 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3
|
|
not finding a block source any more nodes to add?
-TC
|
|
|
|
[2018-02-26 21:44:57] Accepted 400/401 (99.8%), diff 2.64e-005, 2601.96 H/s  -TC Dang! What processor are you running? [2018-02-27 02:52:16] Accepted 984/984 (100%), diff 9.84e-006, 984.63 H/s i9 7980 ex no overclock applied 16 cores +16 vcores |
|
|
|
[2018-02-26 21:44:57] Accepted 400/401 (99.8%), diff 2.64e-005, 2601.96 H/s -TC |
|
|
|
|
blockchain is moving fine.
-TC
|
|
|
|
Turns out another project Aurora DOA has swooped up the AURA ticker this past week, so we need to decide on a new one.
Some contenders are: ARA, XAR, YOU
Please post which one you like best, or if you prefer something else.
I like YOU best of the three -TC |
|
|
|
|
look at that price go!
getting more and more attention and on a green day at that
-TC
|
|
|
|
|
As we are the community of this coin, what would people like to it do once its up and running?
Master node? Multi algo mining, staking, tiered master nodes?
the exchange has to be running an active node for the trades to function so i dont think we need to look too far
-TC
|
|
|
|
|
I always love a good reboot, let me know if you need any help
-TC
|
|
|
|
scam? QBIC project same this: all dem Dash clonez yo! So I bought me a share 10% in a Gobyte MN and I've noticed it's a scam as the reward is constantly getting lower. The more the MNs the less the payout. So the real scam is Gobyte. Though they cost just 100k before Christmas so I couldn't skip the opportunity. Besides the price goes up and I've refunded me 2/3 of those coins already. Besides all MN coins are Ponzi schemes anyway. Unless the dev sells MNs then runs away without listing at the exchanges then we have to call is a goddamn scam of the millenium Not sure how you came to these conclusions but they are not ponzi schemes, if you didnt understand the payout structure of MN thats on you, there are a set number of coins made in a set time period, more active modes the less you get. the point of MN are to bring stability to the network and create scarcity as well as many have governance features. A ponzi pays rewards to early investors from the money put in by new members and will always fail, MN just split newly created up coins up fairly and will continue to pay till the coin has run its course and it has hit the coin cap as defined by the genesis block -TC |
|
|
|
you would have to setup sentinel to use the terracoin.conf to do anything to the coin so it wasnt you. -TC Hello everyone, I hate to be that new guy. But I just thought I should make an account, to thank everyone for the ongoing support and also see if I can double check my configuration. I put up a masternode about a week ago on the 29th using u3mur4's script. At the time I noticed a lot of masternodes in error states, but I guess I didn't think very much of it as it was late and the one line script had worked it's magic.
Over the next few days, I noticed the active nodes drop. Puzzled I looked up what had happened. I was worried when I heard sentinel was the cause for the break in the network as a separate user account on my vps required to run it for a different masternode coin. Even though this had all occurred seemingly a few days after the stormchain I thought I should come clean about it anyway in case it can help any of the developers. I assumed that separate user accounts would help to prevent any conflicts but please let me know if necessary and I will move the node to a dedicated vps.
I removed the script and immediately pulled the github for the current version and configured sentinel,
since then I voted and re-indexed my wallet which removed the pseudo payments and got the core wallet back on the right chain.
Iv'e just restarted and re-indexed daemon on the vps so hopefully that will sync eventually too.
Should we be allowing any additional ports for sentinel?
Also, currently I have sentinel installed as:
(Coin 1) /home/user1/sentinel
(Coin 2) /home/user2/sentinel
Please let me know if this is a problem as I currently have at least one instance of sentinel on most of my vps's configured with a few different coins, in this fashion.
When I run separate tests they both give me the expected outputs.
I hope that I can do my part in keeping the network secure in the future, this seems like a great project and i'm really glad to see such an active community through this development.
Sorry to take up a post.
|
|
|
|
|
we are reindexing the node behind the subdomains data now, to get the explorer over on the longest chain.
-TC
|
|
|
|
I see this coin has really good masternode return, and I want to setup one. This coin is old coin, the devs just implement the masternode recently?
I don't know this coin before but anyway it has good masternode profit. That's one of the most valuable reason for buying this coins.
That ROI is incorrect, our current network issues are showing inflated returns actually expected ROI would be around 30% -TC |
|
|
|
How profitable can be masternode here?
we float around a 30% ROI normally -TC |
|
|
|
I made the mistake of sending some TRC to Cryptopia before realizing there were problems with the chain. Didn't read this forum for several days. Just wondering when all this is sorted out, is there a chance the TRC will show up at Cryptopia? It's not much, but still ...
if your wallet was on the chain that wins when you sent the TRC it will show up in the Cryptopia address like nothing was wrong if your wallet was on a chain that goes away then your transaction never happened and your TRC would still be in your wallet. Think if it very much like time travel and picking the correct reality -TC |
|
|
|
|
there are a couple of issues, that we are correcting currently.
we have multiple splits which is what is causing the incorrect stats you are seeing.
We are setting back up the testnet currently to make sure adding in sentinel and the other fixes will correct the issue.
for the most part mining of TRC is done by asic at this point with multimining.
it is not a GPU friendly algo.
-TC
|
|
|
|
has anyone problems with his masternodes ? mine stopped paying .....
see my post above yours. we have multiple chains currently until consensus has returned to the block it's hard to say who got payments where. We are actively working on correcting the issues. -TC |
|
|
|
|
Quick update.
Clock asked me to make a post over here, he and Six are working with our programmer to get the issues cleaned up.
-we have at least 3 chains currently
-watchdog may still be the cause of the initial issue that kicked all the MN offline a few days back
Hang tight, I will do my best to answer questions and keep you all in the loop
-TC
|
|
|
|
how to solo with minerd?
on windows go to your appdata/roaming foler and fine the Yenten directory you need to create a new files called yenten.conf paste this into it: daemon=1 server=1 gen=1 port=9981 rpcport=9982 rpcuser=username rpcpassword=password Addnode=133.130.66.167:9981 Addnode=52.3.229.122:9981 the addnodes where cust one my client found when I first started it make sure the file extension is .conf and .txt close and reopen your wallet now with your cpu mining software you need to setup your batch file this is what mine looks like minerd.exe -t 8 -a yescryptr16 -o localhost:9982 -u username -p password --coinbase-addr=Yg9V2QcATdh47NvPquo1HuE7T2e83Jaewg PAUSE the - t is the number of threads the coinbase addr change to your address should be good to go -TC |
|
|
|
have you tried to contact them in any way or just accuse them on the forum? also what time frame are we talking about why didn't you start to worry when you were off by 5mil or so instead of mining up over half a billion? -TC |
|
|
|
|
