Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2019, 03:52:27 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Other / Meta / closing my own thread on: January 20, 2018, 10:06:23 PM
I asked a question (, and got an answer for it, and I m grateful to those who answered.

Problem is that now I have 3 pages with exactly same answers repeated over and over agin, and no add whatsoever.

How can I close my own thread please?

2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / explain what Airdrop is on: January 15, 2018, 03:07:39 PM
Hello! Can you explain me what airdrop mechanisms are, their functionning/implications please?
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / How do bounty campaigns work? on: January 15, 2018, 11:20:52 AM
It is all in the title. I checked that thread (, but it is gone.
4  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / libraries supporting n-m address (but not P2SH) on: July 09, 2016, 04:11:23 PM
I realized most libraries implement n-m addresses by using P2SH. Are there libraries (in addition to bitcoinJ) that implement n-m addresses using plain multisig (as in (not in nodejs / javascript) ?
5  Bitcoin / BitcoinJ / create and redeem P2SH - HOWTO on: July 05, 2016, 11:09:27 AM

I am looking for a HOWTO for creating and redeeming P2SHs in a "most correct way".
I looked on the github (and ggle) but could not find a match (apart from the very last paragraph of the "Working with contracts" tutorial). Can someone please help please?

6  Bitcoin / BitcoinJ / which projects use bitcoinJ ? on: July 05, 2016, 09:48:28 AM
I ld like to know which (successful) projects have used bitcoinJ (on top of, of course, Hive, Multibit, Bitcoin Wallet, BitEasy)?
7  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Ways of implementing MPC on: July 02, 2016, 09:42:51 AM

I read on a github conversation that
"Bitcore [...] had a mostly functioning implementation of MPC that used P2SH and bitcoinj used raw multisig. These are not compatible, so I made bitcoinj's MPC into a P2SH version and modified bitcore's conversation structure to make them compatible" (from an experienced developer).
I thought I knew what MPC and P2SH were but I was not aware until now that MPC had been implemented in two ways, raw vs. P2SH. I ld like to more about this.

Could someone explicit the reason for taking one approach or the other please (or redirect me to some useful resource)?

8  Bitcoin / BitcoinJ / interoperability of bitcoinJ's micropayment channel API on: July 01, 2016, 09:52:58 AM

I am working on setting up a Micropayment Channel (MC) between a small-scale, router-like device (the client) and a full blown computer (server).

I thought of using bitcoinJ on the side of the computer since it is AFAIK the only library that implements MPC, and I m glad not to reinvent the wheel. Since no JVM on the small-scale device side, I ll build from scratch the MPC using some other library (suggestions welcome).

Is interoperability bw each side of the MPC going to be an issue according to you? What does it entail?

I ask that because I saw from the BitMesh project, for instance, that :
"[they] modified payment channels quite a bit, the .proto file and the bitcoinj and bitcore code so they could interoperate. We modified Bitcoinj payment channels to use P2SH, not raw-multisig, and bitcore uses the more extensive conversation defined in bitcoinj."
and I am not exactly able to understand the full meaning of this short comment yet.

I will welcome v. much all advice Smiley.

Thank you
Pages: [1]
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!