Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 05:14:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.5.9 on: June 06, 2018, 05:52:21 PM
Hey Doktor - any plans to support the new Masari algorithm (CN-Fast)?

See https://medium.com/@officialmasari/masari-launches-cn-fast-8d6a535a263f for details.
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] NERVA: Cryptonight for solo CPU miners. ASIC, GPU, NiceHash resistant on: May 22, 2018, 05:54:55 AM
OP is it accurate to say this is GPU resistant when you've based your implementation on Monero, Masari and Alloy - all of which are GPU minable? What CPU specific functions have you implemented that make a GPU miner difficult to implement? Would a solo GPU miner not be possible?
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][OMBRE] Cryptonote privacy coin on: May 17, 2018, 03:53:34 PM
Explorer API seems to be down, you may want to fix this: https://explorer.ombre.io/api/networkinfo

{"data":null,"message":"Cant get ombre network info","status":"error"}
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.5.3 on: May 13, 2018, 04:32:09 PM
If started with Vegas miner does not create cached compiled kernels.
Each start it compiles kernels again. Only zero-sized file with name '687F' is created.

Anyone else got this problem with Vegas ?

Yes I have that issue as well - mentioned it a few pages back (couldn't see .srb files in miner directory with Vegas and blockchain drivers).
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][POW][SOLACE] Solacecoin - Your humane Cryptonote coin on: May 11, 2018, 12:04:31 PM
You may want to fix this:

http://explorer.solace-coin.com/api/networkinfo

{"data":null,"message":"Cant get ombre network info","status":"error"}

6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.5.2 on: May 10, 2018, 09:48:46 AM
@Doktor83 - does SRB cache the GPU compile data anywhere on the hard drive to speed up the process in future? I've noticed that one GPU (Vega 64) will not perform better on Heavy no matter what I do but when testing Alloy it outperforms the other GPUs (Vega 56). My current suspicions are that there's either a bug in your implementation for Vega 64 or there's some caching happening and I need to delete these files.

Thanks.

in miner dir, delete .srb files

There aren't any .srb files in the miner folder and I've searched the drive for .srb files but nothing was found. I'm using 1.5.1 and running miner from .bat files located in another directory to the miner. Anywhere else the cache files could be?

No, it creates the files in the miner dir, filenames are like:
RadeonRX580Series12256368CNH.srb

Hmm I looked but couldn't find these files. 1.5.2 also doesn't generate them to the miner folder. I have my miner in C:\srbminer and there are no .srb files there. Is it possible that they aren't generated for Vega or are stored somewhere else?
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.5.2 on: May 10, 2018, 04:22:22 AM
@Doktor83 - does SRB cache the GPU compile data anywhere on the hard drive to speed up the process in future? I've noticed that one GPU (Vega 64) will not perform better on Heavy no matter what I do but when testing Alloy it outperforms the other GPUs (Vega 56). My current suspicions are that there's either a bug in your implementation for Vega 64 or there's some caching happening and I need to delete these files.

Thanks.

in miner dir, delete .srb files

There aren't any .srb files in the miner folder and I've searched the drive for .srb files but nothing was found. I'm using 1.5.1 and running miner from .bat files located in another directory to the miner. Anywhere else the cache files could be?
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Avermore miner - optimized sgminer (AMD) fork for x16r/x16s/xevan(beta) on: May 10, 2018, 03:54:21 AM
Thanks, but that's not my question, i'd like to know the hashrate of RX 570 with an ETH bios.

6-8 mh/s
thats like the speed of a 1060 for comparison
1070s get 11mhs and 1070ti like 15

these amd miners need a fully rebuilt and optimized kernel not just a copy paste

you amd miners paying a fee to mine at the same speed as a 1060 need to stop and got mine xmr
 and buy raven if you have to lol

An Rx 570 is comparable to a GTX 1060 as a lower end/mainstream gaming video card. A GTX 1070 is a whole market level higher, both for gaming and mining.


heck no, not on pricing and the performacr on other algos, and what about the 8gb 580s 7 to 8 mhs on raven
is total trash when it can get 32 mhs eth , 950 on xmr

vs 24 max and 500 max for the 1060 6gb card which doesn’t eveb have and 8gb variant.

the 1070 might be higer end but there is a reason 570 and 580s cost $100 more (8gb) than the 1060s.

32 cores vs 36 cores for the 570 580 comparison is not much of a difference.  My 570s nitros havecthe same memory as the 580s and within 1% of the same hash rates given the same clocks or memory straps

face it these coppied x16 kernels are trash , better to mine eth or xmr for now with kernels that were designed for Opencl

The cheapest 6 GB GTX 1060s on newegg are about the same price as the cheapest 4GB RX 580s and about $25 less then the 8Gb RX 480 --- a difference, but not $100 at this point in time.  The GTX 1070 is scarce even at $500 so it's pointless to be comparing it to a RX 580 let alone a Rx 570 right now.

I agree with you that the AMD RX series does "better" on Ethhash, I disagree with comparing video cards from completely different price segments.  Anyways, we aren't mining Ethhash, Cryptonight7, or X16r on our remaining AMD rigs now as there are more profitable options for daily gains.
thats all Im saying, with the current state of 16x mining its pointless to mine x16 vs other opencl options since the kernels are optimized.  I get the op is trying to fix this but charging a fee for software that is not even fully developed
seems scammy.

Why dont u optmize the kernals and provide performance within 80 % at least of a 1070 or 100% on par with a 1060 before charging a 2% fee

Reread the OP - it's a 1% not 2% fee and if you don't feel this miner is worthwhile then consider that no software is ever "fully developed" and the x16 series might be the only algos that will remain unexploited by FPGAs and ASICs in 2018. AMD cards could be worthless for mining in the next few months if not for a broader range of mining support outside of Ethash and CN.
9  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.5.2 on: May 10, 2018, 12:52:31 AM
@Doktor83 - does SRB cache the GPU compile data anywhere on the hard drive to speed up the process in future? I've noticed that one GPU (Vega 64) will not perform better on Heavy no matter what I do but when testing Alloy it outperforms the other GPUs (Vega 56). My current suspicions are that there's either a bug in your implementation for Vega 64 or there's some caching happening and I need to delete these files.

Thanks.
10  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.5.1 on: May 08, 2018, 01:47:24 PM
So my Vega 56 @ 1437/1100 907mV -30 power target on 56 intensity gets 1530 h/s on CN-Heavy, whereas my Vega 64 with the same settings gets 1380 h/s. I need to raise intensity to 60 to get 1450 h/s on the Vega 64 - but something is not right. Maybe a higher core clock is required on the Vega 64?
11  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.5.0 on: May 03, 2018, 09:20:22 PM
INFO - TEST VEGA 56 PowerColor

3*Vega56 flashed to 64
Crimson-ReLive-Beta-Blockchain driver
SRBminer 1.4.9
GPU - 1442/1437/1407mhz 905-907mv
MEM - 1095/1100mhz 900mv

Cryptonight heavy(sumo)
"intensity" : 56  HR=4550 - 530W



I manage to get 4044 h/s using SRB with these sorts of clocks on my Vegas. What does your config file look like apart from intensity at 56?

your HBM memory not work. reset card and start again.

If HBM not work i have only 1300-1350 per card and i must start xmr-stak and back to srbminer. WHY? i dont now.

Doctor any idea? i reset card but  HBM not start. when i use xrm stak with this xomand HBM start normal and after this all miner work fine with HBM memory.

This option start HBM memory
setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_MAX_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_MAX_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
start xmr-stak --noCPU
exit 0

"verbose_level" : 3,
"print_motd" : true,
"h_print_time" : 60,
"aes_override" : null,
"use_slow_memory" : "warn",
"tls_secure_algo" : true,
"flush_stdout" : false,

if i use xmr stak with this option HBM  start OK.

"gpu_threads_conf" : [
  // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
{ "index" : 0, "intensity" : 1008, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 16, "comp_mode" : true },
{ "index" : 0, "intensity" : 904, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 16, "comp_mode" : true },
{ "index" : 1, "intensity" : 1008, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 16, "comp_mode" : true },
{ "index" : 1, "intensity" : 904, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 16, "comp_mode" : true },
{ "index" : 2, "intensity" : 1008, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 16, "comp_mode" : true },
{ "index" : 2, "intensity" : 904, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 16, "comp_mode" : true },
"platform_index" : 0,

after this start  HBB ON .Why ? i dont now.
with srb miner i try but never HBM start corect if not start first time.

if i use xmr stak with this otion HBM not start.

"gpu_threads_conf" : [
  // gpu: gfx901 memory:3920
  // compute units: 64
  { "index" : 0,  "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8,    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true },
{ "index" : 0,  "intensity" : 864, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true   },
{ "index" : 1, "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true },
{ "index" : 1, "intensity" : 864, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2,  "comp_mode" : true  },
{ "index" : 2, "intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true },
{ "index" : 2, "intensity" : 864, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 1, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : true   },

Thanks - have confirmed that strangely your suggestion works. Now at 4405 h/s. Maybe this issue wouldn't exist on the latest Adrenaline drivers?
12  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.5.0 on: May 03, 2018, 03:57:39 PM
INFO - TEST VEGA 56 PowerColor

3*Vega56 flashed to 64
Crimson-ReLive-Beta-Blockchain driver
SRBminer 1.4.9
GPU - 1442/1437/1407mhz 905-907mv
MEM - 1095/1100mhz 900mv

Cryptonight heavy(sumo)
"intensity" : 56  HR=4550 - 530W



I manage to get 4044 h/s using SRB with these sorts of clocks on my Vegas. What does your config file look like apart from intensity at 56?
13  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.4.9 on: April 29, 2018, 09:47:01 PM
How far away is the API implementation? Having a JSON API would make me switch to SRB.
14  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] ccminer 2.2.2 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) on: December 30, 2017, 04:42:15 AM
I can't seem to get the API to work in windows 10 - have tried -b 0.0.0.0:4068 and -b 127.0.0.1:4068 but when I telnet or connect via a browser I get no response. The miner shows that the API is active on port 4068 when it loads up so is this a known issue with windows? Can anyone share their API parameters or config file that they have gotten to work in windows please?

Thanks.
15  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] ccminer 2.2.2 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) on: December 20, 2017, 12:02:57 PM

i would like to use ethmonitoring with ccminer but:


i dont understand , idéa ?

thx

The API seems to be buggy - I can't get it to show anything in a browser after I set api bind with address and desired port number. Maybe we need to use a config file instead of command line params?
16  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: 1080Ti Specific - Best mining option on: November 13, 2017, 11:59:04 AM
neoscrypt is the best right now. but personally I use automated system that checks diff and profit ratio and point my miners to the most profitable altcoin. I get very good results with this strategy.

Are you using one of the known multi miners? If so, which one?  I have been thinking about going this route but not looking forward to the down time setting up and testing the various ones.

I user hashrefinery and pointed it at Skein only. At 75% TDP I'm getting about 60,000-80,000 satoshi / day

I was doing the same until this morning Sad

I am not sure if it's correct but it's written on my wallet page that "Note: Minimum payout for this wallet is 1 BTC" which takes years for me to reach this level.

I hope they correct this mistake.


 

Can anyone confirm whether it is a 1 BTC payout? Currently on skein on hashrefinery but won't continue if this is true. Sp-mod seems to be the best for skein. Haven't found the best hash to power ratio yet though - I think 50% tdp, +120 core -500 mem is getting me 730 my/s at about 110w.
17  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Any word on amd vega hash rates? on: November 08, 2017, 11:17:52 AM
Hi Mythic ,

Using your method , i have been able to bring my vega 56 to start with 1730 - 1750 h/s per second from 1100 - 1200 h/s because i am using your script to disable and enable hbcc. ( this process because of your suggestion is automated).

however , i am not able to understand how to automate global wattman settings like increasing the gpu frequency to 30% , gpu memory to 950 mhz , reducing the power usage to 20% and toggling the fan speed to manual and putting the minimum fan speed to 3000 rpm , i would like to know if these processes can be automated , because doing it 1 time is oki , when power goes off , you have to do the 4 above processes once again.







Get overdriventool (latest version) and from your .bat file you just need to launch overdriventool before you launch your miner with -p options per card and profile (e.g. create a profile in overdriventool which sets fan speed, power limit and clocks, save it and give it a name of vega1, take note of the number against your Vega at the top, let's say it is 1, then put the following in your .bat file - overdriventool.exe -p1vega1).
18  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Any word on amd vega hash rates? on: November 08, 2017, 01:37:26 AM

I went for an ASUS B250 Mining Expert and have a v64 and a v56 @ 64 along with a 1080 ti running stable. My main issue to date has been trying to get power draw at the wall to resemble hellae and everyone else's whilst maintaining high hash rates. I've found that the only way to curb power draw is to set core to go 1308/1100 @ 905 mV on both Vegas, 1408 core increases power draw at the wall by 100w for a ~200 h/s benefit. With the 1080 ti mining Zcoin (135w) total system power draw at the wall is 495w and the Vegas hash at 3650 h/s. That's not as good as I had hoped and I'm beginning to think the motherboard is the culprit. Power supply is rm1000x so I don't suspect that is the issue. Risers are 006c powered via 6 pin PCI-E, could they be causing higher power draw? Have followed all the guides and used hellae and my own custom power play tables - this has me stumped...


1408mhz causes thee high powerdraw. I am not sure why...

Dial it back to 1400 and you should be good !

Thanks. That strangely seems to have solved my issues for now. 3850 h/s for just over 500w with the 1080 ti now.

What voltages are you using for core and mem now? 905mV for both?

I'm just using hellae's 1100 HBM reg file with the core dialled back to 1400 instead of 1408 on both cards. I think it has 905mV core and 900mV memory but I may be wrong. Will need to check when i get some time to tinker with the rig again. Seeing others @ 1200 HBM makes me think I'll be back to tinkering very shortly...
19  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Any word on amd vega hash rates? on: November 07, 2017, 08:40:54 PM
Mine seem to crash a lot


Motherboards make a HUGE difference. I only use higher end ones. The little extra is worth all the time and headaches saved.

Powersupply is another big thing.

I went for an ASUS B250 Mining Expert and have a v64 and a v56 @ 64 along with a 1080 ti running stable. My main issue to date has been trying to get power draw at the wall to resemble hellae and everyone else's whilst maintaining high hash rates. I've found that the only way to curb power draw is to set core to go 1308/1100 @ 905 mV on both Vegas, 1408 core increases power draw at the wall by 100w for a ~200 h/s benefit. With the 1080 ti mining Zcoin (135w) total system power draw at the wall is 495w and the Vegas hash at 3650 h/s. That's not as good as I had hoped and I'm beginning to think the motherboard is the culprit. Power supply is rm1000x so I don't suspect that is the issue. Risers are 006c powered via 6 pin PCI-E, could they be causing higher power draw? Have followed all the guides and used hellae and my own custom power play tables - this has me stumped...


1408mhz causes thee high powerdraw. I am not sure why...

Dial it back to 1400 and you should be good !

Thanks. That strangely seems to have solved my issues for now. 3850 h/s for just over 500w with the 1080 ti now.
20  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Any word on amd vega hash rates? on: November 06, 2017, 10:28:24 PM
Mine seem to crash a lot


Motherboards make a HUGE difference. I only use higher end ones. The little extra is worth all the time and headaches saved.

Powersupply is another big thing.

I went for an ASUS B250 Mining Expert and have a v64 and a v56 @ 64 along with a 1080 ti running stable. My main issue to date has been trying to get power draw at the wall to resemble hellae and everyone else's whilst maintaining high hash rates. I've found that the only way to curb power draw is to set core to go 1308/1100 @ 905 mV on both Vegas, 1408 core increases power draw at the wall by 100w for a ~200 h/s benefit. With the 1080 ti mining Zcoin (135w) total system power draw at the wall is 495w and the Vegas hash at 3650 h/s. That's not as good as I had hoped and I'm beginning to think the motherboard is the culprit. Power supply is rm1000x so I don't suspect that is the issue. Risers are 006c powered via 6 pin PCI-E, could they be causing higher power draw? Have followed all the guides and used hellae and my own custom power play tables - this has me stumped...
Pages: [1] 2 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!