 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
|
- From version 1.5.0a further excavator supports only NiceHash stratum servers. Stratum servers are available at:
nhmp.LOCATION.nicehash.com (LOCATION: eu, usa, hk, jp, in, br).
sad day when excavator was bound only to nicehash server, anyway gl with developement |
|
|
|
@nitrobg Excavator is not best all alround, for some type my be  yes nicehash team they work to improve ... hsrminer is better like speed but it have big issue with functionality & support, other option it can be Ccminer KlausT 8.19 & 8.20 same it get better speed but same lack of functionality @Blazin ccminer-alexis is outdate short version Nvidia on Neoscript & Equihash (only 1 chose dstm, excavator is very unstable) algorit miner have lack of a good miner sory for off topic Claymore & still hope to see you release support for Nvidia to  cheers |
|
|
|
Sounds like you guys should collaborate on the miner and split the devfee. Justaminer has spent quite some time figuring out what the end-users want, including API and reliability. I doubt that he had any ill intent by patching it in the beginning based on posts in respective thread. Slapping a devfee on a patched release was questionable, but that was done before Palgin's return.
Palgin's kernel optimization work is amazing. No questions about it.
We all would benefit if you two combine your knowledge and experience and make a great miner to try and beat that excavator which currently has ~10% advantage on 1080/1080Ti.
I don't approve patching someone else's proprietary binary, but when the only dev went AWOL, there was some excuse for it. If I were the original dev in such situation, I would expect an apology from someone who hacked my binary without my knowledge and would be open to suggestions and collaboration. But that's just me.
In any case, try to be respectful and open-minded. The last thing we need right now is a dev war in this space.
With respect,
SCSI
Agreed 1000% & i will say for sure all community it have more to win if in stead a war between 2 brilliant person it start combine your mind & force !!! it create more for bouth of you & for all community cheers |
|
|
|
Did I miss something? Difficulity and price went down by about 25% in 10 minutes. Did someone decide to unload GBX and move his farm to another coin?  Well, I don't complain, I can mine more coins now! about difficulty this it was happen after Claymore was release a new miner app for neoscrypt algoritm (AMD support only, sadly) for example on www.altminer.net site from a normal hrate 2-4 G was a jump to ~20-25 G hrate so conclusion is simple this it will settle in few day probabil ... cheers |
|
|
|
Hello @gobyte small suggestion for official pool like: https://us1.gobyte.network/a. try to rise automatically pay balance from 0.001 (to low & it generate to many low transaction) to minimum 0.01 or better to 0.02 b. try to lower minim confirmation from 100 to 50-60 (like other coin) it take to much 5-6 hour to swap from immature to confirmate (this it will be good for other pool to) c. make on Next Payout: 12:36 UTC to become "Current TIME Next | Payout: 12:36 UTC" & give option user to can swap on GMTor make page to automatically detect time region d. try to add eu pool server but from what i see it goo well us aka for me from eu 123 mls is fine best was 40-50 cheers |
|
|
|
Hey all, I created a small script to extract Nvidia and DSTM telemetry data into Prometheus to create nice dashboards. Check it out and let me know what you think: https://github.com/pwm/rig-statsthat look intristing for a person who like to track statistic BUT from what i see it working only for linux  so when you have time to make for windows to will be nice cheers |
|
|
|
Please Also think about us........ NVIDIA miners.......
Earlier yours Zcash was also AMD only....
Both my ZCash and Neoscrypt miners will be AMD-only, sorry. There are many NVIDIA devs here and they already released appropriate miners. come one mate because there are other miner out there not means equality is same, plus more choise always is better & it can create a good dev competition my be in a pozitive way ... personal after i was use your Eth one damn i can say i wish you to change your mind & make Zcash & this new Neoscrypt supporting Nvidia to but probabil maintain AMD & Nvidia on same equality is not easy task ... anyway hope to change your mind & make a lot ppls happy Cheers & thx |
|
|
|
a suggestion for all who post diferite test result with diferite gpu to make post relevant & help developer, community it require more that number & it will be good info to post technical data to ... something like Hardware Spec & setting: GPU 0: Gigabyte Windforce 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB (Samsung for some algorithm it is relevant for) OS: Windows 7 Service Pack 1 Video Driver: 390.65 MSI Afterburn: 4.4.2 (version) Power limit: 74 Temp limit: 80 Core Clock: +168 Memmory Clock: +600 GPU 1: - . - Power limit: --- Temp limit: --- Core Clock: --- Memmory Clock: --- INFO : [19:15:42] : GPU#0 - Gigabyte GTX 1060 3GB, Temp is 57C, Fans at 66%, Power consumption 86W
INFO : [19:15:42] : Share Accepted
INFO : [19:15:59] : Share Accepted, overall speed is 731.01kH/s, efficiency 100.00%
way it help this data because say GPU X = Y Speed with out care / provide info like what tuning it use PL., Core Clock, Mem. Clock is not help anyone nether dev nether community, print screen is good to but not such important like what i suggest first cheers |
|
|
|
bad bad @dropky a small corection   only for equihash - Here is an example of the json file to run equihash on 3 GPUs: = BAD - Here is an example of the json file to run equihash on 1 GPU with 3 Worker: = Good cheers |
|
|
|
NVIDIA support ?
probabil if Claymore it will add support for Nvidia to it will make many miner happy & i will love that to ... hope to see that day came |
|
|
|
Just_a_miner now i get it after reading what you was replay "Okay, now how to connect. As far as I know you can connect from linux with telnet." & "If you are trying to connect from browser using websockets - please show .html you are using" what means you was just implement api request not provide let say a default .html to ... it require user to build own html or use telnet, putty (windows, linux) or Remote manager provide by claymore see the EthMan about awesome miner i not advice to recommend only for appi, putty, telnet (booth work on windows to) is more that inaff ... awesome miner make to much mess, personally i spend to much time clean after i was try to test it ... for future try to implement a default html to like dstm, bminer, excavator have if you can same say in OP treath description it require a external application like telnet / putty cheers & thx for clarify this |
|
|
|
|
Hello
It seams API is not functional or bugy coz i try to use -b, --api-bind=port & i recive:
A. The connection was reset or B. Unable to connect
With TCPView app i see port is allocated for hsrminer but nothing is show in browser aka see msg
cheers
|
|
|
|
Can someone please explain me one thing.
When I run DSTM or EWBF I have one card that starts ok but then goes down very fast to 1/2 hashrate.
NVIDIA Inspector shows very small (about 30-40%) usage of MCU on that card.
If I run ccminer (any algo) - all is fine, all cards are equal. So it seems to me that this is an equihash issue.
Please check card 1. Sometimes it shows shares like .. That card is totally equal with 7.8.9 GPUs, so it must give 750 h/s
Defective card?
2018-02-19 17:47:37| ========== Sol/s: 7020.9 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7058.2 I/s: 3777.9 Sh: 3.89 1.00 184
2018-02-19 17:47:42| GPU0 53C Sol/s: 700.6 Sol/W: 3.29 Avg: 698.9 I/s: 370.6 Sh: 0.18 1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:47:43| GPU1 53C Sol/s: 371.2 Sol/W: 1.96 Avg: 370.1 I/s: 199.0 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-02-19 17:47:45| GPU2 68C Sol/s: 756.9 Sol/W: 2.57 Avg: 755.6 I/s: 405.2 Sh: 0.54 1.00 187 +
2018-02-19 17:47:47| GPU3 64C Sol/s: 735.8 Sol/W: 2.70 Avg: 742.6 I/s: 398.2 Sh: 0.18 1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:47:48| GPU4 66C Sol/s: 761.2 Sol/W: 2.71 Avg: 759.7 I/s: 405.8 Sh: 0.36 1.00 188 +
2018-02-19 17:47:50| GPU5 61C Sol/s: 754.7 Sol/W: 2.61 Avg: 760.5 I/s: 408.4 Sh: 0.73 1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:53| GPU6 66C Sol/s: 690.1 Sol/W: 2.83 Avg: 694.7 I/s: 372.7 Sh: 0.36 1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:47:54| GPU7 56C Sol/s: 758.7 Sol/W: 2.50 Avg: 761.1 I/s: 407.2 Sh: 0.18 1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:57| GPU8 55C Sol/s: 751.9 Sol/W: 2.76 Avg: 754.9 I/s: 404.9 Sh: 0.54 1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:47:59| GPU9 62C Sol/s: 769.0 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 759.6 I/s: 406.4 Sh: 0.91 1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:47:59| ========== Sol/s: 7050.1 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7057.6 I/s: 3778.4 Sh: 3.99 1.00 184
2018-02-19 17:48:04| GPU0 53C Sol/s: 693.4 Sol/W: 3.29 Avg: 698.6 I/s: 370.9 Sh: 0.17 1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:48:05| GPU1 54C Sol/s: 370.9 Sol/W: 1.96 Avg: 370.2 I/s: 199.0 Sh: 0.00 . .
2018-02-19 17:48:07| GPU2 69C Sol/s: 748.8 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 755.2 I/s: 405.2 Sh: 0.51 1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:09| GPU3 65C Sol/s: 742.9 Sol/W: 2.70 Avg: 742.6 I/s: 398.2 Sh: 0.17 1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:10| GPU4 66C Sol/s: 753.4 Sol/W: 2.71 Avg: 759.3 I/s: 405.8 Sh: 0.34 1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:13|> GPU5 61C Sol/s: 745.9 Sol/W: 2.60 Avg: 759.6 I/s: 408.4 Sh: 0.68 1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:15|> GPU6 66C Sol/s: 701.3 Sol/W: 2.83 Avg: 695.1 I/s: 373.0 Sh: 0.34 1.00 172
2018-02-19 17:48:16|> GPU7 57C Sol/s: 759.3 Sol/W: 2.50 Avg: 761.0 I/s: 406.9 Sh: 0.34 1.00 188 +
2018-02-19 17:48:19|> GPU8 55C Sol/s: 758.9 Sol/W: 2.76 Avg: 755.1 I/s: 404.9 Sh: 0.51 1.00 187
2018-02-19 17:48:21|> GPU9 62C Sol/s: 758.5 Sol/W: 2.56 Avg: 759.5 I/s: 406.1 Sh: 0.85 1.00 188
2018-02-19 17:48:21| ========== Sol/s: 7033.5 Sol/W: 2.65 Avg: 7056.1 I/s: 3778.3 Sh: 3.92 1.00 184
@Shodo if that card alone run at max speed with out problem i doubt is Defective card or riser ... single issue what came in my mind is Power or miner have issue suport 10 card. Anyway i see you have 10 card, try to run with lower batch like 3 card, 4 card, 5 card & see if that wierd bug it happen & if it apear at some higher combo. IF bug is about to many card then single solution what i have in my mind to run 2 diferite miner sesion like 5 card to a pool 5 other to other pool ... or in any stable combo you find ... same i not think it need to be full restart your rig just stop miner & restart is inaff for testing special i see bug it strike fast under 2-3 min ... cheers |
|
|
|
When you use the commandline option M, is there any visual indication on startup? I'm just playing around with it and equihash, and I tried -M 2 and -M=2 and neither one seemed to make any difference, so I'm not sure if I'm missing something. FWIW, I'm running the latest Linux version.
@MarkAz for equihash algo to change Mode of algorithm you need to do it like this in confing json file: {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0","0"]} Were ["0","0","0"] = a. 0 = Device 0, b. 0 = worker 0, c. 0 = M0 (for M1 use 1, for M2 use 2) this is only for equihash for other algo there are diferite value https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/tree/master/nvidia#equihashYes it is a visual indication at witch Mode excavator start exactly on beginning in console it say that (using Mode parameter in json or not excavator it start on a default stage & it say it). p.s. for dev make in logs to be record Mode & Block value to pls cheers |
|
|
|
@dropky hello I see a good improvement with 1.4.4.a on neoscrypt algoritm!!! & now i am try to figure how i can tweak best for get close to Hsrminer performance, so can you explain or give more details about what means "Mode of algorithm" is a intensitie, what exactly do ? With default excavator parameter neoscript algo it bring this value mining VIVO: core | Algorithm 'neoscrypt' total speed: 692.720640 kH/s Hardware Spec & setting: GPU 0: Gigabyte Windforce 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB (Samsung) dedicate to mining GPU 1: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 2GB only for own use, not for mining OS: Windows 7 Service Pack 1 Video Driver: 390.65 MSI Afterburn: 4.4.2 Power limit: 74 Temp limit: 80 Core Clock: +168 Memmory Clock: +650 https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/tree/master/nvidia#neoscryptAny news about fix & improve equihash algoritm ? thx & cheer |
|
|
|
anyone has tried intensity option in start.bat in v0.6? i still not understand . CCminer for neoscrypt easy just put -i 17.6 <--(value) i will quote from default cfg bring from dstm, see in your directory were you was extract zm . cfg #intensity=0:0.9,1:0.85 # Reduce the load which is put on the gpu valid
# range ]1.0-0.0[. Format: comma separated list
# of dev_id:intensity values e.g '0:0.5,2:0.6'
# Intensity uses performance data - it takes
# some time till it gets applied.
|
|
|
|
@neekir do not increse clock to much aka +160-170 is aceptable one for 74 Power limit you risc 2 thing: get agen more temperature & fry gpu force him to goo on higher clock with less power make this hapen, i know easy to say hard to be done GPU0 71C it need to become GPU0 ~61C - ~62C
GPU1 71C it need to become GPU0 ~61C - ~62C
GPU2 71C it need to become GPU0 ~61C - ~62C
GPU4 71C it need to become GPU0 ~61C - ~62C
GPU3 71C it need to become GPU0 ~61C - ~62C
GPU5 71C it need to become GPU0 ~61C - ~62C
GPU6 69C it need to become GPU0 ~61C - ~62C
then you will be fine, so do this: - Power limit 74, temp limit 80, core clock +160(my udvice max 165), mem clock 0(100-150), Fan: 75% fixed glad i was can help you cheer |
|
|
|
@neekir well thx to @promomei here your prof see how much important is temperature @promomei perfect proff memory it not matter his 45 C temp with 80 Power limit = 170 intensity = ~310 Sol/s = micron
my 61 C temp with 73 Power limit = 161 intensity = ~302 Sol/s = samsung
your 71 C temp with 74 Power limit = 145 intensity = ~260 sol/s = hynix
to get better result you need to lower your temperature to at list ~62 best case scenario for 80 Temperature Limit & for sure that is not easy for you be in india were humidity + temp are usual high from what i know .... so now i think you get it Power Limit it set a limit what GPU it will goo base on Temperature limit set aka that 2 value are link togheter what are translated in I/s: = intensity / sec what influence Sol/s @neekir set this Power 74, temp 80, core clock +160 , mem clock 0 , Fan: 75% fixed = you will get slice more cheers |
|
|
|
see @neekir there is your problem your temp limit is 78 (you are already on limit) & you let fan auto speed aka your gpu are already to 77 so is exactly what i think aka you get low hspeed because miner it lower intensity to protect (I/s: = intensity / sec) try this setting: - Power Limit 74 = this it suppose to lower heat to a max ~62 my be ~63 depend how is your ambience temp - set Fan speed to a permanent 65 - 70% (tune your value till you see you get lower temperature) let them work on auto sometime it work badly better keep them on a specific speed always coz your rig is never stop & never rest idea is to high temperature it lower gpu & miner intensity because it try to self protect so who say keep them on high temp is good tell them to goo to hell .... yes actual gpu can run on high temp BUT that not means it is normal most bad enemies for all electronic is temp & dust - Temperature limit 80 - Lower GPU clock to 160 that means it will lower temperature to & it will alow to increase memory probabil bigger value but i say agen on equihash speed memory count less yes hynix is worst vs samsung from any point of view but see what i tell about equihash algoritm ... if you was mining eth i say yup is relevant but in our case nop the point is you need to get a balance between power usage > temp > fan speed other way you get scrue up your self losing a lot from income & killing your equipment, tuning you can make it with out stop & start miner app if you using windows & msi afterburner but it possible to crash till you find right combo ... same get a better pool with better latency 250 is bad bad bad special for a dedicate rig hope it help |
|
|
|
|
