 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
The banks already have taken over bitcoin... why do you think blockstream and bitcoin core want to implement such an overly complex solution to scailing that oddly enough makes it extremely easy to centralize bitcoin via lightning network nodes? is that a coincidence? no. WAKE UP SHEEPLE.
people want to complain about roger ver and jihan wu trying to assault bitcoin with the bitcoin cash fork but really it's blockstream through bitcoin core that are harming bitcoin with all the financial institutions funding the take over through blockstream.
the fact that the average person investing in bitcoin (btc) are extremely lazy and simply looking to become wealthy is a huge problem... these lazy investors aren't doing the leg work to actually look into lightning network and the effect it will have on bitcoin... they are literally handing the banks the power over bitcoin because they are ignorant and greedy. they would rather take the words of blockstream funded shills like all the dipshits at World Crypto Network and Tone Vays and Richard Heart (Richard Schueler)
sure... i agree. the name bitcoin cash is stupid. but they couldn't simply take the name bitcoin and have two coins with the same name. so bitcoin cash had to be used... but if you look beyond the stupid name they were more or less forced to use, you'll see that bitcoin cash is the original bitcoin chain...
trust me, i fell for the "btc is the real bitcoin" bullshit, too. but eventually, i had to objectively look at the entire situation, all the players invovled and logically come to my own conclusion... which is that bch/bcc is bitcoin. i felt stupid, but got over it. i'm sure plenty of shills will disagree with my sentiment but do the research... you'll see.
don't trust blockstream.
don't trust lightning network.
make sure you know what is going on here.
the banks have taken over btc....
|
|
|
|
|
they must be pretty desperate to not go to jail
|
|
|
|
|
>when you bought bitcoin 2 years ago and wake up from your coma
|
|
|
|
|
The idea is for you to be your own bank.
|
|
|
|
|
He knows people are keen to the games the banking system is playing with the peoples' money and the connection the industry has to government. I wouldn't be surprised if he takes all those bitcoins he bought during this dip and TRIES to disappear before the people string him up by the neck with the rest of these criminal bankers.
|
|
|
|
|
who cares?
what bearing does it currently have on anyone's life right now if there is a single living thing in the universe anywhere besides on earth?
another distraction to keep people from focusing on reality
|
|
|
|
|
rumored
rumored
rumored
rumored
rumored
more fud for the fudgod
|
|
|
|
|
sliding thread > feeding trolls
|
|
|
|
 sorry. couldn't help myself! 
|
|
|
|
|
Any time there is a big dip or a big climb you're gonna see a lot of volatility. So you'll see fluctuations b/w 3100 and 3400 or whatever for a while. Who knows what could happen, though? Esp since there seems to be this strategic fud campaign.
|
|
|
|
|
just fire them all off! pump up the price!
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, China must respect the boundaries given by UNCLOS. Here is a map:  The Chinese claim is in the red dash line, and it can be clearly seen that their claims don't have any historical or legal basis. The other nations need to stand unite, to fight against the Chinese bullying. border disputes are just issues meant to rile up the citizens so they think there isn't one entity ruling over everyone. do you really think the chinese elite and the western elite care who controls that area? no. they all profit from it. |
|
|
|
First and foremost, what is a CULT? Q. What is a cult? And how does someone know if the faith they are following is harmful? A. The word cult has three definitions. First of all, it can simply be a group that loves something. When people refer to an "Elvis cult" or "The O.C. cult," they mean really devoted fans. The second definition is that of a religion whose beliefs differ from the majority around them. In the Roman Empire, Christians were sometimes considered a cult because they worshiped Jesus rather than the Roman gods. The third, and most commonly used definition, refers to a religious group that is: 1) Exclusive. They may say, "We're the only ones with the truth; everyone else is wrong; and if you leave our group your salvation is in danger." 2) Secretive. Certain teachings are not available to outsiders or they're presented only to certain members, sometimes after taking vows of confidentiality. 3) Authoritarian. A human leader expects total loyalty and unquestioned obedience. For the most part, this third definition of cult is being used less and less today. Experts who watch for dangerous or harmful religious groups now use the term new religious movements. The word cult can hurt people because it carries so much negative meaning. My sister was accused of being in a cult just because she preferred hanging out with Christian friends rather than going out drinking with other friends. She might have been in with a group of people that was unlike the norm (because they devotedly followed Christ), but she certainly wasn't following a harmful faith.
Taken from here. In some arguments pinning down Bitcoin as just another bubble that pop anytime and can left many people holding empty bags, some people are claiming that Bitcoin has already relegated into some sort of a cult. Personally speaking, I find that association to be a little bit insulting because I am always careful on things I am getting into. Yes, we may have become speculators with Bitcoin but to accused us of being a cult can already be on the extreme. Do you think that we are followers of a cult called Bitcoin? In case you agree with that then maybe it is time for you to sold your Bitcoin and leave as soon as possible. If you're a maximalist or an elitist, maybe. Just about anything can be considered a cult, though, depending on how you look at it. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin took a major dive after a big Chinese exchange said it is closing, they have until Sep 25th to pull their money out --> CNBC ....so that's mean price should keep tanking until at least Sep 30th
Logic level: -9000 |
|
|
|
People actually thinking it's going to drop below 2k  |
|
|
|
|
This isn't even a realistic scenario without the internet coming to a catastrophic end. Either you are trolling, FUDing or you're severely lacking the ability to use logic.
|
|
|
|
|
>Kodak CEO "Digital photography is a fad and won't last"
>Blockbuster CEO "Netflix won't last" (passed up a chance to buy NetFlix for $50 million)
>Paul Krugman "The internet won't amount to anything but a fax machine" (somehow people still find this guy relevant)
>Jamie Dimon "Bitcoin is a scam"
|
|
|
|
Mainly full of coins that only seem to exist to get pumped and dumped. Like others mentioned the volume, for the most part, is ridiculously low. I'm not sure how it manages to survive. Maybe they're the only ones trading on it  |
|
|
|
|
