 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
I dont know why people keep posting their ref links here, im sure that 99.9% of the people here have already signed up |
|
|
|
Lol @ noob dummies saying "scam"
I wonder if there is way to hold all these people accountable when WCX exchange launches. Like ban them for life or something?
stop masturbating in your dream and come back a reality, guy  . When are WCX launched?  . Today is 10/10/2017 . This is a moment that we knew  . We were fucked up lol  . I do not want to live on this scam anymore  . Give him a break, he uses emojies after every sentence, he clearly has some form of mental disability. |
|
|
|
Pushing back the ICO like this, at this time, really hurts their credibility, to be honest.
How? it gives everyone a chance to test the exchange before deciding to invest, in my opinion this was a smart move. |
|
|
|
For those asking: China's new legislation and legislation proposals have no effect on WCX or the ICO.
The ICO will run for up to 30 days and will end when tokens are sold out.
Just 2 quick things, first on the roadmap on the bottom of the page the ICO date has not been updated, also with the rapidly growing number of sign ups do you plan on stopping referrals any time soon? |
|
|
|
I can't find info about ICO end date? When WCX ICO will end?
When does the ICO start? When does the launch start? There's your clue. ICO starts on the 31st of October Official launch is on 10th of October How is that a clue? |
|
|
|
Does anyone know the total number of wcx?
1 Billion |
|
|
|
How long before this turns into BTC-E 2.0 if it grows big enough?
Lol i love it when people clearly have no idea what they are talking about. Are you trying to say that the creators of WCX are going to use the site to launder money from Mt.Gox through it? |
|
|
|
Lol at "lost faith" but "wanna keep the coins" . try harder FUD muffins
Look dude i know no one likes it when other people hate on a project they support but out of your last 7 posts 6 of them have just been you accusing other people of FUDing, and most of them were just expressing concern not shouting "scam" i think you should chill out a bit, just ignore them |
|
|
|
Received this from Fran:  " We parted ways recently over a disagreement in how to handle KYC information. Customer funds that are in the escrow wallet we had set up were refunded through shared mutual agreement to their respective investors. I have no opinion on their ICO or company. I wish them well. Thanks " Seems like it was a disagreement on KYC info collection and they've agreed to part ways. I find it weird that in this reply he said "i wish them well" and in others he says "recommend to avoid", something is not quite right here |
|
|
|
|
Any news on when Alpha invites will go out again?
|
|
|
|
Well ok and what? It proves the contrary that there is a beta version and it works. So all is well. Yes, that's what I have been getting at. If you want to try the beta, PM me. Will give you my access since I doubt they check IP access for the beta. Still waiting for them to block my IP, probably don't know how. I was just raising awareness about their lack of security. Apparently, nobody cares about that. Mt. Gox 2.0 Um, I understand that this shows that there could be other security holes, however that is why this is called the Beta version. Discovering bugs is basically guaranteed and there is still a long way to go until the actual release. |
|
|
|
For me:
Centra Card = WCX.
I cant belive, how many people are naive here. Simpl, incredible. Good luck to all of you, who invest in this "invisible exchange".
How long has their whitepaper page been a 404 error? Um its not, i just tried it. I know alot of people still think this is a scam, but to allow Alpha/Beta testers in whichever it is, that means they will have to reorganize the site so things will probably go offline for a bit. If everyone would just relax for a couple hours we will know soon enough EDIT: I just realized by "Thier" you meant centra card not WCX, but ill leave my post here anyway because people just need to chill out for a bit and see what happens. |
|
|
|
Have beta launch emails gone out yet?
I don't see anybody here talking about A. getting one or B. talking about what it looks like in there.
On this forum wcxofficial said they would go out at early September 2nd for Asian countries, or around 5pm Septemberr 1st for US so we still got several hours to go, However in the US by the end of they day we will know for sure if this is legit or not. EDIT: here is the exact quote: Hey all - thanks for your continued support!
Apologies for not being more active on BitcoinTalk lately. We're heads down focused on the private alpha launch which is due September 1st. The launch will likely happen in the wee hours of Sep 2 Hong Kong time (late night Sep 1 Asia / Europe, afternoon / evening Americas).
Invite codes for the private alpha will be sent out to your email on Sep 1. You'll receive one if you're selected!
Also, since we've received an overwhelming amount of signups for WCX, the first 5,000 alpha users selected will be in the English language only. We'll let in more languages in the 14 days after the private alpha launch.
|
|
|
|
You answered with wrong account, Macht was talking to Joking313. LOL, you just admitted using multiple accounts.
If i had a dollar for every wrong assumption on the internet i would be a trillionaire. |
|
|
|
"You're the one making the accusation, you should prove it"
That's not how it works.
That actually is how it works, it is called the Burden of Proof. |
|
|
|
Revealing private key holding team members will only make the exchange less secure. This has been explained a million times in the replies in this thread. If you don't want to invest in the pre-sale you can simply wait till the exchange launches before the ICO then decide.
That's what they say? They are concerned that they are unable to secure the funds of their company? What are they noobs or what? How did all the other ICOs do it? How dense are you people? I mean really i don't want to be an asshole but it is like you people put 0 brain power into thinking these things though. Most ICOs have no problem revealing their team because the crypto they hold is theirs, if they lose it it is their own fault. On exchanges they hold not only their own but all of their clients too, which means that not only do they have vastly more crypto but it is not their own, and losing customer funds would result in a lot of mistrust for the exchange and loss of clients. |
|
|
|
|
1. Says US investors can not participate in the sale probably because of regulations, however do US citizens still get to keep WCXT for their referrals, bounties, and signup bonuses?
2. Once WCTX is traded on the exchange can US investors buy it then?
|
|
|
|
|
Since WCXT is technically a security how do you plan on dealing with SEC regulations for US investors?
|
|
|
|
|
On the closed beta version of the site will you be allowed to buy and sell WCX too?
|
|
|
|
The project is very interesting. I'm afraid of very small commission. The commission is significantly lower of other exchanges. It could trigger arrival on the Exchange many bots. Sir, how will you deal with bot?
Um why you against bots? the exchange would make money on every single trade regardless of if it was human or bot traded, in my opinion the more bots the merrier Low fees generates a lot of small spam transactions. There is no sense in commission, if you can't sell or buy the right amount. And spam transactions will be hard to overload network. There are several ways around it, for instance you could put a cap on the number of transactions under $5.00 USD value per 24 hour period per account, make the minimum transaction amount $2.00,or more if need be. People are clever and they will always find a way around the rules, so instead of fighting them it is best to try to cooperate with them, and allow bots with conditions if the network can not support the number of transactions happening at a time. Otherwise the exchange will just get stuck in a never ending game of cat and mouse trying to chase away bot users. Not sure what you guys mean. There is no 'network' to be overloaded - WCX is not a decentralized exchange and trades are not made on-chain. Bots will also have to pay our commision like everybody else. There is a network to be overloaded, it is the network that the server runs on, essentially bots will spam a large amount of tiny transactions, which requires a separate POST call for each transaction, many bots doing that at the same time will essentially cause an unintentional DDOS attack on the server's network, so it would be in their best interest to somehow limit the number of transactions these bots can perform in a certain time period, of course this limit should be relative to the number of people and bots who use the website at a single time, and the capacity that the server can support |
|
|
|
|
