 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
New faucet. Help yourself to some testnet3 coins at : http://faucet.luis.imPlease return testnet3 coins once used so other people can benefit as well. |
|
|
|
|
I really want to get rid of a box, sitting on the corner, with a few of these fans. Shipped anywhere in the world for $20/each paid in bitcoins at the current exchange rate.
|
|
|
|
|
I still have a few of these left. I can send them to the US for $20 to be paid in bitcoins, the price includes shipping.
|
|
|
|
What is the price in Bitcoins?!
How much will cost to ship 2 to Brazil?
Thanks!
Thiago
Hi, you can check for postage here http://auspost.com.au/apps/international-parcel.html , I suggest you add delivery confirmation for peace of mind. Cheapest air mail to Brazil is AU$16.20, so I could do 5BTC including shipping. |
|
|
|
It would be nice if you could do some research before throwing out model numbers.
Meanwhile there are other cards you have not listed which appear to use the same fan such as the 5770.
Thanks for the correction amended the description to remove older model numbers and include newer, more relevant ones. |
|
|
|
Ah, so a 5450 will accept the fan but it will stick out?
I have no experience installing them in 5450, so it would depend on the design of the fan enclosure, I'm more than happy to provide measurements to see if it can be installed.. |
|
|
|
 Fits reference cooler housing of ATI video cards 4870 5850 5870 5970 6970 6990 Please check suitability before ordering. Fans read: NTK (HK) Limited Model : FD9238H12S DC 12V 0.8A MADE IN CHINA P/N: 14010010146 Manufacturing stamps vary from 2009~2011. I will ship in descending order of recency. AU$20 in BTC including shipping in Australia.
Will ship worldwide for extra.UPDATE: Since I still have a few of these left, I am selling them for US$20 to be paid in bitcoins including shipping to anywhere in the world. |
|
|
|
Just had the same problem happen to one of my 5970s. I am wondering if you figured out where to buy it? I just contacted the card manufacturer and going to send an email to http://www.ntkltd.com to see if I get lucky with them. Edit: There's another thread with links to where you can source them https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=46642.0 |
|
|
|
Whois mybitcoin.com The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and Registrars. Registrant: MyBitcoin, LLC Main Street PO Box 556 Charlestown, Nevis KN Domain name: MYBITCOIN.COM Administrative Contact: Williams, Tom abuse@mybitcoin.com Main Street PO Box 556 Charlestown, Nevis KN +6499518329 Technical Contact: Williams, Tom abuse@mybitcoin.com Main Street PO Box 556 Charlestown, Nevis KN +6499518329 |
|
|
|
Wow, no referral link? There's still some decent people out there. (Unlike the mybitcoin.com owner, it seems) |
|
|
|
|
Was having the same problem with a 4870 but not with a 5970 on the same machine, removed worksize from all the miners (including the 5970) and actually gained 10MH/s.
|
|
|
|
I was able to update my video drivers and it detected my video card. Now I'm cookin' with GPU.
Not to be an ass, but how is that relevant to the thread? |
|
|
|
Started today with a 5970 XFX Black Edition, stock firmware, oc 805/1200. I'm not completely sure about all the settings and oc yet and these are my results. Running solo two parallel phoenixes with : phoenix.exe -u http://xxxx:xxxx@localhost:8332 PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=0 -k poclbm VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 -v
phoenix.exe -u http://xxxx:xxxx@localhost:8332 PLATFORM=0 DEVICE=1 -k poclbm VECTORS WORKSIZE=128 BFI_INT AGGRESSION=10 -v guiminer 290x2~580Mh/s with -v -d 0 -f 1 -w128 phoenix 330x2~660Mh/s at 90degC Is this normal?: [27/04/2011 18:18:36] Result didn't meet full difficulty, not sending
[27/04/2011 18:18:47] Result didn't meet full difficulty, not sending
[27/04/2011 18:18:48] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[27/04/2011 18:18:59] Result didn't meet full difficulty, not sending
[27/04/2011 18:19:01] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
.
.
.
[27/04/2011 18:20:24] Result didn't meet full difficulty, not sending
[27/04/2011 18:20:31] Result didn't meet full difficulty, not sending
[27/04/2011 18:20:33] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
A bit puzzled about all those not sending warnings.
[27/04/2011 18:20:44] Result didn't meet full difficulty, not sending
[27/04/2011 18:20:47] Server gave new work; passing to WorkQueue
[331.20 Mhash/sec] [0 Accepted] [0 Rejected] [RPC] |
|
|
|
|
