I just got into an argument about Bitcoin on Google+. I want to make sure that I win this, and hopefully convert someone who didn't like Bitcoin into someone who does.
Bitcoin is worthless.
Messaged you a bet. Put your money where you mouth is.
I had messaged him a copy of the Memory dealers bet (Google it "Memory Deals CEO Bitcoin $10,000). I offered to put down some money (no where close to $10k) on the same bet.
I do put my money where my mouth is, it's not on bitcoin at all. I don't waste server resources computing hashes. I don't have to deal with the exchange scam/exploit/hack of the month which devalues the 'currency'. I don't have to deal with security issues from people trying to exploit my desktop systems to access my wallet files - there isn't even an authority that can stop people from performing theft. I place no value in bitcoin, because the cost to maintain it far outweighs any monetary gains or existing monetary handling systems.
No central authority == feature.
Bitcoin has actually stabilized because of those hacks. It now has more trading volume than ever, the exchanges are seeing more depth, and the price has remained fairly consistent ($10-13) for over a month now. The hacks scared off all the investors who were just trying to make a quick buck.
Your wallet file is just like your physical wallet. It has to be kept safe. You wouldn't just put your physical wallet on the seat next to you on a crowded train would you? Likewise you (if your smart) wouldn't leave your wallet unsecured on your computer when connected to the "crowded" Internet.
I am pulling this information from a recent talk by the Choas Computer Club. Also Googlable. I'll add links later to where I got it.
I would like to (with the help of the community) examine his possible arguments and ways to refute them. Along with additional ways to refute his current arguments. I would like to keep this argument civil and logical (although I realize my response was a poor example of this).