Bitcoin Forum
August 10, 2026, 02:34:06 PM *
News: COLDCARD users only: critical vulnerability risks funds stored on COLDCARD devices; immediate action required
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Google to ban crypto ads !! Is it good move or it will affect disastrously on: August 14, 2018, 08:34:04 PM
Google's this move could help cryptos market or not by banning crypto ads ??
2  Bitcoin / Press / [2018-01-30] Tether Severs Ties With Its Auditor, Leaving Its Accounts Shrouded on: January 30, 2018, 08:17:14 AM
Tether Severs Ties With Its Auditor, Leaving Its Accounts Shrouded in Mystery

Barely a week passes when Tether isn’t in the news. For a so-called stable coin, Tether and its acolyte Bitfinex are at the center of a lot of instability within the cryptoverse. After it emerged over the weekend that Tether had kissed goodbye to its auditor, critics of the opaque company began to wonder whether they would ever be granted a glance at the company’s books. Months of promises have ended with a whimper now that auditor Friedman LLP has exited stage left.

Tether, Friedman, and the Audit That Never Was
The Tether story is like a children’s classic that’s been retold so many times as to obfuscate many seeds of truth. What is beyond dispute is that tethers – tokens with a fixed $1 value – are widely used as a means of surrogate fiat currency by millions of crypto traders and several major exchanges. Most people have no problem with this arrangement, nor do they dispute that Tether, and Bitfinex – the exchange whose owners hold a controlling stake in the company – is profitable.

With Coinbase recording $1 billion of revenue a year, Binance raking in $300 million and Coincheck instantly compensating victims of the $400 million NEM hack in Japanese yen, exchanges aren’t short of money. It is the secretive way in which Tether operates that has given grounds for concern. Last year, after lingering rumors that the company didn’t possess the USD to cover the USDTs it was merrily issuing, Tether reluctantly agreed to conduct a public audit. Traders waited for the report to be issued, but as delays mounted up, commenters ventured that the audit would never be published. It appears they were right.

Readmore here> https://news.bitcoin.com/tether-severs-ties-with-its-auditor-leaving-its-accounts-shrouded-in-mystery
3  Economy / Reputation / Need Community help against BOUNTY IMPERSONATOR on: January 12, 2018, 11:51:39 PM
What happened::
Hey BITCOINTALK need some help here, I have some person impersonating me and probably others whose claiming bounty stakes in my name but the only problem is this imposter has several medium accounts with no followers unlike myself. I got to know of this when I checked for my name on a spreadsheet i thought I had submitted my work but did not and accidentally found this IMPERSONATOR using my forum name and bitcoin link id, the only thing separating me from this imposter is an address his getting paid on and their fake medium account with low quality work and AFAIK this person has been doing this for a long time and apparently there is an address that links other forum users to the imposters address, roughly 25 accounts.


Reference Link:
for a start this campaign
(UAHPAY ARTICLES CAMPAIGN) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NJ3L72nWIUnnGzSqpDXj9EjrMuVw4MN1m1clDgTzEw4/htmlview
main linking address https://etherscan.io/address/0x734a2058af46c567101cdb945a0813bcb3f6bc9b
Has several accounts linked ( All Addresses from the TX leads to a forum account)
#291 IMPOSTERS ADDRESS 0x5Fa895418A65Ea509e77A5402B9C87D2C2E78d3B
LIKELY AFFECTED
#292 PCIDY https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=896569 0x242B307502e635C128d6B2DEb18B144e57174271
#295 ResponsibleMan = https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=997494 0x242B307502e635C128d6B2DEb18B144e57174271

#284 daniweb =https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=999472 0x43177a62e730a2392563B86F4F02BB4095c554d2
#297 georgeandy =https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=262371 0x203EA49359bB17afCCF4CF0BC8E9D87141A46052
*MORE TO COME
Lucyd Bounty
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15-tXKRZo6MrszvUEssT6sNrymbhIBCIC__8imRz9qI4/edit#gid=2136776937
#168 gredisgold88 = https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=929162 0x5339DB7E52963C66985FbfE68404fD8B39B7c127



All these accounts are linked by this very ETH address 0x734a2058af46c567101cdb945a0813bcb3f6bc9b which sent some eth to the
IMPOSTERS  ETH ADDRESS 0x5Fa895418A65Ea509e77A5402B9C87D2C2E78d3B TX
if address is not on one campaign it will appear on others!

Some of these addresses are still appearing on some old and new bounty campaigns
OLD
Dentacoin I SPREADSHEET-PUBLICATICATIONS
Tokenbox
WorldcoreToken I SPREADSHEET-PUBLICATICATIONS
Lucyd Bounty I SPREADSHEET-PUBLICATICATIONS
Tokenbox

NEW/NOT YET PAID BOUNTIES
Pundi X I SPREADSHEET-PUBLICATICATIONS
HOME LOANS I SPREADSHEET-PUBLICATICATIONS

MY IMPOSTERS WORK
1. https://medium.com/@wladaBobrovnikova/lucyd-project-31fc8232649a
2. https://medium.com/@Ilonawasina/home-loans-d93bf3ed1afe
3. https://medium.com/@NerezvyjAdam
DIFFERENT MEDIUM ACCOUNTS BUT SAME ETH ADDRESS USED and I NOTICED THIS IMPERSONATOR IS A REGULAR IN ColorlessK's CAMPAIGNS
N.B Reported this to medium support hope the make a followup

THE LAST ADDRESS ( 0x6568Da376C6cc5Ed900A0259695e82a00d0Bde2E ) FROM THE LINKING ADDRESS https://etherscan.io/address/0x734a2058af46c567101cdb945a0813bcb3f6bc9b from my google search sends me here which is off limits https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2357073.0

MY SUGGESTION IS PROOF OF ENROLMENT FOR THESE BOUNTIES SHOULD BECOME MANDATORY !!
WILL CONTINUE TO UPDATE, HOPE THIS IS THE RIGHT THREAD
4  Economy / Lending / Need 0.007 BTC loan payback 0.009 on: March 23, 2017, 05:07:02 PM
I need a loan of 0.012 BTC
Repayment will be in 12 days (or less) from when i receive the loan.
i will be paying back 0.015 BTC
Collateral: my account


Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!