Bitcoin Forum
August 13, 2022, 04:14:21 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 23.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: ✅[AIRDROP]🔥 Domaur (RUF) |💰 Up To $1,000,000 Reward on: January 06, 2019, 09:57:15 AM
Interesting project and would be a real good project if it would really take just a few clicks to buy and sell cryptocurrency.

My telegram username @UchihASasukee
2  Economy / Invites & Accounts / [WTS] steam account.. on: January 06, 2019, 07:10:40 AM
Price check
https://steamcommunity.com/id/TheLastOfTheUchiha/
3  Economy / Services / Re: Nexybit Hybrid Exchange Signature Campaign on: July 01, 2018, 06:11:50 AM
Name: Sasuke102001
Rank: Full Member
Nexybit ID: Sasuke102001
Nexybit Exclusive Bitcoin Address: 3KbcoNNzn6gUvzFbKraEmmiMca15ExoVou\

Hope that I will be allowed to participate in the campaign.
4  Economy / Reputation / Re: Negative Feedback. on: June 27, 2018, 09:22:08 AM
The evidences against you are pretty good and tough and DT members confirmed it. If you really like to clear your name you must provide evidences that will testify your innocence, convincing them wouldn't change anything. But at your kind of situation, looks like it's all over for you to bring back your account without Red Trust.

Only Lauda and The Pharmacist has the right to remove your Negative Trust and I doubt that they'll gonna remove it, unless you've got some proof that will break the barrier between you and them. A proof that will really prove that you were innocent, but, where are you gonna get some proof? I think it's really over. Pushing yourself to convince them will only put you in worse trouble.
That is what I'm trying to find some solid proof but can't, I can't think of anything that would 101% show that I haven't used any alt accounts, I don't know wether any IP thing would work not. And is only 1 transaction between 2 address of the other 2 tagged people enough to say we are linked? And it is not like all tokens and coins collected in bounties were transferred to one single address, if this was the case then it might have been a strong proof.
5  Economy / Reputation / Re: Negative Feedback. on: June 27, 2018, 06:46:38 AM
Don't worry, the user (KeithBeeCham) who reported you were spotted as a account farmer as well and has been tagged with Negative Trust as well. So both of you are tied.
But the difference between both of you is KeithBeeCham has done some good contribution for the forum by reporting users with alt accounts. But I think it's purpose is to hide his/her dark motives to take advantage of the forum by farming accounts. But who knows? I'm not sure as well.

Can you use this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3554458.0 and lock this one?

Thank you!
It's kinda not put perfectly so I made a new one, so shall i lock the previous one?
You should lock the old one or this one, but I prefer you to follow marlboroza.
I appreciate his contribution to the forum as well but the thing is he's trying to frame up people with false accusations who haven't done anything wrong, I haven't used any alt accounts since the start which is the reason I didn't give up trying to convince people.
6  Economy / Reputation / Re: Negative Feedback. on: June 26, 2018, 07:17:34 PM
You might need to fight Naruto again until he dies so your negative feedback will be removed once Lauda and The Pharmacist agree to remove.
Thank you for the suggestion sir, will try to do so🙂
7  Economy / Reputation / Re: Negative Feedback. on: June 26, 2018, 10:42:01 AM
4) NO account used the same addresses or applied to all the campaigns closely, so was it enough to say that these 3 accounts are alt accounts?
Absolutely not! But having an alt account would mean having individual wallet addresses for each account. I can't say neither of you were on the wrong but, you (as the victim, probably) should provide concrete evidence that the accuser is wrong and you're right. Unless this is provided, the DT member who tagged you would probably just ignore you.
I put every piece of point I can think of right now like none of the addresses of adioliver fazlur and mine had constant transactions moving money from one acc to another and someone said the best would be to show that the ip address of each acc is diff, I don't know what to do with that.
8  Economy / Reputation / Re: Negative Feedback. on: June 26, 2018, 09:03:24 AM
Can you use this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3554458.0 and lock this one?

Thank you!
It's kinda not put perfectly so I made a new one, so shall i lock the previous one?
9  Economy / Reputation / Negative Feedback. on: June 25, 2018, 04:12:18 PM
As you all see I have been red-tagged by 2 of our Dt members on the evidence provided by KeithBeeCham Refernce

1) As in the evidence, it shows I ( Sasuke) used Eth addresses 0x3157 and 0x9bB96 and only this 2 addresses had been used while applying to campaigns/ bounties.

2) Adioliver and Fazlur both have different Eth addresses used during applying to campaigns/bounties.

3) One Eth transaction between 0x2425 ( Used by Adioliver) and 0x9bB96 ( Used by me), one transaction between 0x856Fa ( Used by Fazlur) and 0x9bB96 ( Used by me) and 3-4 transactions between the 2 addresses I own ( Hopefully no one has a problem with it ).

4) NO account used the same addresses or applied to all the campaigns closely, so was it enough to say that these 3 accounts are alt accounts?
10  Economy / Reputation / Re: Negative Feedback. on: May 06, 2018, 02:45:04 PM
The merit thing, the merit I gave to Adioliver that's my decision and whoever they give it to that's there's. And as you brought it up we know each other personally.
If there's a way to show that the accounts are used by diff ip addresses then please tell, I guess that's the best shot I can give.


News at 11... "They're not 'Alt Accounts', we're just friends/family/classmates/co-workers!" Roll Eyes
@HCP: Can you add below with your news... please  Smiley

While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.

Do not beg for merit excessively.

This was a very simple message when theymos explained about giving merits.

And these are the translations (I might bring you more in future) we are seeing through out the forum.

Quote
Why the negative feedback? Flodner is a friend of mine, am I not allowed to send him some merit? :/
Quote
He is a trusted friend he asked for some merit and I did.
Translation: Award merits to friends

Quote
...mostly i gave my merits to who gave me ?
Translation: Award merits who send your merits

Quote
Because meriting is not prohibited and everybody are free to distrubute theri1 merits to everyone without any reason etc.
Translation: Awarding merit need no reasons so keep awarding.

PS: It's a parody post. Merit abusers, please do not use it as a reference ground for your merit abusing activities.

Update:
New translation 1: Award merit to the bounty managers to show your appreciation/like of the project.

1distributed their
Lol I have seen hundreds of people giving merit on bullshit posts😂
11  Economy / Reputation / Re: Negative Feedback. on: May 06, 2018, 02:42:29 PM
... And as you brought it up we know each other personally.
If there's a way to show that the accounts are used by diff ip addresses then please tell, I guess that's the best shot I can give.
News at 11... "They're not 'Alt Accounts', we're just friends/family/classmates/co-workers!" Roll Eyes

Unfortunately for you, the evidence, while admittedly somewhat circumstantial... shows that all these accounts are "connected". Especially the fact that they were all enrolled in the same bounties and then sent all the tokens to one address.

Additionally, no-one here really buys the "we're different people" excuse... MANY people have tried this... I'm not really aware of any that have actually satisfactorily proved it. As far as using IP addresses to try and prove your case, the only people who can do that will be the admins who have the server records.

Maybe if you had (dated) chat logs showing discussions amongst yourselves to buy/sell/trade the tokens with your "friends" that might help your cause... but I wouldn't get my hopes up.


One last piece of advice... DON'T send Lauda or The Pharmacist unsolicited PM's regarding your negative trust... it'll most probably just make things worse!
Ahh if you didn't see closely we had joined many bounties and and all of that just some 0.003 and 0.184 eth was sent to me and not all bounty tokens. You can check up our eth addresses on etherscan and see how many tokens have we overall received and how many are still lying there.
Ahh there are no pm's saying send me your tokens or so but the pm's can show you that two profiles are not owned by the same people.
12  Economy / Reputation / Re: Negative Feedback. on: May 05, 2018, 01:28:34 PM
The merit sharing between the accounts is all coincidental, as well, right? Especially considering there are HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of accounts across the forums. You two just happened to come across each other 7 posts apart in a particular thread about merit when there were literally DOZENS of merit posts being made on a daily basis...


(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2822349.msg28996429#msg28996429)


(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2822349.msg29010604#msg29010604)



Merit summary for each of the accounts in question:


(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1101160)




(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=925340)




(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1147321)



This is all just coincidental, too, right? That the three accounts in question all somehow tie together with merits that were sent and received amongst the accounts, as well? Roll Eyes
The merit thing, the merit I gave to Adioliver that's my decision and whoever they give it to that's there's. And as you brought it up we know each other personally.
If there's a way to show that the accounts are used by diff ip addresses then please tell, I guess that's the best shot I can give.
13  Economy / Reputation / Re: Negative Feedback. on: May 05, 2018, 01:05:18 PM
No where it could be seen that Adioliver or Fazlur used the address 0x9, all along it was used by me. 0x9 and 0x3 are being used by me.

There are way too many coincidences for these transactions to be random Roll Eyes

And even if I cheated bounties, why would I just cheat 0.184 eth and 0 003 eth?

I've seen a lot worse done by people for a lot less.

And I didn't know that sending some eth to someone makes them there alts (noted).

It does when the transactions, joined bounties, post activity times and ETH addresses all coincide with each other.

I can't see any 100% proof showing that I ever used alts.

Doesn't matter. Apparently, the behavior that your accounts showed was enough to raise suspicion and deem you untrustworthy to at least two DT members, which is why the trust system exists. Now that the accusations have been made, the ball's in your court to prove that these are not alt accounts of each other. Perhaps you can send a staff member of the forums a message to provide proof that none of the accounts have matching IP addresses?

I dunno, it seems pretty apparent to me, but hey, what do I know. I'm just a random forum user *shrugs*
I don't know much about Ip addresses in such cases, if you could help that would be helpful.
14  Economy / Reputation / Re: Negative Feedback. on: May 05, 2018, 12:47:53 PM

1) None of the profiles applied to any campaigns or bounties with the same addresses.


That's not why you were tagged, though. You were tagged for having multiple accounts participate in the same bounty campaign, and then having funds transferred from ETH accounts related to the multis to the ETH address that was previously associated with your current account.

There is an outbound transaction from @Adioliver's recorded ETH address (0x2425736D0764A630bc011C6118d3d01DdbF79470) to a recorded ETH address (0x9bB968440878783811eCf303523C35B7643a9c73) that you've used in the past, as can be seen here:

1. BTT Username: Sasuke102001
2. ETH Address:0x9bb968440878783811ecf303523c35b7643a9c73
3. Telegram username: @UchihASasukee
4. Date Joined the Telegram: 4th February 2018

The same is also evident with @Fazlurkhan.kz's recorded ETH address (0x856FaB3402D730045Ea0446CAD094c4A62dce37e) having an outbound transaction to your recorded ETH address.

Stating "Just one transaction with each address, no frequent transactions that can raise suspicion." is not enough to reduce suspicion. All it takes is one transaction to take place in order for suspicion to be aroused. There were TWO transactions (one each from two separate accounts) that took place from those individual accounts to yours.

You got caught. Deal with it.
No where it could be seen that Adioliver or Fazlur used the address 0x9, all along it was used by me. 0x9 and 0x3 are being used by me.
And even if I cheated bounties, why would I just cheat 0.184 eth and 0 003 eth?
And I didn't know that sending some eth to someone makes them there alts (noted).
I can't see any 100% proof showing that I ever used alts.
15  Economy / Reputation / Negative Feedback. on: May 05, 2018, 10:38:58 AM
A negative feedback was left for me based on the following accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg34957170#msg34957170

1) None of the profiles applied to any campaigns or bounties with the same addresses.

2) Just one transaction with each address, no frequent transactions that can raise suspicion.

Code:
0x856FaB3402D730045Ea0446CAD094c4A62dce37e
0x2425736D0764A630bc011C6118d3d01DdbF79470





16  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q2) on: April 29, 2018, 02:11:01 AM
Accounts Connected:

Fazlurkhan.kz
Adioliver
Sasuke102001

Proof:

Adioliver and Sasuke102001 applied for the same campaign - IOS signature bounty campaign




ETH addresses of Adiliover and Sasuke102001 related to ETH address: 0x9bB968440878783811eCf303523C35B7643a9c73 (An old ETH address of Sasuke102001 - check)





Fazlurkhan.kz used ETH address: 0x856FaB3402D730045Ea0446CAD094c4A62dce37e



And Fazlurkhan.kz  ETH address also related to old ETH address of Sasuke102001: 0x9bB968440878783811eCf303523C35B7643a9c73



Both Fazlurkhan.kz and Adioliver joined Rebellious airdrop in this forum. Although I can't find out the spreadsheet but I know it cause both ETH addresses of these acounts received Rebellious token when Rebellious airdrop distribution happened.




After that Adioliver  send Rebellious token to Fazlurkhan.kz

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x2e444c771f0b7b83797ed5958b32f112592153c4c1c7bb922c4d71a6b3fda10e

Beside all these accounts applied for the same campaign very closely




Related Addresses:

Code:
0x856FaB3402D730045Ea0446CAD094c4A62dce37e
0x2425736D0764A630bc011C6118d3d01DdbF79470
0x3157C72F81C83E06b6b5B48c8293Cae6FD920eC6
0x9bB968440878783811eCf303523C35B7643a9c73

Miscellaneous:

Abusing bounty and airdrop with alt accounts.





Only one transaction between 2 eth addresses.
No strong evidence, just a suspicion of alts just because these accounts had enrolled in same signature campaigns quite a few times.
No same eth addresses used by any of the 3 accounts.
If anyone can review the case, kindly do so.
17  Economy / Reputation / Re: Red Trust. on: April 25, 2018, 07:20:06 AM
1) These social media accounts were used by this bitcointalk profile to join many bounty campaigns.
That is completely fine.

2) So having a transaction with someone indicates those accounts are alts?
Nope.Having 'frequent transactions' with them and posting one after the other in the same bounty threads repeatedly does raise suspicions.Otherwise,what is the probability of your friend posting right after your post in the same bounty thread on the same day ?

3) If still, this is the case saying sending money to someone shows that they are alts, then the way eth had been cashed out you all won't believe.
That's not the case here.

4) If you want I can explain you the whole thing in a pm because it is very long and I don't whether posting that here would be correct or not.
Explain that to the person who left you negative feedback.
I can explain that to them only if they want to listen right? and if they don't block my messages.
I can only see one transaction between 0x9 and 0x2 and not frequent transactions.
18  Economy / Reputation / Re: Red Trust. on: April 25, 2018, 07:10:33 AM
The above link has screenshots showing that all of 3 of us have applied to campaigns with our own social media accounts. And all the accounts are pretty old. I think no one would plan 5-6 years prior to use the social media accounts to apply and "Cheat" bounties.
You do know right the tag you got has nothing to do with the social media accounts you used but the addresses which showed you were connected with the other accounts on the forum ? You got tagged for cheating the bounties with multiple accounts.Cut it.

I don't know wether this would be enough to show that we are 3 different beings. I would like to hear from you members that would this be enough or something more would be required.
So what's the relation between you and other two accounts? You have had transactions with them.Mind explaining why ?

1) These social media accounts were used by this bitcointalk profile to join bounty campaigns. So cannot it be said that those accounts are also connected to this profile as I have seen many have been caught having alts by the same social media accounts they had used for campaigns?
2) So having a transaction with someone indicates those accounts are alts?
3) If still, this is the case saying sending money to someone shows that they are alts, then the way eth had been cashed out you all won't believe.
4) And I only two eth addresses the 0x3 and the 0x9.
5) Whereas the other 2 addresses belong to Adiolive and Fazlur and not me. The only relation between us is that I know them both personally. Those eth were sent to me by them to cash them out to Paytm which is an Indian wallet. If you want I can explain you the whole thing but it is quite long and I don't know whether posting that here would be correct or not.
19  Economy / Reputation / Red Trust. on: April 25, 2018, 06:34:43 AM
I was marked on the evidence  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg34957170#msg34957170.

https://imgur.com/a/AFGuwKV
The above link has screenshots showing that all of 3 of us have applied to campaigns with our own social media accounts. And all the accounts are pretty old. I think no one would plan 5-6 years prior to use the social media accounts to apply and "Cheat" bounties.

I don't know wether this would be enough to show that we are 3 different beings. I would like to hear from you members that would this be enough or something more would be required.
20  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Do you think the Elders would also listen to Youth? on: April 20, 2018, 05:47:42 AM
From what I have seen personally is the elders actually don't like to listen to the opinions and suggestions of the youth. The problem here is the generation gap, the elderly people have an old or outdated thinking you can say whereas the youth has a very modern thinking and modern approach to every situation, so there is always a conflict between the elders and the youth's way of thinking and the elders don't accept the modern way of thinking as they like to stick to their old-fashioned way of thinking. But they have to understand that as time changes, problems change the solution also changes the same old way of thinking and solutions just won't work anymore. The elders and the youth have to work together to create a better society by working together I mean to say the experience of the elderly and the modern mind of the youth, when brought together can do miracles.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!