Bitcoin Forum
September 30, 2020, 12:51:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.20.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
1  Local / Off-Topic (Deutsch) / Ausländische Bankkonten und automatischer Informationsaustausch on: August 13, 2020, 02:14:16 AM
Ich würde gerne einen Thread zu Ausländische Bankkonten und automatischem Informationsaustausch vom Bundesfinanzministerium starten damit sich jeder bewusst ist was hinter den Kulissen gespielt wird.

https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Interviews/2020/2020-02-22-Gastbeitrag-div-Tageszeitungen.html

Auch wenn angeblich die grossen Konzerne im Blickfeld sein sollen (bisher haben die es noch immer geschafft Schlupflöcher zu finden) ist es aus meiner Sicht effektiver die breite Masse zu überwachen und entsprechend zu sanktonieren.

Ich kann jedem nur raten sich soweit wie möglich arm zu rechnen (öffentliche sicht) und den Rest enstprechend zu parken (private sicht).

Konstruktiver Ausstausch ist sehr willkommen. Alles andere wird gelöscht.
2  Other / Off-topic / Some SATs for this little one year girl as birthday present on: November 29, 2019, 09:57:33 AM
A sweet little girl had her first birthday but her wallet address is empty. Give her a good start in this dark world. Make her happy with some SAT's.  Wink

There will be a small session between me and my bitcoin girl, exclusively for WO brothers. Of course you lot are one of the part of my world too.



There you go!
Short session only for WO!
3  Economy / Speculation / Hedge your position right from the start - ongoing discussion on: October 06, 2019, 08:53:54 AM
There was a discussion in the unique "Wall Observer BTC/USD" (WO) thread about to have BTC positions in both directions (long/buy and short/sell) right from the start of opening a position.

I've collected all related post from different users from the WO thread and have re-quoted this posts within this thread. It might be of interest for other users as well and might be a better place to discuss the topic without noise between the posts.
4  Local / Trading und Spekulation / Bitwala Debitkarte mit BTC Wallet on: March 18, 2019, 06:24:11 PM
Hat schon jemand Erfahrungen mit der Bitwala Debitkarte und dem dazugehörigen BTC Wallet gemacht?

Setzt das jemand praktisch ein und wenn ja in welcher Grössenordnung?

Die solarisBank AG ist ja bei dieser Lösung für die Eurokonten verantwortlich. Und die Bitwala GmbH (20.02.2019: Kapital: €45.963) ist alleine verantwortlich für das BTC Wallet?

Wie seht ihr dieses ganze Angebot betrieben auf deutschem Boden?

(Ich habe noch eine speziellen Gesichtspunkt im Hinterkopf aber vieleicht bewegen wir uns bei der Diskussion eh in die Richtung.)

Danke vorab!
5  Other / Off-topic / ~ on: February 04, 2019, 04:05:25 PM
~
6  Other / Off-topic / So Faketoshi (CSW) wants to have back Bitcoin v0.1.0 - what about the price too? on: November 23, 2018, 01:58:45 AM
Faketoshi (CSW) mentioned he will reset FakeCoin SV to Bitcoin v0.1.0 back. He will also apply the "old" Bitcoin address format (non-segwit) in FakeCoin SV which is in fact an attack on Bitcoin because he will certainly not apply a replay protection in his shitcoin.  

What about if we give him also the price of v0.1.0 from this time back and dump out the shit of him?

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-cash-sv/

Should we coordinate a dumping event together?

Opinions are welcome.
7  Other / Off-topic / ~ on: September 03, 2018, 03:12:29 PM
~
8  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Smart Contracts - just a buzzword or are they applicable to the real world? on: August 19, 2018, 09:37:58 AM
I constantly asking me if Smart Contracts are just a overhyped topic to attract people to Altcoins and ICOs or do/could they have real use cases in our daily life besides the topic of decentralized money and Bitcoin?

A smart contract is a computer protocol intended to digitally facilitate, verify, or enforce the negotiation or performance of a contract. Smart contracts allow the performance of credible transactions without third parties. These transactions are trackable and irreversible.[1] Smart contracts were first proposed by Nick Szabo, who coined the term, in 1994.[2]

Proponents of smart contracts claim that many kinds of contractual clauses may be made partially or fully self-executing, self-enforcing, or both. The aim of smart contracts is to provide security that is superior to traditional contract law and to reduce other transaction costs associated with contracting. Various cryptocurrencies have implemented types of smart contracts.

I'm just interested in resilient examples which are applicable today not in any kind of hocus-pocus scenarios for the next century.
9  Other / Meta / [Survey] Who has who on its Ignore List? (Second try) on: August 15, 2018, 03:31:31 PM
As the title mentioned it. A thread where everyone can post its Ignore List to the public.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=%userID%;sa=ignprefs


EDIT: unfortunately self moderated topics are not supported in this forum section.
10  Other / Meta / [Survey] Who has who on it's Ignore List? on: August 15, 2018, 03:02:43 PM
As the title mentioned it. A thread where everyone can post it's Ignore List to the public.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=%userID%;sa=ignprefs
11  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / TLA+ for the design of BitCoin on: August 13, 2018, 08:59:54 PM
I recently learned about TLA+ and are asking myself if Satoshi used this for the design of concurrent and distributed systems like BitCoin?

http://lamport.azurewebsites.net/tla/tla.html

http://lamport.azurewebsites.net/tla/hyperbook.html

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/lamport/pubs/lamport-spec-tla-plus.pdf
12  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / A Guide to 99% Fault Tolerant Consensus by Vitalik Buterin on: August 13, 2018, 12:28:28 AM
Vitalik Buterin describe in a post a way up to 99 percent fault tolerance in consensus of distributed systems.

https://vitalik.ca/general/2018/08/07/99_fault_tolerant.html

Satoshi Nakamoto and Leslie Lamport both also described a solution to it.

interesting is that Vitalik just refer on Leslie not on Satoshi. Is he ignoring Satoshi to be able to sell the idea as his own? but why then the reference to Leslie? is he not aware of the post of Satoshi in the forum? hard to imagine, right?

what does he know what we not know? or the better question is what is his assumption about Leslie Lamport versus Satoshi Nakamoto?


the article which has led me to the questions above --> https://www.trustnodes.com/2018/08/10/vitalik-buterin-proposes-consensus-algorithm-requires-1-honest

fun fact: Leslie is working for Microsoft since 2001. do you remember on which platform the first versions of the BitCoin client were developed?

fun fact: the official working address of Leslie is in Mountain View, CA, U.S.A. the only IP from Satoshi without TOR on 2009-01-10 (Saturday) was from Van Nuys, CA, U.S.A. --> https://whoissatoshi.wordpress.com/2016/02/20/satoshi-in-california/

13  Local / Altcoins (Deutsch) / Der Aktuelle Kursverlauf - Fork wegen Bitcoin Cash on: August 02, 2017, 11:50:10 AM
so jetzt versuche ich das auch mal. kann man so einfach etwas forken wie unten angedeutet?

Na das ist doch was, BCH hat das System ad absurdum geführt. Mit dieser ForkAktion wird der breiten Masse gezeigt wie einfach es doch ist Geld zu machen.

Ich ziehe meinen Hut vor Leute mit massig Knete, alles richtig gemacht in dieser Welt, das muss man nüchtern konstatieren.  Smiley  Einmal den eigenen kritischen Punkt in Sachen Vermögen überschritten und man kann schon fast gar nicht mehr verlieren.
Falsch. Der Fork hat gezeigt, dass das System funktioniert. Es ist dezentral, jeder kann Forken wenn er das möchte. Und das soll auch so sein.
Nö ist schon richtig, OpenSource, jeder kann forken... Nur das ist das Totschlagargument für Werterhalt/Steigerung was als letztes Argument angeführt wird. Das Thema Geldersatz ist schon lang vom Tisch.

Natürlich werden jetzt einige sagen, ja aber die eine Kette  und die andere Ketten sind ja getrennt, richtig! Das stimmt, nur das ist virtuell. Alle Güter da draußen, selbst der physische EUR ist noch so geblieben. Und die Leute haben nicht gleichzeitig das doppelte Geld um die Pyramide weiter zu bauen. Einer muss immer die Coins irgendwann von einen anderem abkaufen damit es funktioniert und warum teuer kaufen wenn man selbst (oder eine Gruppe) die Macht hat einfach einen neuen Fork anzulegen?

Die steigenden Kurse gehen solange weiter wie noch mehr Leute mit den Forks/Splits/Alternativen angezogen werden, danach ist Ende. Aber das dauert noch ein Weilchen, jetzt werden erst einmal Leute angezogen die ihre Chance mit solchen Aktionen wittern.

Ich will mich ja nicht beschweren rund 500,- hab ich nun auch mehr, aber noch nicht gerettet  Grin
14  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Here we go for UASF on 08/01/2017 --> www.uasfguide.com on: May 27, 2017, 02:21:05 PM
http://www.uasfguide.com (https://www.weusecoins.com/uasf-guide/)

download the UASF node here --> https://bitcoinuasf.org/

is there a BIP148 pool for mining already?

let's ask SlushPool and BitFury to support the UASF chain and some others will follow.

yes, voting option is available on SlushPool --> https://slushpool.com/news/new-voting-option-bip148-has-been-deployed-feel-free-to-vote/


http://uasf.saltylemon.org/uasf_percent_all.png

http://uasf.saltylemon.org/uasf_bips_all.png


EDIT: the UASF hat --> https://denarium.com/product/uasf-hat

EDIT2: A Bitcoin Beginner’s Guide to Surviving the BIP 148 UASF

EDIT3: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-heres-why-all-rational-miners-will-activate-segwit-though-bip148/

EDIT4: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Segwit_support
15  Bitcoin / Project Development / What is LBC (https://lbc.cryptoguru.org) really doing? on: April 11, 2017, 05:20:54 AM
This thread is to find out what the so called "Large Bitcoin Collider" is really doing.

https://lbc.cryptoguru.org

Despite of what it's creator is claiming what it is doing.

To find out the truth and fight against FUD.
16  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Would a fork to SHA-3 be usefull because of the destroyed mining market? on: February 16, 2016, 10:02:25 PM
It's obvious more than 50 percent of the Bitcoin hashpower is in the hands of chinese operators. in the last weeks/months the situation escalated because of the near halving event.

Should we consider a fork to SHA-3 even if the price will crash to double or maybe single digits afterwards?
17  Local / Biete / [Biete] Bitcoin Beratung über Telegram.org on: January 21, 2016, 07:38:05 PM
Sie können mich zu allen Bitcoin spezifischen Fragestellungen konsultieren und ich werde Ihnen über einen persönlichen Telegram.org Chat Auskunft zu Ihren Fragen geben.



Vielen Dank!
18  Economy / Services / [WTS] Bitcoin Consulting via Telegram.org on: January 21, 2016, 07:18:06 PM
You can ask me any question releated to Bitcoin and I will answer / teach you via a private Telegram.org chat.



Thank you!
19  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / RFCs for Bitcoin on: January 13, 2016, 03:49:39 PM
2016 will be the year where we can expect different Bitcoin implementations in the wild. Until now it was enough to have one Bitcoin reference implementation in form of code but what we need now is a specification of Bitcoin in form of Requests for Comments.

The wild west time should end now. Boy's you've had your fun. We were impressed of your egos. Grow up or leave please.

Now we need professionalism to continue the success story of Bitcoin!


http://www.rfc-editor.org

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2223.txt
20  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Bitcoin Testnet block height 627810 (port 18333) on: December 26, 2015, 01:06:44 PM
Why is the block height 627810 on the Bitcoin Testnet? Are there information out how and why this happened?

This block height is far ahead to the Mainnet block height.

EDIT: maybe someone put large hash power on the testnet3 and solve a lot of blocks in no time before a diff adjustement happened?
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!