Bitcoin Forum
February 07, 2023, 03:12:52 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 24.0.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Millions to Give! | Daily DogeCoin | Like | Follow | Tweet | Receive DogeCoins! on: December 19, 2013, 12:16:55 AM
DAunGQQaRFwB9hroUz59ajz7AHDcbJBqAn
Thanks
2  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: [ice-Dice.com] Reply to this thread and get 0.005BTC! Auto Confirmation! on: November 27, 2013, 01:51:37 AM
Ice-Dice.com is awesome!
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: November 24, 2013, 07:24:30 PM
Hey there, I love this concept, and I'm trying to branch out and use the large amount of computation power available to me, but the requirement of the password in my userscript really cramps things up.

Why is there a password requirement? I mine BTC over at bitminter and they recently removed worker passwords due to the fact that there's no reason to have them. Is there a way to bypass this?


There is no worker password requirement with multipool. Something else must be wrong. What is happening? Are you using the correct worker name? Each worker name must be added on https://www.multipool.us/accountdetails.php page. It is username.worker  example... allbiznessman.1 allbiznessman.2

Make sure you are using a period (.) and not an underscore (_) between the user and worker names, with your miner.

Just enter a number or name in the box that says user, beside your username where you add your workers. Then in your miner use -u or --user, and....     username.worker

Hope that helps.

Thanks,
Chris

AKA... AllBiznessMan && SudoSuRootDev
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: November 24, 2013, 06:38:04 PM
A while ago it was mentioned we would have the ability to choose which coins we wanted to mine for scrypt.  Is this still in the works or has it fallen to the waysite now that btc is in the spotlight?

I would also like to be able to choose to exclude a coin from the multiport.  Don't have any idea how feasible it is, though.

It is impossible the way things are currently architected.

I'd have to create individual multiports for each user.  It's a feature I have considered adding in the past, but have not had time to fully investigate what it would take or decide on a design.

In other news, I am reconsidering adding per-coin autoexchange to BTC, and doing it a bit differently than the other pools.  Stay tuned.

Just some food for thought, maybe you could create ports for combinations of coins like this:

comb. #1  Top 5 (by value)         LTC, NVC, FTC, MNC, CGB
comb. #2  Top 8 (by value)         LTC, NVC, FTC, MNC, CGB, MEC, WDC, DGC
comb. #3  Middle 6 (by value)     FTC, MNC, CGB, MEC, WDC, DGC
comb. #4  bottom 7 (by value)     MEC, WDC, DGC, LKY, ARG, PXC, CAP

I'm thinking some users might not be interested in coins with micro values, and others might not be interested in mining coins with really long block times.

Thanks.


+1 to that!!! I don't use the multiport anymore because I like to choose which coin I think is profitable, I only mined CGB for a long time, but now the block reward is so low I am mining CAP, but if I could mine both that would be cool. Is it even possible to merge mine on scrypt coins??? That would be awesome if I could merge mine CAP and CGB like many BTC mining pools do with BTC and NMC. PLus the link in my signature does BTC, NMC, IXC, and DVC all merged mining simultaneously. That would be awesome to merge mine scrypt. I am assuming it is not possible though, probably due to the memory/RAM required in scrypt mining, and someone would be doing it already if it could be done. But either way, even choosing the coins which you mine in a multiport is still a good idea. +1 again!!!

Thanks,
Chris

AKA... AllBiznessMan && SudoSuRootDev
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: November 24, 2013, 06:20:30 PM
Hey all Multipool miners, do not worry, I am pretty sure we are all working and getting paid, only the stats for these coins are not updating on the website, but the backend work, payments, etc is actually working. Flound hasn't replied to me yet but I have seen this issue before, and I believe that he just needs to reset one of the servers or a frontend pool script which only takes a minute, plus y ratio of CAP per hour is updating and is around 20  - 40 average even though the stats say no block has been found in over 6 1/2 hours. So don't worry, and I just received a withdrawal because I lowered my auto-withdrawal, so I now have a zero balance and I will update here if/when my balance increases to prove that this is true! Maybe one of the MEC miners, can post if/when their balance increases... or a withdrawal is received.

Keep mining fellows!!!
Good luck, and Good day!!!

Thanks,
Chris

AKA... AllBiznessMan && SudoSuRootDev
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: November 24, 2013, 06:09:28 PM
Now, after looking back, I see that CAP, CGB, and MEC all have not found any blocks in over 6 1/2 hours, according to the stats. Plus MNC, FTC, NVC, and LTC are all over that time... is this just an issue with the stats updating, on the front-end, yet we are still working correctly on the backend? I have seen that happen a lot. Either way I just want to make sure you are aware and we are all getting paid for our work. Thanks again Flound!!!

Thanks,
Chris

AKA... AllBiznessMan && SudoSuRootDev
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: November 24, 2013, 06:01:24 PM
Flound,
I have been mining bottlecaps only on pool1.multipool.us for a few days, successfully, and it seems that something is wrong or very odd. The normal time for discovering a new block is 9 minutes, and we have not found one in over 6 1/2 hours. The difficulty is only at 0.53 and newer miners have joined me, two who have more hash power than I. Can you try to see if it is on a alternate chain, or stuck for some reason. If I were you, I would stop bottlecapsd, then delete peers.dat, and then restart bottlecapsd. Thanks flound!!!

PS... I see the post above stating no blocks for MEC as well, so it may be another issue, or we may be solving them and they aren't showing up in stats. Please let me know what is up.

Thanks,
Chris

AKA... AllBiznessMan && SudoSuRootDev
8  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: [ANN] Coin ♥ Love ♥ Chest [FREE BITCOINS] on: November 20, 2013, 02:26:49 AM
I love Bitcoin because it takes control of 'money', in the US, away from the Federal Reserve System Fraud... and other similar Central Banks in other nations!!!

"It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
--Henry Ford

"The regional Federal Reserve banks are not government agencies. ...but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations."
--Lewis vs. United States, 680 F. 2d 1239 9th Circuit 1982

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
--Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"The Federal Reserve banks are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this nation is run by the International bankers."
--Congressman Louis T. McFadden

"Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States."
--Sen. Barry Goldwater

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."
--James A. Garfield, President of the United States

"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws."
--Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

"If you did not know these things, please do your research, we the people, allow many corrupt things to go on right in front of our faces, because we watch and believe what we are told on the television!"
--Me, Chris... A.K.A.: AllBiznessMan && SudoSuRootDev && Sudoer

One of my Bitcoin Address for the contest or for donations toward the Bitcoin Faucet/website which I am creating and I will also be sharing more truths like those above:
1DfFBCpxUUJGCrLFfQTT2KZt7Am8naRs3v
9  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: First EVER Coinbase Faucet! High Paying (0.00001)! Instant Payout! on: November 16, 2013, 10:26:39 AM
Cool site, I saw another somewhere, don't remember where, and it is great for you, because if someone does not have a coinbase.com account and they use your faucet and buy or sell at least 1 BTC you will receive $% worth of BTC from CoinBase. You should probably be able to get many of the inputs.io faucet owners to use your coinbase API faucet script, and get some donations from them as well, so that they can continue to using their websites for a faucet.
10  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I know this has been brought up before, but confirmation times are getting weird on: November 15, 2013, 03:46:52 AM
Confirmation time =/= block time.

Average time between blocks is <10 minutes.  I pointed this out in the prior thread but it will likely get ingored again.  Any "answer" which involves miners solving less blocks would mean the time between blocks would be greater than 10 minutes and that is not the case.

Miners are on average producing a block size of ~160KB.
http://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size

To clear the backlog and reduce the average wait time to ~1 block would require blocks to be roughly 50% larger.  Miners are chosing not to do that.  The average block has ~300 tx vs the ~2,500 tx limit imposed by the 1MB or ~600 tx it would take to clea the backlog

Simple version: blocks are 90% empty, tx wait longer to be included in a block

Yes it is up to the miners. Anyone can set bitcoind to only accept transactions with 0.0005 BTC transaction fees if they wanted, and if their hash rate is high enough to solve a block reward than that is what will go. Like the add on which was debated quite a while back, to avoid all satoshidice addresses. It is up to the miners. If you have the hash rate, you have the control of who goes and who waits.
11  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I know this has been brought up before, but confirmation times are getting weird on: November 15, 2013, 03:42:28 AM
Another thing which I noticed today, which may or may not be related, is that while making a few satoshidice bets, one bet would show 22:40 and then my bet would come in and showed 21:41, and another right after it showed 23:42. It was quite odd I thought and also it caused one or 2 of my bets to take forever to be returned. While other peoples bets were being returned after one confirmation, my bet which was an hour or 2 before (only according to the time shown) had to wait for about 6 to 8 confirmations before it paid out. This was sent through my blockchain wallet. I do have the privkeys in bitcoind also but I am tethered to my laptop so it'll take forever to download and slow me down browsing, since I haven't been caught up with the blockchain in quite a while.
12  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CryptogenicBullion (CGB) - Version 2.0 of website launched! on: November 01, 2013, 03:00:30 AM
Yes, that makes sense. Hopefully, some of the larger CGB stake holders, who are holding just for POS blocks will read this and realize that by selling a good portion of their stake, they may temporarily lose out on some coins from POS blocks, but it will increase the value of their current holdings and future POS blocks.
13  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] CryptogenicBullion (CGB) - Version 2.0 of website launched! on: October 31, 2013, 11:09:18 PM
The CGB price has been very low lately, is that only due to high Bitcoin price, because it seems a lot lower that that raise in Bitcoin price should have brought on.
14  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: October 18, 2013, 07:21:06 PM
Yup it's good now! I saw shortly after my post, that you were using Incapsula , before it was up it gave a basic Incapsula page so then I knew why I got that message. Good deal, glad to know we're safer!
15  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: October 18, 2013, 06:27:36 PM
Flound... why don't you use CloudFlare? It is a free service, and GREAT (I used it for all my business investment websites, some HYIP which everyone tries to hack and DDoS) OR they also have an upgraded plan which is only like $20 per month with extra DDoS protection, but even the basic protects against small DDoS. You point your domain name at the Nameservers that Cloudflare gives you for your account and then you control the DNS from CloudFlare and they send all requests to your IP/server. So it is much harder to find the actual IP of your server, IP lookups show one of CloudFlares IP's. It is a real good service... a necessity with money/investments/cryptos/etc.
blockchain.info blockexplorer.com primedice.com peerbet.org and so many more use it.

It is way cheaper than these expensive DDoS hosting companies, but it works awesome. When I had my HYIP (High Yield Investment Sites there was one known successful CloudFlare attack on their network which didn't last long. It was kind of a hackers challenge by CloudFlare and no one could do it for a long time.

You can also block IP's or even whole regions with just 1 click, because it lists any suspicious visitors in your account and you just click "block" and they are.

Anyway, the reason I'm here was to ask a serious question. When I visit the website, right now, it gives me a security warning (NEVER SEEN BEFORE)...

""This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked Firefox to connect securely to www.multipool.us, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
www.multipool.us uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for the following names: incapsula.com , *.algstaging.com , *.bridgebank.com , *.closedforgood.org , *.clubintrawest.com , *.depositview.com , *.djoglobal.com , *.efoqa.com , *.fcmrktplace.com , *.gedigitalenergy.com , *.geenergymanagement.com , *.gs1uk.org , *.hummus.co.il , *.lsc.net , *.macu.edu , *.morristech.com , *.nestle.com.au , *.perisher.com.au , *.segalrc.com , *.spacefurniture.com.au , *.tabbank.com , *.tsunagaru-ap.net , *.waubonsee.edu , algstaging.com , apps.nestle.co.uk , bridgebank.com , cleverestcat.nestle.co.uk , closedforgood.org , clubintrawest.com , depositview.com , djoglobal.com , efoqa.com , fcmrktplace.com , gedigitalenergy.com , geenergymanagement.com , gs1uk.org , hummus.co.il , impervasecurepay.reedbusiness.co.uk , lsc.net , macu.edu , morristech.com , nestle.com.au , perisher.com.au , segalrc.com , spacefurniture.com.au , tabbank.com , waubonsee.edu (Error code: ssl_error_bad_cert_domain)""


...I did not proceed, because I know you have been dealing with the DDoS and as you see it says someone may have hijacked the server to redirect me somewhere else where to a Phishing Site copy of Multipool and steal login info.

It could be because you are making changes with DNS or HostName to add DDoS protection such as CloudFlare, or thee certificate has expired or something like that... but I am not going until I know for sure. Please respond and let me know if you know about this warning and if it is safe, something that was caused by you. Thanks!
16  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: October 18, 2013, 01:03:37 PM
What's going on? Now 1 of my miners doesn't show that it's hashing at https://www.multipool.us/accountdetails.php
but guiminer says it's working and getting shares.
Also the reported hashrate is correct but minus the one miner that isn't showing.
I've also tried adding a new worker and switching to US pool, but nothing.
I posted this earlier, haven't got a reply from Flound yet, all the stats relating to worker, hashrates, and shares are stuck... only the balance, blocks, and the MP are updating. Your worker is working, it just won't show till that gets fixed, I have seen the site do that one or two other times.
17  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: October 18, 2013, 01:01:19 PM
Flound, is something wrong with the NVC pool?  My NVC balance hasn't changed in days and the nvc pool stats indicate that we haven't found a block in over two days.
Your balance hasn't changed because a block has not been found in over 2 days. That's why I stopped mining NVC right after I started, and now I only mine CGB... there are only 11 people mining NVC and the highest hash rate is you and like 2 others with only 2,000 KH/s each... the rest less than 1,000. NVC difficulty is way too high (386) for 11 miners with a combined hash rate of 10.4 MH/s to solve a block, except maybe once a week if that. NVC gets a block reward when the MP switches to it.

I would suggest moving to CGB, with a 0.003 BTC value and a block every 5 - 10 minutes on multipool, sometimes every minute or 2. When the MP switches to CGB there are like 2 blocks per minute and it are not too many regular miners either. We usually only have like 35 regular miners, and with 2,500 KH/s you would be getting about .5 CGB every hour... that's 0.0015 BTC per hour.... right now. The difficulty is usually only around 5 -7 right now, and pays 1/10th of what NVC pays, and NVC difficulty is about 50 times higher... that is also why the MP rarely switches to NVC.
18  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: October 18, 2013, 08:46:52 AM
I can access the site, like I said... it's slow and the stats (listed above) aren't updating, but I cannot access the account details page, which I really need, because I can tell by my shares and earnings on recent blocks that a bunch of my workers are down... but I have so many of them that I just have everything numbered with workers and IP's in a list, so I need to access that page... so whenever you can get it up I'll greatly appreciate it. Thanks.
19  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: October 18, 2013, 06:45:56 AM
The website is up for me. I am sure it is still being hit though, because it is a bit slower loading and sometimes it times out when connecting.

Flound, also, all user stats are stuck... personal and other users... stats.php?curr=cgb (only coin I mine) shows no changes in all user's stats, positions, shares, hash rates, and the top 10 hashers. None of that info is changing, only balance info and blocks are updating. The same issue at the top left, for shares, hash rate, and expected reward... and the same on accountdetails.php none of those stats and workers are updating.

I have seen this happen before, obviously it got fixed, and it may be due to the attacks, but I just wanted to mention it cause I have a lot of machines/workers, and like to keep track of my hash rates, workers, and shares to make sure they are all running and none of that info has changed in hours. Just thought I'd let you know. Thanks.
20  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Profit-switching scrypt+ASIC Pool] multipool.us on: October 17, 2013, 11:26:41 PM
Yes, I see that... thanks!
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!