 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Hello, I have 10+ years of experience in financial markets, especially statistical analysis of markets, so I can offer my forecasting skills as a service to people who want to approximate the price of any market into the future. I have also developed some free demo tools, written mostly in Python 3.5+, which is FREE that I give out for free so that you can check my claims by yourself. Whatever I will sell to you will be much better that that! Free Tools:What you Need To Know:First you need to know some things about my methods, I use LOG based absolute error measurements, not RMS and bullshit like that, since that is heavily biased and I don't know why any statistician would use such things, as explained here. So when you see things like 0.1 LN, that means an error rate of that relative to the natural logarithm. Since logs are additive, we can also calculate an average for them. So it's much better to work with that. I call this LN Error. I also have another benchmark which I call Predictive Edge, which is based on Theil’s U value. Basically it counts how much better our model is compared to random guessing. Anything over 0 is a theoretical edge over the market, so it should theoretically be profitable, giving a positive expectancy for a trader, and if it's below 0, then that model is not profitable. Public Model:- Explanation: https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@profitgenerator/forecasting-adventures-9-final-research
- Data: Daily BTC/USD Data + Daily Transaction Fees USD
- Method: Transform the Price with the LN function, make the Regressor cumulative and then transform it by the LN function. Run the Model on the transformed data either backtest or forecast, and then transform back the fitted/forecasted values with the EXP() function.
- Model: ARIMAX(0,1,1){ LN(cumulative_transaction-fees-usd.csv)_1 } with constant
- Coefficients: You have to calculate them yourself from the historical data, since it varies by the data
- Estimated LN Error: 0.031060897872341 LN
- Estimated Predictive Edge: 0.012481538
Private Model:Coming Soon, Stay tuned! I am doing research now, later I will provide my forecasting values for sale. |
|
|
|
Ok what is enough is enough. There is a FUD gang active in the AMP/Synereo community that is constantly spreading lies, FUD, some of them are spreading outright libelous lies and is trying to totally discredit and defame the Synereo project, the rest are obvious shameless trolls which is against the forum rules anyway. The suspects are:donnatelloDefendKebabDiego24cchubooomscamalert0LiuYaoMaster1) I believe that these accounts are either operated by the same person trying to defame the project or they are somehow affiliated in their nefarious activities. I don't have sufficient evidence to prove this, however if somebody could run some kind of script to analyze the login or posting patterns of these guys you will find interesting things for example: * DefendKebab for the last 10 pages or so of his posting activity, he only posts in the AMP thread, and he always posts trollish FUD things, always posting there and nowhere else, he comes online like once a week or once in 2 weeks sometimes taking a hiatus between posting and when he comes back, you guessed it, another FUD post * Looks like ooom and scamalert0 were "deactivated", but they posted FUD together with cchub in the past, who is still active to this day in his FUD campaign * donnatello seems to be a new addition to the team I haven't seen him posting in the past but he really fired up his FUD activity in the past week that is for sure * Diego24 posts there almost every day, like he doesn't have anything better to do than FUD all day long, he seems to be in good "friendship" with donnatello2) They all broke the forum rules, they are trolling there, spreading lies, they are insulting me and others, and they are trying to spread irrational fear there even in the face of good news coming out from the project, it seems like their only objective there is to create panic. Just to give you an idea what they are doing (you find far worse posts in their post history):  |
|
|
|
Warrantless Searches are coming to the US, where the police can just bust into your house for no reason and drag you away for questioning just like in Nazi Germany. People will now live in fear just like in Nazi Occupied Europe 75 years ago, because for any small suspicion they can now be a target for a raid. WARNING NSFW ARTICLE, CONTAINS GRAPHICAL ILLUSTRATIONS!https://steemit.com/nsfw/@profitgenerator/warrantless-searches-are-coming |
|
|
|
|
I need a list of altcoins that are smart contract platforms. Altcoins who's blockchain is like a decentralized virtual machine who's purpose is to run smart contracts, and d-apps.
My list is:
Ethereum
Ethereum classic
IOTA
Stratis
EOS
Are there any other? I need to know, thanks. Please only list altcoins that already have a significant market cap, like above 100,000$. I am not interested in shitcoin copycats, only in real projects that have a possible future.
|
|
|
|
I have seen this video, where it claims that Mind Reading technology is possible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kGZemt2P9MResearchers at Carnegie Mellon University recently made a scientific breakthrough using machine algorithms to accurately guess what people are thinking. In other words, as the university referred to it, they have “harness[ed] ‘mind reading’ technology to decode complex thoughts.” “Predicting the Brain Activation Pattern Associated With the Propositional Content of a Sentence: Modeling Neural Representations of Events and States”
What is your opinion about these news? Is Mind Reading Possible? And how it will affect Bitcoin private keys? How will this affect the passwords that you hold in your brain? |
|
|
|
I am no cryptographic expert, and I am moderately good in python, but I still audited the Electrum Source code to the best of my knowledge: https://steemit.com/programming/@profitgenerator/electrum-bitcoin-wallet-code-audit
And I have found some issues:It's the custom_entropy parameter of the make_seed function. I kind of understood what this code does, it basically replaces an X amount of entropy from the PRNG number with the number you specify there, where X is the entropy difference between the num_bits and the entropy value of that integer. Now there is 1 issue here:n_custom = int(math.ceil(math.log(custom_entropy, 2))) The math.log(custom_entropy, 2) is not the entropy of the custom number. Entropy is the "size of the haystack" basically. Entropy is the Shannon Entropy, so if we pick 1 number out of 2 50, that is 50 bits of entropy, but just taking the log 2 value of a number is not it's entropy, it's more like it's bit size, it's bit length in binary, but not it's entropy. This would assume that the binary length of the custom_entropy string is the same as the entropy value of it. Which is a wild assumption, not really true in most cases. I mean what is the entropy of a string 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111, probably zero yet it's length is 6 bits. So this is a stupid assuption to make. I think this custom entropy function should be designed or removed entirely, it places false trust in the entropy of what people supply to it. Or maybe it should be added not subtracted: n = max(16, num_bits + n_custom) The second issue is the multiplication part:custom_entropy * (my_entropy + nonce) I am no cryptographic expert, but I have researched this subject, it turns out that multiplication lowers entropy. So multiplying 2 numbers gives massively less entropy than concatenating them. In fact the only way to preserve or add entropy is to concatenate strings or encode them into different ways. So in this case I think this part of the code is flawed. Either some cryptographic expert vets this code or I think it should be removed since it's kind of looks like flawed to me. |
|
|
|
|
Are there altcoin advertising networks that accept DASH or ETH or Monero?
I am looking for a cheap cheap advertising network that is the cheapest has has a good CTR ratio for banners or or other forms of ads. Especially no bots.
Also if they would accept altcoins that would be great. In BTC the fees are now higher than the ad cost, so an altcoin based ad network would be nice.
|
|
|
|
Since we can't really trust these shitty websites to analyze the strength of the passwords for us: We can't write our passwords into 3rd party suspicious websites, so I have made a python script that does this 100% locally, and safely. You can analyze the strength of your passwords this way. Run the python3 script from your terminal and analyze the strength of the password with statistical methods. My script will return the autocorrelation down to the sqrt(samplesize) lag order, the Shannon Entropy, and the Skew of the password's bits. And compare it to a pseudo-random password of the same size. Full instructions here:https://steemit.com/programming/@profitgenerator/learn-basic-python-programming-ep-5-let-s-build-a-password-strength-analyzerDownload the Full Script from here:https://pastebin.com/BE5h5ZTq
Any feedback is appreciated. |
|
|
|
Hello I would need a 2-3 BTC loan quickly, I have a good investment idea that could have a very nice ROI potential. I need the loan for maximum 2 months, after which I will repay it with 25% interest. So if you lend me 3 BTC, I pay you back 3.75 BTC
Collateral:I can't provide any collateral, since my assets are all worth way more than 3 BTC. And I don't have any free assets anymore but have plenty of investment ideas... In fact that is why I am putting all my reputation at stake here, for you that don't know I operate a blog on Steemit: https://steemit.com/@profitgeneratorMy blog is worth 33000$ and generates me on average 100$/day. If I were to turn out to be a scammer, the loss on my reputation would be far greater than 3 BTC. So as you can see I am not a scammer, and will definitely not become one. And I can repay the loan easily in 2 months, it's just that curently I don't have enough liquid capital, but the investment idea is pretty urgent, the price could go up 10x in 2 months, but minimum double. So even if the price doubles, I make 75% ROI and you make 25%, it's a win-win. |
|
|
|
The EU is the Nazi 4th Reich according to the Nazi New Order of Europe doctrine, the personal goals and wishes of Adolf Hitler. In 1944 a group of high level Nazis have started planning the fate of europe after the war. Later it became the EU as it is today, it was founded by Nazis after the war. Nazi Founding Fathers of the EU   - Guido Colonna di Paliano:
   - Karl-Günther von Hase:
- Wehrmacht soldier, participated in the Invasion of Poland and France, after the war reinvaded these countries politically by helping expand the EU
- Married to a daughter of a Nazi General
- From 1962 to 1967 von Hase was the head of the press office of the German government and responsible for its public relations and propaganda
- Helped spreading pro-EU propaganda during those years
- Member of the Christian Democratic Union of Germany, which is Angela Merkel's party now
  - Ludger Westrick:
- Head of the Chancellery of Germany
- Chairman, President, and central trustee of the Nazi owned "Vereinigte Industrie-Unternehmen AG" (VIAG), which recently became EON
- Successor of Nazi lawyer Hans Globke who helped formulate the Nuremberg Laws and served under Adolf Eichmann the perpetrator of the Holocaust. Westrick was a good friend of Globke.
ConclusionSo we have Nazi Lawyers, Brownshirt Nazis, Auschwitz Nazi Death Camp Businessmen and Italian fascists basically creating the EU. Now that is a very honorable an moral way to setup a united Europe. The EU was built with the blood of the victims of the Holocaust, and nobody gives a damn. Looks like the EU was indeed a Nazi plan to create a 4th German Reich, the Nazi New Order of Europe just as Hitler planned it in 1942, and later on before the war ended several actual high ranking Nazis have laid out the post war EU planAlso the Christian Democratic Union of Germany party was full of Nazis throughout the years, coincidentally this is the current party of Chancellor Angela Merkel, so that may explain a few things, and makes you wonder why Merkel wants to shut down free speech on Facebook and Twitter for example.
Sources:- https://pixabay.com
- http://www.eu-facts.org/en/background/darkrootseurope_lecture.html
- http://www.eu-facts.org/en/whoiswho/architects.html
- http://www.eu-facts.org/en/whoiswho/foundingfathers.html
- Bundesarchiv, B 145 Bild-F004665-0003 / Unterberg, Rolf / CC-BY-SA 3.0 CC BY-SA 3.0 de, via Wikimedia Commons
- European Community, 2006 | | p-008475-01-15 | 01/10/2006
- By Koch, Eric / Anefo (Nationaal Archief) CC BY-SA 3.0 nl, via Wikimedia Commons
- Bundesarchiv, B 145 Bild-F054633-0020 / Engelbert Reineke / CC-BY-SA 3.0 CC BY-SA 3.0 de, via Wikimedia Commons
- By BundesarchivB145Bild-F018012-0008,Bonn,EmpfangfürInformationsministervon_Irak.jpg: Erdmann derivative work: Hanselmedia CC BY-SA 3.0 de, via Wikimedia Commons
- Bundesarchiv, B 145 Bild-F015051-0008 / Patzek, Renate / CC-BY-SA 3.0 CC BY-SA 3.0 de, via Wikimedia Commons
- Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-64728-0012 / CC-BY-SA 3.0 CC BY-SA 3.0 de, via Wikimedia Commons
|
|
|
|
|
I am really confused about this unlimited vs segwit fight.
Can somebody explain to me what is a hardfork? Is it when 51% of the mining power takes over the other 49% or when 51% of the nodes take over the other 49%?
If so can somebody show me a website that helps monitor the progress of Unlimited vs Segwit, so that I can keep track of which one is winning. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
This is the Ultimate Privacy & Security Guide to protect your freedom, privacy, and security, when browsing the web, or just using the computer for casual activities. This guide contains my experience and research about online privacy and security, and it gives you, especially if you are a newbie in it, a chance to defend against evil hackers and other online threats.
Why do you need privacy?- If you don't have privacy, then you are a slave
- "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" is a direct quote from Nazi Chief of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels in order to justify Special Order 48, that introduced tyranny in Nazi Germany.
- You actually have thing to protect: money, identity, confidential information, family, house, etc... and revealing too much information to the public is exposing them to real danger. The world is full of bad people, and keeping secrets is one way of defending against them.
Download Now, It's Free |
|
|
|
It is well known fact that the European Union was planned by the Nazis in 1942: http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2015/08/the-Nazi-fascist-origins-of-the-eu-superstate-3195288.htmlI am going to take this 1 step further and say that it's very likely that the EU was actually created by the Nazis based on the New Order doctrine, that was in effect even after WW2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Order_(Nazism)
My theory is that the EU was created and still run by Nazis from the background. They can't even hide it anymore, because the tyranny and the totalitarianism that is happening in the EU is very similar to that in Nazi Germany. Furthermore the EU is totally dominated by Germany, the entire EU economy is a master slave relationship between Germany and the other EU countries, where all the corporations are from Germany, and nobody else can compete with them due to their economic regulations. Just look at the car companies, supermarket chains, banks.... all of them are from Germany, and all corporations had Nazi ties that go back to 1930. They even put refugees in Nazi concentration camps, regarless of what your opinion is about immigration, but putting them in Nazi concentration camps is just over the top insanity: http://www.infowars.com/refugees-hosted-in-ex-Nazi-concentration-camp/They are showing their true colors, they can't even hide the fact that they are Nazis
THE THEORY:My theory is that Hitler didn't die in the bunker, but actually fled to Argentina, which there is penty of evidence: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2478100/Theory-Adolf-Hitler-fled-Argentina-lived-age-73.htmlJust research it, there is a lot of evidence, supporting that Hitler lived until 1962. Which means that he coordinated the creation of the EU from Argentina, in post WW2 Germany with his Nazi minions. It is well known that the post WW2 German government was still run by Nazis: http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/from-dictatorship-to-democracy-the-role-ex-Nazis-played-in-early-west-germany-a-810207.htmlSo would it be irrational to think that Hitler coordinated and created the EU right until his death in 1962, and his Nazi minions covertly setup the whole EU as it is now afterwards. |
|
|
|
I have invented a new way of gathering entropy, in order to generate keys from it, I it all described here in detail: https://steemit.com/security/@profitgenerator/generate-secure-random-passwords-or-private-keysIn summary the method is this:- Use the internet to find public data on it that has large information content: files,music, videos, etc.. , or add your own if possible
- All files kept as secret as possible, for obvious reasons, if we want this to be our entropy source
- We gather X number files from a search engine using random keywords, we gather another P number files , where X = P
- Instead of using XOR, due to fears of short key, we just encrypt all the P files with AES256CBC with separate keys generated with the OS's default RNG, the AES256CBC encrypted files will be E
- Then we take the 512 bit hash of the E files, add a random salt to each of them, and use these as separate AES256CBC encryption keys with which we encrypt all the X files separately with AES256CBC
- Then all encrypted X file are already a unique good source of randomness, then we put all X files in a .tar file, and this is our MAINENTROPY.tar file
So when we just want to create a password, we just take the SHA1,SHA256, or SHA512 bit hash of the MAINENTROPY.tar file and that will be our private key. After use, we just add another random file inside the archive, to act as a salt or nonce, and produce a new unique hash next time we use it.
What do you think? |
|
|
|
I think we can safely rebrand BTC to Marx-Coin, because I believe BTC will be destroyed by leftists, specifically communists. As I pointed out in my article, POW coins are doomed to fail, since poor people will take over: But Bitcoin is now bringing in people from 3rld world countries, whom are very poor, and from leftist countries as well. So it's only a question of time until Communist ideas will start to be spread. (China, Venezuela, Vietnam, and other leftists or just poor people) Bitcoin might defend against a network attack, but it can't defend against Communism, because it used POW algorithm, and nodes. It would be very simple, there are 5000 nodes, probably less in the future. A bunch of 3rld world poor people just download a modified software, let's say a coordinated event of 50,000 people, and they will just hardfork money out of your wallet. Since they will be in 90% majority, and the nodes have the final authority, not the miners, it will be successful.
And it will be this easy to steal from rich people. And there is nothing on Earth that would stop this kind of attack on Bitcoin. Just like that, everyone who has a lot of coins will lose all their money. In protests, 100,000 people can be mobilized just like that. So what makes you think that you can't mobilize 50,000 poor people to steal money from the rich? If the Anti-Trump movement can mobilize tens of thousands of women to march on the streets, what makes you think that incentive to steal money out of your wallet can't mobilize millions of poor people around the world to download a modified node software and hardfork the money out of your wallet. They easily outnumber existing honest nodes. |
|
|
|
|
