Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 10:15:17 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 »
221  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [VMC] Official Virtual Mining Corporation Discussion on: July 23, 2013, 03:37:13 PM

you must have a ton of space/power/cooling/etc if you think 384U is the same as 34U.  the "attractive" part of this is the large hashing power in a compact space.


That's easy.  Just take cards out of a bunch of boxes, and fully populate the other ones.  Then throw away a HUGE PILE of extra cases, base boards, and power supplies, and you still paid less.  Or hell, sell the PSU's and cases for scrap and you got it all for even cheaper!
222  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Switching off and on a powerboard from internet? on: July 23, 2013, 02:35:54 PM
I wanted to host miners at a datacentre because of the power used. For that i wanted to use such devices: Click

Its possible to switch power on and off over the internet with it. This way i could easily restart the raspberry and the miner when something is blocking.

Since it seems overclocked boards from burnin can draw up to 100W per board i wanted to use 1500W ATX power supply per 15 boards.

I asked the provider of these devices and he claimed that only 4 of the 6 connectors can be enabled over internet and that a max of 2500W can flow through it.

This sounds about right to me.  Those types of PDU's usually have a couple of "always-on" outlets for other things, and the limit of 2500W for the device comes down to the supply cabling to the PDU itself.  I'm not sure what standard wall connectors are rated at in germany, but 2400W is the practical limit for a standard outlet here.  So it's not the device itself that is limited to 2500W, it is the wall plug.

Quote
This lead me to the question... can many miners be hosted at a datacentre at all? I read at the offer of a 42U-Colocation-Rack that it has max 2 x 10A: Click. For 220V that would mean a maximum of 4400W for a 42U-Colocation-Rack. Oo Am i calculated wrong? If its correct that would mean only 44 miners hosted in such a huge rack. And 40 could be theoretically pressed in one 2U-Rack.

You calculated right.  Most datacenters max out at around 5KW per rack... many are lower than that.  If you're lucky, you MIGHT be able to find some that will go up to 7KW.  This maximum is derived from typical uses cases for hosted customers, and the entire datacenter is built around this assumption.  All of the power cabling, cooling systems, etc, is designed around that maximum. So it is tough for them to go over that without significant work.

Quote
So what to think about this now, what to do?

In case i miscalculated and its fully possible, does someone has a replacement device for european power net for enabling power over internet? One connector should at least take 1500W since thats the power supply i would plug in. I didnt find alternatives.

You're kind of out of luck.  I would look at smaller power supplies, and more of the switched PDU's.
223  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware on: July 21, 2013, 02:47:51 PM
Steamboat-

Thanks for all the updates... the hardware looks awesome!

I'm contemplating an upgrade from DIY kit form to fully-assembled and tested boards.  What sort of difference in shipping time do you expect between these options? i.e., how many days to assemble/test each batch of boards, and will you ship out the DIY kit form ones first?
224  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: New single ASIC miner board on: July 20, 2013, 02:23:44 PM
I am encouraged by the creativity of this forum Great work.
But, the withdrawal of GPU mining in the near future, why is no one designing a board that will plug into the empty PCIe slots? I would think a 2 to 8 chip board with cooling would be a perfect fit, as power is right there with the unused PSU connector from the retired GPU. This might be a future consideration, as I see the small boards as expensive in relation to larger boards, price per square CM per hash rate.
What are your thoughts?

* USB is a much simpler (and cheaper) interface to work with than PCI-E for development of this type
* A single host computer can have a lot more USB devices connected to it than PCI
* The host doesn't even have to be a PC- it could be a raspberry pi or TP Link router
* The boards in development now use the PCI-E power connectors anyway that GPU's use
225  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware on: July 17, 2013, 03:09:46 PM
Actually burnin managed to push it up to stable 450mhz

Quote
Quote from: burnin on Today at 01:30:55 AM
And i have some numbers to go with those from yesterday:
Slightly different air cooling setup therefore different temperatures with
air cooling. (fan placement)
TL;DL : 450Mhz [9Ghash/s] - STABLE
But at the cost of 94Watts of power.
Air:
431 - 54, 48, 1.30V, 87W, stable
450 - 56, 48, 1.30V, 90W, HW Errors
450 - 57, 52, 1.34V, 94W, slightly increased error rate compared to what
i normally call "stable" but close enough
Water:
450 - 54, 32, 1.34V, 94W, slightly less hw errors then with air

Ah, ok- I hadn't seen that update yet. 450mhz drops the price per GH down to $23, so it certainly is better.

If 320mhz is the real limit of the K16, the "break even" point is around 425mhz for a 12-chip board.

The bigger problem: 94W for 20 chips is 4.7W per chip... I don't know if that would work even with 12 chips.
226  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware on: July 17, 2013, 02:39:12 PM
Is your K16 going to use the v0.3.0 revision board, and are you planning on using the 25 Amp buck reg (IR3847) for the banks or the original 16A one?


As i understand it there is no pcb design ready for the ir3847, it is not a drop in replacement, the p/s section of the pcb needs to be redesigned.  I think I'm going to remove 4 chips from each board and overclock the remaining 12.  Alternately it might be possible to build a separate pcb with the ir3847 on it.

From BKK's testing, the last board revision with modifications was good for 320mhz stable... the new board revision should be that good and maybe even a little better.  From other's testing, the chips are only really stable to 409mhz on either water OR air cooling. Since you'll need to buy extra boards, the math just doesn't work out for under-populated boards. It works out to roughly $25 per GH for 12-chip boards and $24 per GH for 16-chip boards.. and you'll have to deal with the instability and shorter life of the OC'd ones too.
227  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Klondike - 16 chip ASIC Open Source Board - Preliminary on: July 16, 2013, 07:28:17 PM

Thats a point. Ill ask burnin if he could change this or not. On the other hand... are there reports of breaking avalon asics anywhere at all?

Yes.  I can't find any exact threads, but I have read reports of chips not performing correctly in avalon-built units.  Of course it depends on what the actual failure mode is, but I wouldn't count it out.
228  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: How to power 16 Klondike K16s? on: July 15, 2013, 02:56:52 PM

Yes you can only power 2 x k16 with one  6 pin pcie.  But a psu usually have 2 x 6 pin pcie so you can power a k64.

On another note.
How about an 8 pin pcie with 3 splitter to power 1 k64?



Yes, that will work.  6-pin connectors are rated to deliver 75W.  8-pin are rated to deliver 150W.  Also note that these are nominal ratings- the physical connector is OK for more than double that.  It would *probably* be safe to run three or four K16's off of a single 6-pin, but that will require some experimentation.

Lots more information here: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/power-supply-specifications-atx-reference,3061-12.html

Also, one of the most important things to look at when picking a PSU- make sure it is single rail.  With cheap multi-rail power supplies, the current handling capability will be divided up across those rails, and maybe in ways that don't divide evenly by 32W.
229  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The price of New Blade and Mini Blade was announced by rockxie on: July 10, 2013, 05:20:16 AM
Or you could have just put the numbers:

10 GH - 18.88 BTC
5 GH - 9.88 BTC

Not worth it.  But people will probably pay it anyway, since it's ASICMiner....
230  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: 40 nm ASIC coming, designed by those claiming to be behind the scene of Avalon on: July 09, 2013, 08:09:01 PM
On the other hand, if the chips sales aren't due to start until September as someone said, what the hell are they doing with a million chips (or 300,000, but whatever the right math is: a buttload of chips) in Shenzen or at least at HKG?

Whoever said september was just pulling numbers out of thin air.  The first chip batches were sold at the end of April.  Avalon specified a lead time of 9-10 weeks, which works out to the end of last month.  

Also- if you look at Avalon's BTC address for chip orders, there's approx. 75,000 BTC there.  This works out to around 97 orders of 10,000 chips, or just short of a million chips.  So these pictures may very well be almost ALL of the orders of avalon chips so far.

Avalon's address: http://blockchain.info/fb/1fgaftz
231  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: 40 nm ASIC coming, designed by those claiming to be behind the scene of Avalon on: July 09, 2013, 05:23:19 PM
Since I'm a nice guy:



Whole album, with translated captions:
http://imgur.com/a/GR0e3

232  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Custom ASIC Mining Rig by MrBitcoin916 on: July 05, 2013, 06:44:33 PM
So I'm not sure if anyone here has ordered a custom ASIC mining rig from MrBitCoin916 although I have and wanted to document the purchase process so that others that have heard of him know what to expect.  I am in no way saying that he is legit at this point but wanted to make others aware of what has happened so far.

I purchased a 50GHash ASIC from MrBitCoin916 on June 4th and have high hopes that I will get it soon.  This being said I have seen nothing besides a few images of the rig being tested in Slush's pool.  If anyone has any thoughts please let me know as well as anyone else who have ordered one (your inout would be greatly appreciated)

Below is the article that I have started and will add pictures and video of the rig (or lack thereof) as I have more to share:
http://www.brandonorndorff.com/bitcoin/mrbitcoin916s-50ghash-asic-bitcoin-mining-rig-order-experience/

Is this satire? It sure sounds like satire.  I really hope for for your sake that this is not a serious post.
233  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Anyway to block miners in China? on: July 01, 2013, 04:52:10 AM
If Gavin Andresen modifies the code to make it impossible for Asics, that would stop the excessive growth of difficulty. Until he does that, people will have a hard time taking Bitcoin seriously.

The stuff I read on here sometimes.  You do realize that the higher the network hash rate is, the more stable bitcoin is?  One of the largest risks to any blockchain-based cryptocurrency is the danger of a 51% attack.  The higher the overall network hash rate is, the less likely it is for a 51% attack to succeed.  So no, invalidating asics won't make people "take bitcoin seriously."
234  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 715 remaining on: June 30, 2013, 11:49:50 PM
If anyone here was expecting fast ROI... you're in the wrong game.  This group buy ALONE is for 14,000 GH worth of hash rate.  At the quoted 282mh/s, that's close to 10% of the entire bitcoin network right now.  If you are running your calculations now, you should be putting in a number like 100 million for the difficulty at the time you start.  I'm expecting 6 months before I hit ROI (calculated in BTC).  Could be sooner if BTC's value rises during that time.
235  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 2,779 remaining on: June 26, 2013, 06:27:24 AM
Order number 100000014, in and paid Smiley
236  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Klondike - 16 chip ASIC Open Source Board - Preliminary on: June 25, 2013, 09:53:43 PM
So for us EE n00bs, how big of a difference in work/debugging/etc is it from the K16 to the K64? (in other words, once the K16 is done and ready, is the K64 just a matter of more chips and components? Or is there extra work to get all 64 chips hashing?

I thought K64 was something you built using 4 K16's and some wire for i2c communication between the boards? Tongue


Not the ones Terrahash is going to be shipping:

https://terrahash.com/product/18-ghsec-modular-board/


The TH board is functionally equivalent to four K16's linked together with i2c.
237  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 2,779 remaining on: June 25, 2013, 03:50:05 PM
Steamboat: I have a question about the payment order queue and future changes to our order.  For right now, I'm planning on ordering JUST board assembly at $95 ea, since that is what I can afford.  If I decide later on to change my order to fully assembled boards, will I lose my place in the assembly queue?
238  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Klondike - 16 chip ASIC Open Source Board - Preliminary on: June 24, 2013, 07:44:10 PM
Quick question; what would happen if I had a PCIe connector and only ran 14 gauge wire to pin 1 (+12v) and pin 5 (ground) and connected that to a K16? Would it work ok or do I need to have 6 wires connected?

I don't think that would really be a problem.  The PCI-e 6-pin connector has a design specification of 75W, and the pinout is:

Pin 1 - +12V
Pin 2 - N/C
Pin 3 - +12V
Pin 4 - GND
Pin 5 - Sense
Pin 6 - GND

So, looking at the wires actually delivering power you have 37.5W on each +12V / GND pair at the rated PCI-e spec.  On top of that, the connector is actually rated for higher power delivery- more than double the 75W specification.  Assuming you use proper diameter wires and good termination, one pair of power wires will be more than enough.

tl;dr: yes, it would work ok.

(edit) Just noticed you had said pin 5- you would want to use pins 1 and 4, not pin 5.
239  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 3,333 remaining on: June 21, 2013, 02:43:11 PM
I'm poking around looking for case/housing options for these miners.  What are the anticipated final dimensions of one fully assembled unit, please?  If the unit is stored in a case, would the bottom standoffs still be necessary? (i.e., do they serve some purpose other than providing spacing between stacked units?)

I'm planning on mounting 4 units in a slim micro ATX case, using something like this:



You do need SOME sort of standoff to keep the PCB suspended in the case, and you will need the others to hold the fan up.
240  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Ann] US based Avalon ASIC chips and assembly: 3,733 remaining on: June 21, 2013, 04:43:48 AM
I'm currently looking at running just a single K16. Has anyone given any thought to using a wall wart with a Molex connector (e.g. http://amzn.com/B002TJNDU4) and running it through a molex-->pcie adapter? Are there any reasons why that wouldn't work? I would love not to have a large, exposed power supply if I don't have to.

Take a look at this little guy: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817129006

Fanless, and enough for a K16 plus a rPi, for only $5 more.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!