Looks like I hit 3 proof-of-transactions yesterday?! Is this POT v2 in effect? I thought it didn't fork till after block 57,000? Also, how did I get two in a row 11 hours apart?

+1

Is the a thread for the development of FLT or just a price speculation thread?

The subreddit is dead. Is this coin dead?

Is anyone working on anything for this coin?

You should, unless you are Satoshi Nakamoto. You have the qualities to be a leader in this space, don't be content to become a spectator and rest on laurels.

DarkCoin has Evan Duffield who has been relentless since January.

DRK's biggest feature is Darksend, which fogs the blockchain through a decentralized network of globally distributed masternodes that collectively split up transactions with an implementation of coinjoin technology. With the final release due in June, transactions of up to 100 DRK (currently about $675) can be rendered totally invisible through Darksend.

The dev also invented the X11 hashing algo and an improvement on KGW called Dark Gravity Wave. People are just now waking up to all of these innovations coming out of the coin, which has resulted in a nearly $6m 24 hour volume.

Crazy times in the world of crypto~

So does anybody know what is happening with FLT? I dont mean the drop in price, im referring to progress, community development, social networking. Has anybody grabbed it by the balls yet? Seems crazy, a coin with a fantastic code behind it. And nobody seems interested 

I believe it will help attract more people to this sexy coin if we also mention what is the maximum possible PoS reward per year. Saying minimum 5% is not as attractive as saying maximum 30% for example. Is somebody able to calculate what is the maximum compound interest that a person could get per year? Also does it make sense to sell all my coins when the 90 days maturation period expires and buy new ones which I then start staking again for maximum per year gains?

you just transformed thekidcoin`s gender... I don`t know why you would do something  like that:)))

Ok got it thats easy ( unless I got it wrong )
So I updated it to represent the new algo since saturday is close



Do you want me to add the whole "every 200/1000 blocks" ?
I'm thinking that because the banner should be read by a single person , it wouldn't matter to him how much PoT reward in total only the part relevant to him ( also this can be calculated with the 80% figure )

Thanks for the comments 
I'm almost done ( mostly alignment and subtle changes remain )



Anything to add/change?
@thekidcoin , do you like it?

*I also think the links to the whitepapers should be right below the banner ( or maybe the specs ) for better visibillity

really?

I heard a rumor that kidcoin was the first female crypto developer, is this true?

no, the PoW phase still going on. read up a few posts ago.

Yes sorry I skipped the second answer of thekidcoin where he says those are rejected.

Are there so many miners on BC?

For a low PoW reward PoW/PoS hybrid you only need to control 51% of the PoW network hashpower (which is easy because the PoW reward is so low) and then you can override the PoS and produce a long stretch of only PoW blocks on the blockchain, effectively converting it to a pure PoW system for a given amount of time and thereby allowing you to take control of the blockchain and double spend during the time period. The BC devs "demonstrated" this on Mintcoin, and Mintcoin had to switch to pure PoS to fix the issue. I think PoT would prevent this from happening even as fluttercoin transitions to a lower reward and the network hashrate drops because the PoT blocks are tied to the PoW blocks and "check" the validity of PoW blocks and would fork the attackers chain away from the main chain. In otherwords, low PoW reward PoS/PoW hybrids are generally vulnerable but I think fluttercoin changes that with the addition of PoT

I still think there are some issues with pure PoS systems. Particularly systems which have a low PoS interest (e.g. 1% for BC) because that means there is less incentive for people to keep their wallets open and securing the network which means the network weight at any given time that one would have to compete with to get 51% of the weight is lower. Also, since the weight is based off of coin-days (a function of number of coins and their age), it seems to me that having no max coin-age (such as in the case of BC) would allow, in theory, somebody to gather infinite coin-days with a small number of coins over an infinite period of time. Practically speaking nobody can let their coins age for an infinite amount of time but depending on how many coins you have you could let those coins sit and collect coin-age indefinitely until you have accumulated enough coin-days to posses 51% of the network weight.

This is my understanding, somebody correct me.

To my knowledge, Colossuscoin was the first 100% PoS coin but they had a lot of pain to get it working. Dunno if it works that good as I haven't followed that coin for a long time now.

WC PoS was coded incorrectly resulting in it never kicking in to start securing the blockchain. The "afterhours" PoW hashrate dropped so low, 51% was inevitable. To re-secure, pools opened WC mining back up at the 10WC per block as was coded. It's still paying 10 to my knowledge. All pure pos have ''afterhours'' pow, btw.

Why do ppl keep saying that Pure PoS coins have security flaws?

edit: I have an idea like 'staking holes', but i want to hear what others think.