Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2021, 08:33:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
1  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL on: July 28, 2014, 09:59:43 PM

Don't worry I sent reports online to Ohio SEC and Real Estate COM, tomorrow I will be calling the NY SEC to talk to guy who handles bitcoin cases there.

Don't forget to mention your fine contribution to the world. http://www.riverboatbitcoin.com/
2  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL on: July 28, 2014, 09:21:28 PM
I do have a question for you Gleb. Did you receive funds from Eric Corlew's bASIC-MINING mining address after he stopped communicating with his shareholders in August 2013. If so what was that 100 btc for?
3  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: July 28, 2014, 08:16:42 PM
@Cannary:  Are you posting the dox or not?


I was going to invest in IBM but they wouldn't send my every document I needed, so instead I made prank phone calls and spoke badly about them in forums.
4  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: July 28, 2014, 07:43:09 PM
@riverboatBTC
I think it's quite fair to question your motives/history as you attempt to make claims of impropriety against others.

I think you are overlooking the fact that RiverBoatBTC is far from a lone voice in this thread.  Regardless of his motives, facts be facts.
Not much you can do about them Undecided

@Zigz: WAT

So are you saying you are in cooperation to spread FUD? I mean so far Riverboat, you and Gleb have a quite a collection of negative history in the community. Yet you are here why, to save potential investors from themselves? How selfless.
Give me a break.
5  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: July 27, 2014, 03:11:29 AM
That post was from nearly a year ago and it didn't happen exactly like that obviously. But as you can see, if you wanted to, we are in a similar neighborhood. I'd call that pretty good job on Benny's part to see where he's taking the company and working to get it there. ...and worth a mention is that when asked he gave an forthright answer.
6  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - buyahash.com Pre-IPO Discussion Thread w/POLL on: July 25, 2014, 03:29:21 PM

Just keep punching, Joe!


But I thought his name was Bruno? ...or Gleb or Phinnaeus. This Phinnaeus (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=667460.0) who tried to scam $2800 and has yet to explain himself.
7  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, and More on: July 24, 2014, 01:40:49 AM
another self moderated money grab?

no, thanks Smiley

Your sig is the most interesting part of your post. Your comment wouldn't have anything to do with BaH selling mining equipment and your business/the business you represent selling mining equipment?
8  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, More on: July 23, 2014, 03:40:34 PM

IPO Magic / MPOE-PR / NotLambchop - if you're going to troll, please do so with less frequency.


I thought Mpex closed, why is MP's gang still bashing everything in securities? Did they move everything over to bitbet? What game are they running now?



@Notlambchop is that you Nicolae? I hear people are looking for you?
9  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, More on: July 23, 2014, 01:50:40 PM
Like I said, if you want to dig so much read the 104 pages on litecointalk. All the current investors already knew the relationship between Branny and Ben lol. You post it likes it's some grand uncovering.
10  Economy / Securities / Re: [Havelock] HASH - Mining Equipment Sales, Contracts, More on: July 23, 2014, 06:24:41 AM
Amazing how about a year ago Benny went from the above to on the heels of garnering a million bucks via Havelock, an entity not in good standings in the Bitcoin community.


If you're interested you can read about how that year has gone here.
11  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 25, 2014, 05:20:23 AM
"ignore" is kind of pointless when so many users love to quote the trolls and I have to see their blather anyways. If anything, this thread has strengthened my critical analysis skills. I read, think, then disregard about 90% of everything in here. Just like watching the news on tv, you learn to read between the lines and spot outright manipulation and lies.  

True, and that's generally how I operate but I'd say reading and discerning the value of every post in this troll infested thread is way more pointless than making use of ignore. You could also use those mental skills to quickly skip the quoted crap too. You'll save yourself a lot of time.
12  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 25, 2014, 03:36:45 AM
...
The trolls are scared of what Active Mining will be able to achieve.

Your investors, OTOH, are scared of what Active Mining has already achieved.
Excelsior!!1

Racking them up today! Crumbs ignored again.

3 down, 8 to go!

My ignore list is at 27 from this thread alone.

VolanicEruptor
crumbs
Mabsark
pankkake
Entropy-uc
CanadianGuy
gecko_x2
MassiveInvestor
Edser
testh
dolor
DoloresHazed
AccountManagement
NickDanger
Cropcircle
DoloresMaze
webgypsy
Bambifan101
Thumper650
Troxy
mainline
fannybaws
bitditzy
Bitdust
iPass
breadcrumbs
EduardoDeCastro

EDIT: and v2rocket
13  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 23, 2014, 06:22:10 PM
Yes I am talking about market supply running out because of high BTC and the resulting high demand. That is our best (only) bet for selling our 55nm chips realistically speaking. Now if we want to add fantasy and unicorns and stuff then hell we might have some rich idiot buy all our chips for 200% Mark up.

The desirability of any chip is not based on it's clock speed but on it's value on the MH/s/$ scale (with GH/W being important)

You could bring out a 8nm ASIC but if it costs 500% more than a 28nm chip but only does 150% more hashing then no-one will buy it.

Our 55nm just needs to be cheap, if they are they will sell. No unicorns need to be employed in this venture.

Are they going to be cheap though? You have no idea. You guys make estimates on the most vague Ideas. Ken can come on here and ONLY say "Don't worry guys I have a plan" and you guys will be on here an hour later with strategic planning, estimates of ROI, share value, and an info graphic and some pie charts with the title "We're gonna be Rich!" and "To the Moon!".

...and then "you other guys" come with nothing except "you're all doomed", "Ken's a cheat" and "Unicorns and Rainbows" so w/e.
14  Economy / Securities / Re: Trading Platforms - Active Mining shareholders poll on: January 16, 2014, 06:59:51 PM
Voted CT.
15  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 07, 2014, 10:43:30 PM
I don't know if any of you read gwern's Blackmail Fail piece but imagine my surprise when VolanicEruptor's name is mentioned...allbeit by the clearly disturbed blackmailer, for some reason I don't clearly understand. With all the crazy that VE has exhibited I can't help but want to imagine he is the blackmailer in the story.

It's long but I found the story quite entertaining, or you can ctrl+f to find the mention.
http://www.gwern.net/Blackmail
16  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 28, 2013, 02:50:35 AM
...

+100
I vouch for this company.  Our firm is a substantial stakeholder in Active Mining.

Who are you? Any details in regards to you, your firm and what you do would be appreciated. Thanks.

+1 to this request. I'm very interested as well.

Our firm offers vintage, pre-owned and bespoke forum accounts for your exacting account needs.
How may I be of service?


I'm thinking I saw thepostman aka VE post in a topic about the purchasing of accounts with established reputation while looking at post history. It might have been dolor or doloreshaze aka crumbs though.
17  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 27, 2013, 02:55:55 AM
I don't know what to do, I got six emails from Virtual Mining saying six different things, and one tells me that they will ship as soon as they get my money, another tells me that they won't charge me for gift wrapping(!)  Has anyone bought anything from these guys?  Is there a support thread?  Are they legit?

C'mon crumbs... dolor err dolor esHaze
18  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 26, 2013, 08:18:50 PM
dolor - there is no way you are Eastern European with that level of written English.
Let's play a game. I'll start.

dolor = Mr LorenzoMoney
thepostman = VE
reloaded = crumbs
Mabsark = Mabsark




I'm going with
dolor =  crumbs
thepostman = VE
reloaded = VE
Mabsark = Mabsark
19  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: December 26, 2013, 06:02:14 PM
It seems we have traded Crumbs out for Masbark which is unfortunate as at least Crumbs sometimes made valid points was funny :/

FIFY.
20  Economy / Securities / Re: Missouri on: December 13, 2013, 01:23:47 AM
Who in Missouri would have bought a Lamboprghini with bitcoin?

Whom do "WE" know in Missouri who has access to loads of bitcoin and likes cars?
Who?

http://touch.latimes.com/#story/la-me-ln-lamborghini-bitcoin-20131212/


It was goat.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=68655.msg3914747#msg3914747
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1sn0gi/someone_on_4chan_actually_bought_a_lamborghini/

...but I think you may have panicked... again.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!