Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 09:30:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Armory / Armory-like Ethereum Wallet on: August 12, 2021, 10:57:37 AM
Dear Community,

im looking for an armory-like ethereum wallet, specifically a wallet that I can run in a watch-only variant on the online PC,
and in an offline variant with the private keys on a second PC. It must be open source.
Which wallet can you recommend for this?

Armory is the perfect wallet for Bitcoin, unfortunately without support for Ethereum.

Thank you for your advice.
2  Bitcoin / Armory / Raspberry Offline Version on: April 24, 2019, 02:41:58 PM
Dear,
I still have an old Armory Build (v. 0.93.3) installed on my Raspberry (for offline sign)
but i would like to update so it supports Segwit and all fixes like fragmented backup and so on.

Im not quite familiar with Linux in general so my questions are:

1) Is there any new Offline-Bundle available? At https://btcarmory.com/releases/  I can only find a Raspberry-Package for 93.3

2) How can I update without a new Packet and without an internet connection to the Raspberry? I tried to download the new Ubuntu-Release on an online computer and transport it with a usb-stick to the offline-Raspberry, but could not install it there...

3  Bitcoin / Armory / Export of Private Keys on: December 01, 2017, 12:11:57 PM
Hey everyone Wink

I've come to the point where I want to access half of my portfolio, including BTC, BCH and BTG.
As all of my funds still sit in an old Raspberry Pi - Coldwallet with Armory, and my Online Computer only runs against a Bitcoin Core Node, so I consider doing it this way:
1) Send the BTC to the target Address (Exchange).
2) Export the Private Key and Import them somewhere, so i can spend the BCH without running a BCH-Node.
3) Doing the same with BTG.

My questions are the following:
a) Does it damage the security of my Armory-wallet by exporting some Private Keys? (In other words: Is it possible in any way that someone could calculate my seed with some of my private keys?) (Ofc. I am aware, that i can not use this single address anymore!)
b) What is the best/easiest way to import my Priv Keys so that i can spend the BCH/BTG?
c) anything you could add / recommend about this plan?
4  Bitcoin / Armory / Own armory entropy on: March 07, 2017, 11:48:40 PM
Hey, just a short question:
Can I use the "recovery wallet" function and enter some lines of which i have created my self to create my own entropy and do not have to trust armory in that case?
I know, this is on my own risk then, if im stupid enough to enter some pseudo-entropy its my own fault. Just wanna know if this might be a possibility if i create them by dices or so...

EDIT: just saw that in the menu of "create wallet" i can find a button "add manual entropy", but then again i have to trust armory that it actually use this "manual entropy". But if i just enter my own lines in the recovery function, it has to, right? So if i would not trust it, it would be the better option.... (just in case Im somewhat paranoid  Grin )
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / WIF Checksum Checking on: February 07, 2017, 02:35:29 AM
Hi there, im not a programmer, so i need your help to update this code for me, as it is not working anymore.
Would be really nice if someone could invest a couple of minutes, as this should not take you too long.
Written in Go:

-------------------------------------
*START*
-------------------------------------
package main

import (
   "fmt"
   "github.com/conformal/btcutil"
   "github.com/conformal/btcwire"
)

func main() {
   step1 := "5HueCGU8rMjxEXxiPuD5BDku4MkFqeZyd4dZ1jvhTVqvbTLvyTJ"
   fmt.Printf("1 - Wallet import format: %s\n", step1)

   step2 := btcutil.Base58Decode(step1)
   fmt.Printf("2 - Converting WIF as Base58 string to byte array: %x\n", step2)

   step3 := step2[:len(step2)-4]
   fmt.Printf("3 - Dropping last 4 checksum bytes from 2: %x\n", step3)

   step5 := btcwire.DoubleSha256(step3)
   fmt.Printf("4/5 - Double SHA-256 hash of 3: %x\n", step5)

   fmt.Printf("6 - First 4 bytes of 5, this is the calculated checksum: %x\n", step5[:4])

   step7 := step2[len(step2)-4:]
   fmt.Printf("7 - Take the last 4 bytes of 2, this is the original checksum: %x\n", step7)
}


And the result of running that program:

1 - Wallet import format: 5HueCGU8rMjxEXxiPuD5BDku4MkFqeZyd4dZ1jvhTVqvbTLvyTJ
2 - Converting WIF as Base58 string to byte array: 800c28fca386c7a227600b2fe50b7cae11ec86d3bf1fbe471be89827e19d72aa1d507a5b8d
3 - Dropping last 4 checksum bytes from 2: 800c28fca386c7a227600b2fe50b7cae11ec86d3bf1fbe471be89827e19d72aa1d
4/5 - Double SHA-256 hash of 3: 507a5b8dfed0fc6fe8801743720cedec06aa5c6fca72b07c49964492fb98a714
6 - First 4 bytes of 5, this is the calculated checksum: 507a5b8d
7 - Take the last 4 bytes of 2, this is the original checksum: 507a5b8d

-------------------------------------
*END*
-------------------------------------
6  Bitcoin / Armory / Question about the paperbased backup on: July 09, 2016, 11:08:26 PM
Hi there,
im relatively new to the hole Bitcoin System and the Armory in specific.
Im just in the moment, where I have to choose a wallet - and I like Armory so far Smiley
My question belongs to the Paperbased backup: I have read, that a paperbackup covers ALL addresses you will create in your wallet - even after making the backup. But how is that technically possible? For my understanding, each time u receive bitcoins (to a new address of course) you will create a new set of private and public keys - and therefor they cant be covered in the "old" paperwallet.
Is it made by simply only using a single address so that each transaction will received with the same one?
Arent there any privecy problems?
Why does other wallets not offer these freature?

Im always happy for detailed answers as I try to accumulate new knowledge about every part of Bitcoins.
Thank you for your help Smiley
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!