Hi everyone, Does anyone have a S4 coupon that they won't use ? I want to buy my first miner to try it for the winter and the S4 seems to be good.  My user name on the bitmain website is lanfeusst (same as here) and the user id is lanfeusst (at) hotmail (dot) fr Thanks a lot your help will be appreciated |
|
|
|
Hi,
On February 11th I did a withdrawal which did not went through to my destination address.
It is marked in my account as completed but it is not.
On February 14th I opened a ticket on the support of btc-e.com explaining the situation.
On February 21st my ticket was closed without answer and the withdrawal was still not done.
I reopened the ticket saying that the issue was not solved.
It is now close to 4 weeks since the withdrawal and I don't have any answer.
Please check my ticket (number #JKH-979-78562) and send the withdrawal as soon as possible.
Thanks in advance
Solved. Thanks ! |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
On February 11th I did a withdrawal which did not went through to my destination address.
It is marked in my account as completed but it is not.
On February 14th I opened a ticket on the support of btc-e.com explaining the situation.
On February 21st my ticket was closed without answer and the withdrawal was still not done.
I reopened the ticket saying that the issue was not solved.
It is now close to 4 weeks since the withdrawal and I don't have any answer.
Please check my ticket (number #JKH-979-78562) and send the withdrawal as soon as possible.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
I have the same error on linux, can't past block 280518 Devs,
I get this when trying to recreate the database:
C:\counterpartyd>python counterpartyd.py server
Status: RESTART
Block: 280518
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "counterpartyd.py", line 618, in <module>
blocks.follow(db)
File "C:\counterpartyd\lib\blocks.py", line 479, in follow
raise e
File "C:\counterpartyd\lib\blocks.py", line 472, in follow
parse_block(db, block_index)
File "C:\counterpartyd\lib\blocks.py", line 57, in parse_block
issuance.parse(db, tx, message)
File "C:\counterpartyd\lib\issuance.py", line 103, in parse
util.credit(db, tx['source'], asset, amount)
File "C:\counterpartyd\lib\util.py", line 160, in credit
assert asset != 'BTC' # Never BTC.
AssertionError
|
|
|
|
Server side, but don't bother because you can't withdraw from btc-e metatrader 4.
tell me more, afaik is from mt4->btc-e account-> take money out is there are problem on that ? Well I tried to do mt4->btc-e account by opening a ticket because they don't have any other way to do it, then they closed my ticket without answering, I reopened it and I'm now waiting for more than 10 days without any answers so... Solved. |
|
|
|
Server side, but don't bother because you can't withdraw from btc-e metatrader 4.
tell me more, afaik is from mt4->btc-e account-> take money out is there are problem on that ? Well I tried to do mt4->btc-e account by opening a ticket because they don't have any other way to do it, then they closed my ticket without answering, I reopened it and I'm now waiting for more than 10 days without any answers so... |
|
|
|
|
Server side, but don't bother because you can't withdraw from btc-e metatrader 4.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm unable to withdraw money from metatrader 4. It has been 10 days now. No answer to my ticket. Anyone has more success ?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Are you going to recalculate Zetacoin balance and when ? Because I have some which have diseapeared when I tried to withdrawal.
I have sent you a PM about that yesterday.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
When I looked at it, it was just a copy of an old version of Quark, with each Quarkcoin in the code replaced by CPUcoin. Nothing more changed. (for the daemon)
|
|
|
|
CPU coin is clearly a garbage, premined 17+ mil.
Well, premined 0 million after the Quarkcoin blockchain overwrote the CPUcoin blockchain.. How did this happen lol  It's quite simple... *Someone* started CPUCoin client with -datadir=/path/to/quarkcoin/blockchain option. CPUCoin has no differences with QRK, so chain is fully compatible and caused cascade of reorganize events in all CPUCoin clients. No, if you do that you will only start Quarkcoin, not CPUcoin. You have to keep the peers.dat file from CPUcoin or the CPUcoin.conf with the good addnode of CPUcoin node. |
|
|
|
|
Well it seems that now there is no difference between Quark and CPUcoin, both the same block number( 90045)
|
|
|
|
|
I had the same problem 3 weeks ago. (1 of 2 withdrawal was missing). Successfully solved by asking the support.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem needs to be fixed, but the spots adjustement can oscillate a lot so it is not a good one, better algorithm are the one in bitbar, yacoin, or primecoin. The difficulty changes smoothly with time (a each block adjusted mean) and does not oscillate.
I think it would better for digitalcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
I have asked coins-e.com to add it.
It is true that it is a good coin and there is no reason for it not being on an exchange yet.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I don't have GPU's, only CPUs.
My calculation of the 600kh/s comes from the hashrate shown by the cpuminer for LTC.
Edit : I don't have 600kh/s in fact, only 300kh/s after verification, so network must be about 20Mh/s and profitability is more about 2700% of LTC(and 5400% of BTC)
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, with 600kh/s (worth of LTC mining) mining at Quark now, I got 1/60 of the total reward(on a long period, difficulty average ~300).
The network is then ~40Mh/s
The total mined per day is 2*60*24*2048*0.000003 = 17.7 BTC.
And mining LTC with 40Mh/s gives 1.3 BTC per day at current difficulty.
The profitablility of quark is then 17.7/1.3 = 1360% of LTC (or 2700% of BTC).
So if you can, you should mine it !
I have done the same math for primecoin a few days ago and I think with the fall in price, it must be now around ~500% more profitable than LTC.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
