I got it with Ufasoft's miner, after a 3.5GHz OC and using all 8 virtual cores.
I'd have pics, but Ufasoft doesn't work after getting an ATI card.
|
|
|
First, I wouldn't want to get caught... read up on people who ran SETI@Home from school computers before you do it. Second, an I7-860 can only do about 10mh/s so I doubt you'd see 20mh/s from 2-3 year old computers.... probably more like 4-5mh/s...
Agree with the first part, but I have the aforementioned processor, and get 60MH/s.... But yeah, school computers? I wouldn't expect enough for solo... but you could point them all at a pool or something.
|
|
|
Awesome, thanks! Redownloading the chain (again) now.
|
|
|
Not enough clients are using the new fee rules, probably. Nodes don't relay transactions that they think have too-low fees.
Okay; so do you think once the new update becomes a stable release my transaction will be rebroadcasted and accepted? And on a different note, what's the best way to get my money back from mybitcoin? Thanks for the replay by the way 
|
|
|
Every time a block is made (Approx. every 10 minutes) that is 1 confirmation. I forget how many confirmations you need to spend the coins, but it's pretty low.
|
|
|
I already tried looking there; it didn't turn up.
|
|
|
I wanted to deposit some bitcoins into my BitYacht account, so naturally I had to go through MyBitcoin. I don't use that service, so I sent it to an address they generated for me... but it appears the coins were lost. I was using the new release-candidate client at the time, so the fee was only .0005 if that means anything, but the transaction has not showed up in block explorer and is not listed at bitcoin charts either. I tried deleting the block chain from my computer and redownloading the whole thing, that just completed, but the unconfirmed transaction is still there, and I don't have the bitcoins. In this case, who does, and how do I get them back?
|
|
|
Ah, so is this the Casino version of the traditional War card game?
|
|
|
These look really neat thanks for the vector  sent a bitdime. 
|
|
|
Sounds great! Love the service - keep up the good work.
|
|
|
Most graphics cards recommend to stay below 85º, more than that is bad. I'm pretty sure the freeze at 100º is more of a safety thing to make sure you won't melt your card, most if not all motherboards have the same thing for CPUs, maybe GPUs started to implement it too.
But, I would download MSI Afterburner (as Kluge said) and make sure your fan is PUMPING 100% when it gets that high, and if you can't hear the difference, you have a problem. Try clearing out the dust, and if that doesn't work, buy a new fan / water cooling.
|
|
|
Add League of Legends. It's a free game thats taken the gaming industry by storm. Theres a lot of tournaments that are just starting to pop up for it and this would be a great start for the game and for bitcoins.
I would participate faceroll. yes, that's a challenge
|
|
|
I am a current customer, maybe if we got enough current customers to bring it up they would consider it more seriously? The drawback I can see from their viewpoint, and definitely understand it, is the fickle exchange rate of Bitcoin.
|
|
|
If you go with the price already filled in, you get the USD immediately.
|
|
|
Oh my god you have POP TARTS!!!!  Amazing.
|
|
|
Thanks for the sharing and update! However:
protip: never never never let your address out. hehe.
|
|
|
Not the best mining card, obviously, but great for gaming. Equipped with a new ZALMAN fan, that even on "silent mode" keeps the card under 60c under load. I'll ship with all the spare parts from the fan, too - i mean NEW as in got it only a few weeks ago.
I think 10 bitcoins is a fair price to start, plus 1.5 bitcoin shipping. Offer.
I'm open to using clearcoin, less shipping cost.
|
|
|
Well - it appears it was a conflict with some old stale drivers I have now removed. Thanks for all your help - again, and once I get some mining done I'll be sure to send you a tip 
|
|
|
I tried that, and I also tried installing the SDK seperate. no dice. I'll rename the topic and change the OP to hopefully get some more help. Thanks for your effort 
|
|
|
Tor is horrible for transferring files for three reasons- 1. IT WAS NOT DESIGNED FOR IT. Read the documentation, it's designed for web browsing. By transferring large amounts of files you ARE killing the network. 2. Less relays compared to I2P - therefore, less bandwidth. I2P is essentially already p2p, so using bittorrent inside i2p works fine. P2P inside tor is painfully slow, and not even allowed by most exit nodes. 3. Know how onion routing works? Yeah. On tor, addresses look like kpvz7ki2v5agwt35.onion On i2p, addresses look like<snip>
I2P's encryption is probably much better. Comparing security by looking at hostnames of services used within the network is about as silly as you can get. The 16-digit .onion address is a /summary/ of the hidden service's public key.
|
|
|
|