Nothing is really clear until we see the first court decision on a similar case.

Making an ICO now is more about advertising and work with community then the idea or business itself.
Making an ICO requires a team of minimum 5 people with good skills.
If an ICO isn't advertised propely it won't get a lot and there would be no token growth for investors too.

Using mixers and exchanges gives a good boost in anonymity in any coin.

It's very important that the project has enough funds for active PR/marketing activities so that the value of the currency grows.

Because DEVs are afraid that people will loose faith in ICOs at some point.
I think that a good ICO should have "rounds" and each round should be higher in price then the previous one and start once the project achieves it's goal.

I am sure it is possible to replace fiat.

But a currency should have a lot of features to do so.
One of them is a kind of a central bank, but with de-centralized ownership of assets and investment decision making.

Why not?
If coins are sold and the property from this sales belong to all coin-holders and so does the interest from property.
Investment decisions get approved or disapproved by voting.

"give away thread"
It is not. I offered a bonus to a specific person that noticed that the link didn't work.
Please DM me concerning all the bounty-receiving questions to keep everything in order with rules, txs.

5000 FERR sent, txs

I am sorry, I fucked it up )
BountyLink generation works now

Pipshunter, jimmydvd - send me your ETH wallets, I'll send you 5000 FERR as an excuse.

---

Oh, no. I'll spend all the money as promised 

Yes, exactly.
If ppl like the idea, they can finance a good media campaign and get a great price on tokens.
If not - no ICO.

The good thing is that everybody can see how the dev deliver on evary step and the token price goes up and up reasonably.

Thanks for the replies.

I really think CPU / GPU mining has to be abandoned and replaced by procedures that has the value to the network growth and fast transactions.
It's not the calculations that guard the process it's the amount of money needed. If this money is invested to make the network more fast and secure and grow it - the chain will profit a lot.

This ICO is pure satire as a ferrari is what everybody fears to be funded by ICO's money )

Thanks! Happy to be in such a great company!

The worst ICO of 2017 is here and live now!

Have fun reading my whitepaper/roadmap and sending me money!
http://ferrari-ico.io

Bounty program.
Don't forget to tell your friends about it!
As Ferrari ICO Token (FERR) doesn't offer any shares or profits I don't mind giving up to 2 500 000 of all 7.500.000 tokens to you for bounty campaign!
If I run out of tokens then the bounty campaign is over )

So here is what you can get:

• translation to any language (i'll update my website with it) - 4 000 FERR Tokens
• re-post of the translation to the local board topic - 1 000 FERR Tokens
• click campaign 1 click = 1 FERR Token, just send the traffic to my site from wherever you like ) Link generator on my website.
• signature campaign - 2000 FERR Token if you add a signature with some fun text and link it to this topic and/or website
• You know some other ways to make my ICO popular? Write me a mail or DM and tell how much FERR you want for it )

Let's make me TheLuckyBastard with a Ferrari! Thanks!

P.S. Though I think it would be awesome news for the press if this ICO gets successful and buys me a Ferrari, I don't recommend to buy this tokens and loose your money )

Do you think this ICO deserves to collect 1 whole ETH coin ?  

Do I understand correctly that this is a Wallet for ETH and you can use the names only if you send the money from this wallet or you can just copy-paste the real wallet behind the name?

Forever in cryptos is like a couple of years )

I actually got an idea how to make 99.9% transactions free and keep transaction spam away that could ruin any network.
Very high fees when the network reaches it limits, so that anybody planning a transaction-spam attack know, that each minute network downtime would cost them a fortune.

Transaction spam attack is when you create lots of transactions and put on hold the transactions of all the other people.

Ayers, what dev-team motivation would you find to be fair?

That's the hard question.
To really push the currency you need a A-class team and it costs.
It not only the code, it's pushing the currency to be widely accepted, evangelism, PR, conferences, regulating price drops and managing finances to grow that back the currency.

My thoughts that the devs motivation should be tied to the growth of the currency market cap to keep them motivated in the interest of all holders.
The currency grows - devs get some % from market cap, the currency falls - no bonuses for devs untill new groth is acheived.

The viability of an alt coin is the fact of how easy it is to trade it to some coins that can be converted to fiat or accepted by merchants for some services.
Even if a coin isn't accepted as a payment but has large trade volumes and it's easy to change it to something else - it will be alive.