3
|
Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Gambling just for fun?
|
on: September 11, 2019, 06:06:52 PM
|
Your analysis about the gamblers is wrong. Most of the gamblers gamble to gain money and are not here for fun only.
I didn't say all gamblers or most of gamblers. I said some of gamblers. Maybe it's better to say " a few gamblers". That's what I have read in some posts and that is exactly what surprises me. I also said that they are addicted or play to win back their losses. So, I don't agree that some people play just for fun.
|
|
|
4
|
Economy / Gambling discussion / Gambling just for fun?
|
on: September 11, 2019, 04:10:38 PM
|
There are some people gamble and lose. if you ask them why do you gamble? They will answer you "just for fun" They know they are loser in long term and no strategy works, but continue to gamble for fun. How can enjoy something that you know you will lose? Is losing money really enjoyable? Isn't there any other entertainment you can enjoy? I think these people are still hopeful of winning back previous losses or they are addicted. Gambling cannot be just for fun. There are many free games too.
|
|
|
5
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: How important is the name of a cryptocurrency project?
|
on: September 11, 2019, 04:02:05 PM
|
Of course it does. For example: Billionaire Token, fetish coin, JasonEdwardsCoin, Fonziecoin (FONZ), Selfiecoin, Pizzacoin, President Johnson coin, Putin, Putin Classic. The name alone you know you wouldn't take it seriously - a real shitcoin.
It's true that all the coins you mentioned are really shit coins. But cannot judge a coin on its name. If a project has a good team and a good concept, its name looks good too. If any one of these coins had a good team, its name wouldn't look that bad.
|
|
|
6
|
Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: What withdrawal fee do you consider as fair in gambling sites?
|
on: September 11, 2019, 03:49:35 PM
|
For me it's not ideal, 0.001 BTC is too much for small time gamblers, and most gamblers in crypto space have a lot of small time gamblers. 0.001 BTC withdrawal fee is even high for exchanges, Binance as one of the most popular only charge 0.0005 btc, and I think that's the normal fee in an exchange. Hey, try to gamble at sportsbet, they don't have withdrawal fee, everything is free.
I never knew there was no withdrawal fee for sport bettors and I am reading about this for the first time. It is impressive and really good to know that such exist at sports bets and I am left with no choice than to start playing sports bet. No, that's impossible. All the gambling websites including those are active betting on sport games deduct some amount of bitcoin from your balance when you withdraw some bitcoins. I guess Japinet is referring to a special platform which I don't know that. Spending some bitcoin as a withdrawal fee is needed in every website I know. The amounts are different. But the fee in none of them is zero.
|
|
|
7
|
Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: The secret of gambling?
|
on: September 11, 2019, 09:46:22 AM
|
It's better to have a strategy than not to have one. Because, if we play without a strategy will certainly make us more defeated. Indeed, the Strategy is not a benchmark we can win. At least with that we can find victory every game.
But I think if you have not any strategy, you would be more safe. A person who has not strategy usually gamble for fun and leave that after some time. But having a strategy causes gamblers to think they can earn big money. They fail and they change their strategy and again fail till they cannot afford to play more.
|
|
|
8
|
Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Gambling Marketing And Religion
|
on: September 11, 2019, 09:11:01 AM
|
I don't think here is a good place to find the answer of your question. Personally I don't pay much attention to these things and act however I think it is right. As I read some replies to your post I see people's opinion are very different. Because usually even the people who are of a same religion have different opinions. If you are a religious person and such things matter to you, should ask from an expert person who is qualified. People here give you different opinions and none of them is 100% right.
|
|
|
9
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Two questions about bitcoin public key
|
on: September 10, 2019, 07:53:36 PM
|
Bech32 addresses use a custom character set of 32 characters - all case insensitive letters (26) and numbers (10), minus "1", "b", "i" and "o" (outside of the first 3 characters "bc1", known as the human readable part and the separator). This has the advantage of being impossible to make mistakes regarding upper or lower case, as well as generating smaller QR codes. You can read more about this in BIP 173. So, characters that are excluded in generating Bech32 and P2PKH addresses are different. Bech32: 1 , b , i , o P2PKH: O , I ( uppercase letter) , l (lowercase letter) , 0 Am I right? I wonder why "b" and "i" are excluded in Bech32 addresses. I think uppercase letter "I" and lowercase letter "l" can cause visual ambiguity much more than "b" and "i". Every one will distinguish "b" and "i" from other characters easily.
|
|
|
11
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Two questions about bitcoin public key
|
on: September 10, 2019, 11:03:24 AM
|
1. Why doesn't any public key contain "zero" ? 2. As far as I know there is no difference between uppercase and lowercase letters when we make a transaction. So, why are there both uppercase and lowercase letters in the public key when they are shown on different block explorers?
|
|
|
12
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ITO] WPP ENERGY TOKEN - TOKEN TO BE TIED TO THE VALUE OF H2
|
on: September 10, 2019, 08:29:57 AM
|
Product development is a top priority that this project should implement as soon as possible because if this product is applied outside life then surely listing at large exchanges is only problem time . I have great faith in this project and will wait patiently until this project is completed. It may take several years to complete but if they can, all investors will be willing to wait under any circumstances.
If every thing go based on the road map, there wouldn't be any need to wait several years. Visit the official website and see the countdown. Only 203 days left until tokens are accepted as a payment method to purchase shares.
|
|
|
14
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Shower thought. Bitcoin ETF bad?
|
on: September 09, 2019, 11:58:51 AM
|
ETF might be useful for those ordinary people that have not enough knowledge to store their bitcoins in a safe wallet. But generally speaking, I don't think ETF is helpful for cryptocurrencies world. And the reason is simple. ETF acts as a third party and we use bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies to eliminate third parties. Some people might think that as ETF provide an easy method to buy bitcoin, it's useful. But it's wrong. These people are those who have not enough knowledge and it's better to be out of the market. Bitcoin market doesn't need them as they help third parties get involved in our transactions.
|
|
|
16
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][PRE - ICO] TwoGap - Thriving the Cryptocurrency Market with CRYPTOBONDS
|
on: September 09, 2019, 09:57:24 AM
|
lock token is not solution to avoid dump but lock token is delaying the occurrence of dump and at the end of the year if all tokens are unlocked there will be big dump on twogap
They cannot succeed even in delaying the dump. Locking the tokens to avoid price fall is a decision have made in many projects. I don't remember any one of them have been successful. Locking the tokens causes the community to not trust the team. This has a worse effect than releasing all tokens. Also, locking a percentage of tokens cause holders to sell the available tokens. Because they expect a price fall when they get close to time of tokens unlock. So, they decide to sell their tokens sooner.
|
|
|
17
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ITO] WPP ENERGY TOKEN - TOKEN TO BE TIED TO THE VALUE OF H2
|
on: September 09, 2019, 09:17:43 AM
|
Do not worry about WPP listing on new exchanges. The main concern in most of tokens is lack of developments. Such tokens lose their value over time and big exchanges never list them. They are listed in some small exchanges with no worth. But we when we talk about WPP every thing is different. WPP has a working product. When there is a working product, listing becomes easier. WPP will be finally listed in big exchanges and sooner or later the price will rise. It's good that investors are no longer worry of development and now the only concern is listing on exchanges.
|
|
|
|