Still not done.

Accounts connected:

gmrana1977 and tolobret.

Proof:

Same FB account used to apply for a signature campaign in the same thread on the same page.

tolobret applies for the linked signature campaign above in post #236:


Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

Twitters: tolobret
FBs: achmad.nofandi

Quoted and verified.

Gonna lock this now. Thanks for the answers.

You may have missed this in the Changelog:

13-Sept-17: Updated Nexchange, Removed EarnFreeCoin, Updated GoGoOption, Added Nexchange (there's a Staff rank but I have no idea where to put it), Fixed typos

And the previous one:

13-Sept-17: Removed EarnFreeCoin, Updated GoGoOption, Added Nexchange (there's a Staff rank but I have no idea where to put it), Fixed typos

It was neither by mistake nor because I didn't say anything.


I was wondering about this not too long ago. Is there an equivalent "Overview of  Altcoin... Campaigns" thread?

Edit: I went searching but all the threads seems to be dead (and not so great in formatting tbh). I might start one.

My second day and I've found my first cheater, and boy is it a big and convoluted one.

Accounts connected:


gmrana1977, abeda55, totamia70, taktar933 and amir55.

Proof:

Same FB/Twitter accounts used for campaigns.

gmrana1977 here applies for the "[Bounty] Snapup-Social Media Bounty.Giving away 1.650.000€" campaign:


FB account above matches with abeda55's here in the "[BOUNTY][PRESALE][ICO]ATLANT REAL ESTATE PLATFORM[OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN]" campaign:


gmrana1977 also applies for the "[Bounty] Snapup-Social Media Bounty.Giving away 1.650.000€" again using the abeda55 alt:


totamia70 is applying for the "CarTaxi.io ≈ 1,661,100$ to share" bounty with a slightly modified version of abeda55's Twitter handle, of course, as an FB handle this time here:


Coincidence perhaps? I think not. totamia70 applies for the "[Bounty]Global marketplace Storiqa 18/09/2017" bounty with this FB handle:


And here, gmrana1977 is applying for the "[BOUNTY][ICO]ATLANT REAL ESTATE PLATFORM[OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN]" with that same FB handle:


Here is abeda55 posting stat updates for the same "CarTaxi.io ≈ 1,661,100$ to share" bounty he applied for as tomatia70:


And here s/he is again, this time as abeda55, applying for the same "[Bounty]Global marketplace Storiqa 18/09/2017" bounty he applied for earlier as totamia70:


And here's this zinger I found when I thought it was done. A new alt, taktar933, applied for the "[ANN][BOUNTY] OBSIDIAN | C# .NET | Stratis Core | PoS | Encrypted Messenger" bounty here: (abeda55 had already enrolled in this):


Notice the Twitter handle matches with the one adeba55 used earlier. Taktar933 has also very recently applied for the same "[Bounty]Global marketplace Storiqa 18/09/2017" bounty (3 alts in this particular one) here:


Finally (!), there's amir55 quoted by richfinch here:


That Twitter handle matches one linked below that gmrana1977 used (notice how s/he applies again just below that richfinch quote with the abeda55 alt). For amir55, he deletes all the posts after making them so the account is still falsely labeled brand new.

There are at least 3 of his alts (amir55, abeda55, gmrana1977participating in this.

---

It's against [BOUNTY][ICO]ATLANT REAL ESTATE PLATFORM[OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN] Twitter and FB campaign's rules to enroll more than one account (gmrana and abeda55):


Also against "[Bounty]Global marketplace Storiqa 18/09/2017" Twitter and FB campaign's rules to enroll more than one account (totamia70, abeda55, taktar933):


S/he's also breaking Woshib's rules here with post #163 and #172; I checked the spreadsheet, both are enrolled.

I didn't see anything restricting more than one account in the "CarTaxi.io ≈ 1,661,100$ to share" campaign or (abeda55 and totamia70) Snapup Campaign.

Addresses:



Waves Address.

Miscellaneous:

Twitters: abedadipti, alogazi, gfiroja, rizlukhan, amirul196961
FBs: shannan.mcclennyt.5, alo.gazi, gidget.gathrigh, roshi.moti, taktar933, abeda.sultana.395, amirul1969

That exchange precedes WCX (by at least 2 years) and is for forex, not crypto. And there's only circumstantial evidence linking the two together; everyone that contacted them says they deny having any relationship with WCX.

I'm fairly certain this has been answered at least 20 times before but here it goes again:

- You can't link one BTC address to more than one BB address but you can link multiple BTC addresses to one BB address.
- You must, AFAIK, link your BTC address if you want to get GBB but you don't need to link them to get GB.

* You may not get GBB if you link a BTC address that has a 0 balance and/or have a significantly small number of bytes. This is from personal experience over the last 2 airdrops.

---

Has anyone seen this?



This should be a first, right?

Accounts Connected:

djkyno and nejibens, a known alt.

Proof:

They used the same Eth address.

Nejibens here:


Djkyno here:


Address:


Miscellaneous:

Twitters: btcandeth, crypto_earner, najiffer, get_ryma (Hellacopter's)
FBs: ramynett, nejibens11

Not against the rules AFAICS but noteworthy, I guess.

He applied for the Snapup-Social Media Bounty as neji and the Snapup - Signature and Avatar Campaign as dj. The dj quote above is for the Sig campaign and this is for the social bounty as neji:


Archived pages: For djkyno and nejibens, nejibens (for second quote).

Wow, I almost gave up on this one but his FB account gave him away.


Accounts connected:

abhinav_thakur01 and abhishek.g.

Proof:

Same FB account used to apply for campaign.

Abhinav_thakur01 here:


One known and tagged alt, abhishek.g, here:


Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

Archived pages: For abhinav_thakur01 and abhishek.g.

Oh, sorry I wasn't clear. I didn't mean he applied for your campaigns with multiple alts, I just thought it was noteworthy.

This is literally my first attempt at this and I've already gotten a match.

Accounts connected: Ahiaba, Bagaji and BUK2016.

Proof:

They all use the same BTC address to apply for signature campaigns.

Bagaji on his profile page and here:


Ahiaba here:


BUK2016 on his profile page and here:


Address:


Miscellaneous:

Twitters: CAhiaba

The Jibrel signature campaign is run by yahoo and WhyFuture was, IIRC, run by Lutpin.

Archived pages: For Ahiaba, Bagaji and BUK2016.

Here's mine:

Message:

Address:

Signature:

Please quote and verify. Thanks.

That was quite the read. I have a few questions:

- Is this still active? I cross-checked the lists on the first page with yahoo's list (since his is the only one that's datestamped) and it seems Lutpin stopped updating the full list on 6/29/17 after this new name.

- @Lutpin, do you have a similar list separate from this one like yahoo and Lauda do? I read through all the pages and noticed that in all your updates, there's no mention of "... and my list". There's also nothing in your created topics and these are also still in the OP:


I'm assuming you're automatically adding it the general list but I can't be sure.

- If this is still active, can you please datestamp the title like Mitchell does in this "Overview of ... Campaigns" thread?

"there is no team" !== "there's no info on [the] team".

And at some recent past, there was at least one known "member" of the "team".


Works both ways.


Or 30. If it is one guy behind this, props to him for his versatility and speed.

Razick, I think the last post in the previous thread that is now locked (I'm assuming you guys are the one's that locked it and not a mod) should be a link to this one. Even a bold, red notice in the OP will suffice.

Yes there is, there absolutely is a massive chance that he is. He, and CapitalTalk claimed that "only spammers are selected who are frequently rejected by professional managers" so I went ahead and checked myself.

I've crosschecked the accepted and potentially acceptable names here with Yahoo's, Lauda's, notaek's and Lutpin's blacklist (there's no explicit list for Lutpin). Unsurprisingly, not a single one of them are in any permanent blacklist that I could find but 3 of the accepted people (their names are below each other on Nexchange's list funnily enough) are on Lauda's and the general SMAS list for spamming/low quality posts.

However, 3 or ~11%, on one list, out of 27 (the total number of names here) is a far cry away from "only spammers are selected who are frequently rejected by professional managers". Not only is nexcher a coward, he's a lying, butthurt coward. CapitalTalk is also a liar, and probably the owner of this alt account which himself could be an alt account of more ranked up member that was rejected, like jacee.

I might do that but, you want me to find evidence for your claim? You better read up on burden of proof.


Because your accusations are almost entirely fallacious and you're a coward.


False. Those mistakes remind me of CapitalTalk just above.


Your butthurt is clouding your judgement. Of the two of I've checked so far, it's not "obvious".


And you still fail to provide evidence for this. You have zero, zilch, nada, nothing whatsoever to back this up other than emotions.

You have no evidence for this, not a single shred of evidence. Maybe that's why you're such a coward that you had to create an alt to post such nonsensical claims.


Pray-tell how is Razick a spammer? Sure, he isn't trusted like Yahoo or Luptin but I've gone through the first page of his latest posts, which is more than I can say for a coward like you, and I'm yet to see spam, obvious spam at least.

As for hiring, AFAICS from his post history, he applied for the position.


Please, do post evidence for this.


Yet another unsubstantiated and nonsensical claim. The "drama" you're talking about (having their thread deleted because it appeared like they were paying people to bump it) has been resolved in the Meta section. Taking things out of context won't help you.

Or perhaps you're not talking about that but something else you pulled out of thin air.


From the level of butthurt in your post it is evident you were one of the permanently rejected applicants. You can't just let it go and move on so you've tried to go on this (failed) smear campaign with a freshly created alt.

Then why don't you man up and post from your main account rather than a freshly created alt like a coward?



Argument from personal incredulity. You have literally no evidence for this and are missing, on purpose or genuinely ignorant, the "duh?" explanation.



Someone should inform GDAX then since WCX's UI is a clone of that and far from generic. ICYMI, you're reaching here.


Can't argue with this.

In case the dense one before still didn't get it (and assuming you're not him), this is what I meant by had names but still anonymous.



Shouldn't that be left to those oh so willing to let go of $25K? They've refunded, in full, someone here that paid earlier so other than envy of missing out, there's not much substance to this.


Then the corollary must also be true:

"Everyone [attack]ing WCX on this thread like it is their [mortal e]n[emy] is obviously involved with [a competitor product] somehow".

And in your case, we can add cowardice to it.

Oh, I understood "recipient" as literally recipient.


I just tried it and yeah, it generates new BTC addresses so that explains it:



It seems whoever owns that Eth address is a beta tester.