My making sense of the rebranding.
Keep FLO as FLO, change PIN to the wrapped project.
1. Make PIN equity in the PIN project. Which would provide smart contract services. But main focus on providing swapping service for wrapped tokens, and exchange/swap for 1:1 blockchain COINS.
2. this current PIN on ether, rename to FLO.w "wrapped"
3. There are 10s-100s of other coins that would use PIN project provide wrap/swap solutions.
|
|
|
Hey market aggregators!
Get your sh*t together.
Nearly every market aggregator copy-pastes the API feed from coinmarketcap.com (which is BNB).
They (who is BNB) have ignored/deleted the coin supply which is free API public info, via, chainz/tokenview/others.
Other qualified blockchains suffering the same fate :: Aurora, GoldCoin, Clam, and Unobtanium. Others?
Seems intentional censorship.
Loads of verifiable dead shit coins are tracked and ranked high above, even more faux tokens, yet here we are, hidden REAL marketcap.
I feel like there is CAUSE for unity with the fellow classic blockchains to organize with right-minded aggregators and standardized a list of classic blockchains @+7yrs.
|
|
|
love to see TRK survive. but right now i do not see any trade. but a lovely stake chain. memo;;; btc dolphins = 100btc+ that's more mcap than many a blockchain. stack ur BTC DOGE LTC. stake ur POS chain of choice
|
|
|
It would be more like "Imagine FLO as a historic building, we are going to knock that over and build a building that actually uses another coin's foundation/network and totally different/scary building structure.... o btw, please sign this HUGE multipage invasive and unenforceable contract and pay 0.9% fee on the "1:1" conversion and give us your personal information."
I feel this drains the entire project of what I thought was cool about it in the first place. I wish y'all nothing but the best though...
RIP FLO.
ditto. I aint gots the time to figure out what exactly is happening. But do clarify, anyone in the know. In principle. Amending anything regarding the classic blockchains, from brand or specs, is terminal. It demonstrates, not decentralized.
|
|
|
The Banana Republic of New Zealand, DO YOUR JOB AND CLEAN YOUR SHIT!!!
bump
|
|
|
That's pretty expensive. Chainz block explorer is like $11-12 and you can also rent a VPS for like $5-6 and set up some open source explorer yourself (IQUIDUS explorer for example) anything under $30/m. & i don't care. will fund 3m cycles if service allows donation. someone take the initiative. will follow the lead.
|
|
|
I say we wait for now.
yes. but. the chain must block. w/ smoothness. other than that. run silent in the deep.
|
|
|
The rise in the price of DOGE helped make these low priced staking coins more valuable. If DOGE continues to stay high, it should continue to do so.
this. think underwritten. longterm. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-_CuPtzoDUProof of Work vs Proof of Stake: Pros and Cons | Charles Hoskinson and Lex Fridman
|
|
|
Basically, all the coins I mentioned need support. They need people to start buying the coins and staking.
Group TALK  Coins that have functioned for years (6-8) but well below the radar. Lots. see paramind's list. then that long list. The next group have some liquidity, but nothing deep. Group PANDA  RDD BLK PPC OK XBC POT, PND, BOAT, PINK, PAC, PIVX Group High profile with big board trade? QTUM? Strat? 3 Tiers?? The rank and file has become well defined in the BTC bull 2020-21 Right now, Group TALK POS coins are for fun. Stake because you like and believe. Invest a few bucks, run the clients. Group PANDA will likely have ROI if you can hodl 24-36 months.
|
|
|
it was about time to give this litedoge more attention , still staking
Once upon a time LDOGE had deep liquidity against LTC and DOGE, back in the days of Cryptopia. I think a good 2-3 year goal is for LDOGE community to build & provide a simple instant swap against LTC and DOGE once again. It just makes sense.
|
|
|
The basis for the consensus of cryptocurrency lies in the fairness of issuance, comprehensive transparency, and the accumulation of time. This is the reason why #Bitcoin, Litecoin, and #Infinitecoin have been issued steadily for 7-10 years.  Focus on the class of coins at least 6-10 years old. ;)Win. https://docs.publicindex.network/for-users/upgrade-flo-to-pin
|
|
|
I like PND too. But Panda having forked into new and old forks is of concern, watching to see the results. TALK did the same, but the new fork failed.
for $300 invest POT, PND, BOAT, PINK, HYP will all stake at least twice week if you run the client 24/7.
for BLK PPC not easy to stake but once a year.
Anybody have knowledge of RDD, OK, CLOAK, VRC, MINT, Beans, i/o, or others?
The only one that qualifies the stake and 'traded on at least 2 decent exchanges for US customers' is NONE? NAV RDD QTUM STRAT have the big league listing but not sure on the staking ability.
|
|
|
if DOGE > LTC then UNO ? BTC; 
|
|
|
That all changed in January last year when persons unknown hacked into the company's system and shunted about $24 million of the exchange's $250m store of cryptocurrencies out of reach. So ... Grant holds $226M (2019 value)? Liquidated $3m of client assets "to fund the recovery". No worse. The company had $1m in the bank and $5m in a third party trust account. The liquidators converted the company's 344 bitcoin to $4.4m cash. The $6m cash covers all the creditors. The bonus sale of BTC covers Grants fees. And is worth $19M if they held it  Also sale of the office/computers made $2m. So where are the clients $250m?
|
|
|
LOlZ Just now the Authorities pick up on the fishy smell, maybe  Cryptopia went into liquidation in May 2019 after a hacker stole $24m – 15 per cent of Cryptopia clients’ digital currency stock, made up of about 900 different currencies including bitcoin. It is regarded as the biggest theft in New Zealand history.
The exchange was holding cryptocurrencies worth about $170m and had 800,000 account holders with a positive coin balance.
So Grant is holding $142m of clients coin? Has there ever been an itemized invoice?
|
|
|
|