|
6
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ANN [MCO] MONACO #1 Cryptocurrency Payments Card
|
on: September 03, 2018, 04:48:26 AM
|
90000+ people are waiting for them to release the card but all they are doing is stalling they should give us one fix date.
It's really frustrating that there are other cryptocurrency project that are rolling out their cryptocurrency cards now. What a shame on Monaco. I read on Reddit that they have already completed testing the cards and now waiting on an audit once that is finished they will release the card. Where? Got a link? |
|
|
|
|
8
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Akroma - Cryptocurrency. Smarter. (Smart Contracts. Masternodes. Oracles.)
|
on: August 26, 2018, 05:17:19 AM
|
Heads up there was a purge of around 200 Masternodes because they don't have the minimum version of 0.1.1 or above. Please upgrade your node to start receiving rewards again. Just follow the part that deals with downloading and installing akroma-mn-setup.x86_64 https://docs.akroma.io/masternodes/operating-systems/installation-on-linux . If your having problems with installing akroma-mn-setup script you can try to manually upgrade masternode's geth version. seanjnkns Yesterday at 10:22 AM
Alright, here's what you need to do, preferably as root to save yourself a bunch of sudo
1) wget https://github.com/akroma-project/akroma/releases/download/0.2.1/release.linux-amd64.0.2.1.zip
2) unzip release.linux-amd64.0.2.1.zip
3) chmod 755 geth
4) systemctl stop akromanode. If you still have it named masternode, then stop masternode instead
5) mv geth /usr/sbin/geth
6) systemctl start akromanode, or masternode
Then you can re-run that geth attach if you want and it should show your version as 0.2.1 That's good for those Masternode holders who updated  . |
|
|
|
|
10
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ECA] Electra ⚡ | POW/POS | NIST5 | Super Rewards Bonanza
|
on: August 22, 2018, 01:00:28 PM
|
I don't take it personal but I do stand for the project where none of the current team members have bad intentions as you suggest. I have no clue who you are since you keep yourself anonymous, therefore I cant verify if we ever had contact or not. But that’s OK. Maverick did leave for personal reasons and he can even return as soon as they have been resolved. I have called him many times in the past weeks and had intensive contact in the past days. The fact you state he didn’t leave for personal reasons tells me you have no relationship with him nor ever talked to him 1-1, yet you state it firmly which makes your posts less credible as it’s simply not true. ECA Mom and Ryu left because they don't agree with the power E01 still have from a developer perspective in the project as well as the control on the premine which is understandable. These kind of projects stand or fall with trust. As long as I believe and trust the good intentions of E01 (I have no reasons to doubt) I will stay. But I can imagine when you loose your confidence you leave the project. You di dforget to mention that Ryu and ECA Mom are still active as member in the project? Ryu is doing an awesome job in helping the community in answering questions. Cryptolife wasn't very active so never had any chat with him. and Ivan also was not very active so didn’t talk to him a lot in the past months and has his own ambitions to achieve his life goals/dreams. Chat with them to understand. Based on these conversations I wouldn’t describe “the both of us as honest people” since I noticed you only post one-sided and incomplete stories. If that’s on purpose, it’s being dishonest. If you believe you speak the truth in making the comments then I can’t blame you for being not fully aware or informed. In the ECA influencers group I can’t recall a day where we said to make ECA 1 EUR and I find it typical you try to throw these statements to me in a way the reader even may think its true. I (and everyone in the team) have the strict rule to not focus on price in terms of predicting. Price can never be predicted or set as goal as it is dependent on many ingredients from which many can’t be controlled. I would like to inform everyone reading this thread that the person Im responding to, who refuses to identify himself, clearly has grudges to the project or feels not respected in the past. A lot of statements or theories he or she writes are either taken out of context or untrue. I can tell from the posts that his person was not directly involved in the coordinators team but watched it from the outside and that’s okay. I’d like to challenge everyone to use common sense, do their own research and by all means verify information directly at the source. Master Den, Bob (The Revolution), Asmoth, myself, and more are working for the project many hours a day where most of us have still fulltime jobs. We wouldn’t do this if we didn’t believe the project has a future. Did you know Master Den spends 10 hours a day for already a year on this project for free where he gets regular offers to join other projects as community manager for serious amounts of money a year? Yes we have quite some bumps in the road to overcome and these are discussed a lot of times in the teams and community. Yes in the young team that we are we also have internal struggles between people. Just imagine, trying to setup and run a project with people from all over the world that don’t know eachother, work together only through mailing and having calls. Some people came with different intentions then others. What I see now is that the current team has a big passion for the Electra project and it’s community to play a significant role in the crypto/blockchain revolution all projects are currently being part of. Again… yes we all have our bag of ECA. Some were able to buy very soon and have big bags, some have smaller bags bought at later stages (such as myself). If I may speak for myself.. I made my crypto portfolio exist for 90% out of ECA to keep myself sharp and motivated to keep on going for the project. You may disagree with what you see or hear in regards to the projects direction but don’t disrespect he people that are working hard, voluntary, next to their jobs with the best intentions. Yes, sometimes there are community members or even supporting team members that don’t behave and have corrupt intentions, but those are being dealt with right away. As far as you concerned Mr. Colx, I have no idea who you are and when we ever discussed stuff. I understand you became disappointed or perhaps hurt within the team. If I was a reason for it or some of the coreteam members I want to apologize for that. Again I want to invite you for a discussion or q&a and that doesn’t need to be in public perse. If you don’t want this then I think it’s pointless to continue because the conversation would become very one sided where you post incomplete comments placed out of context, me countering them leaving the public in confusion what to believe. Take care and all the best, Robert Hello anonymous keyboard warrior. Why don't you let me and the people here know what you actually like? And it doesn't need to be ECA (I dont expect that from you). I assume, by looking at your name, your project's logo is green? Eitherway, I commented where I could on your incredibly short sighted comments, a weak attempt to convince people why ECA is the worst project you can possibly imagine.
Again, perhaps we can do a live Q&A online where you have the possiblity to fire anything at me and for me the noble task to counter all you fire with facts.
It appears that the team is simply dismissing this as FUD/negativity. Reality check: There would be no negativity if there was competency. (you are the negative one here  )Regardless of how you attempt to paint this picture, the facts remain that the people in this project are still spreading misinformation about it in an attempt to prevent more cumulative losses from occurring. (what misinformation?)We are constantly told "the fork is ready" and that "The Electra Foundation would take 3-5 days to set up" (please show me where its asid. I told the community this week that the lawyer adviced 5 days when we submit the forms) . Well, why are we taking so long to implement both of these measures? It's like waiting for winter to arrive on Game of Thrones. Might I remind everyone that the initial founder is to receive all the staking rewards, which is closing in on 400M ECA now. ( discussed it before) Staff tell us the project is doing great, but nothing has changed since December except for the new adoption of this garbage unprofessional approach to marketing. Attempting to hype and sexualize a financial product with blonde bimbos lacking any kind of cryptographic literacy is terrible at best. Why on Earth would anybody put money into that? How does this provide incentive to use Electra as an every day currency, or have we now switched our target audience from every day families to college frat boys? ( we are now 7 months underway my friend and in a bear market. We are doing great if you see where we are coming from (and Im not talking about price!! ) ) We should not be sending people like Cassandra Hawkins (Electra Spirit) to institutional blockchain meetups. She has a degree in homeopathy and fitness ffs. (Somebody from the team works in swimmingpool industry, We have people working in drywalling industry, I work as banking consultant, We have students, Mav is in real estate, etc. etc. And you know what? We are all passionate about the project and know a lot about he subject matter where some are maybe more technically savvy then the others) - Stake reduction delay (no deadline set) - Foundation delay (no deadline set) - Funds still not moved into multisig wallet (what funds?) - Original core team silent - Github activity stalling (Some activities we dont disclose in the open on Github to ensure it remains hidden for competitors) - Founder keeps all staking rewards (no, E01 is also hedging ECA with other crypto) - Overseers Ryu, VergeLife, Eca Giraffe and Zarag gone (3/4 moving onto new projects) (Maverick joined, Ruru joined, Robert Bakker joined - Ryu is till with the project but not in the team, Zarag same) - Team opening bot party chat for sponges (serious?) - Team offering their consumers money to win exchange votes ( - Price per unit below 10 satoshis (yes ) - False ATM announcements (why false?) - Openly shilling Aircoins, Unifox and other vaporware (ICO) products in chat (its not shilling, its talking positive about partner projects) Where do you see this going? (a purple future) Strange that you would take this personally, and yet again dismiss this as negativity. Do you have some undisclosed control over the project that we have not yet discussed? You and I have been in the back end and "ECA Influencers" telegram group for quite a while We both know eachother well, and we both know that personal reasons aren't why Maverick, ECA Mom, Ryu, Ivan and CryptoLife left the project. Consumers don't blindly spread FUD - They ask questions. FUD is false information, and you know full well that what I'm saying is not false. When investors are given vague responses that are engineered to divert attention or confuse for 2 months at a time they become frustrated. A prime example is your clear attempts to dismiss me as a "keyboard warrior", and redirect peoples attention to me rather than giving answers about Electra. Remember that day when we described ourselves in ECA Influencers as "A group of people who have a hard on for getting ECA to $1"? Let's not bullshit anyone on this thread - we're both honest individuals and should keep it that way. All conversations that display a direct conflict of interest were saved, just in case something like our current internal issues were to ignite. - Price manipulation - Buying false social media followers, comments and likes to assert influence over other projects consumer bases - Coordinated hype in the lead up to announcements - Back-end conflicts The list goes on. I will object to your proposition of a Q&A as the last one we coordinated with Aykut on Youtube was pointless and I know any adequate responses would be considered a conflict of interest. Aykut gave the exact same vague answers to our questions with only an emphasis of it's a good community coin. See last failed interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQWWP17TYns&t=77sWe don't need words we need action. Interesting takes. |
|
|
|
|
14
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ENU] Enumivo: Blockchain + Universal Basic Income
|
on: August 20, 2018, 02:24:52 PM
|
In order to vote, you have to be a registered user ( follow this link https://fyrus.pro/register ) and hold at least 1000 FYR. FYR can be acquired by signing up, depositing either BTC or ETH, and exchanging them for FYR in the slide in account menu under the "Get FYR" tab. To access the slide in account menu, please click on the profile icon located at the top right corner of the main exchange page after logging in. Each user can cast ONE vote for each project and each vote costs ONE FYR. Max. 5 votes per account per week. Once voted, your FYR is NOT refundable. For a project to be qualified, the project has to receive a minimum of 1000 votes. So we have to buy FYR essentially. |
|
|
|
|
15
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][ECA] Electra ⚡ | POW/POS | NIST5 | Super Rewards Bonanza
|
on: August 20, 2018, 02:24:02 PM
|
Remember when the Electra team said Maverick left for personal reasons?
Surprise surprise, they lied yet again. What happened to the days of transparency?You can't really blame him for leaving for another project though. It would be very frustrating trying to deal with an incompetent and deceptive business team. They've done a pretty good job at keeping people holding while the max cap and inflation controls haven't been implemented. Just a reminder for investors that the long-claimed 30 billion ECA max supply is actually false, and is actually unlimited until the hard fork is released. Also, don't forget that the recent business partners are run by team members. It appears that the most recent deceptive business tactics are to have team members create a new startup company, remove their faces from the Electra website, and announce a partnership. Let's not even get started on Tekin Akdeniz's admissions of spoofing/botting the charts on CryptoBridge during the previous dump. The SEC is going to have a great time with that one. This is endorsed shilling enabled by individuals such as Robert Bakker and Aykut Baybas. - Maverick joining new team. Also displays that he founded the company most recently announced on Electra forums. https://twitter.com/EvimeriaIO/status/1030467349365907458?s=19 LOL. He is an ADVISOR. He is still an advisor. Whoosh. |
|
|
|
|
16
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ANN [MCO] MONACO #1 Cryptocurrency Payments Card
|
on: August 20, 2018, 02:22:16 PM
|
If they used raised funds than it is worse use case from my opinion. They should deliver asap or accept the truth and tell us what is happening behind the scene instead of sharing these nonsense stories with us. I also agreed with you this is failed project where we only getting this kind of irrelevant updates.
Yeah this update essentially says 'MCO hires staff'. That might have cut it 12 months ago, but now it's just, like, so what? Inputs aren't the same as outcomes. Hiring staff is an input that might help deliver an outcome, but by itself at this later stage, it means very little. From another point of view, it could mean that people are leaving the company because they understand the company cannot deliver what was promised before. That's why they have to hire new staff, just to cover open positions. I simply cannot see the reasons for MCO to extend their staff while they don't have a working card. These are pretty decent hires. Adrienne Wong joins CRYPTO.com as Senior Vice President, Head of Product. She joins from fintech company Square where she managed global strategy and market launches for its flagship product, Square Point of Sale. She had also led growth and expansion efforts in the Canada, UK, Australia, and US markets. A former Deloitte strategy and operations consultant, Adrienne graduated from the University of California, Berkeley with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Bachelor of Arts in Economics, and a concentration in Global Management. Cerulean Hu joined CRYPTO.com as Lead Blockchain Engineer with a strong background in both the blockchain and traditional financial services industries. In her past roles, Cerulean developed easy-to-use and robust financial products and systems. Previously, she was lead engineer at Equichain, implemented blockchain solutions at FINCOVA, led finance and trading systems development at ANX. Prior to that, she was responsible for developing trading algorithms at HSBC. Cerulean graduated from the University of Hong Kong with a Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering. Cerulean is a name I recognize because of OAX. |
|
|
|
|
17
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
|
on: August 20, 2018, 02:20:49 PM
|
Hello! The Ravencoin v2.0.4 wallet binaries are now available and can be downloaded at https://github.com/RavenProject/Ravencoin/releases/tag/v2.0.4This update will enable the Dark Gravity Wave difficulty adjustment for mining, contains the code for the asset layer that will begin activation on October 31st, and it fixes a few bugs found after v2.0.3 was released. *IMPORTANT!* The DGW adjustment will activate on block 338778, which will result in a hard-fork of the ravencoin chain. Please apply the v2.0.4 binary updates as soon as possible in order to ensure that your wallets are on the correct chain after the fork. Anyone not using the new software upon the activation at block 338778 will be "forked off" and will remain on the counterfeit blockchain. Common Questions:What do I need to do to update my wallet?Step 1. Backup the old wallet so you will have a backed up .dat file Step 2. Download the new wallet (see the link above) Step 3. Extract/Install the new raven-qt Step 4. Run raven-qt and verify that you are syncing correctly to the blockchain. * If you are not able to see your coins, import that backed up .dat file into the wallet. If you need additional support go to #wallet-support channel of the Ravencoin Community discord server. Do I need to update my paper wallet(s)?No. You control the keys to your funds with a paperwallet, which you will import to an updated wallet when you decide to access the funds. What will happen if I don't update?If you don't update your wallet it will remain on the old chain, and any coins on that wallet will not be accessible on the new chain. The coins will not be lost, but you will not be able to access them on the new chain until you update the wallet. How does this affect people who are mining?If you are mining via a mining pool, it will not affect your abililty to mine because the updates will be done on the pool side. However, if your mining payouts are going to an old wallet, you will not be able to access them on the new chain until you update that wallet. What if I have already updated to v2.0.3?If you have already updated to v2.0.3 and you can see your coins after syncing to the blockchain then you will not need to update again. (though it wouldnt hurt). If you are experiencing issue when attempting to sync to the blockchain or when activating the QT client, you will need to update. Great update. The DGW adjustment will activate on block 338778, which will result in a hard-fork of the ravencoin chain. I guess we need to apply the v2.0.4 binary updates as soon as possible in order to ensure that your wallets are on the correct chain after the fork. Anyone not using the new software upon the activation at block 338778 will be "forked off" and will remain on the counterfeit blockchain. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
