 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »
|
|
I am not worried. Satoshi would be smart enough to doing it in a way that will not destroy the market (bit a bit).
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin is a Kardashev level 1 currency. Nationalistic coins are against the crypto spirit.
|
|
|
|
|
By design fiat is inflationary and bitcoin deflationary, so it can't be any "end price" if your unit of mesure is fiat.
|
|
|
|
|
I strongly disagree. Dogecoin it's just a jokecoin that should'nt have any value at all. I never understood how that nonsense went so far. And you say it is fun? No, it is not funnier send a transaction with it that with any other alt. Donations? You can donate in any other alt. Dogecoin has nothing to offer.
|
|
|
|
|
I hope so but I am not very optimistic, 5k is a very strong psicological barrier, I think it will fall again to 4k levels.
|
|
|
|
What is your price now?
I would like half bitcoin but I am open to any offer. Send me a pm if you are interested. |
|
|
|
you'll receive more replies if you could show how well this is domain/website is performing for the time being, like reports for revenue/traffic sources/current costs including advertising if any.
This domain is currently unused but it has a great potential because it's a great name. In march of this year bitcoinr.net was sold for $2500. |
|
|
|
1. if you deposit a large amount, they will disable your account and never reply. 2. if you contact their support they will not rely. 3. if you try to log in they will change your desk login details and then you are not allowed to reset your password. 4. You can not take your money back either! 5. Their verifications don't work on top of it, you are stuck in limbo. They stole all of my money, took me for everything and I have never used them even once. They are truly the lowest form of scum on this planet. This is a warning to all to PULL OUT your money now as they are going to take you all for everything you have. 1. bullshit auto response that makes absolutely no sense https://postimg.org/image/hpsrl3sg1/2. https://postimg.org/image/se13xorsx/ - look my account is disabled on my first ever try, well I better go verify my phone number and promptly resolve this issue 3. https://postimg.org/image/g0o9qs24h/- This is 100% without question the code. I am not going to take a picture of me looking at the phone writing this down. Guess I can't verify, oh well how about fuck them and I'll simply take my money back 4. https://gyazo.com/1bc9e156c0a30211ec5f88b596f3501d Well fuck me again, how about I read about the disabled accounts on their page to find out why a month busting my ass in two jobs is being held up 5. https://bittrex.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000240791 Nothing, what about that? Shall I keep going? I am so so angry at this that my head hurts, i'll take a rest but I will dig more evidence later. Let this be a lesson to you all, if they are selectively scamming the little guy, imagine how badly they are going to fuck up a few of the big ones. I do not know. I am with them some time and they always worked fine for me. It is hard to believe that they wanted to scam such a small quantity. Perhaps they need your verification because your country has higher regulations or you changed your address. What you showed is not the proof. Maybe they are incompetent or maybe not, but certainly that is not a scam proof. In 1 they ask you to verify and they say you that your account is locked for 24h. That's what happens in 2 and 4. In 3 maybe you have a problem with your the local time of your device. |
|
|
|
I dont know why people are complaining, these means that there is going to be a new coin available for you to sell and get more bitcoins in return of that. Isnt this a fun way to make money? If you ask me, i want a fork everyday  Because those forks produce doubts about the bitcoin scarcity. If their name were not related to bitcoin it would be fine, but now some people will think that there are 2 kinds of bitcoin (21 M * 2), and that there will be 4 by the end of the year (21M *4). There can be only 1 true bitcoin but those alternatives produce doubts. |
|
|
|
Pero eso tambien lo hacen los exchanges como kraken o Bittrex!!!
Cual sería la diferencia entre los exchanges arriba mencionados y localethereum?
Que lo puedes hacer de forma anónima quedando con un particular y aceptar/usar dinero directamente en efectivo. En los exchangers verifican tu identidad. Personalmente prefiero las transacciones locales porque me parecen más ágiles, no tienes que esperar a que se haga la transferencia a tu exchanger. |
|
|
|
|
El bitcoin no por ser antigubernamental, pero sí que pueden convertir sus monedas nacionales en otras criptomonedas, como ya han anunciado que están planeando varios países (Singapur, China, Rusia, UK).
|
|
|
|
|
Teachers are really important but there could be self-taught professionals without them. (There would be much less and slower but still there will be)
|
|
|
|
the reason of china bitcoin banned due to the crinmenals use bitcoin for the illigal activty, but i think its an alibies of the china government, china not hate bitcoin as my thinking china want to control the bitcoin to hold in hand.
Wrong, that's the official statement. They hate bitcoin because bitcoin is a defense weapon against opresive governments. |
|
|
|
Any proof for "Bitcoin trading ban"? Any reliable source? Or just another unreflected bullshit thread?
First there where insiders anonymous statements. Yesterday Charlie Lee said he has also insider info confirming it. And today we have this: https://twitter.com/YourBTCC/status/908285586368167936Any proof for "Bitcoin trading ban"? Any reliable source? Or just another unreflected bullshit thread?
BTCChina is closing down confirmed by the ownsers and Reuters. What do you need more? It is likely you guys are a bit mentally challenged. Shutting down an exchange is no "BTC Ban". Especially not when "insiders" say it. Lol who is the mentally challenged? No one but you said btc ban. From the begining it was btc trading exchangers ban. |
|
|
|
Hola,
Las nuevas tecnologías siempre suelen ir por delante de la legalidad. Cuando éstas se hacen grandes, suelen hacerse leyes específicas para regluar estas tecnologías. Nosotros estamos encajando de forma satisfactoria Internxt en el marco legal que ahora hay en España, e imagino que las leyes que regulan este tipo de empresas irán evolucionando también. Por otra parte, lo que nos diferencia de nuestros competidores (MaidSafe, DFINITY etc) es que estamos desarrollando una tecnología enfocada al usuario medio. Una tecnología sencilla, rápida, fácil de entender, y muy superior a la que se usa actualmente el usuario medio (Google, Dropbox etc).
Pues sí, en otros sectores siempre ha sido así, pero yo estaría preocupado por la surrealista situación de las icos chinas que tienen que devolver el dinero a los inversores. No sabía lo de Aragon, si fueron una de las icos más exitosas  |
|
|
|
|
Prefiero el btc porque:
1.-El truco ese del bch de ajustar la dificultad de minado es una chapuza, ya que puede ser explotado por los mineros para ganar rentabilidad (como parece que ya hicieron), lo cual provoca inestabilidad en la velocidad de las transacciones (el día que los mineros decidan no minar para rebajar la dificultad, las transacciones estarán atascadas).
2.- Me parecen bien que se aumente el tamaño de los bloques, pero no es una solución suficiente ya que hay limitaciones de hardware para tanto ancho de banda y disco duro. Para escalar a niveles del dinero tradicional hacen falta otras soluciones como las side chains que permite LN.
3.- Hay que seguir a los desarrolladores y, al menos de momento, en btc son mejores.
Lo único que me preocupa del btc es que sí es posible la teoría conspirativa de que blockstream se haya infiltrado en él con oscuros motivos. Personalmente no la creo, pero sí que es posible.
|
|
|
|
|
El bitcoin por un lado tiene el poder de prescindir del sector financiero. Como un político dijo hace poco, puede eliminar todos los empleos del sector financiero.
Pero por otro, los bancos pueden aprovechar la tecnología blockchain para ganar competividad.
|
|
|
|
Any proof for "Bitcoin trading ban"? Any reliable source? Or just another unreflected bullshit thread?
First there where insiders anonymous statements. Yesterday Charlie Lee said he has also insider info confirming it. And today we have this: https://twitter.com/YourBTCC/status/908285586368167936 |
|
|
|
I don't known btccc before any I think nothing worry about that. If btccc close we have btc-e back. that's all
Btc-e is great. Problem is that this might suggest that all chinese exchangers will close. |
|
|
|
Basically, every full node of Bitcoin network is doing the same work as any other payment processor like Visa or Mastercard - validating and keeping record of transactions. The difference is that those companies have powerful servers, while Bitcoin users have their home computers. Satoshi thought that computer technology and demand for Bitcoin's capacity will be growing hand-to-hand, so when more people will want to send bitcoins, Bitcoin users will have more powerful computers to process new transactions. He was clearly wrong, because even now it would be very burdensome to process higher amounts of transaction on your home computer. Also, he didn't take into account the fact that demand for transactions will be also growing, as more people are joining global economy, and as people move away from cash.
You are talking a load of crap. My computer CPU barely use more than 1% of my CPU and spikes to 3% to 5% when a block is received. Computer technology is way way way ahead of bitcoin. Satoshi knew what he was doing. Is not the cpu, is the bandwidth and disk space. |
|
|
|
|
