Latest posts of: Tomohisa

Other than the team's information like you said, I would try to find how they manage their social channels like telegram, discord and such. If they try to shut down or going around any person asking about the project or criticize it, then that is a red flag for me.

Yes, it is very important to think and chose a name for your project because you can't change it without a real set back after going public with that name. From what I saw, only when coin under a swap that they need to change their name. If your coin's name somehow causes a negative reaction from people then you should abandon that project.

Quote from: SistaFista on July 30, 2020, 03:02:17 AM

I just see the token on coinmarketcap, it has very low max supply, around 600k INXT and the market cap is around 900k USD currently.
From your opinion, what is good about this project and why do you think it is 'your hidden gem' ?
It is strongly advised to doing proper research about the coin before buying it, otherwise we will waste our money later.

He thinks it was a hidden gem since no one but him knows about the coin. From what I see, it just likes the rest of the unpopular altcoins that doesn't have a good marketing or unique features to become a real gem. Sorry but I don't think it was a hidden gem at all.

Busted, look at how ETH doing with marketing and development on ETH 2.0 and compare to TRON. For now, every "Ethereum Killers" need to pull out their textbook and note down everything ETH did with its plan for ETH 2.0. Copy it and they would be fine.

Quote from: JeffBrad12 on July 26, 2020, 11:43:17 AM

Quote from: inoes on July 26, 2020, 11:04:45 AM

This is because the blockchain is examined in three separate categories, which results in Bitcoin being ranked 12th while EOS 1st. because according to CCID Bitcoin uses old technology, and the use of BTC is not as much as EOS. reasonable because btc was crypto in 2009 and specifically for currency. it's their judgment, so we can agree and we can't.

that's true, we can agree and we can't but old technology doesnt necessarily means a bad thing. I mean bitcoin is already tested by so many people so we know the flaws and the updates or upgrades will solve that flaw. i dont even sure those coin with newest technology could go well against massive traffic let alone finding out other flaws.

Yes, in crypto, something new with all the new cutting edge technology doesn't mean it will fare better again old crypto in terms of price and widespread use. Just the way of crypto ratings agency giving any new crypto more attention by ratting it higher than the old.

Their time is long gone and they can't come back anymore while there is IEO which everyone prefers it than ICO. Unless something really bad happens to IEO that makes people lost the trust for it like ICO, I don't think they are equally right now and zero chance for ICO to come back.

Quote from: batang_bitcoin on July 25, 2020, 05:02:31 PM

Quote from: kentrolla on July 25, 2020, 02:51:17 PM

I am sure it is all set to break $300k barrier some interesting story is about to come in this crypto market, let's wait and watch...

$300k? You have an excess letter 'k'.

$300 is about to be there but I'm waiting for a higher price than it can. The Ethereum 2.0 can do so much more once it's activated. People want to have that passive income and stack up yourselves for your own benefit even if you won't reach the said minimum of 32 ETH to be qualified for staking.

Yes, I think he must make that k thousand mistake because right now if Ethereum hit $300 then it was a great milestone for Ethereum. Showing Ethereum has the chance to stand out from the rest of altcoin.

Quote from: andra73 on July 24, 2020, 01:43:43 PM

Quote from: Tomohisa on July 24, 2020, 01:39:00 PM

I don't believe in Ripple because it was a centralized cryptocurrency, plain and simple. You need to be really good crypto and have something unique in feature to make holders interest and tolerant your centralized.

You might not like ripples because of the system of the platform. but ripple still has a large market and a community that I think is quite large. I used to like a ripple, but now that the price has been destroyed, I no longer see any significant development of this asset.

I'm the same, used to have a lot of Ripple too because even with a centralized feature, it has a good history of going upset in the market. That id the main point I willing to tolerant its downside but after a lot bad news about founder sold his Ripple bag, fail to meet up the hype, I don't hold it anymore.

What about investors? Did they kill the project too by selling their share when they don't like it anymore? What about the team? Did they kill the project too by selling their share when they need to raise funds? Bounty and airdrop only a fraction of the total market cap of a project. If a project fails because just a fraction of these sold then that's a shit project.

It's possible to make a living by trading cryptocurrencies alone but depend greatly on one how much you need to live as well as your capital investment.

Top altcoins meaning their price are more stable than other coins. This time newbies were like on trial to have a chance to get to know how the market work (demo account like stock market). Once they have learn the basics which will allow them to go for a more risky investment.

I noticed that bounty projects that managed by the team themselves usually have a lower quality compared to bounty managers for hire. Sometimes, it was so bad to the point they don't even know the rules of the place need to advertising (for example, bitcointalk).

If they have as much of that money to fall for a doubling scam and know how to send crypto to an address, I don't think they're newbie anymore. They have to know it's a scam but still want to try their luck, all because of greed.

Quote from: Tipstar on July 17, 2020, 08:41:35 AM

Scammers uses catchy and popular concepts to get easy money from gullible investors. They don't do much work and just copy pastes others work with some slight change. Other popular scams except the ones mentioned by OP at the moment are
1. Masternode coins - 90% of them are just scams.
2. Exchange coins - Don't believe any exchange coins as good exchange would always bring their exchange first and issue the ICO on their own exchange.

Agree about masternode coins. The majority of them soon become a fail project and their coin price becomes very low to the point your masternode running under a loss because of hosting fee. The team knows quite well about it but they don't care since they already got a lot of money of the pre-sale masternode.

Quote from: Zemomtum on July 16, 2020, 11:55:59 PM

Binance everywhere, hope we are not going into centralization in a decentralized revolution? Time will tell and I am expecting institution to come up and join this revolution and makes things more competitive.

Binance only a fraction of the upcoming crypto payment card. They're the leading one, of course, but soon plenty other will follow and implement it. A single centralization service take a lead and many other follow suit till it become decentralized so don't worry.

I would love to be able to go back to early 2017. The year 2017 is really the prime of crypto but those days are long gone now and market like a river, you won't able to bath again on the same flow of that river.

Quote from: Little Mouse on July 16, 2020, 03:02:14 AM

Bounty Detective brings a lot of projects and some of them are shit projects or scam. I do not think Bounty Detectibe doing a great job in this area. However, bubalex is certainly a good campaign manager. I have seen his response in community. He is very active and reponsive guy.

Yeah, Bounty Detective really doesn't have any criteria or requirement on their service while bubalex definitely check to see if the project would meet a certain requirement and bring back profit for bounty hunters. Bounty Detective kinda hit and miss, I guess.

Bitcointalk profile url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1148144
Rank: Full Member
Post count: 206

Yeah, I also want to see how ETH fare in PoS as from my history with crypto that has PoS, MM, there is a lot of time shit happens (spit chain, dud coin, nothing at stake,...). I do believe that ETH could develop something new to tackle those problems eventually tho.

Quote from: Abiky on February 21, 2020, 05:59:29 PM

snip
Everything will be settled on-chain in a completely decentralized way. Node operators would serve as "gateways" that would constitute the whole VPN.

So, tor on blockchain steroid? It's nice to be a note operator and talking about autonomous but once CIA knocks on your door, you will sing a different song. If you don't trust the VPN service provider, will you trust a stranger hosting your private information?