Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2018, 04:18:59 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
  Home Help Search Donate Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Problems with BurstCoin mining on: February 20, 2018, 02:53:07 PM
Hi guys, I'm new to Burst mining.

I just finished plotting my drive and tried to started mining with Blago miner, but it hangs in the following screen and keep showing error message shown below in the log file.

22:11:11 *! GMI: get mining info failed:: 10060
22:11:13 *! GMI: get mining info failed:: 10060
22:11:15 *! GMI: get mining info failed:: 10060

I've uploaded the pictures of hang screen, log file, miner config file in link below:





I've tried different pools, but still the same results, the application is in white list of firewall.

Also the Reward Recipient has been set correctly and waited for almost 20 blocks.

May someone please let me know what's wrong with my settings? Thank you for the big help.
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux) on: February 14, 2018, 04:53:52 AM
And btw crackfoo/zpool is well known scamer/scam pool(steal 10% to 30%).

Source?
I think Unimining might have chance stealing hashpower too, the Actual XVG got from Unimining is almost 50% less than Antminepool.

The 24hr actual profit shown on website of these both pools have huge different.
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [UniMining.net] UniMining yiimp Mining Pool 0.5% mining fees on: February 14, 2018, 04:46:30 AM
The 24hr Actual shown on table of XVG Blake2s is keep going down from 0.032 to 0.029 now, but in Antminepool is going up from 0.038-0.041, it's almost double. May the owner of pool please take a look into this issue? The profit difference is too much. Thank you.
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux) on: February 14, 2018, 04:39:16 AM
The 24hr Actual shown on table of XVG Blake2s is keep going down from 0.032 to 0.029 now, but in Antminepool is going up from 0.038-0.041, it's almost double. May the owner of pool please take a look into this issue? The profit difference is too much. Thank you.
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux) on: February 13, 2018, 03:46:44 AM
Anyone have problem with unimining? due whattomine, i must earned 3 XVG per hour, 77 XVG per day but actually, i only earned 1 XVG per hour and after 18 hour i only earn 25 XVG? what is wrong in here? whattomine calculate wrong or pool is wrong?
My rig is sapphire rx 470, and my hashrate for XVG is 8600 MHs.

Anyone suggest me other pool to try?
I have same problem too. According to Whattomine I should get 400 XVG one day, but Unimining only give me 200 which is only 50% of my hash power.

Antminepool gives correct numbers, but it's often full

Anyone suggest other pools?

6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v10.4 (Windows/Linux) on: January 17, 2018, 03:07:42 PM
Hi~Guys,

I'm using Claymore DualMiner 10.3 Now, and one of my rig keep showing message as below:

PASC: 01/17/18-22:48:21 - New job from pasc-us-west1.nanopool.org:15555
PASC: 01/17/18-22:48:21 - New job from pasc-us-west1.nanopool.org:15555
PASC: 01/17/18-22:48:21 - New job from pasc-us-west1.nanopool.org:15555
PASC: 01/17/18-22:48:21 - New job from pasc-us-west1.nanopool.org:15555
PASC: 01/17/18-22:48:22 - New job from pasc-us-west1.nanopool.org:15555
PASC: 01/17/18-22:48:22 - New job from pasc-us-west1.nanopool.org:15555
PASC: 01/17/18-22:48:22 - New job from pasc-us-west1.nanopool.org:15555
PASC: 01/17/18-22:48:22 - New job from pasc-us-west1.nanopool.org:15555

And the Hashrate of ETH on Nanopool is 0 because it just keep trying to get job on PASC.

The log is in file below, it seems the log file is strange on getting PASCAL jobs:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/imgajx2ppgxsuba/PASCAL_Error_log.txt?dl=0

Does anyone ever encounter this problem?

Thank you guys.
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Lower hashrate of PascalCoin on Nanopool on: January 09, 2018, 07:30:58 PM
Just registered here to say I'm experiencing the same issue as well.
I've been mining for 2 day continuously, claymore's miner reports almost constant hashrate of ~700 MH/s yet on nanopool it shows ~600 on 6-hour and even 24-hour averages.

So, I stopped mining completely for 1 hour then restarted for 1 hour then stopped again and counted the number of (accepted) shares.
On nanopool the sum was around 18% lower than what shows up on the miner.

WTF is going on ?  Angry

(BTW, I'm also getting around 1% rejected shares, but that's clearly not the issue here)
Umm...looks like you're experiencing the same issue.

The reject rate is high but won't cause so much difference.

Accounting to your measurement on share difference, I guess there are two possible situation.

1. Nanopool take some shares as 2% commission fee.
2. The worst case is if the difference is much more than 2%, then it might be some "disappearing" share(hashpower lose) between Miner & Nanopool's communication.

Anybody else has the same issue? Or got any idea about it?
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Lower hashrate of PascalCoin on Nanopool on: January 09, 2018, 03:24:30 PM
Hi Guys,

I've been mining PascalCoin on Nanopool for about a week.

I've tried all their servers and seems only EU1 and US West have best delay around 300ms which is still quite high.

My share rejection rate is around 1.6%, is this value higher than normal? I'm afraid the high delay time causes it.

The hashrates of my 3 rigs shown on Claymore are 1300Mh/s, 3700Mh/s, 2500Mh/s, the total should be around 7500Mh/s.

But on Nanopool average hashrate is always around 6200Mh/s. Even I take 2% fee and 1.6% rejection into account it's still lower than expected.

Is there anything I can do to fix the low hashrate issue? Or is there any other recommended PascalCoin Pool?

Thank you for all the kindly help guys. : )
9  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Does anyone has the same experience of Claymore's miner hang up? on: December 09, 2017, 06:54:25 PM
Hi Guys, I'm new to the mining world.

I just bought 4 MSI RX-480 Armour 8G OC cards and try to set up my first rig.

I tried to use Claymore's miner 10.0 and 10.2 but it all hangs at the line: "POLO/SOLO" version as shown in below link.

https://imgur.com/a/IGTqa

I also tried to use the start.bat which generated by nanopool automatically but still the same result.

I tried to use "-id" parameter to use only 1 GPU to mine, but still get the same result.

Has anyone faced this situation before? May you please tell me how to fix it?

All the cards are original settings, I haven't mod the bios or verclock yet.

I disabled the ULPS of AMD cards by afterburner, but I see one GPU still has various clock speed around 300~900MHZ, other three cards are all fixed at 1291 MHZ which it should be.

Why does that card has various clock speed even I disable ULPS? Does anyone has any idea?

Thank you for all the kindly help & answers, good day.
Pages: [1]
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!