Let's not be naive to believe in fairy tales about what a scammer can come up with when he wakes up two years later to publish another scam.
You're right, I didn't notice the gap in his posting history. I wanted to give him a chance to explain what his relationship with this scam-project is, but in this case I don't see any point. There is no excuse that can justify his actions.
Type 1 Flag on rakec:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2890I am here. The only thing I can be accused for is paying freelancer on fiver to make me whitepaper:
https://ibb.co/W0b36fSAs you can see it is done before 1 month.
It is nice that you have time to read whitepapers of all old project that were scam, or not, but trust me that I dont have time for that.
If you believe that Penny project is scam, I cant do nothing there.
Since you are already in crypto, you should be able to check the announcements of token on Telegram too and 2 videos of our DApp.
When you realize that this is truly next generation of multichain tokens, your accusations will be funny anyway.
You are right for the whitepaper, but not for anything else.
By the way the only reason why I wasn't using this account for 2 years is slow support of bitcointalk forum. When I got account back, I lost a will to write . Proof is also here:
https://ibb.co/Vq56qjkSo please before accuse some project to be a scam, because it has some parts of text of some other project whitepaper, check other details too.
I don't think the plagiarism of their white paper was done by accident. What can we expect from the OP? What can he explain to us? This will be another lie with excuses that they hired the wrong person, and of course, he will fix everything right now and blah blah.
The question is different if they are in such a hurry to announce their project, do not they need to double-check everything from the beginning?
Good check, FatFork.
Let's not be naive to believe in fairy tales about what a scammer can come up with when he wakes up two years later to publish another scam.
The answer is above. Of course I cant double check everything. I can check the token code, but not whitepaper. I dont know how to check it at all? To copy part by part in google and look for similar results? Sorry but I dont have time for it anyway. Need to work on platforms with devs
I would suggest sending a PM to the accused account, if they respond that they will stop cooperating with the scammers, all good. If they dont I suggest opening a flag on the accused.
I addressed the issue in their ANN topic, so it remains to be seen if the OP replies. He was active on the forum today, but I'll give him another 24 hours before tagging his account.
I think it's safe to start proceeding with the negative tag. I tried to reach them via their TG channel and they removed me right away. I don't think they'll heed the invitation you put on their thread
One of main things that I did well in my life is removing negative people from it. Trying to spend the time just with positive and good will people. In a crypto world there is a plenty negative people, that are spreading negativity in the group to others. From one side its good that you posted info there so we know what is happening here. On the other side you can light the fire with negativity on project that didnt started yet. I didnt lose 6 months on coding to have negative comments before start. I have personally told to mods to delete all the fuds from the group. Some of them deleted your comment too.
I hope that proves above are enough to see that all of you are wrong.
Whitepaper is 1% of the project.
Code is 90%. So before you accuse someone to be a scam, you should check the code, right?
If we wanted to scam people, probably will make token in 5 minutes on some launchpad. I don't think that scammers are working 6 months on code to scam people.
How many project you know that done audit before private sale?
How many project launching first platform before presale?
How many multichain tokens have the staking, voting, proposals options in DApp? You are right 95% of them don't even have DApp for that.
How many multichain tokens have option to receive staking rewards on one network, while people moving tokens on 2 others? Probably none
How many multichain tokens have option to recognise TX?
How many multichain tokens have protocol validator for burning and minting tokens on another networks?
So accusing someone that is scam because he copy parts from whitepaper is fine.
But that could do 3rd grade kid. Maybe he will look for other details before he do what you have done.
I expected more from Hero and Legendary members on this forum.
Best Regards
Dejan
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
Show Posts
