Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Hello tiCeR, thanks for the question.
The seed sale was ongoing in October and the hard cap was reached. There is a presale for strategic contributors that's ongoing at the moment until the 19th February - above 100 ETH. Then on the 20th and on the 21st February there will be a presale for whitelisted contributors - above 5 ETH. The public token sale starts on the 22nd February and it will last until the hard cap has been reached or until the 22nd March.
Videos are not stored on the blockchain, you actually only store the information regarding transactions and that relates to videos (hashes, etc). The technology is advancing.
Interesting. I am not sure if I understand how your platform works if videos are not stored on the blockchain. If someone creates a video and someone else wants to see it, does that other person have to pay for it and that transaction gets recorded on the blockchain? And then, how does the other person access that video if it's not stored on either a central server like Youtube provides or on a blockchain? Does that person need access to the producers computer? The blockchain only stores pointers (the hashes) to the locations of the videos i.e. the VIEW hosts. The decentralized CDN (content delivery network - that serves videos) means essentially that anyone can host videos and be part of the Viewly network. Whether its one person making use of their home internet upload capacity when they're not using it or professional CDN's, they all treated as nodes in the network and yes some will be more capable than others and will set for theselves a higher VIEW token price for use. The centrality is only the blockchain itself that points to where videos are.
|
|
|
Interesting this platform, but can any kind of video be used? Does it restrict itself according to the content of the video?
If you mean video format, that basically just depends on the encoder we use on the back end and what that can support i.e. h264 . In terms of content, at least pre launch we'll be aiming for the high quality mainstream and auteurs and artists types of content and likely opt-in walls for the riskier stuff. Community voting will also play a factor as time goes on
|
|
|
only 4 pages ? am i too early ?
nah from from it, we've specifically tried to focus our community into TG instead of letting people settle into whatever they like best hence other channels have been a little neglected. If you're interested in presale you're actually running a little late, not too early
|
|
|
hey can anyone give me the background history of how the multiple ICO's worked with NEO? did they list right after the first one? or right at the end? was there a lockup? did they discount off the current list price for the other ICO's if they listed after the first one?
|
|
|
Hi guys,
We're prefunded and looking for our whitepaper to be rewritten. No time to screw around with amateurs here. Please reply here with samples. Those without samples they can link will be ignored. Payment can be done in either crypto or cash
Looking to get this started pretty much asap
|
|
|
Actually no, its more like these are high $$$ buys. Think lambos lol.
|
|
|
thanks man. I didnt know OTC was an option. Didnt know Ethereum was still so small at $350 million. Are you sure? there have been a number of companies raising in the $30 mil range of ETH. This would mean they are then only 10 companies or so in that realm. Seems like it should be a lot more but I'll look into it. Thanks Anyone else have any experience actually trying to sell millions of ETH?
|
|
|
Hey guys.
Serious question related to potential projects. Say a company does a $20-50 mil ICO and now needs to convert that into fiat to pay for mass hiring, commercial property, repay debt or pay out investor dividends etc. How much could the market provide in relatively hassle free way? Obviously "relatively" will be different for various people, conversion via a mass of accounts and doing it over time so you dont tank the price.
How much could a successful post-ICO company cash out at a time? and what's the recommended strategy for capital liquidity over time?
|
|
|
Can you explain why the following is in the T&Cs of the ICO? I want to invest, however, this is saying I cannot, if I am a resident, domiciled, or even located at time of purchase, in the US.
" 12. Purchaser Representations and Warranties By sending ETH to purchase Tokens from the Company, you represent and warrant and covenant that: . . . (k) you are not resident or domiciled in the United States of America or purchasing Tokens from a location in the United States of America; "
Thanks in advanced for your feedback.
Its standard boilerplate for this and other ICO's, espec for any company that's big enough to have a legal team that will recommend this as a standard disclaimer currently while the SEC figures out what to do about ICO's. You aren't electronically prohibited though if were were to use a VPN etc. Every ICO company has to take reasonable steps to cover themselve This is interesting, but I think it's too niche. I'd rather go with something like unikoingold because they can do what you guys do.
Actually Unikoin is the niche player but they are looking to dominate their niche. Enjin is targeting the whole game ecosystem but isn't focusing on e-sports. The opposite of Unikoin
|
|
|
BurstIQ seems kind of poorly marketed to me. Even the name doesnt really help to describe the health domain you're in or why the average person should care. My own interest perked up only after it was explained here i.e. the possibilities that any person has with their *own* health data that you guys became interesting to me. What that analyst said "BurstIQ plans to provide a marketplace for exchanging health information and offering products and services, where control and access rights over the data lies with the individual who can choose with whom to share their data and for how long, or whether to sell their data or donate it to a project or study they support. This represents an innovate aspect of the platform, insofar as it represents a unique intersection where Individuals, research institutions, and pharmaceutical or other medical related companies can identify either studies they would like to participate in or appropriate subject populations for trials and research projects. This should be on your front page
|
|
|
They could do it too. Between machine learning eating up a lot of discovery work and tools like Etherparty eating up the business of executing and signoff of routine civil and solicitor level work, it seems like things are going to get a lot rougher for fresh law school graduates. The market hates paying lawyers and is screaming for better alternatives. They're definitely onto something here.
|
|
|
There are never enough crypto bounties good luck to the hunters on this one
|
|
|
The hacking was unfortunate but the true measure of any team is how they handle adversity and not how they handle success. The hackers got away with very little which is a testament to the team vs all the ICO's where they were hacked for millions and the teams were left slack jawed or shoulders shrugging.
|
|
|
22-23% or roughly around $9 mil worth sold in the first 20 mins
|
|
|
Where I find most people stumble is the concept or public and private keys. Its still too easy for people to get confused and accidentally send out the private keys my mistake, then it becomes "whoops here's the public one instead" and then that's one step down towards someone losing their shirt...
|
|
|
well guys, one company is literally trying to get the entire industry (if possible) to adopt crypto. Enjin Coin technically the name of the company is Enjin. Not only that but it would be properly decentralized and flip the script from the developers and platforms controlling access to data and stuff that players should actually truly own to the same games pointing at player ownership records on the blockchain instead. you can learn more about them here but here's a nice intro article about them. https://medium.com/@enjin/introduction-to-enjin-part-1-of-5-f5d90676b948Full disclosure, Ive thrown in to write some articles for them and more are coming including an interesting one that compares philosophical similarities between f2p games and blockchain itself i.e. with blockchain, the users are also the infrastructure whereas with f2p, the players are also often each others content. You guys would probably enjoy that. since it would really emphasize how much gaming fits with blockchain
|
|
|
|