 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
Are you swapping into an existing coin or a new blockchain?
Is the new swapped coin going to be maintained by you or a new dev team?
What is the current status of the project? What about planned swapping coins? |
|
|
|
Why not true? Beeminer showed me 78 Terra Hash on S17 instead of 53THS normally
What is the power consumption of S17 @78TH/s ? |
|
|
|
"Dear Netko community. Here is a short summary of what was and wasnt happening at Netko HQ and why we havent moved from the "deadspot" . Please note i dont work at Netko company and i have my own sole proprietry company and am not paid a cent to do anything i do. A few months ago two team members (one IT specialist and one developer) left Netko while Gregor was in the process to hire additional devs so the ceo Gregor was and still is headhunting for new staff members to join the team and he is still doing so (we all now good devs and IT personal are hard to find). Since Netko company offers a variety of IT business services the loss of staff members caused a major work load to fall on the ceo and outsources staff so there was esentially no time to put some focus towards Netko coin. The idea to abandon Netko coin project was never up for debate. Hopefully when staff issues are finally resolved we can get back on track. I am still in "charge" of the community aspects of the Netko cryptocurrency i i took the time today (after Gregor provided hosting login data) to update the https://netko.tech website a bit so its at least updated and all the hyperlinks are functional. Before anyone asks when new exchanges dont forget netko was a fair launch with no ico and we simply cant finance listing Netko on places/exchanges you most likelly want to see Netko listed on. For the time being if you have some spare time and some spare satoshis you can vote for Netko on https://insane.exchange/ListingVote (free and paid votes) and get some DTRVoice tokens on https://www.tokens.net/voting/ (and cast some votes for NETKO). As this being said all i can say thank you dear Netko community for your time, support and patience. Netko blockchain hasnt failed you event if you belive the company vision for Netko coin has. https://netko.tech
https://t.me/NetkoCoin/22"
|
|
|
|
Then it was assumed that GPU mining would be dead since ASICs came out and then Litecoin came out with Scrypt which was only possible to mine with GPUs.
Then Litecoin got ASICs and it was the entire cycle all over again with ETH.
In fact, the anti-ASIC Litecoin direct successor was not Ethereum but Vertcoin (launched in January 2014, while Ethereum was launched ~1.5 year later) btw, it looks like new algo aka Verthash - may have a similar characteristic to ethash (ie. "AMD friendly"): https://old.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/cl2ske/verthash_is_near_to_the_final_version/ |
|
|
|
Great news! "Abandoned for shure not, underfed for shure. Same problems that many have, having hard time geting devs. We should have had an integration with Netko aio crm long time ago."and what is going on with Greg? no info for a long time... |
|
|
|
Hello i am from SatoshiShift Exchange. We have received an request to list this coin on our exchange. We are now at the point where we need to test deposits and withdraws for Netko. Could you please send a few NETKO coins to this address so we can finish up the testing. We have tried to find a discord link or something so we could get in direct contact with the developer but no luck .
Address: Ndd7UMncaYQT6hghwtTMmiUUbstBy4j3d1
100 NETKO sent: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/netko/address.dws?Ndd7UMncaYQT6hghwtTMmiUUbstBy4j3d1.htm |
|
|
|
Zero volumes on all pairs. No one seems to trade there. But since the listing is free, it's worth a try. 2019-05-15 18:04 - If listed with Cryptopia, list for free with Nova Exchange. Dear Cryptocommunity, We've just been reached by the news that Cryptopia Exchange is going out of business due to the severe damage that they faced earlier. It is sad to hear that a fellow competitor of ours is facing these problems since all competition is good for crypto. Cryptopia as a company has been around for many years, providing excellent trading, service and a healthy ecosystem for the cryptocurrency community. In order for the communities to survive, especially the ones being traded only at Cryptopia, we at Nova Exchange would like to offer our help in order for the ecosystem(s) to grow, and offer free listing for all coins that were listed with Cryptopia. The only condition for the free listing would be the following: 1: We receive the listing application before 1st of June 2019 in this format (please specify Cryptopia Free Listing under payment options) 2: We ask their developers to add in the extra comments, addresses that they know that belong to the hackers. This will ensure that we do not facilitate money laundering from people that are responsible with actions that are not in the favor of the cryptocurrency community. https://novaexchange.com/news/... |
|
|
|
if you need netko working peer, you can try at start: addnode=161.53.40.94
addnode=162.212.154.236
addnode=188.151.51.151
addnode=193.198.102.23
addnode=2.84.171.16
addnode=212.183.93.106
addnode=45.32.232.27
addnode=50.116.55.60
addnode=89.142.67.55
addnode=95.176.131.17
addnode=92.222.238.47
addnode=212.25.39.105
addnode=188.251.216.252
addnode=80.211.243.155
. |
|
|
|
any news about linux version progress? |
|
|
|
No... You've got it all wrong. For power, I have to invest only $175,000 for 2 MWh batteries + 150 solar panels (off-the-grid) which would power up to 400 RTX 2080Ti GPUs.
so, 400 x 2080Ti GPUs = 400x 0.2kW = 80kW solar panels must be in 400-800kW range, then (i.e 1300 - 2600 panels, and not 150  ) |
|
|
|
Uh, 150 solar panels @ say 300w each will generate 45,000 Watts at noon on a sunny day during the summer. So during that brief moment each day (in the summer months only), you can power 225 GPUs that consume 200 Watts each.
So unless you farm is floating in space with sun 24/7, you will only see a fraction of that power on an annual basis.
I currently have 128 panels with a total output of about 34,000 Watts at noon on a sunny day during the summer. Last month I generated a total of 2,151 kWh from this array. There were 28 days in February, so that works out to an average production of 77 kWh per day, or 3,200 Watts per hour. That in turn translates into 16 GPUs @ 200 Watts.
During March, I have had a few days where I generated 175 kWh, which translates to around 7,300 Watts on a 24 hour average, or enough to power 36 200W GPUs.
Not sure why you want to go off grid. It is MUCH more economical to be grid tied, especially if your POCO offers net metering.
In central Europe the expected factor is 2.7 hours of full max solar power per 24h - what is quite close to your 3.2kW from 34kW solar power So the general rule is really simple, someone needs to multiply the power of his GPU farm - by 5-10 factor to have necessary power output of planned solar panels and to accumulate that energy somehow/somewhere... |
|
|
|
Take the constant number of Watts being drawn from the wall outlet and divide it by 1000. This converts Watt Hours into Kilowatt Hours (kWh). Then multiply that by 24 hours per day, then by 30 average days per month, then by your cost per kWh.
In my Example:
650 ÷ 1000 = 0.65 (kWh)
0.65 X 24 = 15.6 (kWh per day)
15.6 X 30 = 468 (kWh per month)
468 X 0.12535 = $58 (actual cost per mo.)
just because you use word: incorrectly... It should be: "Take the constant number of Watts being drawn from the wall outlet and divide it by 1000. This converts Watt into Kilowatt (KW)." - you just can't change into different unit type of measure, by multiplying/dividing by a number. 650 W ÷ 1000 = 0.65 ( kW) 0.65 kW x 24 h = 15.6 ( kWh per day) |
|
|
|
Nice job. All of your algos aren't profitable.. Your team is good, but not good enough in this game..
Perhaps they can score in fortnite?
...
Best miner for lyra2v2 nVidia, the same will be for lyra2v3 it seems. Not that bad... |
|
|
|
|
nice, but
last cuda 9 version is: 9.2
and support for 9.2 is missing...
./ccminer: /usr/local/cuda/lib64/libnvrtc.so.9.1: version `libnvrtc.so.9.1' not found (required by ./ccminer)
|
|
|
|
Bad news  This release contains the proposed upcoming Vertcoin main network hard fork to the new Lyra2REv3 mining algorithm at block 1080000 in order to rid the network of the current generation of Lyra2REv2 ASICs and FPGAs. It also contains the hard fork for the test network which already occurred at block 158221. The related pull request is here: #72. The difficulty will be forced down to 0x1b0ffff0 for 10 blocks after the fork before the usual KGW difficulty adjustment algorithm kicks in again to prevent the network from stalling due to the large expected decrease in network hashrate post-fork. Monacoin, the last hope... |
|
|
|
v0.15.2 released
I have found there is one more important bug (not present probably in 0.15.1) There is lack of per GPU hashrates report after some minutes from start, please compare: [14:03:04] INFO - GPU0 Intensity set to 6
[14:04:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2176KH/s (Avr 2076KH/s) : 19.74KH/W : T=69C Fan=41%
[14:05:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2184KH/s (Avr 2108KH/s) : 19.37KH/W : T=69C Fan=41%
[14:06:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2184KH/s (Avr 2133KH/s) : 19.43KH/W : T=69C Fan=41%
[14:07:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2175KH/s (Avr 2145KH/s) : 19.38KH/W : T=69C Fan=41%
[14:08:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2175KH/s (Avr 2151KH/s) : 19.35KH/W : T=70C Fan=42%
[14:09:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2176KH/s (Avr 2157KH/s) : 19.38KH/W : T=69C Fan=42%
[14:10:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2188KH/s (Avr 2160KH/s) : 19.34KH/W : T=69C Fan=42%
[14:11:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2184KH/s (Avr 2156KH/s) : 19.30KH/W : T=69C Fan=42%
[14:12:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2184KH/s (Avr 2159KH/s) : 19.30KH/W : T=69C Fan=42%
[14:13:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2176KH/s (Avr 2161KH/s) : 19.29KH/W : T=69C Fan=42%
[14:14:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2176KH/s (Avr 2163KH/s) : 19.32KH/W : T=69C Fan=42%
[14:15:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2175KH/s (Avr 2160KH/s) : 19.30KH/W : T=69C Fan=42%
[14:16:04] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1080 : 2184KH/s (Avr 2162KH/s) : 19.30KH/W : T=69C Fan=42%
[14:23:03] INFO - GPU0 : GTX 1080 : 8119 MB
[14:23:03] INFO - GPU0 Intensity set to 6
GPU0 hashrate report ends at 14:16, while shares report is present still, till 14:21 [14:03:26] INFO - 1/0 Accepted : diff=0.142942 : 7936KH/s
[14:03:33] INFO - 2/0 Accepted : diff=0.118747 : 8112KH/s
[14:03:54] INFO - 3/0 Accepted : diff=0.0897117 : 8071KH/s
[14:04:26] INFO - 4/0 Accepted : diff=0.124667 : 8135KH/s
[14:05:11] INFO - 5/0 Accepted : diff=0.2416 : 8287KH/s
[14:05:24] INFO - 6/0 Accepted : diff=0.122412 : 8315KH/s
[14:06:08] INFO - 7/0 Accepted : diff=0.115169 : 8377KH/s
[14:06:18] INFO - 8/0 Accepted : diff=0.0826039 : 8386KH/s
[14:06:23] INFO - 9/0 Accepted : diff=0.184124 : 8389KH/s
[14:07:12] INFO - 10/0 Accepted : diff=0.101493 : 8424KH/s
[14:07:35] INFO - 11/0 Accepted : diff=0.112573 : 8436KH/s
[14:08:30] INFO - 12/0 Accepted : diff=0.0991434 : 8457KH/s
[14:09:47] INFO - 13/0 Accepted : diff=0.105754 : 8476KH/s
[14:11:36] INFO - 14/1 Accepted : diff=0.865807 : 8473KH/s
[14:11:47] INFO - 15/1 Accepted : diff=0.4031 : 8474KH/s
[14:12:03] INFO - 16/1 Accepted : diff=0.229242 : 8477KH/s
[14:12:09] INFO - 17/1 Accepted : diff=0.0985157 : 8478KH/s
[14:12:39] INFO - 18/1 Accepted : diff=0.193298 : 8482KH/s
[14:12:42] INFO - 19/1 Accepted : diff=0.102334 : 8483KH/s
[14:14:38] INFO - 20/1 Accepted : diff=0.126195 : 8496KH/s
[14:15:59] INFO - 21/1 Accepted : diff=0.40178 : 8488KH/s
[14:16:50] INFO - 22/1 Accepted : diff=0.42063 : 8493KH/s
[14:17:20] INFO - 23/1 Accepted : diff=0.584302 : 8495KH/s
[14:17:56] INFO - 24/1 Accepted : diff=0.129144 : 8485KH/s
[14:18:13] INFO - 25/1 Accepted : diff=1.40748 : 8486KH/s
[14:19:03] INFO - 26/1 Accepted : diff=0.0935376 : 8478KH/s
[14:21:07] INFO - 27/1 Accepted : diff=0.235707 : 8478KH/s
[14:21:24] INFO - 28/1 Accepted : diff=0.153555 : 8479KH/s
[14:21:46] INFO - 29/1 Accepted : diff=0.0957902 : 8481KH/s
[14:23:19] INFO - 1/0 Accepted : diff=0.0850728 : 7679KH/s
[14:23:28] INFO - 2/0 Accepted : diff=0.0921943 : 8035KH/s
and my monitoring tool restart miner after 5 minutes without per GPU hashrate report.... |
|
|
|
"NVRM: Xid" driver error is an overclock issue.
but there is no OC, and there is no such behaviour for other algos on these rigs, even for x16r |
|
|
|
|
