|
Could you please enhance your API to include the best results for
-dual-subsolver -1
-dual-intensity -1
which bminer found during it's optimization phase?
Thank you very big!
|
|
|
|
Feature request for next version: Please allow for different config files, e.g. -CONFIGFILE=[json file] This will allow for easy inclusion in programs like www.MultiPoolMiner.ioYou do not need to wait, the parameter for this is -usercfg=<pathToFile> as described bottom of page 2 of the manual  Did not see this! Thank you! |
|
|
|
Feature request for next version: Please allow for different config files, e.g. -CONFIGFILE=[json file] This will allow for easy inclusion in programs like www.MultiPoolMiner.io |
|
|
|
It would be convenient to run the miner using the .bat file.
The conf.file is not very convenient to use.
You can.... just pass all options as command line parameters like [-parameter]=[Value] |
|
|
|
Both CryptonightV7 and CryptonightHeavy doesnt work with NiceHash, all shares will be rejected.
This is the error message: "Invalid nonce; is miner not compatible with NiceHash?".
Can you please check this? Maybe add a -nicehash option like in other miners. Thanks!
Can Confirm: ******************************************************************************** _____ _ _____ _ / ____| | | | __ \ | | | | _ __ _ _ _ __ | |_ ___ | | | |_ __ ___ __| | __ _ ___ | | | '__| | | | '_ \| __/ _ \| | | | '__/ _ \/ _` |/ _` |/ _ \ | |____| | | |_| | |_) | || (_) | |__| | | | __/ (_| | (_| | __/ \_____|_| \__, | .__/ \__\___/|_____/|_| \___|\__,_|\__, |\___| __/ | | __/ | |___/|_| |___/ ******************************************************************************** [18:59:45] INFO - CryptoDredge 0.9.0 for NVIDIA GPUs [18:59:45] INFO - DevFee is 1% [18:59:45] INFO - NVML is enabled [18:59:45] INFO - GPU0 : Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : 11264 MB [18:59:45] INFO - GPU1 : Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti : 11264 MB [18:59:45] INFO - Selected pool: cryptonightheavy.eu.nicehash.com:3364 [18:59:45] INFO - Selected algo: cryptonightheavy [18:59:45] INFO - Intensity set to 5 [18:59:45] INFO - CCminer TCP API: server started on 127.0.0.1:4000 [18:59:45] INFO - Start user session [18:59:46] INFO - Received new job #000000d59fdab09f, diff=50 [18:59:56] INFO - 0/1 Rejected : diff=51.83, reason: Invalid nonce; is miner not compatible with NiceHash? [19:00:14] INFO - Received new job #000000d59fdab693, diff=50 [19:00:20] INFO - 0/2 Rejected : diff=54.575, reason: Invalid nonce; is miner not compatible with NiceHash? [19:00:25] INFO - 0/3 Rejected : diff=994.896, reason: Invalid nonce; is miner not compatible with NiceHash? [19:00:26] INFO - 0/4 Rejected : diff=90.389, reason: Invalid nonce; is miner not compatible with NiceHash? [19:00:33] INFO - Received new job #000000d59fdabae0, diff=50 |
|
|
|
|
How do I specified advanced pool config details via password field?
e.g.
lolMiner -coin=ZER -apiport=4002 -pool=equihash192.mine.zergpool.com -port=2144 -user=****************************** -pass=Password,c=BTC -disable_memcheck=1 -devices=2
-------------------------------------------------
Welcome to lolMiner 0.43
This software is only meant for pool mining
with the Equihash 96.5, 144.5 or 192.7 algorithm
Made by Lolliedieb, August 2018
-------------------------------------------------
Warning: Malformed parameter: -pass=Password,c=BTC
Warning: No user profile defined in command line (-profile=<profileName> missing)
Using only DEFAULT section and command line input
...
I tried converting it with System.Web.HttpUtility]::UrlEncode
-pass=Password,c=BTC -> -pass=BlackBox%2cc%3dBTC
but then the miner sends the sting to the pool as is :-(
|
|
|
|
I change bat file to select only gpu1 and gpu2 but not gpu3? How can I do this?
add -d 0,1 z-enemy.exe --help is your friend :-) |
|
|
|
|
Suggestion / feature request
Please add --benchmark -a[algo] parameter.
E.g. for X16r it would benchmark each of the 16 sub-algorithms n times and then report the average hash rate.
In theory this will produce the most accurate hash rate average because over time each sub-algorithm would be run equally often.
Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Suggestion / feature request
Please add --benchmark parameter.
E.g. for X16r it would benchmark each of the 16 sub-algorithms n times and then report the average hash rate.
In theory this will produce the most accurate hash rate average because over time each sub-algorithm would be run equally often.
Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Bminer 10.0.0 error (can be reproduced any time)
[WARN] [2018-08-11T00:01:25+02:00] [D1] From Stratum Channel, ethash miner cannot process message ethash.blake14RNonce, [56 28 135 0 90]
[WARN] [2018-08-11T00:01:25+02:00] [D1] From Stratum Channel, ethash miner cannot process message ethash.blake14RJob, {000000971f2b21dc [5 0 0 0 139 169 186 182 200 0 32 140 120 202 65 174 180 176 88 110 223 46 147 50 79 45 14 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 168 119 73 126 174 29 28 140 39 241 25 181 62 117 22 16 68 138 194 13 151 100 151 138 63 59 111 40 165 161 177 143 204 234 144 30 104 203 120 169 194 138 109 18 54 95 167 198 149 104 239 158 239 35 70 185 251 140 224 224 13 161 223 233 1 0 88 113 16 127 116 150 5 0 4 0 220 158 0 0 142 224 0 25 221 26 79 63 2 0 0 0 225 8 4 0 181 29 0 0 139 9 110 91 0 0 0 0] [5 0 0 0] [5 0 0 0] 5b6e098b true}
Used command line:
BMiner.exe -api 127.0.0.1:4000 -uri ethstratum://**********.********:x@europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20585 -uri2 blake14r://*********************************.********:x@decred.eu.nicehash.com:3354 -watchdog=false -no-runtime-info -nofee -max-temperature 0 -devices 0,1
Overall Ethash mining with version 10.0.0 is much more stable than with older versions! Excellent!
Hi UselessGuru, Thanks for your feedback. It looks like decred on nicehash pool is currently not supported. Please use pools in examples at https://bminer.me/examples/#dual-mining-for-ethereum-eth-and-decred-dcr-verge-xvg for dual mining eth and dcr. We will try to support decred.eu.nicehash.com in a future version. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
Bminer 10.0.0 error (can be reproduced any time)
[WARN] [2018-08-11T00:01:25+02:00] [D1] From Stratum Channel, ethash miner cannot process message ethash.blake14RNonce, [56 28 135 0 90]
[WARN] [2018-08-11T00:01:25+02:00] [D1] From Stratum Channel, ethash miner cannot process message ethash.blake14RJob, {000000971f2b21dc [5 0 0 0 139 169 186 182 200 0 32 140 120 202 65 174 180 176 88 110 223 46 147 50 79 45 14 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 168 119 73 126 174 29 28 140 39 241 25 181 62 117 22 16 68 138 194 13 151 100 151 138 63 59 111 40 165 161 177 143 204 234 144 30 104 203 120 169 194 138 109 18 54 95 167 198 149 104 239 158 239 35 70 185 251 140 224 224 13 161 223 233 1 0 88 113 16 127 116 150 5 0 4 0 220 158 0 0 142 224 0 25 221 26 79 63 2 0 0 0 225 8 4 0 181 29 0 0 139 9 110 91 0 0 0 0] [5 0 0 0] [5 0 0 0] 5b6e098b true}
Used command line:
BMiner.exe -api 127.0.0.1:4000 -uri ethstratum://**********.********:x@europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20585 -uri2 blake14r://*********************************.********:x@decred.eu.nicehash.com:3354 -watchdog=false -no-runtime-info -nofee -max-temperature 0 -devices 0,1
Overall Ethash mining with version 10.0.0 is much more stable than with older versions! Excellent!
|
|
|
|
using windows version here mixed with some autoswitch software that fail to read api response since 8.2, had no problem with version 8.0 or 7
same here. Windows + Awesome Miner. What a Windows version do you use? Thanks for your help! Windows Pro x64 10.0.17134.165 |
|
|
|
...
question. you can make under the algoritm HEX, it's possible, you would be the first))))
 |
|
|
|
UPDATE This is announcement for Equihash 144 coins stratum setup change effective as of 06.08.2018 10:00 CET. I am excided to annoucne that we managed to get personalized equihash coins profit switch without EWBF miner restart, as well as adding mc= functionality to equihash stratums. Credits to EWBF developer supporting the change. We will group all Equihash 144 5 coins under one port equihash144.mine.zergpool.com:2146 making all Options(1,2,3) functionallity working with latest EWBF release 0.5. Following command lines needs to be used for different equihash144 mining options in combination with EWBF release 0.5 based on Snowgem example Commands for different mining options Option 1 Auto coin switch by profitability within algorithm with payment to wallet miner --algo 144_5 --pers auto --server equihash144.mine.zergpool.com:2146 --user <YOURBTCWALLET> --pass c=BTC
Option 2 Direct coin mining to coin wallet miner --algo 144_5 --pers auto --server equihash144.mine.zergpool.com:2146 --user <YOURXSGWALLET> --pass c=XSG,mc=XSG
Option 3 Direct coin mining with autoexchange to specified coin wallet miner --algo 144_5 --pers auto --server equihash144.mine.zergpool.com:2146 --user <YOURBTCWALLET> --pass c=BTC,mc=XSG
Please note mc stands for mining coin symbol, c stand for payout wallet coin symbol What host/port will the API report? equihash144.mine.zergpool.com:2146? |
|
|
|
... Request to developers: Please keep the algo list consistent. a) Either allow ANY of the numeric algos, like 144_5. Currently 210_9 is not allowed :-(, and allow secondary argument --pers b) Allow ANY Coin name, like Aion & Zhash, but also BitcoinZ etc. The current situation is confusing (to say the least) and makes the adaptation for 3rd party miners (e.g. www.multipoolminer.io) unneccesary complicated. I don't think you are ok to request something from dev as you are using no fee option  Good point... |
|
|
|
In my tests pers must be set to AION0PoW otherwise solutions are invalid
I cannot confim this: miner --fee 0 --pec --algo aion --server 99.255.106.25 --port 3333 --user 0xa01e968221584946dac1e6842bf985de7ff49c8b9913220ed793d64a150b2864 +-------------------------------------------------+
| EWBF's Eqihash CUDA miner. v0.4 |
+-------------------------------------------------+
17:01:25 INFO: Configured pools: 1
17:01:25 INFO: Selected pool: 99.255.106.25:3333
17:01:25 INFO: Algorithm: 210_9 "AION0PoW"
17:01:25 INFO: Devices: All.
17:01:25 INFO: Temperature limit: 90
17:01:25 INFO: Api: Disabled
---------------------------------------------------
17:01:26 INFO: Detected new work: 00000e27
17:01:26 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11264 MB i:64
17:01:26 CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6144 MB i:64
17:01:27 INFO: Detected new work: 00000e28
17:01:28 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 134ms [A:1, R:0]
17:01:29 INFO: GPU1 Accepted share 135ms [A:1, R:0]
17:01:30 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 131ms [A:2, R:0]
17:01:32 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 134ms [A:3, R:0]
17:01:32 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 137ms [A:4, R:0]
17:01:32 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 133ms [A:5, R:0]
17:01:33 INFO: GPU1 Accepted share 128ms [A:2, R:0]
^CRequest to developers: Please keep the algo list consistent. a) Either allow ANY of the numeric algos, like 144_5. Currently 210_9 is not allowed :-(, and allow secondary argument --pers b) Allow ANY Coin name, like Aion & Zhash, but also BitcoinZ etc. The current situation is confusing (to say the least) and makes the adaptation for 3rd party miners (e.g. www.multipoolminer.io) unneccesary complicated. |
|
|
|
1. Could you check an another port or the firewall settings.
2. We'll try to resolve issue with "-b localhost:4444"
1. Firewall settings is default. Connection established. Command sended normally. Readed answer as `null`. No exceptions. powershell code work with any ccminer: $Client =[Net.Sockets.TcpClient]::new("127.0.0.1", "4444")
$Stream = $Client.GetStream()
$Writer = [IO.StreamWriter]::new($Stream)
$Reader = [IO.StreamReader]::new($Stream)
$Writer.WriteLine("summary")
$Writer.Flush()
$result = $Reader.ReadLine() # $Reader.ReadToEnd() same $null
Write-Host "Answer: $result"
2. Thanks. Please, try $Writer.Write("summary"), because WriteLine sending "summary\r\n". We'll fix it > Please, try $Writer.Write("summary"), because WriteLine sending "summary\r\n". We'll fix it When??? Please check v0.7.0 Fixed, thank you! Miner ready for testing with MultiPoolMiner ( www.multiPoolMiner.io) |
|
|
|
1. Could you check an another port or the firewall settings.
2. We'll try to resolve issue with "-b localhost:4444"
1. Firewall settings is default. Connection established. Command sended normally. Readed answer as `null`. No exceptions. powershell code work with any ccminer: $Client =[Net.Sockets.TcpClient]::new("127.0.0.1", "4444")
$Stream = $Client.GetStream()
$Writer = [IO.StreamWriter]::new($Stream)
$Reader = [IO.StreamReader]::new($Stream)
$Writer.WriteLine("summary")
$Writer.Flush()
$result = $Reader.ReadLine() # $Reader.ReadToEnd() same $null
Write-Host "Answer: $result"
2. Thanks. Please, try $Writer.Write("summary"), because WriteLine sending "summary\r\n". We'll fix it > Please, try $Writer.Write("summary"), because WriteLine sending "summary\r\n". We'll fix it When??? |
|
|
|
api reports wrong servers for bitcoin-gold
host_list: "hub.miningpoolhub.com;us-east.hub.miningpoolhub.com;asia.hub.miningpoolhub.com;europe.hub.miningpoolhub.com",
instead of:
host_list: "us-east.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com;asia.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com;europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com",
Still broken... |
|
|
|
Does this support API and --benchmark command?
Thanks!
--benchmark command will be available in the next release. API coming soon. Oh Thanks. Last question. Does --device can use more than 10? ^_^ Yes, it can. There is no limit for the number of devices. How exactly do I specify the devices? What is the separator? Comma, Space, Semicolon? What number format is used? Decimal or hex? I assume devices start with 0. Pls. give an example for 13 cards. e.g -d 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 And: Please support API! Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
