 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »
|
|
Besides a shiny website and a custom Qt client, Verge never had features unique from any other coin. Pumping prices with the supply and funding they have is easy, so there might still be upside possibilities but I would consider it a risky play if they decide to pull the plug at some point.
|
|
|
|
Can you respond to my lengthy post on page 36?
They will only respond if it's a positive comment or simple question, like where is the coin traded at etc, don't expect more. |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE---—
This is radbit on bitcointalk.org 7 Dec 2017
—---BEGIN SIGNATURE---—
1HJVoABaNywyPJBJ7ZYB2UqeRz8XhCrEPo
IP9yavAyWBTXnv6HbAh6GO8cOqimmps7okMppF6x8WdfrSSZ1FWGNCn2kGLA9sCMLtTNI+IVFw6BhPUBEs8tExE=
—---END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Quoted & Verified. http[Suspicious link removed]%3D Thank you. Can I change my bitcoin address in this forum in the future? You can but you will need to sign another message with your previous address you posted to confirm it's not just someone else posting a new one. |
|
|
|
Addresss: 1Hbozpfk7rH9p8pcf5924ET6E4D7P7QJi4 -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is "Redbackone" on https://bitcointalk.org and the date today is 7 December 2017.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
H4MvwE9mypw2sHM05Y9+/LK2WdPylVlndOjlu6JhgwwAcRl8+4B4ilV+R7mwXictLpWZTYphew77SRYSdx/pIPo=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Please quote and verify |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is richardivan on bitcointalk.org 6 Dec 2017 -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Address: 1JMB55XPWnwLHkhssWM669VPvvhFCtchZ7 Signature: H/kp0Q+eqcwPaa/MpvjptkH83cWCjHDnW+7rwWcswmg6Oej0/vxEcEiBm0p/XPVewvzNIbqQo9w6Dz1iyYdaREY= -----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----. Please quote and verify. Thanks before. I can quote, but getting wrong signature on electrum and online tools |
|
|
|
In addition tokens were selling on etherdalta at 30% price before the ico ended. Who was selling ctx on etherdalta? I also got banned from telegarm.
That's interesting, only the devs could have done that to liquidate their last tokens that were going to be unsold. This ICO has raised so many red flags I mentionned in this thread it's impressive to see how many people still believe in them. Maybe I'll get proven wrong by one of the responsive team members here though? |
|
|
|
Not used coinbase much but have recently used their website to receive and send some crypto.
I have sent some BTC to a different wallet but it has been pending for 4hours now and i do not even have a transaction ID for it either.
Anyone know much about this?
Thanks
You should be more patient, with the new afflux of users they have, the transactions are pretty slow and can stay pending for a while. |
|
|
|
Bitfinex is a fraudulent company, you like it or not. Everything is doing is illegal, starting with not having any license and ending with their shit Tether.
Like I said, there is lots to point to. Unlicensed MSB, unregistered securities (BFX tokens), unregistered derivatives (Tether), the banking blockade against them, their unwillingness to provide an audit of Tether, Phil Potter admitting he trades on the exchange against his customers, etc. But Bitfinexed is still a wingnut. I think he has been going at it for some time and kept being unacknowledged until now that people are starting to believe him, and took a big head. Still, if you put aside his spammy retweets, his analysis are pretty well documented and made a lot of folks looking at them with more scrutiny, which is a good thing. I used to use them, they have a nice interface and good trading platform in general, but I would be careful if you want to leave funds on there just in case they get hacked again and decide to make their users pay like last time. |
|
|
|
Much better, this is good policy to avoid some newbie scammer which launching new ico project and the main goal is to get fund from the investors and then run away took all the investments. By this i think only serious people who have real and good project will pay for this to make their threat much more interesting in the eyes of the people.
In the contrary, I would say it will enable more shady projects to get a good looking ANN and trick more people for the very small cost it has. It might reduce spam partially, but without any metric it will be hard to confirm. |
|
|
|
You were moderated
your post had been deleted because you have spammed maybe
Repeating what has already been said ten times is also considered spam, you should pay attention yourself. |
|
|
|
I can not remember exactly where on the forum but I came across to a link to a document with time and dates that shows when are reset intervals for activity counts. Unfortunately, I did not save that document. Does anybody have that link?
Here it is That's it, thank you very much. Now I will definitely remember. Guys, This file shows the intervals when counting resets. Within a single interval, you can have up to 14 activities No problem! You can also copy it on your own drive and do a basic excel function to do a +14 on each row starting from the date you joined, so you know at which date you can pass ranks, it's useful |
|
|
|
1JRfpdjzKgYApQLn48v1qpsLReFPhPHwhq i can't sign, because i using coinbase  thank you You should get your own wallet and put your funds on there |
|
|
|
I can not remember exactly where on the forum but I came across to a link to a document with time and dates that shows when are reset intervals for activity counts. Unfortunately, I did not save that document. Does anybody have that link?
Here it is |
|
|
|
I did get an error that the gas limit was not enough and needed to be increased before the transaction would process. I was moving it from my MEW wallet to my Ledger wallet via MEW. I have another one to do today and will take note on the wording and error or restriction notifications when trying to process the transaction.
Appreciate the assistance.
It could also be that you did it at the exact time something was bloating the network, increasing the gas prices drastically (e.g a presale) and thus it's only a matter of retrying. Sometimes, as other said it's because you inputted something wrong that will use all your gas, so double-check everything just to be sure. |
|
|
|
Do we know what activity is based on? I more posts than activity, and over the past few days of reading and posting, no increase in activity
could it be tied to the amount of time you are active and online on the forums?
No, it's just capped every 14 days, it doesn't matter how much online you are, you'll need to wait a bit before your activity can increase again. |
|
|
|
Hi! Address 1MUkpUqNjLqEUnEazjW5PrC2Ra2xo2dFW9 Message This is kapac, 02/12/2017 Signature H3ccj2Rio4tFr0EQ5Yb07n8C1vTLgy3witxZbjNs1SKPIK01efd6VVdWEEB57vFzm4Kg0NnET282cRjbxGiphbU= Please verify and quote.  |
|
|
|
BTC Address1PU9u7BbT12ySixTWZiqRT8tvd7rafSKgH This is ps (bitcointalk.org) - 02.12.2017 H+tfB0ojARoMv2j5QcA+ARqjUKXIg0qzfIwHomh8d0iyAcXinA68/YFzAxznGkTwsLABDuZVJingtlM/bx68Yn8= Please quote and verify. Verified |
|
|
|
I am curious as to how difficult it will be to get this verified with a signature from my Segwit P2WPKH-in-P2SH address. A few of the online tools linked in this thread seem to choke on it. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2017-12-01: I, nullius (bitcointalk.org #976210), hereby certify
36finjay27E5XPDtSdLEsPR1RypfhNW8D8 as my Bitcoin address and PGP key
0xC2E91CD74A4C57A105F6C21B5A00591B2F307E0C as my master trust anchor.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
36finjay27E5XPDtSdLEsPR1RypfhNW8D8
H7sJIPP41AO1A86NG4RhWL+gTq4wxG9Sp0+Q+0BfgmPAMlnF83coNFLp2R7/bq2tdmEvQOKZF4h96l7OOxPXaEk=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Cross-certification with PGP key: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Date: 2017-12-01
Bitcointalk.org login: nullius (976210)
Bitcoin address: 36finjay27E5XPDtSdLEsPR1RypfhNW8D8
E-mail: nullius@nym.zone
PGP fingerprints:
* Ed25519: 0xC2E91CD74A4C57A105F6C21B5A00591B2F307E0C
* RSA: 0xA232750664CC39D61CE5D61536EBB4AB699A10EE
I declare that my aforestated PGP Ed25519 Certification key is
the peremptory trust anchor for my online identity at this time,
and unless/until that key signs a statement declaring otherwise.
Unless this statement be revoked or modified by a statement bearing
authentication rooted in that key, I declare that aforestated Bitcoin
address may issue signatures controlling the aforestated Bitcointalk
account.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEARYKAB0WIQSNOMR84IlYpr/EF5vEJ5MVn575SQUCWiHpvgAKCRDEJ5MVn575
SXTBAP0VUpfJ+gSzqv9vZlT1lKn0BeAhNEDuQqlh78bWSD2apwD/ab23Gb5nnOKX
mdiEIsMEUZ7DbhdScTgos6Jzl9NgGAo=
=7yj+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Please verify and quote! Verified on keybase |
|
|
|
Please verify and quote. Address 1Kgwo7EgLSb2nCACToy3iSRXwbM8okDDYz Message Today is 02.12.2017 bitcointalk account admobbedmia (u=1077723) belongs to this address Signature HzlAwQZWUYyf0k1/3eIhu2KmA/iATYLEyEOUoE7xrNJZW5OKS8nGy3UBhscWw6L51zSMWCSIKyrXg258m4xLyxw= . |
|
|
|
Please, quote for staking. Thanks! Address: 1N9Kc62ZCAXPwHjYwWtHJANkDtTUo2pjio Message: 30/11/2017 mike0182 1N9Kc62ZCAXPwHjYwWtHJANkDtTUo2pjio Signature: HzlYV5lcE3BOBlFVm824SYt2Wbpz74C3xGCUJRdwLLahQsAQRJ6vcy66MFtZJ5tmsm/HBOWaiOivSFZdZlPL91g= |
|
|
|
|
