I'd love to have a discussion about this. Just saw this presentation:
http://www.finovate.com/asia13vid/klickex.html

They're calling it Cryptocurrency 2.0, and it's supposedly asset-backed, though it seems like the asset is local currencies. What's significant about this is that it seems like it has the support (and backing) of the central banks. So it looks like this is the direction they want to go in.

What do you guys think about this? Does it have a chance to succeed? When launched, how will Bitcoin fit into that system?

I want to have an offline deterministic wallet that's a sort of savings wallet. I'll follow it as read-only on an online computer. But the thing is that I don't want to reuse addresses on the offline one. Is it possible to send BTC from my online wallet to a brand new address on the offline wallet?

Or better yet, is it possible to figure out the offline wallet's next address through the online one, and give that to someone else to send BTC to?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0L7SOPDOvvI


Basically his point is that gold has intrinsic value, while Bitcoin doesn't, and that most of the BTC is being hoarded and not actually used in commerce. This leads him to believe the price is highly inflated.