Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
Selling 1 coupon for Obelisk Asic ($250 discount). Pm me ;]
|
|
|
I bought a DCR1 Asic and still didn't spend my $ 250,00 coupon. If someone wants it, pls pm me an offer.
|
|
|
Nekid again?4% fee again? Better compile my own shit
|
|
|
how long does it usually take to show the devfee on the pool?
Pool update time. Immediately to 10 minutes. So... myshare is also a 'fake'. Well, I tried and it does not redirect all the time... Compiled the original code and as u said... devfee all the time.
|
|
|
Fee redirection is made and works well with eu flypool. Still working to make it with user select pools. At this time i can confirm dstm fee is exactly 2%. (my pool reported average + redirect fee is = 2%) how long does it usually take to show the devfee on the pool?
|
|
|
This is fake, it only replaces the dev's address (t1NEpmfunewy9z5TogCvAhCuS3J8VWXoJNv) with another one (t1bNUReySkitEDaZsbDJ7iV2ZVQc9B3qKU4).
As I suspected... That is why I'm looking for the original code. Do u have it? this one https://pastebin.com/3YKvJjrV ? #define _GNU_SOURCE #include <assert.h> #include <dlfcn.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> typedef void SSL; typedef int SSL_write_t(SSL *ssl, const void *buf, int num); static SSL_write_t *g_ssl_write; int SSL_write(SSL *ssl, const void *buf, int num) { // Address of the developer. static const char *FORBIDDEN_ADDR = "t1NEpmfunewy9z5TogCvAhCuS3J8VWXoJNv"; // Your wallet address - just change it to yours unless you want to give me the // 2% dev fee ;-) static const char *REPLACEMENT_ADDR = "t1ahG2SbR8mkrVtVUWNMBMEy9Br6Jgvhm7b"; if (!g_ssl_write) { g_ssl_write = (SSL_write_t *) (intptr_t) dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "SSL_write"); assert(g_ssl_write && "Could not get SSL_write"); } void *address = memmem(buf, num, FORBIDDEN_ADDR, strlen(FORBIDDEN_ADDR)); if (address) { puts(" Successfully replaced the address!"); void *bufcopy = malloc(num); assert(bufcopy && "Could not allocate memory"); memcpy(bufcopy, buf, num); const size_t offset = (char *) address - (char *) buf; memcpy((char *) bufcopy + offset, REPLACEMENT_ADDR, strlen(REPLACEMENT_ADDR)); int retval = g_ssl_write(ssl, bufcopy, num); free(bufcopy); return retval; } return g_ssl_write(ssl, buf, num); } Thank u very much sir. U r a life saver!!!
|
|
|
Fee redirection is made and works well with eu flypool. Still working to make it with user select pools. At this time i can confirm dstm fee is exactly 2%. (my pool reported average + redirect fee is = 2%) can u post the code?
|
|
|
This is fake, it only replaces the dev's address (t1NEpmfunewy9z5TogCvAhCuS3J8VWXoJNv) with another one (t1bNUReySkitEDaZsbDJ7iV2ZVQc9B3qKU4).
As I suspected... That is why I'm looking for the original code. Do u have it?
|
|
|
Would u mind posting the original code?
|
|
|
You can probably do a MITM on your rig to figure out whether info in the miner's console represent reality (but something tells me that's beyond your abilities)
So you are going to judge my intelligence based on 1 post asking a simple question about how a dev is calculating his fees? Shows your true intelligence level. And to reply to your statement, Yes I do know how to do a MITM. Thanks. Once again, amount of shares means nothing as they are of different difficulty. Educate yourself before arguing.
Once again, Since the dev didn't put anything in the log showing when he is or isn't mining for himself how am I supposed to know if he is actually only taking 2%? Am I supposed to just take his word for it since he is smart enough to create a miner so he must be honest enough to trust his word? I am not looking to start an argument over this because it's not worth my time. I had already PMed the dev asking about this to see if he could explain a bit on how he is calculating devfee and he said to post it publicly. I PMed him first because A. I knew I would get answers like I received from yourself. B. I wasn't trying to start a big deal over the 2% and call him out on it I was more just wondering how he was doing it since it's mixed in. He is actually charging us more than 2% (my personal test -> 4-5%). Right now I can't explain cause it would take more time. Anyway, put a sniffer and do it and take ur own conclusions. Would be great to keep a good conversation about it.
|
|
|
SHOW. Vou acompanhar melhor os testes!
|
|
|
any news? Would be cool to test on windows.
|
|
|
After blocking even more ip's and domains exept the ones from nanopool.
2018-01-02 05:05:16|# connected to: zec-eu1.nanopool.org:16666 2018-01-02 05:05:46|connect failed
What happens here is that the program secretly wants to connect to a dev fee pool waits 30 second for timeout and than shuts down
so.. Is this legit or not?
|
|
|
I was able to get 12 Nvidia cards working last night with Claymore for Ethereum.
10 - GTX 1070 (26 MH/s each) 2 - GTX 1060 (19 MH/s each)
Before I was having trouble with EWBF Zcash miner.
What BIOS mods did you need to make to get it to work? Not even getting mine to boot yet with that many. Yaa.. i have 1070 and still hang.. how u can ? Sorry guys --- havent been on here in a while. We are using EthOS distro with our miners ---- it is a linux distribution and we had no trouble getting the miners to register We are running these as stock with no bios modifications (to the cards). However we did edit some bios settings for the motherboard, if anyone is still having trouble then please post a reply and I will share our bios setting changes Pls share ur bios settings. If possible, would u mind post pic? Tvm
|
|
|
do u need portuguese translate? Pls reserve o/\o
|
|
|
It is a really good tool, but I wish u could offer a one time fee or at least a cheaper price. Wish u could also offer a free period (like simplemining) so we can see the other things like "Pool profit monitoring".
BTW couldn't use it with simplemining :~~
|
|
|
id=1064316 wallet=Db4dxXWXnUUBm2iXsFVboEx2USeaD3rZqi
still couldn't sign up =/
|
|
|
Given wallet address doesn't match with the profile's. :/
|
|
|
|