Bitcoin Forum
August 20, 2022, 02:03:05 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 23.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »
1  Economy / Speculation / Re: Stolen BTC(e)'s using mixer to laundry on: July 26, 2017, 03:36:50 PM
Both guys have "1967" on their T-shirts (the fat guy in blue arresting the thin guy in black). Coincidence?

https://thebitcoinnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Alexander-Vinnik-admin-of-BTC-e-arrested-in-Greece-for-4-billion-in-Bitcoin-money-laundering.-696x449.jpg

https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailythess.gr%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F07%2Falexander_vinnik-2.jpg&t=579&c=Hpd6PH1YNis8tQ

2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: POLL Is Craig Wright Satoshi Nakamoto? on: May 05, 2016, 12:38:43 PM
I don't believe this haha, also take a look at those names and too far by craig on satoshi. Craig is not Japanese but satoshi nakamoto is a true japanese.  This is just a total hoax. Craig wants attention only because he knows he can caught attention if he will do it.

Are you trolling or just stupid?
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: POLL Is Craig Wright Satoshi Nakamoto? on: May 02, 2016, 11:59:41 AM

Further cements my believe that the real Nakamoto is the late Kleiman.
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: POLL Is Craig Wright Satoshi Nakamoto? on: February 04, 2016, 10:47:32 AM
OK so whatever the fuck happened to this story? No follow-up? No repercussions? How is it everyone's been quite about it for months?
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: POLL Is Craig Wright Satoshi Nakamoto? on: December 11, 2015, 04:41:54 PM
Wright is not Satoshi. It's becoming clear that he scammed the Australian tax office with a fraudulent R&D expenditure claim to gain tax credits, in a scam involving bitcoin mining claims.

Here is some other evidence debunking Wright, from what I recall about Satoshi:

1. Satoshi's posting and email patterns show he slept from Midnight-6 AM eastern standard time (USA). Not that he had to be in that time zone, but that's when he apparently slept. Very odd for an Australian on the opposite side of the world.

2. Satoshi valued anonymity VERY highly and was disciplined about it. This Wright guy teased Wired and gave them enough "evidence" to cause this story. That is TOTALLY out of character from what we know of Satoshi.

3. Wright has a flamboyant writing style with lots of "mouthing off". To the extent I've seen Satoshi's writings, he doesn't "mouth off", was concise and to-the-point in his writing and kept logic and reason ahead of emotion, unlike Wright.

4. Likewise, Wright's writing samples include many typos - clearly unlike Satoshi who was pretty impeccable about what he wrote.

It would be interesting to compare the writing style of Satoshi with that of Daid Kleiman - a Florida man (EST time zone). I'm baffled as to how many people are completely dismissing the Wired/Gizmodo story (meaning also dismissing the connection between Wright and Klieman) all the while there is evidence that even Kleiman's senile father (92 years old) knew in 2014 his son was somehow involved in the creation of Bitcoin.

The right question to ask is this: How exactly did Wright and Kleiman know each other, if at all?
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Interesting Facts About David Kleiman's Life on: December 11, 2015, 01:00:19 AM
You forgot the bit about how he clutched his silver metal encased USB the last few years of his life and now his brother has the key to 400M if he was one of the co-authors of the paper.

haha

It appears DK's talent in computers was mostly in the area of HDD fragmentation analysis and how hard it really is to 'erase' anything digitally.

What did Norton Erase used to do, like write 00000 over and over on a file thousands of times to make sure it couldn't be read again.

Nothing in DK's career or limited academic 'career' if his academics can even be called a 'career' show any connection to encryption and other ideas expressed in the original white paper.

DK didn't write it, the fake Satoshi aka Craig Wright didn't write it, neither had even one paper out on encryption and high level math theory.

DK analyzed HDD to try to put back together smashed drives and Wright was nothing but a guy installing canned network software that was good at updating patches.

There's nothing 'interesting' about either DK or CW as to their life.

Neither came up with anything original in their life.

Neither started a major company.

Neither authored a paper or a book worth reading.

The only interesting thing is how gullible the media is to believe Wright could have been Satoshi.

HAHA

And yet, in 2014, Kleiman's father makes this comment under a Techcrunch bitcoin article:

Quote
Please send information pertaining to David Kleiman's participation in the development of Bitcoin

http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/10/bitcoin-wins-best-technology-achievement-but-satoshi-doesnt-show/

Nothing interesting you say?
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Kleiman's old man "lets on" as early as 2014 on: December 10, 2015, 08:27:16 AM
This bit alone gives at least some credibility to the rest of the story. This is very probably not planted evidence.
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Kleiman's old man "lets on" as early as 2014 on: December 10, 2015, 01:10:25 AM
What if they were planning it for several years?

By "planning" you mean using the Facebook account of a senile geezer to make an obscure post referencing Kleiman's involvement with Bitcoin, 2 years before leaking the info on Wright?? That's some elaborate scheming right there! Cheesy
9  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Kleiman's old man "lets on" as early as 2014 on: December 10, 2015, 12:59:24 AM
Read the first comment below this Techcrunch article:

http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/10/bitcoin-wins-best-technology-achievement-but-satoshi-doesnt-show/

Quote
Louis Kleiman Boss at SELF EMPLOYED PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER

Please send information pertaining to David Kleiman's participation in the development of Bitcoin

Like Reply 2 Feb 12, 2014 12:24pm
10  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Has Wired discovered the real Satoshi Nakamoto? (.. this time) on: December 10, 2015, 12:24:36 AM
http://marc.info/?l=security-basics&m=114408728823821&w=1

Quote
Craig
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Wright
Sent: Sat 1/04/2006 7:45 AM
To: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers; security-basics@securityfocus.com
Cc:
Subject: How DNS works

Hello,

To alleviate some ignorance regarding the DNS process and public servers.

1          DNS

DNS Servers are public if they are a part of the public domain hierarchy. \
This is NOT that they are on the Internet. This is NOT if anyone can \
connect to port 53 and use them.

DNS Servers are public if and ONLY if they have become an authorised part \
of the DNS infrastructure.

This is a contractual agreement. To connect a DNS Server to the hierarchy \
it needs to serve a domain. To do this the higher level domain server and \
your domain system have an agreement a contract (and please contracts are \
not required to be written) which exists with implied rights and restraints \
as dictated by the Internet community and the standards associated with use \
and the various domain bodies.

How this works;

Say I want to register              satoshi.com

I have to go to a register and apply to register the domain (in this case \
with a .com authority). There are terms in the contract which is formed.

Thus the name servers which are listed in the application and thus in the \
DNS hierarchy are public.

If I stick a server -ex               satoshi.private

On the internet for the use of the Internal network, than this is PRIVATE. \
If it is secure of not has NO relevance to the status of being public or \
private this is a separate issue.

What are you quoting dude? The linked email doesn't have the domain example "satoshi", but "ignorant".
11  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Has Wired discovered the real Satoshi Nakamoto? (.. this time) on: December 10, 2015, 12:10:59 AM
Someone on Reddit found this very intriguing comment under a 2014 Techcrunch Bitcoin article from David Kleiman's father (the guy in the facebook photo seems senile enough to let on something he shouldn't have?):

http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/10/bitcoin-wins-best-technology-achievement-but-satoshi-doesnt-show/

Quote
Louis Kleiman

Please send information pertaining to David Kleiman's participation in the development of Bitcoin

WTF???
12  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Will the chikun arise? on: June 10, 2014, 07:43:59 AM
Guys, will LTC ever recover or should I sell my 24 LTC now? I've been waiting for 6 months and it's only going downhill so that's why I ask. I am purposedly not asking on LTCforums because I want to avoid bias. Thanks!
13  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com on: June 05, 2014, 10:06:20 PM
90% LTC profitability? Can anyone explain why one should stay with this pool and not straight mine LTC currently? No flaming, thanks!

Because LTC pools also have days with as low as 50-70% LTC profitability. You don't ever get straight 100.00000000%, ever. There's always some bad or good luck.

Most single-coin pools simply don't show such stats. But some of them do. Just an example from straight BTC pool stats: https://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=pplns - at the very bottom of the page they show their results over several time spans which are (at the moment when I write this):

Quote
24H: 74.669%
3D: 93.416%
1W: 96.422%
2W: 95.940%
1M: 95.391%
3M: 89.551%
All Time: 98.219%

This shows that 75% day is perfectly normal even for a large pool which has 10-15% of total network hashrate.

In the long term mining straight LTC will give 98-99% LTC profitability (it won't be 100% because of orphans, etc). There will be days with 70% and days with 130%, but in the long term it will be just slightly below 100%, like 98-99%.

When you're mining at CleverMining, part of your hashrate goes to mining LTC and part of your hashrate goes to mining other coins (because not always there are other coins more profitable than LTC). That LTC part will generate ~98% in the long term just as if you were mining on a straight LTC pool. That other-coins part will generate >98% in the long term. The combined and final result is our 106% LTC profitability over the last 30 days compared to ~98% which you can expect at a straight LTC pool, so it's 8% better. And this is your reason to stay at CleverMining.

Thanks a lot for the explanation!
14  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com on: June 05, 2014, 09:03:32 PM
90% LTC profitability? Can anyone explain why one should stay with this pool and not straight mine LTC currently? No flaming, thanks!
15  Economy / Exchanges / Re: MtGox reclaim procedure? on: May 19, 2014, 10:27:45 AM
OK but seriously, where exactly are these reclaim instructions??

They aren't anywhere, this thread is just FUD. The only official statement thus far is "they will be published later".





It is linked from mtgox.com

It's under Press releases and announcements:
2014-04-24(002): 破産手続開始決定書 / Bankruptcy proceedings written decision



Those are NOT reclaim instructions.
16  Economy / Exchanges / Re: MtGox reclaim procedure? on: May 18, 2014, 01:36:34 PM
OK but seriously, where exactly are these reclaim instructions??
17  Economy / Exchanges / Re: MtGox reclaim procedure? on: May 18, 2014, 08:05:22 AM
Let me get this straight.... The reclaim instructions are buried somewhere in one of the PDFs posted on mtgox.com and people have to learn about it from a forum? How about the fucking administrator get all the email addresses used to log into Gox and send a fucking notice to the users??
18  Economy / Exchanges / Re: MtGox reclaim procedure? on: May 16, 2014, 08:20:47 PM
While I agree with everything that you said and share your frustration (lost 1.000 myself), I only see

"The method for filing claims will be published on this site as soon as we are in a situation to announce it. "

on mtgox.com

Where does it say how and until when claims can be filed?

But yeah this whole Gox post-collapse business is a colossal mess and I don't understand how Kepreles is not constantly watched and bombarded by the tech press and bitcoin enthusiasts alike...
19  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: suing mt.gox poland on: April 24, 2014, 07:11:23 PM
I am really looking for someone to help me make claim against the bank in poland,
but we need to get togather. I did not get reply from st4nl3y,
lets get our money somehow

I really wish people stopped believing that the WBK Poland bank is in ANY way complicit in what happened to Gox and their money.

Why not?? they knew what was going in gox because one of there accounts was there.
if you give me money that i know would get lost i keep it and say oops i lost it.

Please tell me you're not for real...
20  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: suing mt.gox poland on: April 24, 2014, 05:38:44 PM
I am really looking for someone to help me make claim against the bank in poland,
but we need to get togather. I did not get reply from st4nl3y,
lets get our money somehow

I really wish people stopped believing that the WBK Poland bank is in ANY way complicit in what happened to Gox and their money.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!