I made the payment to empty my wallet, this is why it is at 0 At the moment. It was not the case before of course.
|
|
|
Could it be that the delete transaction can only be done if you still have BTC in you wallet? I get 0 for now.
|
|
|
I still see You are currently on the waitlist. You will get notified once you are granted access. Do you know how much time it takes to get access to the accelerator? I have set a way to low fee and turned off RBF ... What a mess, there is no confirmation after 1 month ...
If 1 month already passed, most node already drop your transaction from it's node. Depending on which wallet software you use, you can "delete" that unconfirmed transaction and create new ones with better fee rate. I use bitcoin core QT. I do not see delete transaction when right clicking on it. (abandon transaction and increase fee (RBF was off) are grayed out) Transaction is here: https://mempool.space/tx/42888c7b1540f8d5b9e074d15c2d86d7b03878adf6f173c7316f09910c2dabd9If I delete, will my sat be back in the wallet?
|
|
|
I still see You are currently on the waitlist. You will get notified once you are granted access. Do you know how much time it takes to get access to the accelerator? I have set a way to low fee and turned off RBF ... What a mess, there is no confirmation after 1 month ...
|
|
|
weird, the miner for the kawpow says:
kawpowminer - GPU ProgPOW(0.9.3) miner for Zing
Well, ...
C:\mining\miners\kapow>kawpowminer.exe --help
kawpowminer 1.1.3+commit.d8f61789 Build: windows/release/msvc
kawpowminer - GPU ProgPOW(0.9.3) miner for Zing minimal usage : kawpowminer [DEVICES_TYPE] [OPTIONS] -P... [-P...]
Devices type options :
By default kawpowminer will try to use all devices types it can detect. Optionally you can limit this behavior setting either of the following options -G,--opencl Mine/Benchmark using OpenCL only -U,--cuda Mine/Benchmark using CUDA only
Connection options :
-P,--pool Stratum pool or http (getWork) connection as URL scheme://[user[.workername][:password]@]hostname:port[/...] For an explication and some samples about how to fill in this value please use kawpowminer --help-ext con
Common Options :
-h,--help Displays this help text and exits -H,--help-ext TEXT {'con','test',cl,cu,api,'misc','env'} Display help text about one of these contexts: 'con' Connections and their definitions 'test' Benchmark/Simulation options 'cl' Extended OpenCL options 'cu' Extended CUDA options 'api' API and Http monitoring interface 'misc' Other miscellaneous options 'env' Using environment variables -V,--version Show program version and exits
|
|
|
no, i told you i instantly received the sin. BTW, is there a cpu miner for the x25x?
|
|
|
Cool, I could easily send my SUQA from my full node wallet to the new Sinovate full node wallet ^^ Instant transfert.
|
|
|
I can confirm that this version is even better than CryptoDredge. The only thing that one instance of the program is working with only one GPU. It is not so convenient to use it on multi GPU configurations. It perfectly runs fine with one instance for 3 Pascal GPU under Win10.
|
|
|
Works great with Pascal version.
|
|
|
Sad, only 1 vites coin per block found .. (solo mining)
|
|
|
Where can we get info on what MTP is,aisde the fact that it will take more GB on the HDD?
Is it 10 Gb of system ram or GPU ram? Will that works with 3 GBytes (gtx 1060)?
https://github.com/zcoinofficial/ccminer says: "mtp requires 4Gb of vram, hence cards with less than 4.5Gb of vram won't work. while running, ccminer will also use around 5.5Gb of ram." I've tested the miner on a GTX 960 4GB, and it didn't work, as expected. GTX 1060 6GB and GTX 1070 8GB were fine, though slower than expected, both around 100 kh/s. ok, not for me then, too bad.
|
|
|
Where can we get info on what MTP is,aisde the fact that it will take more GB on the HDD? Edit, found on the FAQ:
The MTP (Merkle Tree Proof) algorithm was devised by Alex Biryukov and Dmitry Khovratovich from the University of Luxembourg in their paper published on the 11 June 2016 titled Egalitarian Computing. These are the same researchers who came up with Equihash that is currently used in ZCash and the Argon2 key derivation function.
MTP promotes fair and democratic mining by making ASIC development expensive. The key element of this approach is large (in size) and intensive (in bandwidth) use of RAM. RAM is expensive in both FPGA and ASIC and slow on GPU. Previous attempts in large and memory intensive proof of works were problematic. This is because to verify these memory intensive proof of works, the nodes had to also have that memory and spend a relatively long time calculating it. This made the network susceptible to transaction DoS attacks where nodes are constantly occupied in verifying transactions.
MTP’s advancement means that hard memory intensive proof of works can be verified quickly with low resources. MTP was designed to be able to require miners to utilize large amounts of RAM up to potentially 10 gb while remaining fast to verify! This can potentially revolutionize PoW mining by bringing it closer to the original vision of Satoshi where one CPU = one vote and democratizing mining instead of keeping it within a handful of powerful miners while maintaining a resilient and low resource network of nodes.
Is it 10 Gb of system ram or GPU ram? Will that works with 3 GBytes (gtx 1060)?
|
|
|
ccminer (tpruvor and alexis built) gives compute error using X11 ghost in solo mining using ccminer-x64.exe -a sib
It is actually ok, one GPU creates memory error.
|
|
|
When will the algo change?
|
|
|
.......DarkKomet ........ Beats me. How could we guard cryptocoins against so many Cyber Thiefs and Robbers, in order for general/non-techi to adopt blockchain technologies. Exactly. Police should be much more pro active chassing those thiefs.
|
|
|
and how about fpga that can follow whatever algo there is, and most people wont even be able to run FPGA
btc was first mined by cpu, then gpu killed cpu, then asic came, what most people dont know is that before asic came there was a short time of about 6months that a few people were mining with PFGA and beating the crap out of gpu miners, the people who used fpga to mine didnt let the public know about this because they had a huge advantage over gpu miners
fpga mining was only publicly announced that time when the fpga miners were selling theyr rigs because they lose to asics, so we fork and gpu mining is still dead because there are people here who has fpga and thus is promoting to go anti asic so that theyr fpga can continue to dominate over gpu miners
it already is a fact that gpu mining is dead, we only have to choose either fpga or asic
fpga, most people cant use due to high requirement of programming needed(vhdl and verilog, plus know some basic electronics, not to mention before you learn those vhdl and verilog you ahve to know other programs also), to buy you can buy direct from manufacturer, cost of 1 unit is high, good thing about it is you can transfer to whatever algo there is faster than devs can fork to a new 1(only if your a good fpga engr)
asics, plug n play, bad about asic is you stay with 1 algo(dont know how ai asics can be used in the future), can buy direct from manufacturers
so its just a matter of... we all learn how to program our own bitstreams for fpga or we use plug n play asics, btw there have been fpga mining on equihash even before asics came and they have been mining with fpga on equihash for a long time already most people just dont know
just to give some people an idea of how fpga performance is, take out asics in the picture, an fpga that was made 6years ago to mine btc compared to the best gpu we have now and mine btc, that fpga still wins by a mile and only runs on 40watts
Even If I use FPGA and code vhdl for 15 years, that doesnt mean I can develop the algo on hardware ^^
|
|
|
When will the algo change , against the ASICS?
|
|
|
zencash-swing-wallet-ui.zip/ ZENCashDesktopGUIWallet_0.83.0-win.zip is not starting fine on win 10 (previous version was ok).
|
|
|
|