|
1004
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: TMAN False Feedback
|
on: November 26, 2019, 02:52:06 PM
|
Anyway, I am saying that the behaviour of TMAN is ridicule and quotes like this, should not be accepted from a DT user.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the way that he writes, you need to stop being a baby and toughen up (as does everyone else who gets offended by words). Now it all becomes clear, LAUDA is here too lolz. Insulting on the level that TMAN does should not be accepted. I might even bring this to my local authority to see what they can do about this deep insults. Looks like it is time to flag you. This was completely unnecessary. Quoted for reference. |
|
|
|
|
1005
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: TMAN False Feedback
|
on: November 26, 2019, 02:45:42 PM
|
Anyway, I am saying that the behaviour of TMAN is ridicule and quotes like this, should not be accepted from a DT user.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the way that he writes, you need to stop being a baby and toughen up (as does everyone else who gets offended by words). |
|
|
|
|
1006
|
Other / Meta / Re: BAN REQUEST for TMAN cause RACISM and excessive vulgar speaking
|
on: November 26, 2019, 02:37:15 PM
|
TMAN is just a an unattended child troll, each of his posts is just to insult
unfortunately the bad administration of btctalk, leads to this type of people, has killed the trust that this site had years ago
I wonder whose alt you are. Can you make it any more obvious?  |
|
|
|
|
1011
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: November 25, 2019, 02:53:28 PM
|
Time will tell of course, but it's funny how you refute the relevance of technical analysis when just two weeks ago many traders predicted a down trend with the support at 6.4k, and guess what the support is 6.4k is real. It clearly shows today. It's not imaginary stuff. It's pure fact.
I am not talking about these bearish predictions based on nothing, but these short term bearish predictions based on facts.
A blind chicken, after a million tries, will do what? What's what these "traders" are.  |
|
|
|
|
1012
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: November 25, 2019, 01:43:23 PM
|
Every time we dip a bit stronger than usual, most of WO is scared shitless with their "reasonable" worst-case bullshit estimates. So disappointing, especially given the size and history of the thread. I see no panic around. Do you? Right, and stuff like "no movement till 2024 halving" is a rational opinion or assessment after such a dip? It's fear and panic disguised as staying calm. Maybe I made the mistake of assuming that the average person here is smarter than a monkey? "No new ATH" is not equal to "no movement", unless you consider 2x or even 3x ups and downs as "no movement". The problem is not the current dip, but the trend. The end of the cyptowinter is not confirmed and, unfortunately, past performance is no guarantee of future results. All of what you said confirms what I mentioned prior. There is no "winter", just inexperienced bears trying to use old-world TA on the new world and hope they see a few lines. Pathetic really, but I guess if you got nothing better to do it is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
1013
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: November 25, 2019, 12:59:33 PM
|
Every time we dip a bit stronger than usual, most of WO is scared shitless with their "reasonable" worst-case bullshit estimates. So disappointing, especially given the size and history of the thread. I see no panic around. Do you? Right, and stuff like "no movement till 2024 halving" is a rational opinion or assessment after such a dip? It's fear and panic disguised as staying calm. Maybe I made the mistake of assuming that the average person here is smarter than a monkey? |
|
|
|
|
1015
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: TMAN & Lauda
|
on: November 23, 2019, 08:10:42 PM
|
It doesn't have the "too good to be true" scammy odor. This is a case of "too true to be good". I guess my flag is unwarranted indeed.  Reference link more or less. |
|
|
|
|
1016
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: connect=192.168.1.100 command in bitcoin-qt.conf is being ignored
|
on: November 21, 2019, 11:04:30 AM
|
I'm running Ubuntu with latest Bitcoin Core.
For some reason I don't have this problem with Windows v0.18.0, which connects to the 192.168.1.100 node no problem.
Which is it now? Latest is v0.18.1. You should test both versions on both systems. If v0.18.0 works on Ubuntu as well, then a regression must have occurred. Once you do, update the thread and I'll file it. Maybe also wipe your debug.log one more time before you do the tests and upload them here (or pastebin).
Did you create the file called bitcoin-qt.conf? (see post under me) |
|
|
|
|
1017
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: November 21, 2019, 10:19:39 AM
|
The first time I read about this FUD was a few days ago. It got me worried.
Fair but unsubstantiated. A quick fact-check (since you don't seem to fully understand how things work, which is fine since the supermajority doesn't) with a single search should have lifted it. I trust WO.
Very dangerous and bad. Almost everyone here is self-interested; rarely anyone altruistic. Why do you have to respond so aggressively?
Ad nauseam -> aggressive responses. Is fine as long as I'm right; would be very bad were it both wrong and aggressive. Am I so powerful and important as to be able to harm Core contributors with my questions? If nothing else, this whole discussion benefits those who may have been affected by that FUD. It clears things up and motivates us to dig deeper and understand the protocol, how it works, what's possible and what's not.
There is no discussion to begin with as I've told you. Should we discuss things that can't affect Bitcoin ever in regards to Bitcoin as a serious discussion? Re: harming Core contributors you missed the point. That's the whole goal by Shellby et. al. and they keep winning at it, which just shows why you absolutely should not trust WO as many WO-members initially got worried about it.
Hope all of that has helped.  |
|
|
|
|
1018
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: November 21, 2019, 09:16:27 AM
|
What's wrong with raising my concerns and asking for the opinions of fellow WO contributors?
What's wrong, you're asking? How long has SegWit been active? If the junkie-mumbling from a degenerate like Shellby can raise flags in you, then you need to reconsider your whole life. The garbage that you're worried about has been repeated ad-nausem and there is only one correct answer: The attack DOES NOT EXIST. Anyone who questions it again is intentionally (or not) harming the Core contributors among many other people in the sidelines that actually understand this shit unlike the wanking twat Shellby et. al. Essentially what people are doing with this is similar to asking Sipa (Peter) to debate vaccines causing autism rather than work on the protocol. The mentioned "attack" is probably less relevant to Bitcoin than the "vaccines-cause-autism" debate.
Need anything else? Your comments about "constructed lies" and "attempting to waste valuable time from contributors", are totally a figment of your imagination. I would never post or do such things. My two posts were purely driven by my concerns. I hope you are able to understand and accept it.
Great. Now read the part again where I tell you to reconsider your whole life. You'll thank me one day. |
|
|
|
|
1019
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: November 21, 2019, 08:37:42 AM
|
Many thanks to everyone who replied to my above post. I also don't believe such an attack will happen, and if it does, it will fail miserably, just like all the others before it. Bitcoin is growing fast and getting bigger and stronger day by day, and FUD is expected to intensify, especially around the time before/after the 2020 Halving. Business as usual.
For fuck sake already. Are you THAT boneheaded? Doing what is described is not any different than launching a hard fork attack of any kind, i.e. there IS NO ATTACK. Just stop. So, those with coins in SegWit addresses will eventually end up with only those SegWit coins (in the SegWit chain), whose value will drop to near-zero due to the majority of the miners mining for the Legacy chain and enjoying the riches of their rewards.
You are really pushing it with these constructed lies. The scenario that you described is impossible as the governance structure doesn't work like that, not that you'd ever understand it. but I think it's worth discussing the different possibilities and the plausibility of different scenarios. More info = more security. Better safe than sorry.
No, it is not. You're just an idiot attempting to waste valuable time from contributors. Anyone who has ever discussed this "attack" has harmed the main contributors in many ways. Your comments encouraged!
STOP spreading FUD and LIES. You are damaging newbies and should be flagged. There's your comment, cunt.
Your comments encouraged!
Nothing much to comment. Big blockers FUD. Halvening is getting closer and closer and bitcoin shorts will be rekt big time! Ace. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
