It looks like you created a transaction but instead of signing and broadcasting it, you saved it. That's why it shows up as a local transaction. Load the saved local transaction in the app, sign it, and broadcast it. Better yet, delete it completely and create a new one because you are overpaying the fees.
Are you getting an error when you try to sign and broadcast the local transaction?
|
|
|
Suppose I want to setup a wallet with 1 seed with Sparrow wallet. Now all can just work find. But what has happens now behind the scene in my hacked Sparrow wallet, is that it created a multi sig wallet, a 1-out-of-2 wallet. To be honest, I didn't understand what exactly you are asking. So, let me try to cover some general points. You are not creating the wallet in Sparrow. Jade is creating it and generating your seed in an airgapped environment. Sparrow wallet (the hot wallet) doesn't know your seed, so you can't lose your bitcoin even if your Sparrow wallet got hacked. Again, I can check receiving addresses using another software wallet. But is there a way to detect something is wrong without the extra software wallet? Something would be wrong if the address that Sparrow wallet displays in the interface can't be verified on your Jade with the correct seed phrase loaded in it. If Jade can't verify your address, then Sparrow isn't showing you an address which is part of your wallet or you have imported the wrong seed in Jade. You need Sparrow or a different hot wallet if you are going to work with your Jade in airgapped mode. The hot wallet creates your transaction and broadcasts it to the network. The Jade (cold wallet) signs the transaction with its private key(s). Both are essential to the process.
|
|
|
I would recommend you use a 12-word seed with your Jade. It's safe enough, and you don't need more entropy. You can always extend your seed with a passphrase. You will need time filling out the 12-word QR seed template, but if you opt for a 24-word seed, it's going to take significantly longer. You increase the odds of making a mistake and having to start over. And as I said, 12-word seeds are secure.
|
|
|
Before deleting/ uninstalling a wallet on a device, you must be very sure that you already make wallet backups, not only one but several back ups. It is not enough if you stop there, because you have to test that you can recover your wallet with backups you have. Make sure through testing, your recovery result shows that you succeed to recover a same wallet on your device. Making physical backups of the seed and recovering your wallet from seed should be done immediately after creation and before funding the wallet with any significant sums. You can either take note of a few bitcoin addresses and then recover your wallet from seed to see if the recovered wallet contains the same addresses. Alternatively, and I think this is better, send a small amount of BTC to one of your addresses, delete your wallet, and recover it from seed. Spend those coins to be absolutely sure that everything is ok.
|
|
|
Svakako bi trebali izaci izvan US trzista, mada je i sam Amazon prilicno US orijentisan. Tačno je to ali je i Evropa dosta dobro pokrivena. Ne kupujem često preko Amazona ali mi je prvi izbor kad tražim knjige. Rijetko da me nešto zanima ili mi treba a da na Amazonu nema. A kao kupac, od njih imaš zaštitu u slučaju da nešto nije kako je predstavljeno. Obično se ono što ima u US može naći i u EU. Bar je takvo moje iskustvo.
|
|
|
Certainly, but isn't the primary appeal of the coinJoin protocol that it's trustless-- that it doesn't require trust in the coordinator to function? Or do you believe there's still some risk involved in choosing a random coordinator for coinjoin? Being "trustless" is just marketing gimmick. It doesn't mean anything unless you and everyone using a coordinator don't have the coding skills to read and interpret what the software does. WasabiCoordinator was also trustless, but it was discovered that they were slowly stealing their customer's bitcoin by charging higher coinjoin fees. In reality, you have to trust that the coordinator is honest and doesn't act maliciously most of the time. The alternative, learn how to code and read code and verify everything yourself. Now, how many people out of 1000 or 10000 know how to do that?
|
|
|
First of all, your Sparrow Wallet or other companion app must contain the master public key of your wallet. If you are using Jade as a stateless signer, then you must first load your seed into it from your SeedQR. After the seed is loaded, you will see a "Scan QR" option in Jade. Click on it to activate the camera. At the same time, find the address in Sparrow wallet that you want to verify and display its QR code. Scan this code with your Jade and the feedback should tell you that the address belongs to your wallet. Do this every time you want to send bitcoin to a new address that's part of your Jade's seed to be sure.
|
|
|
I am not convinced of the results. 5 or 6/10 is something a good bettor should get anyway, without using AI. Considering that it usually picks big favorites to win with small odds, you might still be in a loss overall even if it guessed 6/10 games so far. It would be good to know if Grok takes into account and has data on injuries and players who won't play. Perhaps you should ask it to provide you sources that it's basing its predictions on and list everything that has influenced it to make such prediction.
|
|
|
Sto je najbolje servis koji se reklamira vjerojatno cu i koristiti u buducmosti ako se pokaze kvalitetan. Uskoro ce i se otvoriti i ANN tema na forumu gdje ce se moci podijeliti iskustva korisnika. Ne tvrdim sa sigurnošću ali mislim da je Zellin isključivo namjenjen za građane SAD-a i da se naručena roba može slati samo unutar SAD-a. Zanimalo me je kako usluga funkcioniše pa sam primjetio da ne radi ako ne ubaciš link od artikla sa američke verzije Amazona. Te linkove prepozaje, ali linkove sa Amazon.de ne prihvata. A onda kad dođeš na dio da unosiš adresu od ponuđenih država ima samo SAD. Ako griješim, slobodno ispravi nakon što testiraš uslugu. ANN tema u nekoj formi postoji ali se ne može takvom zvati. Plus, smještena je u off-topic forumu.
|
|
|
Total Goals: 31 BlackJack username: Pmalek
|
|
|
Most people don't have problems signing up for centralized casinos and playing these and other games there. If they did, we wouldn't have hundreds of different online casinos popping up all over the place with new ones coming every day. I think you will be limiting your userbase significantly. First, you need players interested in playing poker and blackjack. Second, they need to be aware of and care about centralization to want to switch to a decentralized gambling style. And lastly, you will have to incentivize them to leave well-known casinos to come and play at your place.
Don't forget, anything decentralized is always more complicated and time-consuming to set up and run than centralized services.
|
|
|
Napokon sam upao u BTC kampanju i ja, ovaj projekt mi se cini bas ok. I odlicno mi je da nema minimalni broj postova, kao da je radena po mojoj mjeri
Zazelite mi srecu, valjda ce proci u redu sve. Sretno i break a leg. Nemoj da se previše opustiš misleći nema minimalan broj postova pa je ok i da napišem samo 3-4 tjedno. Nije isključeno da te menadžer šutne ako bude smatrao da nedoprinosiš dovoljno svojom aktivnošću i primi nekog drugog ko će pisati puno više od tebe. Baš me zanima hoće li Zellix potrajati i steći određenu popularnost. Usluga je zanimljiva mada skupa jer naplačuju proviziju od 10% po narudžbi.
|
|
|
I see no benefits in creating a legacy wallet in 2024. It's good to know that you could in case you needed to. But even if you must send bitcoin to an old legacy address, the wallet you are sending from doesn't have to be legacy. And if you are using a service that only makes payments to legacy addresses, forcing you to use them, it might be time to look for an alternative. If they couldn't make time to add support for segwit, who knows what else they have overlooked that might affect you personally.
|
|
|
So can I turn this watch-only wallet subsequently (=now) into a full wallet? Simply by importing seed or private key? Or do I need a full new installation. The software is already installed on your system. You don't need to install it a second or third time. A watch-only wallet always remain a watch-only wallet. It doesn't contain private keys to broadcast transactions. Later I want to toggle this wallet occasionally from watch-only to full and back. Is this possible without fiddling with seed and/or private keys? Do you plan to do that on the same device? You don't gain anything in doing that. Watch-only wallets are useful in combination with a cold wallet installed on a different offline machine. Using both on the same system brings zero benefits. I assume you have bitcoin in your wallet already, right?
|
|
|
You need a microscope and very steady hand to replace the screen yourself, but I don't think it's worth it. I like messing around and fixing stuff myself, but Trezor One already have tiny screen, so why don't you switch to something else. He has no choice. Unless he remembers where and how he hid his recovery phrase, he won't be able to regain access to his crypto. In that case, all he can do is try to fix his current Trezor One, where the seed is already stored in the device's memory, or have someone else fix it for him.
|
|
|
There is a list of many crypto wallets here on (Link removed). There are better sources than the one you mentioned or perhaps shilled. It's just a list. The Bitcoin Hole compares the most important features of both software and hardware wallets in a much better format. Electrum Wallet is good which I am using it with error foe years now. The transaction fee is very small and it is not up to a dollar so it is affordable at all time of transaction. But when the mempool is congested then the fee will be high. But it is one of most secure wallet to store bitcoin. Bluewallet transaction fee is high than Electrum. So you choose your choice. It seems like you are allowing your wallet to tell you how much to pay in fees. That's not how it's supposed to work. Both of the wallets you mentioned allow you to enter transaction fees manually. You are supposed to check the current state of the network and then enter appropriate fees into the software. Electrum wallet is also an online wallet, so it may not be the best for long term storage of a large amount of BTC, for that either use a hardware wallet or run Electrum in an airgapped device. As you know, Electrum can also be coupled with popular hardware wallets so it stops being a hot wallet in that case. In my opinion, the best option is the Electrum mobile wallet. Why limit yourself exclusively for the mobile variant of Electrum when the desktop version is better and more feature-rich? Personally, I would always pick Blue Wallet on mobile over Electrum.
|
|
|
Konacno da imamo kampanju a da nije gambling. Takodje, pokrenuta je njihova kampanja i na altocoinstalks, mozda je to znak da je ozbiljna ekipa iza. Sjećam se da je bilo sličnih usluga u prošlosti gdje su korisnici nudili mogućnost kupovine preko Amazona sa kriptovalutama ali mislim da se niko nije nametnuo kao dovoljno siguran i kao osoba od poverjenja. Naknade bi bile prevelike a tu je i uobičajeni problem da ljudi ne žele da otkriju svoje osobne podatke nepoznatim osobama što je razumljivo. Gift cards koje se plate kriptovalutama su dosad bile najbolje rješenje.
|
|
|
Could you briefly describe the disagreements you had with the Wasabi maintainer(s)? I believe explaining these differences would help your clients decide which wallet software best suits their needs. Currently, since you're a fork of Wasabi, it may not be immediately clear to customers why they should choose your fork over the original, which has been maintained for a longer time and still allows connections to your coordinator and other features. I think one big reason is the profit side of things. Ginger wallet has made their coordinator the only one you can use with this software in one of their recent updates. You can't select a different coordinator and coinjoin with Ginger wallet. I remember that OP mentioned that the software uses 2FA, which is another security boost. Apparently, Wasabi wallet doesn't. Other than that, the two coinjoin apps should be pretty similar for now.
|
|
|
The mistake is that he did not backup his seed phrase which he can use to recover his coins. He said later that he did back up his recovery phrase. He laminated it and hid it somewhere. Unfortunately, he forgot where he put it. He thinks it's between his library and safe, whatever that means. Going back to the location and looking at the possible hiding places should refresh his memory. It couldn't have been that long ago that the information is completely wiped from his head.
|
|
|
|