<...>
Regarding the hacking of sites, any site that has its platform to make money move because it is easily hackable, nothing else can be accepted but that, as far as I am concerned things can happen for any type of company, be it for a casino, be it for an exchange, they all have the same risk, they are hackers, and the important thing about this is that the casino or the site that has been created have enough strength to continue operating Without the Clients were Affected, that is what we have to see, of course we are people who can generate different ways of doing things and seeing where we will put our money , they have already given an example of casinos, exchanges, and If there are Binance-level hackers capable of hacking into the 2FA security layer, then this is very likely to happen.
The important thing that one should see is that these sites like Duelbits , stake.com and Some more that have been hacked because they have come out ahead and what is most striking is that they have not compromised the money of Others , because it is very ugly If we are in a casino and suddenly nothing can be done, they close it for a while and people's money is kept there while they do investigations, authorities go , no, things can't be seen like that , then we have to rescue them These systems have been Responsible with what they have and what they have done to get Ahead, our money when it is in an exchange, or casino is no longer ours, it belongs to where it is, that is what must be understood.
websites with an structure like exchanges (and this includes casinos) usually have to have a hot wallet with funds that will be more vulnerable but that the users will have more access too if they want to withdraw but they usually have layers of protection with a cold wallet and a wallet that is airgapped (even an extra layer of security over cold ones) I wouldn't say it's always easy to hack them you have to verify how the hack was done, if elaborate phishings, inside jobs or something else That's right, what I think about this is that when there is a type of hacking in this way, I believe and dare to think that there may be complicity, because with so many SHA-256 style passwords, I think that things can be very different and difficult to access, for example I don't know if you remember the Binance hack, they hacked the 2FA, and that can be and turns out to be something from another world, really the bots and the programmers who do something like that are in another world, things can be different. Hacks of this style can occur in casinos and it is true, they must have their wallets active, otherwise the casinos would make withdrawals manually and honestly that is a problem, in fact I am one of those who think that when a casino becomes to make and execute withdrawals in that way is because something bad is about to happen. Sometimes I have thought that this is something similar to a scam, perhaps what they are trying to steal is that active wallet. In this order of ideas I say something, like the security of a casino, and it is basically money, and the money must be very well protected, so in that sense, money is the responsibility of many, and not just of a few people, in This things can be very determining, for me the people who are in the safe, security of the casinos must be made up of professional people, specialized in networks and security with constant updates that they make and apart from those white hat hackers who are always active looking for vulnerabilities, casinos must be very intelligent to attract this type of people, all because the security of a casino does not look so vulnerable. |
|
|
|
They might think about not transparent on KYC since they fail to read the TOS that's why they got surprised when this suddenly ask to them. If they know already that there's instances that this KYC requirement will be asked for sure no big questions will be asked about this since they are aware that this will be asked especially if there's something need to verify in their account.
If they afraid about this since they think about that maybe much really better for them to deposit only a small amount and just have fun on their participation on any casino activities so that they will not be harm if something they don't like to expect and happen will come to them.
While more and more casino platforms now ask users for KYC verification, I think all gamblers now know how they should play at the casino. Maybe at first, they weren't asked for KYC and just verified their email or cellphone number notification. but now I'm sure all gamblers have an understanding of KYC in the future when it comes to withdrawals, especially if they are in large amounts. Of course, the casino tries to ensure that the withdrawals made are following procedures and the account does not have problems. This can be a topic that can be addressed with many different opinions, and that is the idea, however each person will explain why they agree and why they do not agree, and seeing how things are going in the world it is a fact. that for everything you need identification, and there will come a time when for any movement you need to verify your Identity and those who do not do it or allow it will be frowned upon, or perhaps as criminals, things may be like that in the future , casinos always Require a small KYC as I said, email, maybe a phone number, but also the KYC verification levels can be something else, level 1 which is supposedly the least difficult because it is easy to pass, but With that level it is enough to know where they live and what their address and residence address are. Having this data it is only possible to give and reach the person's residence (this in case of a data hack or data leak) this is what is sometimes thought, but a kyc for data verification and to be able to make a minimum withdrawal is only what is sought, however, the things to make withdrawals there are casinos that are old that allow you to do it without the need for a KYC, for example amounts of up to 100usd, but since this is so radical, I think that almost all of them already The requirement does not have to be met in order to generate that withdrawal. A large amount to withdraw if they demand more requirements and that is in the rules and regulations of their casinos, I consider that it is something that is not good, because it is becoming more and more like a fiat bank, and this is crypto, so there is many things that don't add up, at least not for me, for that reason I have always said, the best thing to do is Always avoid those things that could affect us in the future. The site that we trust is the site that I recommend staying and doing the KYC. |
|
|
|
Even though we have a high increase of new casinos getting introduced, we still can easily spot the fake from the real ones this is because aside from all that you have mentioned such as copying of reputable casino templates, we have others that have a very highly professional features that make it hard for one to spot what the shady deal is around them and at times some of them will even run for year's with backing out just like 1xbits who's casino is known for scam and low reputation but yet there are still very much available this type have the high networks that keep running without being caught at any time.
But with their reputation, we can still have them exposed, and anyone who cares to read will already know how those scam casinos operate.
We just need to be sure and clear while making our selection for online gambling casinos, because as you've already mentioned, some of them have nothing to offer and you can have a feeling on that right from the way they have developed their site, the management, legal endorsement and licensing and many other things are what we can take a look on for us to be able to know how we can make our selections, its not about the newly introduced platforms or the existing ones, this is base on what we want to see with online gambling casinos. What I think about this is that we should take good advantage of our eye for the casinos that we see are fraudulent, first to not get involved or make any deposits and second to alert everyone that a fraudulent casino can be, this is what we can do cause a good effect on things and thus protect people from falling into scams, it is very easy for there to be sites that are created to steal from others, a verdict cannot be given at once but something can be done How to stop people, what do you use as a reference to that fraudulent casino ? Well, yes, you're right , there are many things that we can use to our advantage and thus alert people, On the other hand, what I don't know is that the casinos that are new come with the intention of stealing or scamming, there are casinos that are very well established, besides they are companies, we can't scare them away, the companies and everything that means a business is welcome, It's just that we must treat these new companies with special care , but never disrespect something like that. Sometimes I have seen that some forum users are somewhat grotesque with their treatment of people, they are very rude and treat them badly, and that is not good, that is scary, and if it is scary there is no progress, there is no movement of money, So there are many who do not have a high enough financial education to understand those things, which is very sad, so we have to have a very careful approach to what we can and cannot do, businesses, companies and any type of thing that we do. It has to do with thinking, we don't have to pay attention to it, its intentions, its scope, goals, aspirations, everything. |
|
|
|
<Snip>
I understand that your point of view is very valid, sometimes well yes, it is as you say, but what I am saying is that perhaps for now it is not given so much importance and nothing can happen, but there are many things that can happen, first , a hack occurs on a platform where you have met the requirement and without realizing it, your data is in the hands of a criminal who will probably put you on a list of those who have the most money to those who have the least money, then they can act, but how do they act? Suddenly, and I'm not trying to be paranoid, but when it comes to my safety and that of my family, I am very radical, If one of those people comes to the door of the house just with any excuse, because they know that person has money in crypto, and then they can put the entire family in a situation like gagging them until they take that money, sometimes there are people who come and kill them and leave them in their house, and they don't know if they were robbed or not, suddenly They end up dead like that, and while the police don't investigate, they don't say anything. , they say that they were good people, that they were people who were in their lives, and we do not know or realize the origin of those things, due to things like a simple KYC. It may sound a bit exaggerated but I have learned that our security is not something that should be questioned, putting our KYC on a trusted site is different, we have many examples on the forum, Roobet for me is one of the most trusted casinos. They have shown it in the forum, perhaps there is not so much of a problem here, in the same way taking these possible scenarios into account will not hurt us. |
|
|
|
Well, we all know that in the game the fact of losing cannot and should not be seen as a reason for shame or something similar because events can always happen like this, in the game losing is normal, and something else is different in other areas such as sports betting that It's something that doesn't just come down to luck, but has a lot to do with the degree of knowledge as such of the person, but a person who is in a casino and plays slots, roulette, something like that, knows very well that You can lose, because you are destined for that and you must know how to assume these things, that depends on the maturity of each game, and maturity is acquired through experience and in players who want to learn, because there are many who, no matter how much they lose and spend money, because they learn.
So I believe that the responsible game is and it is described when we know that the losses cannot exceed us and leave us financially bad, the losses must be controlled because if we take our money due to losing to risk in a casino and risk it, it is something that we control, then in that way we do not run the risk of losing money, much what we do not have or things like that, but few people do it because they mess with the game, they say that the money is very strong, and well they lose a lot , that's where responsibility comes in.
If we are responsible with our money, we are responsible with the game, that is synonymous with control in every sense, it is something we cannot lose sight of Now, the casinos that do not ask for KYC are the decentralized ones, but they no longer fall into this classification, they fall into others, so basically we are going to look for ways in which a casino does not have this requirement and I have searched and there are none, they all ask KYC, how many casinos are there that do not ask for KYC up to a certain amount? because now all casinos ask for KYC, but there are old casinos that do not require as much, it is obvious that things must be like this so that people continue to believe, because there will come a time when no one will want to enter a casino just because they have to do a KYC and that's a sad thing.
It's a good idea to take a look at some of the most common and common mistakes that people make when they're playing a game. Gambling that requires skill or knowledge and gambling that only depends on luck is the same, both must be done carefully, I mean not to overdo it, realizing the huge losses that can occur if we do. Excessive gambling should not distinguish between gambling that depends on luck or that depends on skill and knowledge. Although gambling such as sports betting that requires us to have knowledge and skills can increase the chances of winning, it does not mean that we should do it outside the control of responsibility, it must still be done responsibly. Don't overdo it and harm yourself. That's what I mean, being responsible with aspects related to gambling such as money and others. Responsible gambling should be done to avoid big losses, If the casino asks for KYC then do it, don't ignore it because it can be a problem that will also occur possibly. Yes, things can actually be affected when they are done that way , we are People who when we are in a casino we must Evaluate all these things, the KYC thing I believe is a very general norm, something that we do not We felt well fulfilled, at least I am like that, in fact where I have fulfilled it have been sites that are actually very old and that have all my trust, why ? because I'm not as stupid as to leave my KYC, my personal data on sites that are new that probably have more chance of not turning out well than a casino that has been through a lot, and that is still on the market giving everything, That is what we must see, however things may not be like that , there are Casinos that even begin can be Reliable, and will always be reliable, but prevention of others is the best we can do. When it comes to playing, yes, we have errors, but not Errors when it comes to the game , but Betting errors, that is, betting when the bet should not be increased, or not controlling the game we want to make us Win more Money we Cannot use the excuse that the casino is for Fun and that is why we spend large amounts of money, no, we have to have more moderation, I think that one of the things that a responsible gambler can do is that he must be very careful with respect to money, I have often said that everyone has their own way of seeing things and Solving their own game as well as stopping themselves from Spending more, but it is always good to be responsible for not Spending so much money. I think that by becoming aware of not spending so much money money, everything is resolved , I see things like this, the Problem will always be Money and as long as we Responsibly take care of it, it will not become a problem nor will problems be Generated. |
|
|
|
<snip>
Exactly for this reason I say that we cannot control our emotions, when we are advancing in our game and we start to feel that we are doing things right , we get more excited, we do not have more optimism and that optimism is not good, first because It is one of the ways we have to make ourselves more susceptible, our Morality is at stake, if we win, because we feel invincible, if we lose we begin to experience feelings of rage, of impotence, of repentance and of things that are not good, so generally negative, for me it is very difficult to control emotions because sometimes they are what makes us more human, for that reason it is more reliable to control what we can control, it is money, we can control that with a good plan we do it well. It is this order of days that we can conclude that when we have money that is willing to lose because it is the most efficient way to do things better , we can control only that, but as long as we play with money that is willing to lose our emotions can come out. from the heart if you want, only with the proviso that when the money destined to be lost runs out, because it was lost, we have the maturity to Accept it, and not to deposit more, because if we break that rule, we simply have not done nothing, we will spend uncontrollably, we will lose control of the money, the Emissions and that can result in it but, as in addiction , loss of our money, and that is a total disaster , we should not think like that, but in an efficient way , money in a casino must be taken care of , because it is the only thing that makes us have life there , without money we are nothing in a Casino. |
|
|
|
<snip>
Well, what I can say about this, I have my own experience with the government I live in, and I think that applies to any type of government in the world, even if it is the most prosperous country, and the government does not care about its people. , the structure is made so that they take advantage of the resources of their countries and for the pronas only give them crumbs, and not what each one of them deserves, for this reason I say, the regulations are thanks to governments, those governments do not They have control over crypto obviously they want to have it but they can't because things are difficult and this can impact the things they do, the things they don't do and the things they are going to do to see if they can get money, and when they do they realize that If they can manage a mass, and unfortunately we are included in the mass, and what is the control? KYC, if they handle crypto? That is something they do not tolerate, they do not accept, if they handle it they have to be penalized, but they are penalized with money, and at the same time they are obtaining money through crypto. So exchanges, brokers, casinos, they are all part of a regulation by them to be able to have at least a slice, they will never support people who have crypto to operate freely, because financial freedom comes from an alternative economy that is superior to the traditional one, and that is what produces all these problems, in the end we realize that we are fighting against governments, bankers and people with a lot of power, it is difficult to raise our voices, that is why the KYC that can be avoided and even better, because what you say is very true, at the time that those sites cease to exist and are left without even a domain, since that information is absorbed by the governments or whoever has the most power at that moment . |
|
|
|
<snip>
Well, we are people who are always going to see things in the sense that they can bring us benefits, I think that many do not like the idea of leaving their identification, just as there must be people who don't care about leaving their data, it doesn't matter to them. , but when it comes to money, I think one has to be jealous and careful with things, because basically things with their way of seeing money can be different, for example leaving a KYC in a casino implies risks, a hack or something like that, it can be assumed that this data falls into the hands of criminals, they find the addresses, they find the account balances, and they can use that information to intimidate, and although I see the governments almost or equal to the criminals, but with a tie, because for me they are the same, because if they do not fall into the hands of criminals, they will fall into the hands of governments that also in the near future will take advantage of those who carry out operations with crypto, and manifest themselves through taxes. This scenario is one that the People cannot imagine, perhaps they can say that one is exaggerating, but things are like that, personally, privacy and anonymity are rights that no longer exist, and the worst thing is that people do not They realize it, and if they realize it, then they ignore it, and they don't give them importance, that's why in the world there are so many people who appear dead and we don't know why? What happened? Or what did they do, sometimes we don't know about people's deaths? Some say that the person owed money or was involved in strange things, but it could be that things were like this because of a hack on some platform and from there they extracted that information, I think that people currently do not give importance to this. |
|
|
|
<snip>
One of the things I like about slots is that with little money you can't win a lot in slots, it's something incredible, while in other games like craps, poker, black jack, we have to have money to play. to be able to do something, and that is what we see that you can do something, however when we look for a way to do anything, yes, it is true, one can lose a lot if one does not know how to bet, we cannot play the slots thinking Come on, it's best to make maybe 5 or 6 bets once, so controlling our money is important when making bets. I have had luck in the slots, but I did not seek to win in the slots with such intensity, because there are times that one makes up to 20 or 30 turns and does not win anything at all, but in those touches of useurte sometimes you do win, with a good multiplication because something is done, usually when I play I only play with 10usd, but it is not something that says that I want to win and I seek to win, I do it as entertainment, to relieve stress, pressure, something like that and considering this, Well, for the sltos sometimes you do have to know about strategies. I look for slot strategies a lot, in fact I always recommend the bitcasino blog, because there is information about slots, because slots have their theory, for those who do not understand RTP well, the different types of slots, that is very wide sometimes we don't know how wide the slots can be, and they have their secret, their way of making a good Game , this is something that we know as we play and gain experience, but I have always said, if we play it is good to know what we are not involved in, what we are playing and how we can manage Ourselves and know when we can Increase the bets, sometimes our instinct can help. |
|
|
|
no strategy can granted you the gambling win. if you want to gambling then you must have to accept the risk. how do you stop your losses when sometimes even a very bad team can be seen playing well and winning the match? In this case, when you win a few matches and leave a larger amount of bet with confidence, you will suddenly lose one of the matches and lose all the previous gains together. so you shouldn’t use gambling as a source of income you should use gambling only for fun.
If no strategy can give you a win, you should not have to try too hard to win. That means you must enjoy the gambling game and stop on time. This is to avoid losing because the longer you gamble, the more likely your losses will increase. As a gambler, one must be wise in using gambling. And every time he tries a strategy, he doesn't have to try it for too long or try another strategy. He must be able to anticipate another loss and only place bets that he can afford. By doing that, he can use gambling as it is intended and not have to experience more problems. When you can win, consider it as a bonus because not many people can win from gambling. But you are one of the lucky people to win, so appreciate your win. Don't continue gambling after winning because you might not be able to win again. Well, I know that there is no single strategy to make us win, in particular I have always believed that bears can do well if we enjoy the game, sometimes we play and win and we don't know how we won, but sometimes we play applying strategies and we don't win, do you know what's going on there? What are we doing wrong? And so let's review our strategy, because we don't find any flaws, it's just that the game is like that. I understand that there are many players who say that they don't have strategies that work, but if I apply a strategy and it works for me, it doesn't mean that someone else applies it and it's going to work for them. Maybe someone else applies it and if it works for them, then this guy some things are very strange. But in particular, I am an Aperons who does use strategies, why? because I know that at any time I'm going to be applying one of the strategies and it's going to win and that for me is good enough, I can say that when we are applying any type of strategy and if we don't know many of them, well, we'll just stay here. game wondering what we will do? How can we continue? Because under patterns we will easily lose, and the idea in a casino is to win, apply strategies to win. Fun and all that, well yes, it is something that we can see well and that it serves us well, but we all know that in a casino in sports betting we not only have fun, we want to win, and we do everything to win, so sometimes Sometimes things don't work out for us, that's why strategies come to light because of the need to win because we do anything to achieve that goal. I don't clip the wings of anyone who applies strategies, I tell them to keep going, the more strategies is more learning. |
|
|
|
In the question that the OP asks by defining the name of this topic, in my opinion there is enough uncertainty.
Therefore, it is probably worth bringing some clarity and a clear understanding of the ongoing identity verification processes.
So, we can probably now conclude that practically no casino can afford not to mention KYC at all in their documents for the legalization of their work. Including in ToS, of course. And what do we have as a result: all casinos that secretly mention the obligation to verify the KYC procedure are disingenuous, or rather misinforming citizens. This means that for us, players, consumers of their services, these casinos are legally in the so-called “gray zone”. And for this it means that at any moment related to the transfer of our money, first of all, won at the casino, we can receive from the casino not money, but a KYC requirement. For many players, remaining anonymous automatically means losing that money.
My question to the OP is whether there is at least one casino that guarantees the absence of KYC under any circumstances. Moreover, this guarantee is directly written down in the regulatory documents of the casino and in the ToS too. Or are there simply no such casinos? But if they are not there, then the topic itself and the OP website itself are simply meaningless and represent an elementary and primitive marketing technique to attract naive clientele and inexperienced players. In this case, OP, I think, could tell us that the site is just another selection of casinos that are in the “gray zone” when it comes to KYC verification, and from which the player should always expect an “unexpected gift” in the form of sudden KYC. But the fact is that any casino seems to either require KYC and warn about it, or is in a “gray zone” for reasons of using a fake “no KYC” as a marketing technique and nothing more.
In short, such a selection of casinos “without KYC” is simply a pointless idea.
I think the same, in fact one of the things I check this thread for is to see if I can find a casino that has the No KYC requirement, appreciated for privacy and anonymity because they have been very biased currently, I personally don't trust the casino that says yes KYC, because at some point they will say that they have to verify the identity, I don't remember in which forum thread they said that they did not ask KYC only to some random users but come on, we are not children, they can't be fooling us with those things, if they ask, ask and that's it, then sometimes casinos say that for a particular withdrawal they do not ask for KYC, but when it is a very large amount, yes, but that is something that we already know here, the essence and the goal of being a casino that does not require KYC. For example, like freebitcoi.in, which until recently stopped being a non-KYC site, now you have to comply with it to make any withdrawal, so there are no casinos that do not require KYC, and for me it is a total shame. , because we have all always looked for this. |
|
|
|
All sites that have a good level of security can also sometimes be hacked, not all loopholes can be closed perfectly and we never know what the hacker's motive is for taking the funds, I'm sure Duelbits will learn a lot from their mistakes, as long as they can still claim all the funds safe, all users should no longer need to worry about that and discuss this issue, because Duelbits continues to operate as usual and has not stopped their operations, so everyone can still gamble as usual.
Absolutely. Even Binance which is the top exchange encounter multiple hack in the past despite they the most advanced security on their field. The reason why services like Duelbits with strong security still being hack is because is they are popular which means they are the common target by hacker. The more popular the casino is means the more possible security breach it will encounter that’s why they need to frequently upgrade their security as time goes by. This kind of hack incident will make them more secure because they learn how to counter this threat to avoid it in the future. I do not think that nearly 5 million dollars is "pocket change" for them, it is still a lot of money, but it is also not more than what they have obviously. Plus they are a casino, so they print money anyway, the house edge makes sure of that. Even if you consider all the money in the deposited amounts, you will realize that how much of it will be withdrawn anyway? I do not think that most of them would, they will either be lost by gambling or just left in there. So they should be fine, it shouldn't really be an issue for them. The thing is that we should consider this "hack" to be not that worth much to just fuss about, they should be fine of course. In any case, they should hope to not have any issues regarding this ever again to be fine of course. As long as there is a money circulation system in it, I don't think the money will look like a lot, but that doesn't mean that 5 million dollars is also small, let's say like this, if a private bank has a lot of money because many of their customers put their money in that bank, but when all their customers withdraw all their money, of course the bank will collapse, as will the casino, no matter how big they are, as long as their users still trust the casino and put their money on this site, everything is still safe because there is money circulating in it. Just try if all users withdrew all their money from the casino it would definitely have the same impact on the fate of the bank, but I believe that the casino's profits are very large so the loss of 5 million dollars can still be overcome and replaced by the casino, after all they have said that all users' money is safe and there is no loss, so everyone will not feel panic about withdrawing all their money from this site because they still trust this site and their money remains safe there. We can never feel whether the value lost is small or large except for the casino itself. as usual saying an amount of money is big or small is a matter of reference and what you are comparing it to for a personal bankroll 5 million is quite a lot but for a country it's peanuts. simple concept but that we usually forget about. Regarding the hacking of sites, any site that has its platform to make money move because it is easily hackable, nothing else can be accepted but that, as far as I am concerned things can happen for any type of company, be it for a casino, be it for an exchange, they all have the same risk, they are hackers, and the important thing about this is that the casino or the site that has been created have enough strength to continue operating Without the Clients were Affected, that is what we have to see, of course we are people who can generate different ways of doing things and seeing where we will put our money , they have already given an example of casinos, exchanges, and If there are Binance-level hackers capable of hacking into the 2FA security layer, then this is very likely to happen. The important thing that one should see is that these sites like Duelbits , stake.com and Some more that have been hacked because they have come out ahead and what is most striking is that they have not compromised the money of Others , because it is very ugly If we are in a casino and suddenly nothing can be done, they close it for a while and people's money is kept there while they do investigations, authorities go , no, things can't be seen like that , then we have to rescue them These systems have been Responsible with what they have and what they have done to get Ahead, our money when it is in an exchange, or casino is no longer ours, it belongs to where it is, that is what must be understood. |
|
|
|
Regarding that specific issue concerning about being paid or not, I doubt that most good reviews are paid.
The promoted site itself might not even recognize or know some of the game review sites. Generally speaking, most review sites need to have a good set of reviews shown on their site as they are also marketing their affiliate link. Referrals are required to have a real deposit on that site before the commission will be received by the promoter.
If these review sites lure their visitors to a bad site, then they are just wasting time on managing their review sites. What's the sense?
That's a good point. If a review website is posting paid reviews to promote platforms that aren't good but they are representing them as good platforms, they won't get much benefit from this because they will only get a one-time payment from the platform to post the review but if they promote legit services and platforms, they will keep getting benefits from their referrals that they have got through their affiliate links because whenever one makes a deposit and gambles with it, they will get their commission for it. However, those who have the aim of posting paid reviews and stuff will not understand this because they only see the money they are getting from the platforms for posting good reviews about them and they don't care about people joining the websites through them. There are many ways to do this, it is known that when there are casinos that suddenly appear reviews with strange names or that we do not know, that have not even been on bitcointalk, at least I do not continue reading that reviewer anymore, because I know that it is shilling , and it may be that even the casino is good, and has better things than some bitcointalk casinos and that is something that is debatable, but it is something that happens a lot, not only in this forum, in many. We consider what we want to see in the reviews to be the basics, such as: 1.-How demanding are they with KYC. 2.-VPN acceptance. 3.-Withdrawals without KYC? How much do I ride? o To make a minimum withdrawal, KYC must be considered. 4.-If the casino has no risk of being a scam. 5.- If the casino has immediate withdrawals. They are very basic cases but we must see, there is no other way, also if the things in the casino have a good reputation, all these things are what are looked for in general. A good thing for me is that you have to give details about everything, about your games, about everything and everything they have, if they have chat, if the casino support is great, or if they have pure AI agents, all of this One realizes, if they have PSVP games, if the casino has plans to do something more than normal, all these things are what reviewers should focus on, but the ones I have seen always focus on the same thing, they should also Putting the criteria they used to determine which is the best and most reliable casino, all these things influence, it is not just the same as putting all the criteria but saying that the best casino is: XXXX and that's it. |
|
|
|
Losing is indeed inevitable and if you are someone who dont really have that kind of control when it comes to gambling then you are really that likely
on putting up yourself on such trouble. Be responsible on every actions that you are taking on which we know that we are talking about money on here. If you are really that looking for entertainment
and leisure then it would really be just that normal that you should really be making out some budget that you can afford to lose.
Dont make yourself go into those levels that you are already compromising your life savings or emergency funds because this is where people do usually mess up their lives on the time
that they would really be doing such thing. If you are someone whose really that having no good control into your emotions or simply being impulsive then
you would definitely be ending up miserable.
The fact is that defeat in gambling cannot be avoided because it is a definite thing that happens, but I think it depends on how we respond to the defeat, if we respond wrongly to the defeat in gambling that occurs then it is true that you say we only put ourselves in trouble, but if we respond to the defeat correctly in the sense that we can accept it or not make a problem out of it, there will be no problems. I agree with you that if we consider it entertainment then it is natural that we spend a certain amount of money that we are willing to lose. That's right, it's not recommended to force yourself in gambling to get a win, because it's the same as going into a prison that makes yourself miserable. Please gamble by being responsible for what happens can be accepted properly. Exactly, if we do not have good self-control then we will end up miserable, even stuck there is not the end. Well, we all know that in the game the fact of losing cannot and should not be seen as a reason for shame or something similar because events can always happen like this, in the game losing is normal, and something else is different in other areas such as sports betting that It's something that doesn't just come down to luck, but has a lot to do with the degree of knowledge as such of the person, but a person who is in a casino and plays slots, roulette, something like that, knows very well that You can lose, because you are destined for that and you must know how to assume these things, that depends on the maturity of each game, and maturity is acquired through experience and in players who want to learn, because there are many who, no matter how much they lose and spend money, because they learn. So I believe that the responsible game is and it is described when we know that the losses cannot exceed us and leave us financially bad, the losses must be controlled because if we take our money due to losing to risk in a casino and risk it, it is something that we control, then in that way we do not run the risk of losing money, much what we do not have or things like that, but few people do it because they mess with the game, they say that the money is very strong, and well they lose a lot , that's where responsibility comes in. If we are responsible with our money, we are responsible with the game, that is synonymous with control in every sense, it is something we cannot lose sight of Now, the casinos that do not ask for KYC are the decentralized ones, but they no longer fall into this classification, they fall into others, so basically we are going to look for ways in which a casino does not have this requirement and I have searched and there are none, they all ask KYC, how many casinos are there that do not ask for KYC up to a certain amount? because now all casinos ask for KYC, but there are old casinos that do not require as much, it is obvious that things must be like this so that people continue to believe, because there will come a time when no one will want to enter a casino just because they have to do a KYC and that's a sad thing. |
|
|
|
For me, PSG's dominance will end when Mbappé leaves, I know that they feel safe with the player, and in fact they do, but basically when we can think about what they can do and achieve, well for me it is a fact that the only one who moves that team is the french, and he doesn't understand it, due to the whims of the player in the team he already has everything, he is the only leader, he already ran to messi and neymar, that was not what he wanted to, ? According to Ney, the player was too egocentric and he only had to do things the way he wanted them, and if they were not done that way he would basically make them leave the club, so this player cannot be given much power, if he goes to Madrid I am sure that he will not succeed with his whims, because the players there will not do what he likes, things are different there.
You are you right but with how wealthy PSG is the team management will surely look for a replacement before then, although Mbappe performance on PSG is something they can never forget easily because Mbappe is one of the reasons for most of there achievement so his absence will easily be noticed but however one thing they most no is that there is every likelihood that a player will always like to try there career on other team, so it is expected for PSG to find someone that can handle PSG the way Mbappe did so that there reputation and performance will be intact, although just like I mentioned on most of my post PSG will mostly find it very difficult to perform if Mbappe is not longer with them but with time they will learn to adjust, however there are even more good quality players on PSG that could easily perform well so perhaps irrespective of the challenges they may have in terms of performance but the team still has a chance to maintain there performance a bit. What I think about all this is that Mbappé is one of the players who have the most relevance in the world, and this may be something that PSG will regret losing, he is a player who has a lot of leadership on that team and who It can make a difference, in this sense laws things can be seen in a different way, it is already a fact that he is leaving, because with everything they have speculated in the articles on social networks, that it would be a disaster if he does not do so, it It is more likely that he is already signed for MADRID, which I don't like, however things could be different, it could be that he goes to a LIVERPOOL that also showed interest in the French star, but this is not certain, it is that also although information has been leaked, because everything is under a single mystery, something that I do not understand because they should be open, for me there are others who are much better than him, like Haaland, but I do not know if Hallan is interested in leaving sa a PG where he is very fractured and has a coach that is somewhat problematic, because Luis Enrique can be very good, but he has very strange outbursts. In fact, as the safest thing to do if it's not Haaladn, what other player can it be? I don't see another one? Maybe a Benzema who has not been able to adapt to Saudi football where things have gone a little bad, but a player who is doing everything possible to get ahead, is a good prospect for this team since he needs to do a good job. restructuring, the strange thing is that Luis Enrique does not like to work with players who are veterans.  However, Sesko is a forward who Chelsea also have on their radar.
According to The Athletic, the Blues have been scouting the 20-year-old, who will be available this summer.
Sesko has a €50m (£42.8m) release clause in his contract which is set to become active, reports Sky Germany journalist Philipp Hinze.  Source : https://www.thechelseachronicle.com/transfer-news/psg-are-considering-43m-striker-as-kylian-mbappe-replacement-chelsea-like-him-too/I don't see Chelsea Competing against a PSG with such a big money machine, unless the player doesn't want to go to PSG , since he will stay in a Chelsea team that he really needs. |
|
|
|
<Snip>
I think that we can play with a chance not of 1%, but go beyond, perhaps some will consider $10 so that it can be distributed in the month, and that is something that we can see how to play it although in my very opinion Personally, I would not say 10%, I would say a maximum of 8% to risk, because it is something like when I trade I am also able to risk 10%, it is always less than 10% because for me that figure can be significant . In games of chance things can look very different because for any game there is always a risk, whether it is 1% or 10% whatever, the important thing here is that things can happen very differently for a particular situation, that is That is to say, not everyone has the same economic and financial situation, not everyone is under the same conditions and expenses, according to that, we see that gambling can be seen as a luxury, a luxury that many cannot afford, so it is difficult to establish something very general. What I can advise is that a person who can afford to play has to be very careful so that their decision will not affect them in the future, because the people who risk their basic balance and leave behind many things that they cannot cover that they should Addressing this now enters the realm of irresponsibility, and that already attracts other problems and that is what leads to desperation, stress and pressure that many cannot endure and collapse. |
|
|
|
<snip>
If in fact one of the keys for us to be able to perform better is to have the best self-knowledge, but in part if this does not occur in the very difficult person who can achieve it, I no longer live by being self-controlled, just by putting my money Being prepared to lose is enough, it is very difficult to be able to control the emotions, it is very difficult because we are people whose emotions sometimes lead us to make decisions with a certain ease, in this aspect I am a person who will always allocate my money that way. Well, if they used that strategy, the addiction would not exist. But to be clearer, each of us has a method to stop in the game , either When you see that you will run out of money and the fact of having a family , or the Fact of running out of money and not having to buy your things later Basics , that is something that We have and that Everyone Knows their pocket and knows how far they can go. But going beyond the degree of responsibility is something that Cannot be Allowed , that is , we are people who must generate more ways to do Things better We know that if money can be lost in the casino, then why bet and risk ? so much ? A person who is stingy does not play in a casino, very difficult, but why does a stingy person not play? Because your money hurts and if your money hurts you won't play for anything in the World , sometimes each person has their own way, it is very difficult to show that there is a Method to Stop , each person has their own very different way of thinking. |
|
|
|
~~~~~ snip. ~~~~~~ Well, personally , I think that things should be at $10k just like they do at the airports, after $10k, if the arguments are made about the origin of funds, for me that is all that should be done, but baado in that the casinos have their own rules, it is up to us to Accept if we want to have our data there and roseguri with the Records and everything, but personally for me things must be very different, I might think that things could be seen differently. In a different way, I have always said that when we are looking for a casino that does many good things, well it is difficult. I might think that if we are not in a casino things can be very difficult, if we want to have a good experience, well We have to go quickly to a casino that is highly reputable and something that focuses on Trust.
The core of all this is that they generate trust, because anyone who deposits, or likes having their money gnawed, does not like improper things being done to them and because of this I say that things will always be focused on doing the best possible for everyone, I can deduce that for me the most important thing in a casino is money, and for me as a player it will always be that, no matter how much one understands a game, or how much one can do, but The important thing about these things is that we manage to do things well, what I can recommend is that, in a casino what we must look for is trust, where to have safe money and here in the forum there are many casinos that are trustworthy, such as sportsbet.io, bitcasino.io, stake.com, duelbits, among others, because they are casinos that have a very good reputation, they are very well accepted in the crypto world, on the financial side and this is the only thing that really matters, because there will be no reason to doubt them, this is something that must be seen.
So, while discussing the topic of limits on payouts of winnings to a gambling player, I come to the conclusion that the $2K limit without mandatory KYC is clearly outdated and already requiires an upward revision. You have listed excellent casinos that have proven themselves well and in general there are few complaints from players about them, even here in the topics of our forum, which are dedicated specifically to these casinos. And our forum is perhaps one of the few where the information is quite objective and reliable. It would be good and correct if at least one of the casinos you listed would finally increase the limit on cryptocurrency transfers without KYC to the level of, well, maybe not $10K, but for starters at least to $5K. I understand that this may irritate local regulators, but it would allow anonymous players who actually have quite a lot of savings and cryptocurrencies to play. I think that the casino itself, which decided to take such a step, would seriously benefit not only from additional income from rich players, but also from the image of the casino, which is a supporter of cryptocurrency and supports the original purplose of cryptocurrency as a method of anonymous and reliable payments. Although it seems to me that this is a good figure of $5k, because Calrouno says $2k for the mere fact that it is a figure that seems quite decent, but there are casinos that if you are going to make a withdrawal of $50-100usd then they already ask you the KYC , then these things can be a little more flexible, so when you talk About how to do Things better it may be that that amount can be given to a casino without problems, but I have seen that at any time the casinos prepare for your withdrawal They have to comply with the KYC , I don't know if in the future People will not play as much or become aware of the issue of identification because as I said , Adoption before was a problem now the problem will be that People will Not want to comply with these requirements, because if the governments come to the Conclusion that those who manipulate crypto will have to pay high Sums of money in Taxes, because no one will want to pay it , at least in my country People will look for a way to evade it , the Government If you have too much money and don't have good Policies , then they obviously Won't Help. If people in Europe Still think that they have to give the Government money for just using crypto , then things will be very different , it may be that they accept it and say yes to their conditions, but in the case of the majority, maybe they already They won't want this, so we all know what anonymity means, the privacy that no one is aware of how much money they manipulate, because in part if those things are known it is not good, it is also dangerous, I understand that part, so it is better to avoid this type of things so that other types of problems are not triggered later just by using crypto. From the moment the KYC began to be issued for the excahges and casino, I knew that things were not going in the right direction, however in some Cases they have been able to enter with the regulations at full speed and the people Accept them, and incredible, for That talked about the $10k requirement, but $5k is acceptable. |
|
|
|
~ snip ~
....... ... , but how do you go about fighting the titans? ....... Of course, fighting a titan is very difficult and may even seem impossible. However, let’s imagine that information has spread among cryptocurrency lovers that, for example, such a KYC option as sending a photo of a person with a document in hand is not an acceptable identification option. And no one will send such personal information to the casino. If this becomes widespread enough, then the casino itself, seeing that clients have begun to massively refuse to provide such data, will be forced to look for other methods of personal identification. And this, for example, may be only the first step in the overall struggle to restore anonymity in gambling in casinos with cryptocurrency. But this is of course just an example. However, it is possible to begin implementing such programs to fight for privacy rights. Well I have a type of experience in these things, but not in an exchange, in the casino, a long time ago I was going to make a withdrawal, but it turns out that it was more than 10mBTC and when I was going to do it on Binance they sent them what I had to do a temporary kyc, and I was surprised, the question was to verify my face through a video of about 3 or 5 seconds, and that was something that they could determine if I was the Owner of the Account , I don't know if this It's good or bad, but based on the fact that I had Already left my KYC documents and then they verified my face with my documents because things were Going to look good for them , then when I had to do it, well then they did allow the withdrawal, but I It seemed Absurd, I think that with the security that Binance had with the email, and the 2FA factor was Sufficient , these things are what I say that are Sometimes Incoherent. I don't know if this can Apply to casinos, because it is something that we can see as normal, but to be honest these things are unnecessary, with their excuse of having more security what they do is obtain more data from us, this time with a video , it means that the anonymity, the privacy in the exchanges is already like a normal bank, I don't Even want to imagine what they do in a broker, it must be like this or more Demanding , but the casino could do something like that, What you say is very true, anyone can be with their ID in hand, with a photo and that's it, anyone can do it, this will bring many problems in the future, of that I am sure. |
|
|
|
Everything will belong to Bayern if in the end Bayern wants it so with a situation like this then indeed the chance is still very possible for Xabi to train Bayern if indeed Xabi is interested and Bayern offers the right clause for Xabi.
But indeed if you talk about the future then Bayern is the right choice for a stepping stone especially after this season Xabi played well at Leverkusen then there is nothing wrong if he decides to look for a bigger club because in the end if what happens now may not necessarily be the same as next season if the Leverkusen players leave and Xabi rotates players.
But on the other hand if Xabi wants to be loyal to the club that raised his name as a coach then staying at Leverkusen is also still very good for him who is a new coach.
What I think is that if l Madrid and then went to Barcelona, so something like that happened to a player, I don't know if you remember Figo, but he played for Barcelona and from there he went to Madrid, that was something uncomfortable, and it looked ugly, but I think That is something that should not happen with a coach like Xabi, in fact I think that Xab will do much better there in Leverkusen than in Bayern, things at Bayern can be managed by a coach like Mou. For me he is a very good coach with great experience and I think he could do things much better than the current one. Taking this to a certain point, I would evaluate things and for now with the coach that Bayern has right now because they usually have these types of sudden changes, this is how I removed the coach previous to the one they have, then these types of changes like that, Well they don't work much. Things in football have to be taken with great caution and everything cannot be dealt with quickly or at all, because there is a group already adapted to your game system, we cannot change it from one day to the next and this could undoubtedly mean the way of looking at things, a coach is one of the most significant people on the team, for now they have to get out of where they are, in that space because if they continue losing they can lose the Bundesliga, what I can say about this is that Xabi If he leaves for Bayern it would look very bad, in fact a Leverkusen fan would jump on him and it's something ugly, even though it's just a professional plan because I wouldn't recommend him doing that, not for now, maybe if it happens to another league and from that league back to the Bundesliga because that would seem very good to me, otherwise I don't see it well. That's what inevitably happens because after all, great rivalries make things difficult to control when someone comes from one club and is at their rival club the next time around. Figo's case where the pig's head was thrown into the middle of the field is proof that something like this will not be forgiven because the word traitor will always be embedded behind his name. It could also happen to Xabi if he decides to stay at Barcelona but whatever it is I think it's the least likely possibility that it might not even happen because after all Xabi realizes that being at Barcelona with the current situation and against the club he used to defend (Madrid) with supporting resources will make Xabi dig his own grave in terms of career so he will definitely consider other clubs if he wants to leave Leverkusen. Exactly that is what is always expected, if a player or coach does something like that, inevitably the deaths will be able to become older, it is not only in the stadium, I am sure that in many countries there are those fans who do not forgive these mommies and can do That when one of these players goes to their country or their state in particular, things can be very ugly for them, then when we see the things that can happen in football like what I said about Luis Figo and about a coach like Xabi , Well, for me it is much healthier that Xabi's next team is a Madrid, because like that or they are in the same league, if he then moves to the Bundesliga league it is another thing, because there he can choose which team to go to, and it is not known. He will look bad, or he will look like a traitor, because that is the only thing they can brand him, as a taridor more than anything because of what he has achieved with Leverkusen, at that moment I think it is not advisable for him to Change teams, he is changing Everything that the Budeskliga means, he is leaving behind a team that has always been winning the Bundesliga and that is something that can be very favorable for Xabi's reputation. So I think that for now he shouldn't invent, and at Leverkusen they know him, he knows how things are, his fans accept him and defend him and as I say, he has changed the face of German football.  The 42-year-old emerged as the early frontrunner to succeed Jurgen Klopp as Liverpool manager following the German's surprise decision to stand down at the end of the season.
A popular former player at Anfield, Alonso is also one of European's brightest young coaches, with his Leverkusen side unbeaten in 2023/24 and leading the Bundesliga by eight points after 22 games.
Widespread reports suggest Alonso is the favourite to take over from Klopp in the summer, while there have even been rumours that the Spaniard even has a clause in his contract that allows him to move to one of his former clubs. Source: https://anfieldwatch.co.uk/cant-see-it-xabi-alonso-backed-ignore-interest-stay-bayer-leverkusen-liverpool-manager-news/For this reason it's a mistake for Xabi to stay, I don't deny it, he Sounds very tempted to leave for another team, but with all that he has Achieved to leave him tendered and go , it's something he can't afford. I personally see Xabi signing a good contract that lasts many more years with this team, because who would have imagined that this Team would go so high? or who would have thought that with Xabi we would achieve so much? I think no one, much less in Germany, in fact I myself before starting this season gave him the good view of Bayern and second to a Dortmund team that is not doing badly at all. Now, we have to wait, but as I see Leverkusen, is far above the expectations of many. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
