The pattern is there! The fingerprints of ETCV people are all over it. The same snapshot stuff argument. The only difference is that they are using a different ratio. For ETCV, 1:3 and for this similar scam, 1:5. There are so many similarities.

There is an urgency to red them as they might be able to siphon off a lot of Waves from gullible and innocent people.

Need some confirmation though from the experts!

Thanks a lot.

Their ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5091265.0

Their Bounty thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5091272.0

A thread was created on the Meta Section showing a certain fraudulent scheme operating in some bounties.
Here is the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3252934.0

As I was also a victim of such scheme, I also shared my similar experience. And as advised by a known DT2 member, I should make a thread here detailing the same, perhaps partly to give the manager involved enough time to respond. So this is it.

I was a part of Nousplatform signature bounty campaign, managed by Mirkic7 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=245426

The same modus operandi is running in the signature campaign. This is the link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kqiiN2ZwG9XpSLhKZInVPljlrOBbV-S3VAOGdArWgcs/edit#gid=1040397988

I posted the same concern in their bounty thread, PMed the campaign manager, and even brought the concern in their official bounty telegram channel in the hope that this fraudulent activity will catch the attention of the manager. I did this more than once. Unfortunately, there was neither a response nor an action against it.
In the end, the duplicate accounts were paid.

You should create a separate thread in the reputation section (or scam accusations) about that guy.
I'll give the manager in question a few more days to respond. IMO if he refuses to even acknowledge this at all, he should be tagged(?).

I am not directly accusing the manager of direct involvement on this modus but his lack of required/necessary response and action to the issue amounted to extreme negligence. This lack of action or even response did not only condone such fraudulent action; it also somehow encouraged the perpetrators to continue their modus.