that are awarded Nobel prizes and given high status at universities (and in governments) when their pseudo-science is really no different to a cult or a religion.

(yes - I like to stir the pot sometimes - so come on you Keynsian fans and smite me)
74  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Why I think neither Ethereum and AT are going to be the future of blockchains on: January 17, 2015, 02:54:52 PM
Whilst there is a lot of excitement about the possibilites of "Turing complete" blockchain transactions that are supported by Ethereum and AT (the latter being my own invention) after studying how these work I have come to the conclusion that they are just not going to really scale up to provide us with a "new internet" (which is what I have now come to think of as being the main goal that blockchains should be used for).

If you think of how things like this forum work today (via HTTP/HTTPS) you create a forum post by effectively populating a form with values that gets turned into a HTTP/HTTPS POST request for the server to then turn into a DB operation (after performing validation).

But both Ethereum and AT instead are actually working more like low-level machines (either a Java VM in the case of Ethereum or a virtual CPU in the case of AT) which are very inefficient in comparison to something like HTTP with a web server backend that uses say FCGI.

They have to work this way as otherwise you could create a very simple program like this following:

Code:
while( true )
 str = str + str;

that will run your computer out of memory (causing it to either crash or become completely unresponsive) unless the fees to execute more than X amount of steps are high enough.

But is there another way?

Yes - I designed a concept called Software Manufacturing (http://ciyam.org/open/?cmd=view&data=20121221010507352000_P&ident=M100V112&chksum=b3d538bf) many years ago (which works in a somewhat similar manner to Charles Simonyi's project called "Intentional Software").

In Software Manufacturing the above pseudo code would have to be divided into two components - a looping specification and a separate specification that covers what to do within the loop. As all source code is "generated" you can't stop the resulting code from effectively being something like this:

Code:
while( true )
{
   if( str.length( ) > c_max_allowed )
      throw runtime_error( "str too big" );

    str = str + str;
}

This is not something you can do using either Ethereum or AT as they are simply not high level enough but this is something that can be easily be done using Software Manufacturing (as you have no choice).

Using such a high level approach means that rather than bothering each node with putting a VM or virtual CPU between the network and the DB you can just put in the functional operations themselves (which would look more like SQL statements than machine code).

This will scale to at least the level we have today in regards to internet applications and this is what CIYAM is currently developing.

If you'd like to learn a bit more about what exactly Software Manufacting is then a quick introduction can be found here: http://ciyam.org/docs/methodology.html.
75  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / The next step in going against "conventional wisdom" - Create your own Crypto! on: January 01, 2015, 06:29:25 PM
I created a topic about "brainwallets" that some of you might have followed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=885616.0) where I challenged the idea that "no-one can create a secure brainwallet".

I pointed out my own brainwallet address with 1 BTC (https://blockchain.info/address/1Au4v6dZacFVsWXeKUMJd99AtyBZeqti2L) and it still has that 1 BTC there (so those wanting to show that you can't create a good brainwallet are not doing a good job in that they seemingly are unable to sweep that 1 BTC and it has been there for a long time - and as I took out 9 BTC previously the public key is available also).

My next challenge to conventional thinking is with crypto itself. We are constantly told *don't roll your own crypto* and for sure just like *don't create a brainwallet* it is not something that *anyone can do* but I think that those who are smart enough to create a brainwallet should also be thinking about exercising their skills at creating crypto (if they are keen to work out how to do so).

Why?

Because maybe you shouldn't trust anyone else to create it for you.

Everyone here should be well aware that any publicly created crypto could likely have been influenced by the NSA or other groups (as has already been exposed by Wikileaks and others).

So I prefer that we discuss ways of creating new crypto rather than saying "we can't discuss that as we are not qualified". As that is the easiest argument to force everyone to use unsafe software (i.e. don't think for yourself just use what *we say you should use*).
76  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Can we decide on RFC 6979 or an equilvalent before we have more issues? on: December 19, 2014, 04:25:50 PM
We have seen a big problem with compromised private keys due to bad random values used by crappy .js code (and this is not the first time we have seen such things) yet the Bitcoin devs seem to not be very enthused about changing things (presumably they are very busy with other things but I am asking them to consider what is most important at the moment).

I think this needs to be elevated to priority #1 as if people can't trust their private keys due to poor RNG (and we have been made aware that the NSA seems quite determined to compromise RNGs as much as they can) then we can't really trust anything to keep BTC safe.

We need deterministic sigs and we need them ASAP - if there is an issue with RFC 6979 then please solve it via another RFC or create a BIP that achieves the same thing.

The main thing is - stop with not doing anything and let's get deterministic sigs happening so no further such issues as have happened recently with blockchain.info happen again.
77  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / AT for anonymity with cross-chain transfers (moderated to remove shills) on: December 15, 2014, 05:29:54 PM
Sorry - but we ended up with one of those typically aggressive shills attacking the other topic so I have started this one.

Those that seriously want to talk about AT and ACCT should post here (I'll delete any shill posts).
78  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / AT can be used to anonymize inter-blockchain transfers (who would have thought?) on: December 14, 2014, 01:59:33 PM
One member of the Burst (a coin that works on HDD capacity rather than PoW or PoS) community asked me whether AT could be used to help anonymize transfers and at first I thought this was simply not possible as AT has *no secrets*.

I am glad I then thought about this again - and suddenly I realised that the "atomic cross-chain transfer" (http://ciyam.org/at/at_atomic.html) use case could be changed ever so slightly to do something I had not thought that AT could ever do (help provide anonymity).

Normally an ACCT (atomic cross-chain transfer) would involve putting the same "hash" into two ATs (each residing on a different blockchain) and then sending the secret to unlock both in order to make the transaction take place.

But there is no need for the secret to be "identical" - so here is an example:

one AT is created with the hash 2bb80d537b1da3e38bd30361aa855686bde0eacd7162fef6a25fe97bf527a25b hard-coded in it - but the AT on the other blockchain doesn't have this but instead 04d3368f72736ed54c3cb63454eef23c2ecfb1deed27e2a4aa8e442e898fdbf5.

If we were to study both blockchains we can't see any immediate relationship between the two ATs that have been created to do the ACCT but an ACCT can occur nonetheless as those hashes are actually SHA256 hashes of "secret" and "terces" (this is of course a trivial example of how to do this - a more viable version would use something much more complicated than just reversing the secret).

Assuming we had numerous ATs operating across numerous blockchains all doing transfers at around the same time it is pretty clear that the "ultimate decentralised coin mixer" could be created.
79  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / A challenge to the idea that no-one can create a good brainwallet on: December 07, 2014, 04:38:51 PM
So here is a brainwallet address I created two years ago: https://blockchain.info/address/1Au4v6dZacFVsWXeKUMJd99AtyBZeqti2L

Originally I had stored 10 BTC there but after reading so many posts from people such as Gavin I decided to reduce the risk to 1 BTC but kept that just to see if my brainwallet would be discovered.

So after 2 years no-one has discovered it (and it is an address that was created via a passphrase that I have remembered successfully since then - I retested my memory of the passphrase just prior to making this post).

I don't dispute that creating brainwallets is not for everyone but I *do dispute* the idea that no-one is capable of creating a decent brainwallet.

So now that you know the address - let's see if anyone can work out my passphrase and steal the 1 BTC.

Smiley

Also I'd be interested to know from those who are keen on analysing the blockchain how much BTC they think I might have based upon this address.
80  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / AUA (ask *us* anything) about AT on: November 19, 2014, 04:46:58 PM
I was asked about doing an AMA on reddit recently for AT but I don't use reddit and I don't like the idea of *me* when AT is a team effort.

People not familiar with AT should first read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=822100.0 and for the more technical: http://ciyam.org/at

and those that are interested in the tech (and might want to earn some BTC) might also want to read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=826263.0

So - in this topic feel free to ask questions about what AT is and what it can do and at what stage things are at in terms of the development of this project.

I will allow questions that compare AT to Ethereum or other projects but will delete any ads and also any personal attacks or rubbish posts made by those in sig campaigns that contain no useful content.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!