Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 02:25:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
1  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled on: July 14, 2017, 04:25:52 PM
anyone?
2  Economy / Economics / Re: Your plans for 1st august? on: July 14, 2017, 03:46:35 PM
I'm going to sell a little bit and buy just to see how the market reacts. Mostly sell
3  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Money Transmitter License for a Crypto Exchange Required by Every US State? on: June 28, 2017, 08:50:53 PM
So does anyone know if just an individual who day trades from multiple exchanges.. does he need one of these?
4  Economy / Exchanges / coinbase vs gemini on: June 28, 2017, 06:19:07 PM
I've had awful exp with coinbase but have never heard of gemini. Can anyone please explain
5  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: localbitcoins.com banned my account when a fraud account use my ID to scam on: June 28, 2017, 06:14:47 PM
mine too! And i have proof including police reports, bank report of me reporting ID theft as well as witnesses such as my employer and other employees who saw me go through this AS WELL as a check made out from my boss to me for "advance: ID theft issues". They are still refusing to unban my account.. If one of the most reputable sites of BTC exchange can't be trusted who can?
6  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: COINBASE SCAM ALERT!!!!............ on: June 28, 2017, 06:12:06 PM
lot of greys still with bitcoin...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2015/12/16/bitcoin-at-tax-time-what-you-need-to-know-about-trading-tipping-mining-and-more/#4e521ced6bde

Forbes themselves said coinbase has filed all necessary paperwork but they are awful
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: sent bitcoins to wallet, charged me transaction fee but sent back bitcoins on: June 27, 2017, 08:11:53 PM
https://blockchain.info/tx/f5a4a02add4af3f4fe8ed1b7275347b1fd3658c56237be6b43652cb90c71adfe
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / sent bitcoins to wallet, charged me transaction fee but sent back bitcoins on: June 27, 2017, 09:14:02 AM
sent bitcoins to wallet, charged me transaction fee but sent back bitcoins
9  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: weird happenings with software wallets on: June 27, 2017, 07:52:10 AM
Did you check transaction fees? Your transaction fee can be set high, which can be the cause of your loss. Go to the Tools/Preferences and check your transaction fee per kigabyte. I hope it is not the case.

nothing.. and this was sent via a usb drive on a different laptop.

another culprit maybe is that when everything failed me in terms of restoring my corrupted wallet on armory a friend referred me to another friend who does legit IT work for different business near me.. he did use a thumb drive full of recovery tools to recover my corrupted armory wallet but he had no access to my electrum wallet which the rootkey/private keys on only on the tails usb drive.. he said he would run the recovery tools on RAM while I go to work to see if he can spot the wallet and either still this was 20 minute (even more AFTER I sent the transaction to the dnm wallet). furthermore it was exactly x10 in scale it was around a .05 transaction while i had .69 in my wallet
10  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: weird happenings with software wallets on: June 27, 2017, 07:16:34 AM
well i don't want to say anything that would be too implicit but it was into a trusted darkmarket wallet, but it was only for about 0.06, instead my entire electrum wallet gets deposited which held about .6... this is also using tails using a tor proxxy connection.

Also this happened after i coincidentally deposited a good about of btc from my paxful account into several software/offline wallets

Still confused about the problem, but i'm guessing here:

You were depositing funds from your electrum wallet to a darknet wallet, and you're confused because you only deposited 0.06 instead of 0.6.

My first guess would be that the base unit in electrum was set to something else instead of BTC... In this case your wallet wouldn't have contained 0.6 but 0.06.... you just tought your wallet contained 0.6 btc because the base unit wasn't correct. This is only my first guess tough.
Can you see other transactions in your electrum history, does your electrum wallet still have any balance left?

no balance, these are rough estimates. I deposited around .067 or something, my full funds with was around .69 and were deposited 20 min after my deposit into a darkweb wallet

So, to sum it up
- you had an electrum wallet, you're sure the sum of the unspent outputs (the wallet balance) was 0.69 BTC
- you deposited 0.067 BTC to a webwallet
- now, it looks like your electrum wallet is empty, while it should have +0.6BTC left

My idear still remains that you actually only had 0.069BTC, but had a different base unit so it looked as if you had 0.69BTC. But just in case:

- did you try to restart electrum?
- did you try to switch servers (green button in the right bottom corner)?
- did you see any other "outgoing" transactions in your history tab?

there is no way, i even asked the dnm wallet support team about it and they said the receiving address matches none of their generated addresses for my wallet. It also doesn't make sense that my armory wallets were deleted a day before as well as soon as i bought and withdrew from paxful.. could maybe someone on paxful have done it? Although I have a copy of the wallet on my computer/desktop I used the usb on my laptop to boot up tails wallet.. sounds like someone got my IP address?
11  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: weird happenings with software wallets on: June 27, 2017, 07:15:32 AM
no other transactions, just this one and it was right after i sent the transaction from my tails usb to the dnm
12  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: weird happenings with software wallets on: June 27, 2017, 06:58:39 AM
well i don't want to say anything that would be too implicit but it was into a trusted darkmarket wallet, but it was only for about 0.06, instead my entire electrum wallet gets deposited which held about .6... this is also using tails using a tor proxxy connection.

Also this happened after i coincidentally deposited a good about of btc from my paxful account into several software/offline wallets

Still confused about the problem, but i'm guessing here:

You were depositing funds from your electrum wallet to a darknet wallet, and you're confused because you only deposited 0.06 instead of 0.6.

My first guess would be that the base unit in electrum was set to something else instead of BTC... In this case your wallet wouldn't have contained 0.6 but 0.06.... you just tought your wallet contained 0.6 btc because the base unit wasn't correct. This is only my first guess tough.
Can you see other transactions in your electrum history, does your electrum wallet still have any balance left?

no balance, these are rough estimates. I deposited around .067 or something, my full funds with was around .69 and were deposited 20 min after my deposit into a darkweb wallet
13  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: weird happenings with software wallets on: June 27, 2017, 06:20:48 AM
well i don't want to say anything that would be too implicit but it was into a trusted darkmarket wallet, but it was only for about 0.06, instead my entire electrum wallet gets deposited which held about .6... this is also using tails using a tor proxxy connection.

Also this happened after i coincidentally deposited a good about of btc from my paxful account into several software/offline wallets
14  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / weird happenings with software wallets on: June 27, 2017, 06:02:20 AM
also it makes me wonder if it has anything to do with my possible being hacked?

https://blockchain.info/tx/f5a4a02add4af3f4fe8ed1b7275347b1fd3658c56237be6b43652cb90c71adfe

transaction ID.

This was right about the same time also i made a deposit into tor for around .0067, instead of that going to the .onion my entire account gets deposited. Mind you this is off of tails using persistent storage but only with wallet.

this was done mind you off a usb drive using persistent storage but how did someone get the private key to do this, who do you think the culprit is?

https://blockchain.info/tx/f5a4a02add4af3f4fe8ed1b7275347b1fd3658c56237be6b43652cb90c71adfe

this is transaction id

went to this wallet:

1AtAEzLsSSuSjcjaSW5AzyH7hQaG6y1Dhf


, at a weird transaction rate.    1BWo6D86YojPRiR38v2i4Dnn3epqZJttkz
15  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled on: June 27, 2017, 04:45:42 AM
thanks.. also it makes me wonder if it has anything to do with my possible being hacked? Recently another wallet of mine was entirely deposited into a .tor site which was run completely from a USB drive, encrypted, using persistent storage.

transaction is this

https://blockchain.info/tx/f5a4a02add4af3f4fe8ed1b7275347b1fd3658c56237be6b43652cb90c71adfe

also please if anyone has any idea what's going on i can provide full details.

If any developer/coder can please help I promise to hold funds in escrow
16  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Localbitcoins and legal protections on: June 26, 2017, 05:44:14 AM
What are you asking us in legal terms? I can understand the case, but if you want to know if they can legally keep your account banned even though you're explaining the situation, the answer is yes.

I think it should be moved to "service discussion" or "exchanges".
so in that case the case always goes to the vendor without a judiciary??
17  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled on: June 26, 2017, 05:04:14 AM
just pm'd someone btw if they can help with corrupted files, they are encrypted but if you can un- corrupte ill put btc in escrow or something.
18  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled on: June 26, 2017, 03:18:34 AM
so it couldn't be the platform? upgrading the client or trying it on another comp wouldn't work?
The platform doesn't matter. The Armory version might make a difference, but none of the wallet code as been changed in any of the latest versions.

the thing they are clearly marked .dat files for wallets for armory..
Armory doesn't use .dat files. If you are seeing .dat files that are supposedly for armory, those aren't Armory files.

if anyone can please help we can sign some agreement saying ill a % of the wallet. They don't seem all the way corrupted can someone please help.
How would you know they aren't corrupted? Do you happen to know the Armory binary file format? Armory uses a binary file format that you wouldn't know whether it was corrupted unless you examine it byte by byte.

Have you tried the Armory wallet recovery tool? It's in the software itself.

That's for wallet.dat files which are for Bitcoin Core only, not Armory.

i'm sure they might be but the error log says wrong path or wrong armory wallet.. even though i created this wallet and it's encryption using armory core.I did OFC try that as well as a number of other different things.

There's gotta be a way willing to pay through escrow to make sure the developing team has the funds that it deserves. I've been using armory since .88 same for this one breach to make it stop using it forever/

And as you can see this is clearly a systems error.. i i mean 3 wallets are randomly deleted from an OI issue? I'm a very much laymen but how would this happen?


Oh and I've read this python script helps you find it but how do i do this? I haveno exp in this please help

 #!/usr/bin/env python -u

# Read from stdin, corrupt/remove random bytes, write to standard out.

import optparse
import random
import sys

def main():
  parser = optparse.OptionParser(usage="%prog [options]")
  parser.add_option("--n", dest="n", type="int", default=1,
                    help="how many single-byte errors to introduce")
  parser.add_option("--r", dest="remove", type="int", default=0,
                    help="how many bytes to erase")
  parser.add_option("--verbose", dest="verbose", action="store_true",
                    help="be verbose")
  (options, args) = parser.parse_args()

  data = bytearray(sys.stdin.read())

  for i in range(0, options.n):
    position = random.randrange(0, len(data))
    oldbyte = data[position]
    newbyte = (oldbyte+random.randrange(1,256))%256
    data[position] = newbyte
    if options.verbose:
      print >> sys.stderr, "Replaced byte %d with %d at position %d"%(oldbyte,newbyte,position)

  for i in range(0, options.remove):
    position = random.randrange(0, len(data))
    oldbyte = data[position]
    del data[position]
    if options.verbose:
      print >> sys.stderr, "Deleted byte at position %d"%(position)

  sys.stdout.write(data)

if __name__ == '__main__':
  main()
19  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled on: June 26, 2017, 02:08:36 AM
so it couldn't be the platform? upgrading the client or trying it on another comp wouldn't work? the thing they are clearly marked .dat files for wallets for armory.. if anyone can please help we can sign some agreement saying ill a % of the wallet. They don't seem all the way corrupted can someone please help.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=25091.0

i've seen is another idea

edit: also there never says files are corrupted just that the wallets themselves are not acceptable wallet files

anyone help plz will be appreciated, dont mind putting out bounties or service fees.. i know there's a way I just read multiple programs including using pythonwallet itself to run a recovery.

also the exact reaosn as to why it won't recover is: Invalid path - or file is not a valid armory wallet?

wtf?
20  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: come home to see armory all wallets deteled on: June 25, 2017, 06:15:50 PM
I'm trying to import them but it says it is corrupted or something at startup then when i try to manually import digital copy it won't let me hit continue or go on, for all copies that i saved from recuva.

can developers plz help me? I know there is a way to get my root key from that wallet.

edit: i'm sure these are not watch only cause it doesn't say when i opened used notepad..

also when i try to fix damaged wallet it says they are not valid wallets
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!