"we stop bounty, as it was unsuccessful and we are not satisfied with results".
If that's what project does, then that project is failed one. You did work, you deserve to be paid. I have done few bounties where the admins were dissatisfied with results yet they paid. That's right, but if the project doesn't have a good idea, is poorly organized and only hopes to raise money quickly and then disappear, do you really care about tokens that will have no value, because most likely they won't even be listed on exchange? That's fair, I meant for projects who solely don't pay bounty hunters just because bounty results didn't turn out as they expected. They could still be having tge, etc. |
|
|
|
"we stop bounty, as it was unsuccessful and we are not satisfied with results".
If that's what project does, then that project is failed one. You did work, you deserve to be paid. I have done few bounties where the admins were dissatisfied with results yet they paid. |
|
|
|
Patterns will always exists. People do browse the forum by their interests and this has a high potential of creating merit circles/"gangs".
a person with Legendary rank has no advantages in receiving merits, as much as in spending them to incremental the pool of reliable users (with high rank) Exactly, I love your comment but won't merit it cause you are already leggy  plus for me it's rather rare sight to earn merits (ik improve post quality). Would rather hold whatever some are left and spend when opportunity arises (good post + rank < leggy). |
|
|
|
And those few who have done it + were successful, considered it waste of token allocation.
If I might ask can you give me an example of that? I believe that some projects already calculated and reserved some token allocation specifically for the bounty. JRT, this was back early 2018 ig, shortly after bounty was done they said, bounty was given unnecessary allocation, it did nothing good for project. |
|
|
|
I'm sorry to compare scammers to this wise turtle
 |
|
|
|
|
Host's eyes felt like reading script, I think genuity would help in catching viewer's attention.
Also, just like Bitcoin core updates under 'news' tab , a weekly video's link would help channel in viewership.
|
|
|
|
4. counterstrike
Is it joke or fr? |
|
|
|
..I wonder how will take it's toll for those who doesn't receive the airdrop yet buy the token in the market, that's a lot of pain to take tbh if this one takes another rug pull.
For minnows even claiming this drop is not worth it, you might make it in claiming if gas fees are low enough however if you try to sell (uni, sushi), it would net you loss. People who bought in start are already down significantly. |
|
|
|
|
I don't see many successful projects having done bounties.
And those few who have done it + were successful, considered it waste of token allocation.
Yet this forum is littered with many bounties, may be I'm missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
^^ I was speaking from creators standpoint. Plus, i'd reserve the judgement until project becomes big or folds out as apparently the 20% instant unlock tokens will be burned.
|
|
|
|
Gasdao launches 10h ago. Anns airdrop to ethereum users who spent at least $1559 on gas, community gets hyped. Contract copied from another dao project. 15% available to team out of which 20% instantly available. Total supply 1T. No whitepaper, no website, no utility and look at price: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/gas-daoNo substance, anon team, 30b instantly unlocked tokens for their "25" anon teammates screams rugpull (although they haven't rugged yet). Be careful of such projects. |
|
|
|
On myactivity page of GoogleI have all 3 activity disabled (including subsettings and old data is 'deleted') yet on YT it reflects my searches and watches. So does that mean those settings are for namesake? I mean, I'm not surprised, I have seen this on fb too, but like why do they pretend? |
|
|
|
|
Pretty sure same thing happened last time too, when market turns cold they be like, people will automatically leave it lmao
|
|
|
|
What does it do different from hive/steem? Nevermind, sounds lowkey scam. Wouldn't be surprised if above two responders were created by op himself. Meriting was mistake  |
|
|
|
If tweets can be sold as nft why not bitcointalk posts? To be honest, I haven't understood why should tweets be sold in the first place. Neither do I, but people buy them at amounts one would consider absurd. |
|
|
|
Luckily, once someone becomes an NFT owner of a Bitcointalk post, no one else can see the post publicly. You can no longer click on it, you can't copy-paste it, or quote it. It completely disappears from the face of the earth (Internet) and can only be found in the buyer's Ethereum wallet.
"According to "Valuables," the tweet itself will "continue to live on Twitter," but the winning bidder would own the NFT, "signed and verified by the creator," like a virtual autograph. - cnbcI assume similar would be applicable to this forum and posts will continue to live on bitcointalk. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
