Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 08:18:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: August 15, 2019, 08:45:48 PM
It looks like it can work random in the specified keyspace:
https://github.com/pikachunakapika/BitCrack/issues/13
https://github.com/pikachunakapika/BitCrack/issues/3
Try "--keyspace START:END" and "-r" flags together
2  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: August 14, 2019, 04:49:31 PM
Well I tried with -o file command and without and no file was saved when the key was found, then I tried the same in the latest version and it worked perfectly.
When I tried on Windows to run the original bitcrack, it saved output file in windows/system32.
Try naming the file non-standard way, run bc, and then searching for the file in system.
3  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: August 14, 2019, 02:25:44 PM
This version does not save key text file at all, just tested it, it's broken.
Maybe bitcrack writing output file to the wrong directory where you're looking?
4  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: August 14, 2019, 12:55:04 PM
Here it is necessary to load completely (green button " Clone or download ") all in ZIP archive, and then to open archive on the computer?
This is the source code, you need to compile it in executable file (section "Building in Windows/Linux")

Whether and there is a combined variant of use of functions " - keyspace " and " -r, - randoom ", i.e. that worked so:

For example - we write -- keyspace 100000000000:500000000000 and -- random OR -- random 100000000000:500000000000 then The search is made only in a range 100000000000:500000000000, but casual (random like a flea or a kangaroo ) by jumps?
-r, --random
  Each point will start in random KEYSPACE
5  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: August 14, 2019, 10:34:26 AM
Description does not specify this function, so it is only in this fork - https://github.com/pikachunakapika/BitCrack
6  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: August 14, 2019, 04:50:14 AM
Telariust, thank you very much Wink
7  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: August 13, 2019, 01:06:46 PM
Why would you want to search random key space?
Someone mentioned in this topic(OP?) that there is a possibility, but I have not found..
At first glance, a random start in a given range seems more promising than a long straight road.
Something like Vanitygen, where the number changes every 1000000 passed keys
8  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: August 13, 2019, 09:38:31 AM
Why not add the ability to search by ripemd160 or known public key to speed up Roll Eyes
And which bitcrack version supports random key space function ?
9  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: July 25, 2019, 01:05:22 PM
as we already know bitcoin puzzle wallets are randomly chhosed by the creater
how do you know that for sure?
10  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys on: July 24, 2019, 09:37:14 AM
who has a successful experience of bruteforce attack on private keys?
Nobody.
11  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Collection of 18.509 found and used Brainwallets on: July 15, 2019, 04:23:28 PM
also ran some checking on the old style electrum seeds with a "modified" word list...
What is "old style" different from the new?
12  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Collection of 18.509 found and used Brainwallets on: June 26, 2019, 10:15:51 AM
- The transaction originally funding this brainwallet split 1 BTC into neat sets of 0.001 and 0.005 BTC. Could other outputs from this transaction - there are 101 in total - also be brainwallets, or some other kind of special address? Some are still unspent, 7.5 years later.
You can see that addresses are arranged alphabetically, sorted by first two letters (first is always lowercase).
Looks like addresses were generated by vanitygen.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!