ccminerx16r-x16s

Shame those just cause errors and reboots on 6*1080ti rigs
something about memory, before ccminer throws a wobbly, and if not manually terminated will crash sys

Tried latest, and then master, same issue.

Works fine when those are deleted from the list.

Thanks CLoco, That took my CeleronG2930  in one rig down to 40% from 80%

If you have a ZenCash addy I'll send you £1's worth for that useful post. 

(and yes technically I'm trying to get rid of my old lame coins sorry Zen)

Waiting till April and the new Nvidia cards, 1090? whatever the overpriced high hashrate card is, grab a rig full and carry on.

Keep trying other algos, coins, but always come back to multimine and auto change to btc options, the % increase over the past two years is plenty 700+%
While other coins will assuredly rise this year, probably see an increase in security ones like Zcash or its derivatives. Chasing those is fine, but how much risk do you want.

Amassing btc is risk enough for me and is paying off incredibly well (despite the recent action) Take a 36month view and see what a 700% acclimation year on year is and just sit back and hold on to the edge of your seat.

Algos that has gone ASIC, "scrypt", "myr-gr", "lbry", "keccak" and "skein"  - Pointless having any in a GPU mining list.

I understand your point, it has some merit.

Counter to that, I mine to make money not save a circuit board for the grandkids or for the manufacturer to send me a thank you note for taking care of my capacitors.

The unmistakable constant rise in bitcoin over the long term means that anything you make now will be worth much more later.

You may be earning $100 a week, after 3 years you look back and in fact you were earning at "today's" prices $1200 a week.

Keeping fans under x% / low power to "prolong life" is the height of folly as far as I'm concerned.


The more btc you earn now the better, and a small increase in the hash rate will pay you massive dividends later on.

Replacing a fan with a $3ebay one is easy for anyone who mines. Should it die, put the old fan back on and send in for replacement.
If cards die get them cross shipped with replacements, hardly any downtime.

Sell when there is 6months warranty left, (evga's is transferable, making for increased resale value to gamers) and use the funds to buy the latest cards.

These are machines for working not pets that need looking after.

Something's a miss somewhere probably ashashpool and a lame hsr miner both.

6x1080ti's last night and my "totalUnpaid" has hardly moved in 10 hours, almost 90% less than yesturday

Edit - just checked again
I see thee has been a refresh and balances have changed, maybe the decline in the coins lately is having an effect on the clearing times??

In any case, I've just switched over to SMOS and one single coin for now, to keep my eye on exactly what I'm earning.

Hope that illustrates the point of my past few posts 
the profit you make is what's in your own hands, not displayed in a program or on a pool.
Take it easy out there.

Supposed to be I grant you, but here you are relying on AM, and the Pool stats.
Both of which can and have been woefully wrong many times.
From simply not updating the AM software, or a glitch, or api not refreshing I could go on...


Simplify things, just take the pool stats directly, check them against what you are getting in your wallet - job done.

I wouldn't call a screenshot of Awesomeminers coin stats "Actual" profit data mate.

When I used AM, I found many discrepancies and only BTC in my wallet data is the metric I use for anything I would label "Actual"

I run identical rigs in parallel on different pools to gain my data, as should everyone intrested in profits.

@EfEks That was awesomeminer, more of a timevampire and winxpthrowback with lots of uneeded bells and whistles for a simple monitering and autoscript type program.

Fully agree with you MagicS, One simple readme with clear instructions would save a lot of issues, and other people just not bothering with the program.

Even a simple front end where you could enter the GPU's the Alogs you want and the pool/s you mine on, address details etc, would go a long way.

Just an FYI CLoco,
Open the folder - type cmd in address bar - bask in awesomeness.

I think I agree with you, but I can't bring myself to waste a couple of hours on Zpool, esp as I don't intend to mine there to reach a minpayout.
I not sure why shares found would affect your constant hashrate, but I do see that difficulty changes would.

I just found it weird for such a high discrepancy. You are probably entirely right, but having large %swings added to your benchmarks can't be ideal, or expected on consecutive runs of the same benchmark on 3x the same cards.

I'll have a play.

In any case I'm liking nemosminer so far, much better than the others I've tried.

Yes, thanks. I wondered if that' the expected variance.
But let's be clear here we are talking about a 12% difference  not a 2% difference. Sure Hash rate will be unaffected obviously, but will switching be unaffected?
surly the benchmarks are used to denote the switching preferences?

Anyone else reran the benchmarks several times after clearing them, and seen such % differences?
I may try another machine tomorrow, or the older version just to see.

At a loss as to why that's a reply to my Q millsys

I was asking why the same benchmark reran produces three different results.
I'm guessing it's down to the pool and not some markup in the maths if only one benchmark is run - to make it look better...what can I say I have a suspicious outlook

Just ran it again and got around 56.13 so I guess it settles down.

My point being if it was only run once, would that skew the profit profiles and have you mining the wrong algo?

Anyway just what I found, take it as you will.

I was just trying this on a spare 3x1080ti machine and I accidently closed the benchmark after only one result  on x17

No problem, reset the benchmarks and started it again... noticed a rather large difference - is this the expected variance over consecutive benchmarks?

Stats ' X17 ' ->  59.90 MH after 481 sec
Stats ' X17 ' ->  54.38 MH after 481 sec
Stats ' X17 ' ->  53.70 MH after 481 sec

v 2.41-master

I wouldn't mind hearing a little more about this, 

Thanks Nemo,
Yes currency sorted, was worried that using US for location would have repercussions for server pings etc,
but it's working fine so I'll leave it alone.

Looking forward to v2.4.1 

Thanks guytechie,
That Question was from someone else, I'd always rebench if different miners were used or updated.

No my other Q was about currency and location - but meh just left it on usd and us

Thanks paskevic.
And yes I was only using ahash

Is it Ok to copy over the hashrates/benchmarks to several identical machines, I'm assuming it will be.

Active time is def wrong, is that used for anything though?
As for phi, it worked fine for me